Abstract SOHO (Small Office, Home Office) has become a popular work arrangement all over the world because of the growth of knowledge workers, the trend of outsourcing, and the development of Internet. As we can see, there were 680,000 SOHO in Japan in 1996, and 43,000,000 SOHO in America in 1997; moreover, according to the investigations of SOHO magazine, SOHO has reached up to 20% of total work population in Taiwan. However, what kinds of jobs do these SOHO do? What are their motives of choosing to be a SOHO? What kinds of competitive advantages do they have? What¡¦s the current situation of these SOHO? And are there any special requirements for people who want to be SOHO? These questions and issues are what we¡¦re intersted in. According to the purposes of this research, we have discovered some important results: a. The demographic statitics of SOHO: We find out that most SOHO in Taiwan are female, single, about 25~34 years old, bachelor degree, major in science & engineering or business & management, work at home, living in north Taiwan. They usually have more than 10 years work experience, but only 2 years or less in SOHO field. The monthly income are about 40,000~60,000. Most people regard SOHO as a part-time job and devote themselves to designing-orietated works. b. The motives of being SOHO: ¡§To have more free time¡¨, ¡§to increase income¡¨, ¡§to be one¡¦s own master¡¨, ¡§to satisfy achievements¡¨, and ¡§to have different life¡¨ are the five topic motives of being SOHO. c. The current situation and competitive advantages of SOHO: We discuss these issues in four parts, including the current situation, the way of getting cases, the clients, and the future of SOHO. We also find out that ¡§professional knowledge & techniques¡¨ is the most important comparative advantage, which can be accumulated from previous work experience. d. The charateristics of being SOHO: We propose two factors in the characteristics of being SOHO; they are ¡§getting cases factor¡¨ and ¡§work result factor¡¨. We also find out that the ¡§work result factor¡¨ has mainly influence on reaching high achivements of SOHO work.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:26:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2010-03-12Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:55:11Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 barros_thb_me_mar.pdf: 674163 bytes, checksum: d0c244ec98eee20178f3cf2da8b28d21 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Discourse Analysis is a discipline that has theoretical and methodological characteristics that may contribute to the theory growth of the Archival Science. The study of discourse helps to understand how its construct certain linguistic formations, concerned mainly with the context in which the text was produced. As the Archival Science a product of historically constructed knowledge, the conceptual context of production ultimately reflected in different streams of thought and approach. Thus contributes to the discourse analysis and Archival Science, since it has a theoretical approach in this regard relating the discourse produced by Archival Science manuals . We discussed the basic concepts of archival organization: Description and Organization divided into two complementary phases Classification and Arrangement. These concepts were discussed by means of its historical and conceptual in a series of works. We analyzed a total of six manuals / books, divided into before and after the development of the assumptions of Appraisal. They are: The Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives, (Handleiding voor het ordenen em beschreijven van Archieven) by Muller, Feith, and Fruin (Ed.1 1898) the A manual of archive administration including the problems of war archives and archive making (1st Ed 1922) by Sir Hillary Jenkinson, responsible for the first utterances of the archival techniques and the manual that still responsible for modifying a number of practices in the archives, the Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques (1st Ed 1956) Theodore R. Schellenberg. And of all the most current manuals, were selected to Antonia Heredia Herrera, Archivística General (1 Ed. 1986) and Arquivos Permanetes de Heloisa Liberalli Bellotto (1 Ed.1990). As a counterpoint, and thus not excluding what was thought previously presented by the textbooks, but with different ways of perceiving the same ...(Complete abstract click electronic address below)

Orientador: João Batista Ernesto de Moraes / Banca: Maria Leandra Bizello / Banca: Lídia da Silva Freitas / Resumo:A análise do discurso é uma disciplina que possui características teórico-metodológicas que podem contribuir para o crescimento da teoria Arquivística. O estudo do discurso contribui para se compreender como se constroem certas formações lingüísticas, preocupando-se principalmente com o contexto em que o texto foi produzido. Sendo a Arquivística um produto do conhecimento construído historicamente, o contexto de produção conceitual acaba por refletir-se nas diferentes correntes de pensamento e na abordagem metodológica. Deste modo contribui-se para, a análise do discurso e para a arquivística, já que possui um levantamento teórico a esse respeito relacionando o discurso produzido pelos manuais de arquivo. Foram discutidos conceitos fundamentais da organização arquivística: Descrição e a Organização dividida em duas fases complementares a Classificação e o Arranjo. Estes conceitos foram discutidos por meio de seu percurso histórico e conceitual em uma série de obras. Foram Analisados um total de seis manuais/livros, divididos em antes e depois do desenvolvimento dos pressupostos da Avaliação. São eles: Manual de Arranjo de Descrição de Arquivos (Handleiding voor het ordenen em beschreijven van Archieven) de Muller, Feith, e Fruin ( Ed.1 1898) o A manual of archive administration including the problems of war archives and archive making (1 Ed. 1922) de Sir Hillary Jenkinson, responsáveis pelas primeiras enunciações da técnica arquivística e ainda o manual responsável por modificar uma série de práticas nos arquivos, o Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques (1 Ed. 1956) de Theodore R. Schellenberg. E do conjunto de manuais mais atuais, foram selecionados o de Antonia Heredia Herrera, Archivistica Geral (1 Ed. 1986) e Arquivos Permanentes de Heloísa Liberalli Bellotto (1 Ed.1990 ). Como contraponto e, portanto não excluindo o que foi pensado pelos ...(Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: Discourse Analysis is a discipline that has theoretical and methodological characteristics that may contribute to the theory growth of the Archival Science. The study of discourse helps to understand how its construct certain linguistic formations, concerned mainly with the context in which the text was produced. As the Archival Science a product of historically constructed knowledge, the conceptual context of production ultimately reflected in different streams of thought and approach. Thus contributes to the discourse analysis and Archival Science, since it has a theoretical approach in this regard relating the discourse produced by Archival Science manuals . We discussed the basic concepts of archival organization: Description and Organization divided into two complementary phases Classification and Arrangement. These concepts were discussed by means of its historical and conceptual in a series of works. We analyzed a total of six manuals / books, divided into before and after the development of the assumptions of Appraisal. They are: The Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives, (Handleiding voor het ordenen em beschreijven van Archieven) by Muller, Feith, and Fruin (Ed.1 1898) the A manual of archive administration including the problems of war archives and archive making (1st Ed 1922) by Sir Hillary Jenkinson, responsible for the first utterances of the archival techniques and the manual that still responsible for modifying a number of practices in the archives, the Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques (1st Ed 1956) Theodore R. Schellenberg. And of all the most current manuals, were selected to Antonia Heredia Herrera, Archivística General (1 Ed. 1986) and Arquivos Permanetes de Heloisa Liberalli Bellotto (1 Ed.1990). As a counterpoint, and thus not excluding what was thought previously presented by the textbooks, but with different ways of perceiving the same ...(Complete abstract click electronic address below) / Mestre