Orientador: Rogério Bertani / Banca: Paulo César Motta / Banca: Denis Rafael Pedroso / Resumo: O gênero Dolichothele Mello-Leitão, 1923 é revisado e compreende 11 espécies: D. exilis Mello-Leitão, 1923 (espécie-tipo), D. bolivianum (Vol, 2001), D. dominguense (Guadanucci, 2007), D. rufoniger (Guadanucci, 2007), D. tucuruiense (Guadanucci, 2007), D. diamantinensis (Bertani, Santos & Righi, 2009), D. mineirum (Guadanucci, 2011), e 4 espécies novas: D. sp. nov. 1, D. sp. nov. 2, D. sp. Nov. 3, e D. sp. nov. 4. Dolichothele auratum (Vellard, 1924), cujo tipo está supostamente perdido, é considerado nomem dubium. Todas as espécies são rediagnosticadas e uma chave é apresentada permitindo as suas identificações. Mapas com a distribuição de todas as espécies são apresentados. Análises cladísticas utilizando uma matriz com 30 caracteres e 20 táxons foi analisada utilizando pesos iguais com o programa Nona 2.0, assim como com pesos diferentes usando PeeWee 1.3 e concavidades de 1 a 6. Dois cladogramas foram obtidos com pesos iguais, o consenso (L = 68, IC = 0,55, RI = 0,67) não recuperou o gênero Dolichothele como monofilético, uma vez que D. exilis não está incluído no clado com as outras espécies. Um único cladograma foi obtido usando diferentes pesos e concavidades 1-6 (L = 62, fit = 1996.4), todos com a mesma topologia. O cladograma escolhido com pesos diferentes confirma o monofiletismo de Dolichothele, cujo clado é suportado pelo caráter "escópula tarsal da perna IV integral, com fileira de cerdas esparsas" / Abstract: The genus Dolichothele Mello-Leitão, 1923 is revised and comprises 11 species: D. exilis Mello-Leitão, 1923 (type species), D. bolivianum (Vol, 2001), D. dominguense (Guadanucci, 2007), D. rufoniger (Guadanucci, 2007), D. tucuruiense (Guadanucci, 2007), D. diamantinensis (Bertani, Santos & Righi, 2009), D. mineirum (Guadanucci, 2011), and 4 new species: D. sp. nov. 1, D. sp. nov. 2, D. sp. nov. 3, and D. sp. nov. 4. Dolichothele auratum (Vellard, 1924) which type is supposed lost is herein considered nomem dubium. All the species were rediagnosed and a key is presented allowing their identification. Maps with the distribution of all species are presented. Cladistic analyses using a matrix with 30 characters and 20 taxa were carried out using equal weights with the program Nona 2.0 as well as with different weights using Pee- Wee 1.3 and concavities from 1 to 6. Two cladograms were obtained with equal weights, and the consensus (L = 68, CI = 0.55, RI = 0.67) did not recover the genus Dolichothele as monophyletic, since D. exilis is not included in the clade with the other species. A single cladogram was obtained using different weights and concavities 1-6 (L=62, fit=1996.4) all having the same topology. The chosen cladogram using different weights confirms the monophyly of Dolichothele, which clade is supported by the character "scopula tarsal of the leg IV integral, with row of sparse setae" / Mestre

Submitted by JACIARA CRISTINA ALMEIDA DO AMARAL (jaciaramaral@ufpa.br) on 2018-06-06T16:55:50Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Filogenia_da_tribo_Attacobiini_Roewer_1955.pdf: 1908567 bytes, checksum: 9c6d549ced312aa3158f4555c4947fe2 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by JACIARA CRISTINA ALMEIDA DO AMARAL (jaciaramaral@ufpa.br) on 2018-06-06T16:57:13Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Filogenia_da_tribo_Attacobiini_Roewer_1955.pdf: 1908567 bytes, checksum: 9c6d549ced312aa3158f4555c4947fe2 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-06T16:57:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Filogenia_da_tribo_Attacobiini_Roewer_1955.pdf: 1908567 bytes, checksum: 9c6d549ced312aa3158f4555c4947fe2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-02 / CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / A cladistic analysis of tribe Attacobiini (Corinnidae, Corinninae) with 17 taxa and 109 characters is presented. The outgroup is composed by four species (Castianeira aff rubicunda ACR; Xeropigo cotijuba; Septentrinna yucatan and Falconina gracilis) all of them represented by males and females. The ingroup is represented by 13 Attacobiini species, seven of which represented by both sexes (Attacobius TOC; A. attarum; A. verhaaghi; A. lamellatus; A. uiriri; A. blakei and A. carranca), three represented only by females (A. luederwaldti; A. nigripes and A. kitae) and three represented only by males (Ecitocobius comissator; Attacobius PAR and A. tucurui). Regarding to terminals, the present data matrix represent an increase of two species in relation to a previous analysis of the Tribe. The availability of data was improved by adding character states on genitalic features for three terminals, of which the counterpart sex was unknown at the time in which that previous analysis was made (males of A. verhaagui and females of A. blakei and A. uiriri). Furthermore, several characters used in the previous analysis were re-interpreted and some new characters were proposed. A single tree was obtained under equal weights. Attacobinni and Attacobius were retrieved as monophyletic groups but the groups of species of Attacobius depicted here are considerably different from those recognized in the previous analysis. The exact solution under equal weights and all characters running unordered resulted in a fully resolved, single most parsimonious tree. As in the previous analysis, the bettersupported clades were Attacobiini and Attacobius. However, the groups of Attacobius species recovered here are considerably different from the ones recovered previously, with the exception of an apical clade composed by A. nigripes, A. kitae, A. attarum and A. luederwaldti, which was recognized in both analyses as the best supported group within the genus.