Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:55:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 448380.pdf: 1031015 bytes, checksum: 7951c94bcd5afa19e0416aa9b6e19f37 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-03-27 / Bloch s ontology suggests different levels in the category of possibility, and, among them, the subjective possibility, which presupposes the human beings capacity to accomplish their daydreams and build their utopias that is a fact that triggers an instrumental rationality, determining the domain that men has towards nature. Another level of the possibility identifies, in the natura naturans movement, nature that produces nature , the domain that matter has towards man and the consequent degeneration of the matter in this relationship. Thus, our main objective is to present a blochiana solution to the conflict. According to Bloch, the possible dialectic is carried out through the organic interaction between the human being s tendencies as well as latencies of matter. The current study reflects this possibility and verifies that the process of the instrumentation of the world reveals the possible dialectic , which can be the solution of the of the impacts, that are trigged by the matter dynamic and the man s activity, that generates a relevant tension in docta spes, that is, clarified hope. So, we tried to demonstrate that the consequences of this conflict are appropriate for two movements: the first is generated by the human being s instrumentation, announced by Frankfurt School and was not understood by man in the XXI century; and the second has, as a consequence, the natural evolution of the science, that develops technologies which can build a new face to the world. Therefore, this research suggests that is necessary to rethink about the solution of organicity, man-matter, announced by Bloch, who introduced the ethic aspect in this relationship. / A ontologia de Bloch prop?e v?rios n?veis na categoria da possibilidade, entre elas, uma possibilidade subjetiva, que pressup?e a capacidade de o ser humano em realizar sonhos diurnos e construir suas utopias, fato gerador de uma racionalidade instrumental, determinando o dom?nio do homem na natureza. Outro n?vel de possibilidade identifica, no movimento da natura naturans, natureza que produz natureza, certa imposi??o ao ser humano, determinando o dom?nio da mat?ria sobre o homem e consequente degenera??o da mat?ria nesta rela??o. Esta disserta??o, portanto, objetiva apresentar a solu??o blochiana para este confronto. De acordo com Bloch, a dial?tica do poss?vel se realiza atrav?s da conviv?ncia org?nica entre as tend?ncias do ser humano e as lat?ncias da mat?ria. O estudo reflete esta possibilidade e verifica que o processo de instrumentaliza??o do mundo revela a dial?tica do poss?vel que pode ser solu??o incompreendida diante dos impactos decorrentes da din?mica da mat?ria e da atividade humana, causando, por conseguinte, significativa tens?o na docta spes, esperan?a esclarecida. Procura-se, ent?o, demonstrar que os reflexos desse confronto s?o apropriados por dois movimentos: o primeiro decorre da instrumentaliza??o do homem, j? denunciado pela Escola de Frankfurt e n?o compreendido pelo homem no s?culo XXI; o segundo tem como causa a evolu??o natural da ci?ncia, colocando em curso tecnologias capazes de edificar uma nova singularidade no mundo. Neste sentido, o estudo sugere repensar a solu??o de organicidade, homem-mat?ria, anunciada por Bloch, introduzindo como pressuposto o elemento ?tico nesta rela??o.