Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

INTRODUÇÃO: A vacina contra febre amarela é a principal forma de prevenção da doença, e é raramente associada a eventos adversos graves, para os quais pessoas que vivem com o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) teoricamente possuem risco aumentado. Nessa população, estudos sugerem que a imunogenicidade da vacina é inferior, e fatores associados à resposta vacinal são pouco conhecidos. Neste estudo, avaliamos a imunogenicidade e reatogenicidade da vacina contra febre amarela em pessoas infectadas por HIV e controles, comparando os títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes, ocorrência de viremia pelo vírus vacinal e eventos adversos após a vacinação, e investigamos potenciais preditores da resposta vacinal. Avaliamos ainda o grau de conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e a adesão às recomendações de vacinação entre pessoas que vivem com HIV. MÉTODOS: No Estudo 1, indivíduos com infecção por HIV e controles com indicação de receber a vacina foram incluídos em uma coorte prospectiva com um ano de acompanhamento, com avaliação periódica de eventos adversos, viremia pelo vírus vacinal e títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes específicos contra febre amarela após a vacinação. No Estudo 2, indivíduos com infecção por HIV sob tratamento antirretroviral e controles com uma única dose da vacina contra febre amarela no passado foram incluídos em um estudo de corte transversal para avaliação dos títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes contra febre amarela. Finalmente, no Estudo 3 pessoas infectadas por HIV foram convidadas a completar um questionário avaliando o grau de conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e a adesão às recomendações de prevenção. RESULTADOS: Não observamos entre pessoas infectadas por HIV maior risco de viremia pelo vírus vacinal, ocorrência de eventos adversos ou diferença estatisticamente significante nos títulos de anticorpos nos primeiros três meses após a vacinação. Entretanto a persistência de anticorpos foi significantemente inferior entre indivíduos infectados por HIV, e associou-se inversamente à relação CD4+/CD8+, um marcador de ativação imune e inflamação de importância crescente. Nas respostas ao questionário, embora os participantes tenham demonstrado conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e sua prevenção, a prevalência de discrepância entre as recomendações e o uso da vacina foi de 19%. CONCLUSÕES: Nossos resultados enfatizam a necessidade de novos estudos e intervenções entre pessoas infectadas por HIV a fim de melhorar a adesão às recomendações de uso da vacina, reduzir a ativação imune excessiva associada à pior resposta vacinal, e determinar o intervalo de tempo ideal para administração de reforço vacinal nessa população / INTRODUCTION: The yellow fever vaccine is the main prevention strategy against the disease, and is rarely associated with severe adverse events for which HIV-infected persons present theoretical increased risk. Studies suggest that the immune response to the vaccine is reduced in this population, but predictors of the vaccine immunogenicity are not well known. In this study, we assessed yellow fever vaccine immunogenicity and reactogenicity among HIV-infected persons and controls by comparing yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers, detection of viremia by the vaccine virus and adverse events following vaccination. We also investigated potential predictors of vaccine response. Furthermore, we assessed knowledge and perceptions about yellow fever, and adherence to yellow fever vaccine recommendations among HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: In Study 1, HIV-infected participants and controls with indication to receive yellow fever vaccine were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and followed for one year with serial assessments of adverse events, viremia by the vaccine virus and yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers after vaccination. In study 2, HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy and controls with a history of a single dose of yellow fever vaccine in the past were enrolled in a cross sectional study to evaluate yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers after vaccination. Finally, in Study 3, HIV-infected persons under clinical follow up were invited to complete a survey assessing knowledge and perceptions about yellow fever and adherence to yellow fever prevention recommendations. RESULTS: We found no increased risk for the occurrence of viremia by the vaccine virus or adverse events, and no significant difference in yellow fever-specific antibody titers among HIVinfected participants in the first three months after vaccination. However, the duration of antibody response was reduced in HIV-infected persons, and was inversely associated to CD4+/CD8+ ratio, a biomarker of immune activation and inflammation of increasing importance. In the survey responses, although participants demonstrated awareness about yellow fever and yellow fever prevention, the prevalence of discrepancy between vaccine recommendation and actual compliance was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reinforce the need for new studies and interventions among HIVinfected persons to improve adherence to yellow fever vaccine recommendations, reduce excessive immune activation associated with impaired vaccine response, and to determine the ideal interval for a booster vaccination in this population

INTRODUÇÃO: A vacina contra febre amarela é a principal forma de prevenção da doença, e é raramente associada a eventos adversos graves, para os quais pessoas que vivem com o vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) teoricamente possuem risco aumentado. Nessa população, estudos sugerem que a imunogenicidade da vacina é inferior, e fatores associados à resposta vacinal são pouco conhecidos. Neste estudo, avaliamos a imunogenicidade e reatogenicidade da vacina contra febre amarela em pessoas infectadas por HIV e controles, comparando os títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes, ocorrência de viremia pelo vírus vacinal e eventos adversos após a vacinação, e investigamos potenciais preditores da resposta vacinal. Avaliamos ainda o grau de conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e a adesão às recomendações de vacinação entre pessoas que vivem com HIV. MÉTODOS: No Estudo 1, indivíduos com infecção por HIV e controles com indicação de receber a vacina foram incluídos em uma coorte prospectiva com um ano de acompanhamento, com avaliação periódica de eventos adversos, viremia pelo vírus vacinal e títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes específicos contra febre amarela após a vacinação. No Estudo 2, indivíduos com infecção por HIV sob tratamento antirretroviral e controles com uma única dose da vacina contra febre amarela no passado foram incluídos em um estudo de corte transversal para avaliação dos títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes contra febre amarela. Finalmente, no Estudo 3 pessoas infectadas por HIV foram convidadas a completar um questionário avaliando o grau de conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e a adesão às recomendações de prevenção. RESULTADOS: Não observamos entre pessoas infectadas por HIV maior risco de viremia pelo vírus vacinal, ocorrência de eventos adversos ou diferença estatisticamente significante nos títulos de anticorpos nos primeiros três meses após a vacinação. Entretanto a persistência de anticorpos foi significantemente inferior entre indivíduos infectados por HIV, e associou-se inversamente à relação CD4+/CD8+, um marcador de ativação imune e inflamação de importância crescente. Nas respostas ao questionário, embora os participantes tenham demonstrado conhecimento a respeito da febre amarela e sua prevenção, a prevalência de discrepância entre as recomendações e o uso da vacina foi de 19%. CONCLUSÕES: Nossos resultados enfatizam a necessidade de novos estudos e intervenções entre pessoas infectadas por HIV a fim de melhorar a adesão às recomendações de uso da vacina, reduzir a ativação imune excessiva associada à pior resposta vacinal, e determinar o intervalo de tempo ideal para administração de reforço vacinal nessa população / INTRODUCTION: The yellow fever vaccine is the main prevention strategy against the disease, and is rarely associated with severe adverse events for which HIV-infected persons present theoretical increased risk. Studies suggest that the immune response to the vaccine is reduced in this population, but predictors of the vaccine immunogenicity are not well known. In this study, we assessed yellow fever vaccine immunogenicity and reactogenicity among HIV-infected persons and controls by comparing yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers, detection of viremia by the vaccine virus and adverse events following vaccination. We also investigated potential predictors of vaccine response. Furthermore, we assessed knowledge and perceptions about yellow fever, and adherence to yellow fever vaccine recommendations among HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: In Study 1, HIV-infected participants and controls with indication to receive yellow fever vaccine were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and followed for one year with serial assessments of adverse events, viremia by the vaccine virus and yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers after vaccination. In study 2, HIV-infected individuals under antiretroviral therapy and controls with a history of a single dose of yellow fever vaccine in the past were enrolled in a cross sectional study to evaluate yellow fever-specific neutralizing antibody titers after vaccination. Finally, in Study 3, HIV-infected persons under clinical follow up were invited to complete a survey assessing knowledge and perceptions about yellow fever and adherence to yellow fever prevention recommendations. RESULTS: We found no increased risk for the occurrence of viremia by the vaccine virus or adverse events, and no significant difference in yellow fever-specific antibody titers among HIVinfected participants in the first three months after vaccination. However, the duration of antibody response was reduced in HIV-infected persons, and was inversely associated to CD4+/CD8+ ratio, a biomarker of immune activation and inflammation of increasing importance. In the survey responses, although participants demonstrated awareness about yellow fever and yellow fever prevention, the prevalence of discrepancy between vaccine recommendation and actual compliance was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reinforce the need for new studies and interventions among HIVinfected persons to improve adherence to yellow fever vaccine recommendations, reduce excessive immune activation associated with impaired vaccine response, and to determine the ideal interval for a booster vaccination in this population

Résumé L’objectif de cette étude était de déterminer les effets de la source de sélénium sur les concentrations de Se et de GSH-Px des vaches de boucherie (n =33) et leurs veaux et sur des paramètres immunitaires des veaux. Deux groupes de vaches ont reçu 3 mg/j/animal de Se organique ou inorganique dans le minéral. Le troisième groupe n'a pas été supplémenté en Se et leurs veaux ont été divisés en deux sous-groupes, l’un des deux a reçu une injection de sélénite de sodium (0,087 mg/Kg) à la naissance. Le Se et la GSH-Px ont été respectivement mesurés par HPLC-UV et par cinétique enzymatique. La phagocytose, la flambée respiratoire et le ratio CD4:CD8ont été évalués par des kits commerciaux et les IgG totales ont été mesurés par immunodiffusion radiale. La supplémentation de Se a augmenté significativement le Se sérique et colostral (P<0,02) et la GSH-Px(P≤0,04) pour les vaches et leurs veaux avec un effet significativement plus élevé pour le Se organique. Le Se du lait a augmenté de façon significative uniquement avec la source organique du Se (P≤0,0007). L’injection du Se chez les veaux a permis une augmentation significative mais temporaire (P<0,0001) du Se sérique. La supplémentation en Se n’a pas influencé les paramètres immunitaires mesurés (P>0,01, non significatif après correction de Bonferroni). Nous concluons que la supplémentation en Se améliore le niveau du Se colostral, lacté et sérique ainsi que la GSH-Px pour les vaches et leurs veaux sans effet sur les paramètres immunitaires mesurés des veaux. Mots clés: Sélénium, veaux de boucherie, phagocytose, flambée respiratoire, anticorps, ratio CD4:CD8, GSH-Px. / Abstract The aims of this study were to determine the effects of selenium (Se) supplementation sources (organic and inorganic) on Se and GSH-Px concentrations of beef cows (n=33) and their calves and on immune parameters of the calves. Two groups of cows were given daily 3 mg of either organic or inorganic Se in mineral supplement starting from 12 weeks before calving until weaning. The third group had no Se added into the diet and their calves were divided into two subgroups either injected or not with 0.087 mg/kg of sodium selenite after birth. Serum Se and whole blood GSH-Px were respectively measured by HPLC-UV and by kinetic-enzymatic technique. Calves immune parameters were evaluated using commercial kits for phagocytosis, respiratory burst and CD4:CD8 ratio and radial immunodiffusion for total IgG concentrations. In cows and calves, Se supplementation increased significantly serum and colostrum Se concentrations (P<.02) with significant higher effect for organic source. However, milk Se concentrations increased significantly only with the organic source (P≤.0007). Se supplementation increased GSH-Px concentrations in cows (P≤.04) and their calves (P≤.0004); organic source induced a higher effect than inorganic one in calves (P≤.0004). Se injection in calves allowed a temporary increase (P<.0001) of serum Se concentrations. No significant differences were noticed throughout the experiment for all of the immune parameters measured (P>.01, not significant after Bonferroni adjustment). Our results showed that Se supplementation improved colostrum, milk and serum Se and GSH-Px concentrations in cows and their calves without effect on the measured immune parameters in calves. Key words: selenium, beef calves, phagocytosis, respiratory burst, antibodies, CD4:CD8 ratio, GSH-Px.

Résumé L’objectif de cette étude était de déterminer les effets de la source de sélénium sur les concentrations de Se et de GSH-Px des vaches de boucherie (n =33) et leurs veaux et sur des paramètres immunitaires des veaux. Deux groupes de vaches ont reçu 3 mg/j/animal de Se organique ou inorganique dans le minéral. Le troisième groupe n'a pas été supplémenté en Se et leurs veaux ont été divisés en deux sous-groupes, l’un des deux a reçu une injection de sélénite de sodium (0,087 mg/Kg) à la naissance. Le Se et la GSH-Px ont été respectivement mesurés par HPLC-UV et par cinétique enzymatique. La phagocytose, la flambée respiratoire et le ratio CD4:CD8ont été évalués par des kits commerciaux et les IgG totales ont été mesurés par immunodiffusion radiale. La supplémentation de Se a augmenté significativement le Se sérique et colostral (P<0,02) et la GSH-Px(P≤0,04) pour les vaches et leurs veaux avec un effet significativement plus élevé pour le Se organique. Le Se du lait a augmenté de façon significative uniquement avec la source organique du Se (P≤0,0007). L’injection du Se chez les veaux a permis une augmentation significative mais temporaire (P<0,0001) du Se sérique. La supplémentation en Se n’a pas influencé les paramètres immunitaires mesurés (P>0,01, non significatif après correction de Bonferroni). Nous concluons que la supplémentation en Se améliore le niveau du Se colostral, lacté et sérique ainsi que la GSH-Px pour les vaches et leurs veaux sans effet sur les paramètres immunitaires mesurés des veaux. Mots clés: Sélénium, veaux de boucherie, phagocytose, flambée respiratoire, anticorps, ratio CD4:CD8, GSH-Px. / Abstract The aims of this study were to determine the effects of selenium (Se) supplementation sources (organic and inorganic) on Se and GSH-Px concentrations of beef cows (n=33) and their calves and on immune parameters of the calves. Two groups of cows were given daily 3 mg of either organic or inorganic Se in mineral supplement starting from 12 weeks before calving until weaning. The third group had no Se added into the diet and their calves were divided into two subgroups either injected or not with 0.087 mg/kg of sodium selenite after birth. Serum Se and whole blood GSH-Px were respectively measured by HPLC-UV and by kinetic-enzymatic technique. Calves immune parameters were evaluated using commercial kits for phagocytosis, respiratory burst and CD4:CD8 ratio and radial immunodiffusion for total IgG concentrations. In cows and calves, Se supplementation increased significantly serum and colostrum Se concentrations (P<.02) with significant higher effect for organic source. However, milk Se concentrations increased significantly only with the organic source (P≤.0007). Se supplementation increased GSH-Px concentrations in cows (P≤.04) and their calves (P≤.0004); organic source induced a higher effect than inorganic one in calves (P≤.0004). Se injection in calves allowed a temporary increase (P<.0001) of serum Se concentrations. No significant differences were noticed throughout the experiment for all of the immune parameters measured (P>.01, not significant after Bonferroni adjustment). Our results showed that Se supplementation improved colostrum, milk and serum Se and GSH-Px concentrations in cows and their calves without effect on the measured immune parameters in calves. Key words: selenium, beef calves, phagocytosis, respiratory burst, antibodies, CD4:CD8 ratio, GSH-Px.

We studied the effects of 30 minutes of exercise on T lymphocyte counts and proliferative responses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in 25 runners. Exercise resulted in a T lymphocytosis in the immediate post-exercise period in all subjects (p < 0.001), and reduced CD4+/CD8+ ratios in 22/25 subjects (p = 0.001). The change was due primarily to a 2.2-fold increase in CD8+ cells (p < 0.001). Exercise also reduced PBMC mitogenic responses to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) in 13/14 subjects (p = 0.049), and to pokeweed mitogen (PWM) in 11/14 subjects (p = 0.022), but not to concanavalin A. Postrun sera from 5 of 6 subjects inhibited PHA but not PWM responses of resting autologous PBMC with normal CD4+/CD8+ ratios (p < or = 0.05): indomethacin and monocyte depletion blocked the serum inhibition (p = 0.003, p = 0.0006, respectively). We conclude that post-exercise suppression of mitogenic responses to PHA is due to the release of a serum factor(s) capable of inducing prostaglandin synthesis by circulating monocytes, whereas exercise-induced suppression of PWM responses depends primarily on the reversal of CD4+/CD8+ ratios.