The aim of this thesis is to define the disputes arising from the execution and bankruptcy proceedings, to categorize them to the systematic framework, to outline their nature and to create a comprehensive overview about these disputes. The thesis is devided into three chapters, which are subdevided into subsections and parts. The first chapter of this work is aimed to the general issues, that have the influence on creating and forming of disputes resulting from the execution and insolvency proceedings, because it would be impossible to capture this topic coherently without these initial premises. Thereof, there are incorporated the conceptual definition of the execution proceedings and the principles of the execution proceedings, particularly considering the principle of protection of the obliged person and the principle of protection of third parties. In the part dealing with the aspects that form the disputes in the insolvency proceedings there are indicated the historical development of the insolvency, the overall characteristic of the insolvency proceedings, its specific principles and the difference from the former legislation. Further, for making a general overview of disputes arising from the execution and insolvency proceedings, there is also included in the first chapter the classification...

Bankroto teisinius santykius reguliuojančius teisės aktus galima laikyti vienais iš svarbiausių aktų, reguliuojančių ūkio subjektų tarpusavio santykius rinkos ekonomikos sąlygomis. Visų pirma, kiekvienos įmonės bankrotas yra susijęs su daugelio kreditorių reikalavimais, todėl bankrutavusios įmonės likvidavimas daro tiesioginę įtaką visai valstybėje vykstančiai civilinei apyvartai. Antra, koncentruotai, operatyviai ir ekonomiškai vykdomas bankroto procesas užtikrina ne tik bankrutuojančios įmonės skolininkės kreditorių, bet ir jos pačios bei valstybės socialinių interesų apsaugą. Bankroto bylų nagrinėjimo sudėtingumą lemia dažna teisės aktų, reglamentuojančių bankroto teisinius santykius, kaita, poreikis ginti viešąjį interesą, taip pat specifinė bankroto proceso struktūra. Todėl, nagrinėjant bankroto bylas teisme iškylanti problematika ir jos įveikimo būdai yra labai aktualūs. Šio mokslinio tyrimo objektas - bankroto teisiniai santykiai bei bankroto bylų nagrinėjimo teisme ypatumai, bankroto procedūrų istorinė kilmė, raida, teisinė prigimtis, tikslai bei paskirtis. Darbe siekiama kompleksiškai ištirti bankroto bylų nagrinėjimo teisme ypatumus, surasti esamus bankroto santykių teisinio reglamentavimo trūkumus ir pateikti jų tobulinimo pasiūlymus ir rekomendacijas; analizuojamos bankroto proceso ištakos ir raida (bankroto proceso užuomazgos romėnų teisėje, bankroto proceso raida viduramžiais, naujaisiais ir naujausiais laikais, Lietuvos bankroto procedūrų raidai)... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Legal acts governing bankruptcy legal relationships may be considered amongst the most important legislation that regulates mutual relationships between economic entities under market economy conditions. First of all, bankruptcy of any company is associated with numerous requirements of the creditors, that why liquidation of a bankrupted enterprise makes a direct impact on civil turnover in process of the state. Second, bankruptcy proceedings executed in an intense, effective and economical manner ensure protection not only of the interests of creditors of the enterprise-debtor that is under bankruptcy but also the interests of the enterprise itself and social interests of the state. Complexity of bankruptcy cases’ investigation is reasoned by frequent change of legal acts ruling bankruptcy legal relationships, the need to protect public interest, specific structure of bankruptcy procedure. Because of the listed reasons research of bankruptcy procedure becomes extremely vital. The object of this research – bankruptcy legal relationships and specific features of judicial investigation of bankruptcy cases, historical origin, development, legal origin, objectives and the essence of bankruptcy procedures. This research seeks to study in a complex manner specific features of investigation of bankruptcy cases in courts, to detect drawbacks of the existing legal regulations and to make proposals and recommendations for their improvement. Also the author of this research analyses... [to full text]

La cession est une solution incontournable du droit des entreprises en difficulté.Déterminer les droits des créanciers dans le cadre d’un plan de cession s’avère pourtant une tâche délicate.Le droit des entreprises en difficulté a fait l’objet de réformes importantes (loi du 26 juillet 2005, ordonnance du 18 décembre 2008 et ordonnance du 12 mars 2014 dans une moindre mesure).Dans le même temps, le droit des sûretés subissait des évolutions nombreuses (ordonnance du 23 mars 2006, loi du 19 février 2007, loi du 04 août 2008, ordonnance du 30 janvier 2009) mais parcellaires, preuve du manque de cohérence du législateur en la matière.Les réformes du droit des entreprises en difficulté et du droit des sûretés ont révélé l’absence de ligne directrice claire en ce qui concerne l’articulation de ces deux droits. Les réformes du droit des entreprises en difficulté et du droit des sûretés aboutissent à un enchevêtrement des textes, rendant leur application particulièrement complexe.Les nombreuses interrogations tant théoriques que pratiques créent une insécurité juridique.Dès lors, en me basant notamment sur les difficultés rencontrées dans le cadre de mon activité professionnelle ou sur celles pointées du doigt par la doctrine et les commentateurs de textes, consécutives aux évolutions législatives récentes, l’objectif de ce travail de recherche est de procéder à des recommandations à l’endroit des professionnels ainsi que de réaliser des propositions visant à un meilleur équilibre des intérêts en présence. / The sale of a business is one of the most important insolvency solutions.However it’s a hard task to determinate creditor’s rights under these circumstances.Insolvency law has deeply changed consequently to main reforms (Act of July 26, 2005 called the “Safeguard Act”, Order of December 18, 2008 and to a lesser extent Order of March 12, 2014).At the same time, guarantee law has been modified by lots of reforms too (Order of March 23, 2006, Act of February 19, 2007, Act of August 4, 2008, Order of January 30, 2009).These reforms were fragmented. Furthermore they have been built without guideline. As a result, the articulation between insolvency law and guarantee law is very difficult.The theoretical and practical questions generate a real legal insecurity.The goal of this research work is to make insolvency practitioners propositions based on, amongst others, doctrine’s comments and criticism. The objective of these propositions is to establish a better balance between the pluralities of interests involved.