Master of Science / Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering / Zifei Liu / This study reviewed state-of-the-art cattle enteric methane (CH4) emissions with three reported measuring units: g/head/d, g/kg DMI (dry matter intake), and %GEI (gross energy intake). Cattle emissions studies included in this meta-analysis were reported from 1995 to 2013. Fifty-five published studies were analyzed with specific objectives: (1) to gain basic information regarding magnitudes and distributions of enteric CH4 emission rates with various units, regions, cattle types and feed situations; (2) to identify and evaluate effects of influence factors or diet mitigation techniques on enteric CH4 emissions; and (3) to evaluate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) approaches to estimate enteric CH4 emissions. Emissions data (n=165) with the unit of g/head/d had large variances and non-normal distribution, and were not homogeneous across the studies. Emissions data (n=134) with the unit of g/kg DMI were not homogeneous across the studies, while emissions data (n=76) with the unit of %GEI had small variances and normal distribution, and were homogeneous across the studies. Therefore, data with the unit of %GEI may be better for meta-analysis compared to data with the units of g/head/d and g/kg DMI; however, the number of data with the unit of %GEI was small relative to the number of data with the units of g/head/d and g/kg DMI. Enteric CH4 emissions with the unit of g/head/d are significantly influenced by geographic region, cattle classification, sub-classification, humidity, temperature, body weight, and feed intake. Emissions and feed intake had a strong positive linear relationship with R2 of 0.75 (n=148). Emissions with the unit of g/kg DMI are significantly affected by humidity, body weight, and feed intake. The relationship between emissions and feed intake is positive. Emissions with the unit of %GEI are significantly associated with humidity, production stage, and body weight. IPCC Tier 1 and Tier 2 estimated emissions were approximate to most of the measured enteric CH4 emissions; however, the residuals were not normally distributed. Based on results from PRD method and paired t-tests, IPCC Tier 1 overestimated emissions in Asian studies, underestimated emissions in European studies for beef cattle, and underestimated emissions in Oceanian studies for dairy cattle. IPCC Tier 2 underestimated emissions in Asian studies for beef cattle. The underestimated emissions of IPCC Tier 2 in Asian studies might result from no consideration of effects from production stage and body weight.

In this study we determined the magnitude of plant mediated CH4 emission (flux) in two vegetation types of Carex ramenskii. The objectives of this paper were to quantify the proportion of CH4 emissions from plant mediated flux and the total flux (plant and soil). This information is needed in order to understand how grazing affects plant mediated CH4 flux. In addition, we differentiated between two vegetation morphs, grazed and ungrazed, and determined the plant mediated CH4 flux for vegetation type.  This study was conducted at a field site on the Tutakoke River (61 15’N, 165 30’W) which is located in the coastal region of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. Three replicate plots of the two vegetation morphs of Carex ramenskii were established. Methane flux was measured with a total flux chamber (plant and soil) and a single leaf chamber using a Picarro Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy Analyzer (Model G2308, Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, California). Plant density for the two plant types was determined. Temperature measurements were taken and correlated with gas flux. This study found that total net CH4 emissions from Carex ssp. were the same in both vegetation types. This similarity could indicate that plant mediated flux through vegetation is not affected by grazing in the sense that grazing is neither facilitating nor inhibiting plant mediated CH4 flux. The magnitude of plant mediated flux was still greater in the ungrazed meadow type, indicating on both greater facilitation of CH4 flux, and below ground oxygen transport enabling higher rates of CH4 consumption.

Methane (CH4) is guaranteed to affect climate change and is essential in rising temperatures. Scientists have known for over two decades that wetlands emit CH4 to such an extent that it affects our climate. Tropical trees that grow in wetlands tend to emit or act as a conduit of CH4, to the extent that it has a negative environmental impact. However, until this study, no one has examined whether wetland species growing in another environment have the same effects. Hence, this thesis aimed to collect data from wetland-adapted tropical trees in a non-wetland environment, namely the Botanical Garden in Rio de Janeiro. The results showed a difference in the sampling height of the stem, namely that a decrease in emission is seen with an increased height. All the species except one (Pseudobombax munguba) showed both assimilation and emission from the day-to-day measurements of CH4, which speaks for the trees acting both as a sink and a source of CH4. This suggests that the species are more robust than the environmental stressors in a non-wetland environment. Previous studies have found that increased CH4 emissions can be seen with different meteorological parameters. The results presented in this thesis show the opposite, that some species tend to emit less or assimilate more CH4 during days with increased rainfall, humidity, and temperature.