No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:26:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013-07-15Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:15:18Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 batista_ca_me_assis.pdf: 732130 bytes, checksum: 606cb6da65ca7b24158bc77ae67832cd (MD5) / Os discursos oficiais da Igreja Católica, principalmente, as encíclicas, proporcionam interessantes discussões a respeito do posicionamento que a Igreja assume perante a realidades históricas que se sobrepujam à instituição, muitas vezes, seguindo por um lado oposto de seus dogmas, doutrina e costumes. Enfocaremos neste trabalho justamente essa relação de contradição. Enquanto a modernidade pedia por um reposicionamento da Igreja Católica, o corpo eclesiástico, formatado desde o Concílio de Trento, não atendia mais as necessidades e se demonstrava ultrapassado e ineficiente para contemplar as novas circunstâncias que se delineavam no decorrer do século XIX: as relações conflituosas entre burguesia e o movimento operário. Relutante em se adaptar, a Igreja ainda se empenhava em traçar uma estratégia para normatização do que não estava mais no caminho de uma salvação. O ultramontanismo representa todo este empenho em não conciliar-se com a modernidade. A partir deste cenário, permeado pela Igreja, imbuída pelos ideais ultramontanos e um contexto que não congregava mais com uma posição de centralidade da religião, busca-se discutir duas posições diferentes de relação com a questão operária e o mundo moderno através da análise de duas encíclicas: a Quanta Cura (1864), de Pio IX, e a Rerum Novarum (1891), de Leão XIII. A primeira trata de negação, hostilidade e luta por permanência dos parâmetros tridentinos; a outra de procura por tentativa de adaptações. Pretende-se, com tal esforço, compreender o processo de preocupação e envolvimento da hierarquia eclesiástica com a questão social, partindo de dois eixos que se demonstraram de extrema importância no delineamento do século XIX, o capitalismo e o socialismo. Feito isso, buscaremos compreender as soluções propostas por cada pontífice, analisando suas características e particularidades / Les discours oficielles de l`Église Catholique, principalment, les encicliques, proportionnent intéressantes discussions à propos du positionnement qui l` Église assume sur realités historiques qui se surmontent l´ instituition, beaucoup de fois, en suivrant par un côté opposé de ses dogmes, doctrines et habitudes. Nous aborderons dans ce travail justement cette rapport de contradiction. Pendant que la modernité demandait par un repositionnement de l`Église Catholique, le corps éclésiastique, formé dès le Concile de Trento, n`entendrait plus les besoins et se démontrait dépassé et inefficace pour contempler les nouvelles circonstances qui s`esquissaient au découler du XIXe siècle: les rapports antagoniques entre bourgeoisie et le mouvement ouvrier. Résistant à s`adapter, l´Église s`engageait encore à tracer une stratégie pour réglementations de cela qui ne etait plus dans le chemin d`une salut. L´ultramontanisme répresente tout cet engagement en on ne concilier pas avec la modernité. À partir de ce décor, traversé par l `Église, impregnée par les idéales ultramontanes et un contexte qui ne rassemblait plus avec une position de centralité de la religion, on recherche discuter deux positionnes différentes de rapport avec la question ouvrier et le monde moderne à travers de l` analyse de deux encicliques: la Quel Curé (1864), de Pio IX, et la Rerum Novarum (1891), de Lion XIII. La première elle s´agit de négation, hostilité et lutte par permanence des paramètres tridentines; l`autre de recherche par tentative d` adaptationnes. On prétend, avec cet effort , comprendre le procès de préoccupation et enveloppement de la hiérarchie éclésiastique avec la question sociale, en partant de deux pivots qui se démontraient de extrême importance dans le... (Résumé complet accès életronique cidessous)

<p>The significance of early modern Bible translation cannot be overstated, but its “breadth, and length, and depth, and height” have often been understated (King James Version, Ephesians 3.18). In this study, I use three representative case studies of very different types of translation to create a more dynamic understanding of actual Bible translation practices in early modern England. These studies examine not only the translations themselves but also the ways that the translation choices they contain interacted with early modern readers. </p><p><br></p> <p>The introductory Chapter One outlines the history of translation and of Bible translation more specifically. It also summarizes the states of the fields into which this work falls, Translation Studies and Religion and Literature. It articulates the overall scope and goals of the project, which are not to do something entirely new, per se, but rather to use a new framework to update the work that has already been done on early modern English Bible translation. Chapter Two presents a case study in formal interlingual translation that analyzes a specific word-level translation choice in the King James Version (KJV) to demonstrate the politics involved even in seemingly minor translation choices. Chapter Three treats the intermedial translation of the Book of Psalms in the Sternhold and Hopkins psalter. By using the language and meter of the populace and using specific translation choices to accommodate the singing rather than reading of the Psalms, the Sternhold and Hopkins psalter facilitates a more active and participatory experience for popular worshippers in early modern England. Finally, Chapter Four analyzes John Milton’s literary translation in <i>Paradise Lost </i>and establishes it as a spiritual and cultural authority along the lines of formal interlingual translations. If we consider this translation as an authoritative one, Milton’s personal theology expressed therein becomes a potential theological model for readers as well. </p> <p><br></p><p>By creating a more flexible understanding of what constitutes an authoritative translation in early modern England, this study expands the possibilities for the theological, interpretive, and practical applications of biblical texts, which touched not only early modern readers but left their legacies for modern readers of all kinds as well. </p>

This dissertation studies a local manifestation of ecclesiastical reform in the medieval county of Savoy: the twelfth-century transformation of secular canons into Augustinian regular canons at the church of Sts. Peter and Ursus in the alpine town of Aosta (now Italy). I argue that textual sources, material culture, and the practice of place together express how the newly reformed canons established their identity, shaped their material environment, and managed their relationship with the unreformed secular canons at the cathedral. The pattern of regularization in Aosta—instigated by a new bishop influenced by ideas of canonical reform—is only one among several models for implementing reform in medieval Savoy. This study asserts the importance of this medieval county as a center for reforming efforts among a regional network of churchmen, laymen, and noblemen, including the count of Savoy, Amadeus III (d. 1148). After a prologue and introduction, chapter 1 draws on traditional textual evidence to recount the history of reform in medieval Savoy. Chapters 2 through 4 focus on the twelfth-century sculpted capitals in the cloister built to accommodate the common life of the new regular canons. Several of the historiated capitals portray the biblical siblings, Martha and Mary, and Leah and Rachel, as material metaphors that reflect and reinforce the active and contemplative lives of the Augustinian canons. Other capitals represent the regular canons’ assertion of their precedence over the cathedral canons and suggest tensions between the two communities. The final chapter examines thirteenth-century conflicts over bell-ringing and ecclesiastical processions in the urban topography of Aosta to illustrate how the regular and secular canons continued to negotiate their relationship. Appendices include an English translation of a vita of St. Ursus (BHL 8453). The dissertation as a whole reconstructs the places and material culture of medieval Aosta to convey the complexities of religious and institutional life during a time of reform and beyond. / text

This study considers Thomas Hoccleve’s role, throughout his works, as a “religious” writer: as an individual who engages seriously with the dynamics of heresy and ecclesiastical reform, who contributes to traditions of vernacular devotional writing, and who raises the question of how Christianity manifests on personal as well as political levels – and in environments that are at once London-based, national, and international. The chapters focus, respectively, on the role of reading and moralization in the Series; the language of “vice and virtue” in the Epistle of Cupid; the moral version of Chaucer introduced in the Regiment of Princes; the construction of the Hoccleve persona in the Regiment; and the representation of the Eucharist throughout Hoccleve’s works. One main focus of the study is Hoccleve’s mediating influence in presenting a moral version of Chaucer in his Regiment. This study argues that Hoccleve’s Chaucer is not a pre-established artifact, but rather a Hocclevian invention, and it indicates the transnational literary, political, and religious contexts that align in Hoccleve’s presentation of his poetic predecessor. Rather than posit the Hoccleve-Chaucer relationship as one of Oedipal anxiety, as other critics have done, this study indicates the way in which Hoccleve’s Chaucer evolves in response to poetic anxiety not towards Chaucer himself, but rather towards an increasingly restrictive intellectual and ecclesiastical climate. This thesis contributes to the recently revitalized critical dialogue surrounding the role and function of fifteenth-century English literature, and the effect on poetry of heresy, the church’s response to heresy, and ecclesiastical reform both in England and in Europe. It also advances critical narratives regarding Hoccleve’s response to contemporary French poetry; the role of confession, sacramental discourse, and devotional images in Hoccleve’s work; and Hoccleve’s impact on literary tradition.