Electroporation is an efficient, low-toxic physical method which is used to deliver impermeant macromolecules such as genes and drugs into cells. Genetic modification of the cell is critical for many cell and gene therapy techniques. Common electroporation protocols can only handle small volumes of cell samples. Also, most of the conventional electroporation methods require expensive and sophisticated electro-pulsation equipment. In our lab, we have developed new electroporation methods conducted in microfluidic devices. In microfluidic-base electroporation, exogenous macromolecules can be delivered into cells continuously. Flow-through electroporation systems can overcome the issue of low sample volume limitation. In addition, in our method, electro-pulsation can be done by using a simple dc power supply, without the need for any extra equipment. Furthermore, our microfluidic chips are completely disposable and cheap to produce. We show that electroporation and electroporation-based gene delivery can be conducted employing tapered asymmetric curving channels. The size variation in the channel's cross-sectional area makes it possible to produce electric pulses of various parameters by using a dc power supply. We successfully delivered Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein, EGFP, plasmid DNA into Chinese Hamster Ovary, CHO-K1, cells in our microfluidic chips. We show that the particles/cells undergo Dean flow in our asymmetric curving channels. We demonstrate that there are three main regimes for particle motion in our channels. At low flow rates (from 0 to ~75μl/min) cells do not focus and they randomly follow stream lines. However, as flow rate increases (~75 to 500μl/min), cells begin to focus into one line and they follow a single path throughout the micro-channel. When flow rate exceeds ~500μl/min, cells do not follow a single line and demonstrate more complex pattern. We show that the electric parameters affect the transfection efficiency and cell viability. Higher electric field intensity results in higher transfection efficiency. This is also true in the cases with longer electroporation duration time. In our experimental work, we executed flow-through electroporation for various duration times (t = 2 ms, 5 ms, and 7 ms), and at various electric field intensities (from 300 to 2200 V/cm) while we utilized different flow rates as well, i. e. 150 μl/min (focused flow) and 600 μl/min (complex flow). To explore the impact of individual electric pulse length and electric pulse number on electroporation results, we designed control channels with straight narrow sections. Cells experience different hydrodynamic forces in straight channels compared to curving channels. Flow pattern and cell focusing were also studied in control channels as well. Also, electroporation on CHO-K1 cells was successfully conducted in control channels. The hydrodynamic forces under the conditions we used do not appear to show substantial impact on transfection efficiency. / Master of Science

'Regulators of G protein signaling' (RGS proteins) modulate the G proteincycle by enhancing the GTPase activity of Ga subunits. These changesaccelerate the kinetics of ion channel modulation by Gai/o-coupled receptors(GPCRs) such as the G protein-gated inward rectifier K+ (GIRK/Kir3) channel. Myexperiments indicate that a single cerebellar granule (CG) neuron, a cell type thatendogenously expresses GIRK channels is able to express a wide variety ofRGS proteins. I selected two of them, which are widely expressed andtranscriptionally regulated during pathophysiologic conditions, to compare theirfunctional properties. I originally described the differential modulatory effects oftwo RGS proteins, the RGS3 short isoform (RGS3s) and RGS4, on muscarinicm2 and serotonin 1A receptor-coupled Kir3.1/Kir3.2a channels expressed inChinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells. Both RGS3s and RGS4 acceleratedGIRK activation and deactivation current kinetics in a similar way. However, onlyRGS3s si gnificantly decreased the maximal GIRK current (Imax) elicited by ACh(~45% inhibition) and significantly increased the EC50 for both GPCRs. Thehypothesis that emerged from this initial study was that the distinct RGS4 Nterminaldomain mediated a direct coupling of RGS4 to GPCR-GIRK channelsignaling complexes that was not shared by RGS3s. To test this hypothesis, Iepitope-tagged several GPCRs, the Kir3.1 subunit, RGS3s, RGS4, and severaldeletion mutants and chimeras for co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Using anepitope-tagged degradation resistant RGS4 mutant RGS4(C2V), I detected coprecipitationof different GPCR-GIRK channel complexes with RGS4 but notRGS3s.The functional impact of RGS4 coupling to the GPCR-Kir3 channelcomplex versus uncoupled RGS3s was not apparent in recordings from CHO-K1cells presumably due to a high degree of RGS collision-coupling. Controlledexpression in Xenopus oocytes revealed a 30-fold greater potency for RGS4 inthe accelerating GIRK channel gating kinetics. In summary, these findings demonstrate that one of the ways for the cellto achieve signaling pathway specificity may be through selective coupling of thedifferent GPCR-effector-RGS protein complexes.

Background Evaluating potential genotoxicity of pharmaceutical drug candidates is important during drug development. A method that can be used for this purpose is the micronucleus assay (MN- assay) which can identify agents that induce chromosomal damage. One of the most commonly used cell lines in an in vitro MN-assay is Chinese Hamster Ovarian K1 (CHO-K1) cells. Propolis, a natural substance produced by honeybees from exudates of different types of plant, is used in folk medicine to improve health and prevent diseases and was the evaluated substance in this study. Aim The major aim of this thesis project was to evaluate the potential cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of propolis in CHO-K1 cells by in vitro MN-assay. Method Two solutions of propolis were prepared in different ways and CHO-K1 cells were cultured. The two different ethanolic extracts of propolis were evaluated with the cytochalasin B protocol of the MN-assay, using mitomycin C as a positive control. Results Ethanolic extract number 1 had a statistically significant increase of genotoxicity at 50 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml. It was also found to induce a statistically significant increase of cytotoxicity at all concentrations tested (5-100 μg/ml). Ethanolic extract number 2 had a statistically significant increase of genotoxicity at 50 μg/ml but no statistically significant increase of cytotoxicity. General conclusion Rather surprisingly, the present study showed that propolis induced chromosomal damage in CHO-K1 cells, and one of the extracts tested was also found to be cytotoxic using the cytochalasin B version of the in vitro MN-assay.