nÃo hà / Esta pesquisa apresenta uma anÃlise integrada das caracterÃsticas sintÃticas, semÃnticas e pragmÃticas do tradicionalmente chamado aposto de oraÃÃo. A base teÃrica assenta-se nos pressupostos da GramÃtica Discursivo-Funcional (GDF), desenvolvida por Hengeveld & Mackenzie (2008), cuja unidade bÃsica de anÃlise à o Ato Discursivo. Para a definiÃÃo e descriÃÃo das funÃÃes discursivas da aposiÃÃo encapsuladora, tomamos como aporte os trabalhos de Quirk et al (1985), Meyer (1992), Nogueira (1999, 2012), Decat (2010) e Hannay; Keizer (2005). Metodologicamente, a pesquisa apresenta um percurso de descriÃÃo que parte das caracterÃsticas formais, anÃlise de frequÃncia com o uso do programa SPSS para um desenho do comportamento prototÃpico dessa estrutura e, por fim, apresenta uma anÃlise qualitativa das funÃÃes discursivas das estruturas em questÃo, baseada em um corpus composto de 108 ocorrÃncias advindas de artigos de opiniÃo publicados na Folha de S. Paulo, entre os anos de 2006 a 2010. Na anÃlise, optamos por descrever formalmente a aposiÃÃo encapsuladora como as relativas sem cabeÃa ou nÃo nucleadas, conforme proposto pela GDF, e determinar o carÃter atributivo dessa estrutura. A estrutura mais frequente à aquela composta de pronome demonstrativo + oraÃÃo adjetiva restritiva, encapsulando Estado-de-Coisas. As funÃÃes discursivas assumidas por essas estruturas foram definidas com base na natureza da informaÃÃo que elas acrescentam ao fluxo textual. Assim, definimos as seguintes funÃÃes bÃsicas: AvaliaÃÃo, ExplicaÃÃo, Desdobramento, ConstataÃÃo/RatificaÃÃo, ConclusÃo. / This research presents an integrated analysis of the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic characteristics of the tradition ally called âapposition clauseâ. The theory is based on the assumptions of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG), developed by Hengeveld and Mackenzie (2008), that basic unit of analysis is the Discourse Act. For the definition and description of the discourse functions of the encapsulated apposition, we take as support the researches of Quirk et al (1985), Meyer (1992), Nogueira (1999, 2012), Decat (2010) e Hannay; Keizer (2005). Methodologically, the research presents a description course that starts from the formal characteristics, frequency analysis with the use of the SPSS program for a design of the prototypical behavior of this structure and, finally, presents a qualitative analysis of the discourse functions of the structures in question based on a corpus composed by 108 occurrences from articles of opinion published in Folha de SÃo Paulo between 2006 to 2010. In the analysis, we chose to describe the encapsulated apposition as the relative headless or non - nucleated such as proposed by FDG and to determine the attributive feature of this structure. The most frequent structure is composed of demonstrative pronouns + restrictive adjective clause, encapsulating State â of - assairs. The discourse functions assumed by these structures were defined based on the na ture of the information they add to the textual flow. Thus, we define the following basic functions: Evaluation, Explanation, Developing, Evidencing / Confirming , Conclusion.

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-10-11T11:07:12Z No. of bitstreams: 1 josuecarloslourencoferreira.pdf: 860386 bytes, checksum: 7ac776d78799f147a23cd5285120b9dc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-10-11T15:55:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 josuecarloslourencoferreira.pdf: 860386 bytes, checksum: 7ac776d78799f147a23cd5285120b9dc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-11T15:55:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 josuecarloslourencoferreira.pdf: 860386 bytes, checksum: 7ac776d78799f147a23cd5285120b9dc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-09-21 / Este trabalho objetiva, através de uma análise de interface entre gramática e discurso, verificar como se operam as construções apositivas, cuja unidade base seja constituída do elemento linguístico o seguinte, em interações argumentativas, mais especificamente, em audiências de conciliação do PROCON/JF. Tais construções se apresentaram com notável frequência em nossos dados, revelandose uma importante estrutura de interação interpessoal modelada por características particulares. No plano interacional argumentativo, o falante se utiliza deste tipo de construção apositiva para: (i) introduzir seu ponto de vista; (ii) sustentar o ponto de vista; (iii) apresentar um acordo; e (iv) sugerir um acordo para as partes envolvidas na audiência. Já o elemento linguístico o seguinte, presente na unidade base da construção apositiva, apresenta comportamento semelhante a um marcador discursivo, desempenhando duas funções na organização do discurso: a textual (direcionada para a estrutura do texto, para o seu “amarramento”) e a interacional (relacionada aos interlocutores, aos participantes da interação). O seguinte comporta-se sintaticamente como: (i) argumento de um verbo; (ii) conjunção integrante; e (iii) conjunção explicativa. Cabe destacar que as ocorrências deste tipo de construção apositiva são todas relevantes nessa interação investigada, principalmente pela peculiaridade do elemento híbrido o seguinte que permite ao falante sinalizar ao seu interlocutor a relevância do que será dito a seguir. / This paper aims, through an analysis of the interface between grammar and discourse, see how to operate the apposition buildings, whose basic unit consists of the linguistic element o seguinte in argumentative interactions, more specifically, in conciliation hearings of PROCON / JF. Such constructions are presented with remarkable frequency in our data, revealing an important structure of interpersonal interaction modeled by particular characteristics. On the interaction of argument, the speaker uses this type of construction for patching: (i) introduce their point of view, (ii) support the view, (iii) make an agreement, and (iv) to suggest an agreement for the parties at the hearing. However the linguistic element o seguinte, that is present in the base unit of apposition buildings, behaves like a discourse marker, playing two roles in the organization of discourse: the text (directed to the structure of the text, for its "tethering") and the interactional (related to partners, the participants of the interaction). O seguinte behaves syntactically as: (i) argument of a verb, (ii) integral conjunction, and (iii) explanatory conjunction. It should be noted that occurrences of apposition constructions are all relevant in this interaction investigated, mainly by the peculiarity of the hybrid element o seguinte that allows the speaker to signal the interlocutor the relevance of what will be said below.

Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.

Protocole d'entente entre l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Chicoutimi / L’enseignement de l’écriture est un souci constant dans le milieu académique, de l’école secondaire aux études supérieures, et quand on parle de rédiger un texte, plusieurs questions sont soulevées. Quels outils sont à notre disposition pour réaliser une rédaction? Qu’est-ce qui fait qu’un texte est cohérent? Comment accompagner l’étudiant dans sa démarche? Sur quels critères baser la correction du travail rédactionnel? Dans ce mémoire, afin de mettre en lumière certains aspects délicats du processus d’écriture, nous avons voulu clarifier la fonction d’une structure spécifique : la construction détachée participiale (CD part). Nous pensons en effet que cette construction joue un rôle à trois niveaux de structuration du texte définis par Gagnon (1998, 2003, 2008, 2015), soit au niveau référentiel, informatif et événementiel. Nous étudierons donc les participes présents détachés dans le cadre théorique de Gagnon, soit celui de la cohérence textuelle, à ces trois niveaux d’arrimage. La majorité des études sur les CD ont été faites sur des corpus de scripteurs experts (textes informatifs et littéraires) mais dans ce travail, nous avons choisi de nous intéresser majoritairement aux textes produits par des étudiants, et ce, afin de mieux cerner l’utilisation réelle de cette construction et de proposer des pistes de réflexion pour l’améliorer. Nous verrons qu’utiliser une CD requiert plusieurs connaissances textuelles, liées aux trois arrimages visés : respecter la règle de coréférence, peu présente à l’oral, réaliser un enchaînement pertinent au plan informatif en plaçant, de préférence, l’information de la CD au second plan du texte et enfin, être conscient de la relation établie entre la CD et la proposition principale. Nous espérons que mieux comprendre le rôle des CD participiales permettra de mieux les maîtriser et, par le fait même, de mettre en lumière certains éléments essentiels à connaître dans la démarche rédactionnelle. De ce fait, les enjeux de notre recherche sont doubles : linguistique et didactique.

No description available.

This thesis deals with syntactic relation of subject-predicate agreement in Czech, concentrating on special cases. The theoretical part describes the term "agreement" in terms of the traditional dependency approach, presents the definition of the term and specifies its width. It describes the subject-predicate agreement from from other theoretical perspectives, too (for example generative grammar analysis etc.). The main part of this theoretical chapter contains particular cases of subject-predicate agreement, as described in Czech grammars and textbooks. However, this description does not take into account all options and variants of agreement used in everyday conversation. Therefore, we investigate the problem of agreement through an empirical survey, which serves us to identify more complex cases (multiple subject with disjunctive, adversative and compared relation between its constituents; based on the cases found in the Czech National Corpus). Another source of data comes from a questionnaire, which maps how complex agreement structures are acquired by users of the language (students of the Faculty of Arts, Charles University). The data found in Czech National Corpus enable us to specify tendencies of agreement in more complicated cases; these tendencies should be included in the grammatical...