• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A política é a produção da humanidade: implicações à formação humana a partir do dispositivo da antropogênese e da vida nua / La política es la producción de la humanidad: implicaciones a la formación humana a partir del dispositivo de la antropogénesis y de la vida desnuda

Valerio, Raphael Guazzelli [UNESP] 01 March 2018 (has links)
Submitted by Raphael Guazzelli Valerio (guazzellivalerio@hotmail.com) on 2018-03-17T02:48:17Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE_versãofinal_RGV.pdf: 1339613 bytes, checksum: dd55f282c9d1ede1a2d48bf091a0c11d (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Satie Tagara (satie@marilia.unesp.br) on 2018-03-19T14:14:37Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 valerio_rg_dr_mar.pdf: 1339613 bytes, checksum: dd55f282c9d1ede1a2d48bf091a0c11d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-03-19T14:14:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 valerio_rg_dr_mar.pdf: 1339613 bytes, checksum: dd55f282c9d1ede1a2d48bf091a0c11d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-01 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Esta tese se propõe a responder a seguinte questão: há uma relação entre a formação humana e o governo sobre a vida? Ela acolhe a hipótese biopolítica elaborada por Foucault e desenvolvida por Agamben, tendo como fio condutor a noção de dispositivo, desenvolvidas por esses filósofos. Todo dispositivo implica um processo de subjetivação sem o qual ele não poderia agir como dispositivo de governo, mas, apenas como pura violência. Ora, isso é o que vemos na genealogia dos mecanismos disciplinares foucaultianos, por meio de práticas, discursos e saberes criam-se corpos dóceis, mas, também livres, formam-se sujeitos que assumem sua liberdade no próprio ato de seu assujeitamento. Deste modo, para Agamben, o dispositivo é, antes de tudo, uma máquina que produz subjetivações e somente enquanto tal é também uma máquina de governo. Os dispositivos não são apenas máquinas de governo, mas, produzem o humano que cabe a estes governar. As instituições educativas, a nosso ver, aparecem aqui como lugar privilegiado desta perspectiva. Por meio delas, podemos ver que este humano que deve ser governado é ele também um produto da máquina. O humano enquanto tal, mais do que definido, tem sido, na tradição ocidental, constantemente produzido, por meio do que Agamben designa máquina antropológica. / Our text proposes to answer the question: is there a relationship between the human formation and the government over life? Assume the Foucault’s biopolitical hypothesis, developed by Agamben. Our guiding thread will be the notion of apparatus. The notion used by Foucault and taken up by Agamben. Every apparatus involves a process of subjectivation, without which could not act as government’s apparatus, but only as violence. Now, that's what we see in the genealogy of Foucault’s disciplinary mechanisms, with practices, discourses and knowledge are created docile corps, but also free. Are formed subjects who assume their freedom in the act itself of subjection. Thus, for Agamben, the apparatus is, before, a machine that produces subjective and, as such, it is also a government machine. Apparatus are not just government machines but produce the human they rule. Educational Institutions they are privileged places in this perspective. Through them, we can see that this human which must be governed it is also machine product. The human as such, in Western tradition, more than defined has been produced such which Agamben designates anthropological machine.
2

Mit Texttieren jenseits der Grenze des Schweigens sprechen. Sprachkrise, Machtdiskurse und eine Poetologie des Offenen in der deutschsprachigen Nachkriegsliteratur am Beispiel Wolfdietrich Schnurres, Guenter Eichs und Ilse Aichingers

Kleinhans, Belinda 30 July 2013 (has links)
In this dissertation I analyze how the postwar German writers Wolfdietrich Schnurre, Günter Eich, and Ilse Aichinger negotiate anthropocentric and speciesist discourses via animal figures by drawing on such posthumanist thinkers as Derrida, Agamben, and Deleuze & Guattari. The literary texts question a world view and discourse organized around the establishment of power that utilizes animal metaphors to turn living beings into objects (and could thus be called “carno-phallogocentric”). They thus react to the strict hierarchy of (gendered) man over animal and respond - in the aftermath of the Second World War – by highlighting instead the similarities between man and animal, such as creaturely existence and shared trauma. The analysis is guided by questions such as: How do the literary texts reflect and subvert the power discourses which surround man and animal? What is the role of language in this context? How does the animal, which is usually assumed to be mute, relate to the categories that are established in language? Does its place outside of language grant it capabilities the human cannot realize? Can the literary encounter between man and animal establish a space of the “Open” in which language can be re-evaluated and, after World War II, be saved? Is there a unique “animal poetology” which correlates to post-anthropocentric conceptions of the human? Because these writers disorient the reader’s perception of reality via figures of the animal, i.e., animals as both metaphors and as subjects, I develop what I would like to call an “animal poetology” that is unique to them. This animal poetology, which redefines Agamben’s concept of the open by giving it a postwar, language-critical dimension, includes a thorough critique of human language with regard to power structures and a speciesist language which, during the early 20th century, was a vehicle for ideology and discrimination. The encounter with the animal leads the human being to reflect on the limits of language and thus enables the establishment of a mode of being in which the encounter with the other – beyond a space of judgement and hierarchies –is once again possible.
3

Mit Texttieren jenseits der Grenze des Schweigens sprechen. Sprachkrise, Machtdiskurse und eine Poetologie des Offenen in der deutschsprachigen Nachkriegsliteratur am Beispiel Wolfdietrich Schnurres, Guenter Eichs und Ilse Aichingers

Kleinhans, Belinda 30 July 2013 (has links)
In this dissertation I analyze how the postwar German writers Wolfdietrich Schnurre, Günter Eich, and Ilse Aichinger negotiate anthropocentric and speciesist discourses via animal figures by drawing on such posthumanist thinkers as Derrida, Agamben, and Deleuze & Guattari. The literary texts question a world view and discourse organized around the establishment of power that utilizes animal metaphors to turn living beings into objects (and could thus be called “carno-phallogocentric”). They thus react to the strict hierarchy of (gendered) man over animal and respond - in the aftermath of the Second World War – by highlighting instead the similarities between man and animal, such as creaturely existence and shared trauma. The analysis is guided by questions such as: How do the literary texts reflect and subvert the power discourses which surround man and animal? What is the role of language in this context? How does the animal, which is usually assumed to be mute, relate to the categories that are established in language? Does its place outside of language grant it capabilities the human cannot realize? Can the literary encounter between man and animal establish a space of the “Open” in which language can be re-evaluated and, after World War II, be saved? Is there a unique “animal poetology” which correlates to post-anthropocentric conceptions of the human? Because these writers disorient the reader’s perception of reality via figures of the animal, i.e., animals as both metaphors and as subjects, I develop what I would like to call an “animal poetology” that is unique to them. This animal poetology, which redefines Agamben’s concept of the open by giving it a postwar, language-critical dimension, includes a thorough critique of human language with regard to power structures and a speciesist language which, during the early 20th century, was a vehicle for ideology and discrimination. The encounter with the animal leads the human being to reflect on the limits of language and thus enables the establishment of a mode of being in which the encounter with the other – beyond a space of judgement and hierarchies –is once again possible.

Page generated in 0.0958 seconds