Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-10-26T21:38:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 LeilaReginaDeBritoAndradeCartaxo_DISSERT.pdf: 1337404 bytes, checksum: ff1eb72d1f977420133ddde6b5b68268 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-12-20T22:00:46Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 LeilaReginaDeBritoAndradeCartaxo_DISSERT.pdf: 1337404 bytes, checksum: ff1eb72d1f977420133ddde6b5b68268 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-20T22:00:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LeilaReginaDeBritoAndradeCartaxo_DISSERT.pdf: 1337404 bytes, checksum: ff1eb72d1f977420133ddde6b5b68268 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-05-30 / A presente disserta??o tem o objetivo prec?puo de apreciar a legitimidade jur?dico-constitucional da redu??o da maioridade penal no Brasil. O trabalho busca demonstrar os postulados filos?ficos, morais e jur?dicos que assentam a imputa??o. Partindo da defesa de que somente com um olhar cuidadoso ? poss?vel chegar ? imputa??o devida, ser?o descritos os requisitos da inimputabilidade das pessoas que n?o atingiram a maioridade penal e quais os ditames que a estabelecem. Ao longo do texto, destacar-se-? o contexto hist?rico no qual foi fixada a idade penal m?nima em dezoito anos, bem como em que aspecto essa previs?o estaria inserida nas cl?usulas p?treas. O estudo do tema revela a preocupa??o da sociedade com o aumento da viol?ncia e a dissemina??o pela m?dia da redu??o da idade penal m?nima como sendo a solu??o ?m?gica?. A partir disso, tratou-se do elemento social e das estat?sticas da viol?ncia, passando pelo valor da interpreta??o da disposi??o normativa penal ? luz dos direitos e garantias fundamentais que imp?em o respeito aos princ?pios, em especial ? dignidade humana. A an?lise visa abordar que a resolu??o do problema da viol?ncia n?o pode justificar a redu??o e, ao mesmo tempo, que n?o h? coer?ncia em defender que seja redefinida uma redu??o na idade de imputa??o das pessoas no Direito brasileiro, at? porque existe previs?o de puni??o para os adolescentes em conflito com a lei. Assim, com base nos elementos te?ricos e emp?ricos arrolados no desenvolvimento, conclui-se, enfim, pela inconstitucionalidade da referida proposta, diante da impossibilidade de se modificar cl?usula p?trea. / This work has the main objective to analyze the legal and constitutional legitimacy of the legal age reduction in Brazil. The work intends to demonstrate the philosophical, moral and legal assumptions that imputation is based on. From the defense that only with a careful look one can reach the proper imputation, the non-chargeability requirements of the people who have not reached the legal age will be described and identified which dictates that set. Throughout the text, the historical context in which it was fixed the minimum criminal age of eighteen years-old will be highlighted, and in which aspect this prediction would be inserted into the foundation clauses. The theme study reveals the society concern with increasing violence and the dissemination by the media of the minimum criminal age reduction as the ?magic? solution. From there, it was approached the social element and violence statistics, through the criminal legal interpretation value in the light of fundamental rights and guarantees the respect of the principles, in particular human dignity. It adopts bibliographical research as research methodology, including the exploration of doctrine, legislation, treaties and general conventions. The analysis aims to determine that the resolution of the violence problem cannot justify the reduction and, at the same time, there is no consistency in analyzing a redefinition of a reduction in the age of imputation of people in Brazilian law, because there is legal foundation of punishment for adolescents in conflict with the law. Thus, based on the theoretical and empirical elements listed in the development, it is clear, finally, the unconstitutionality of the proposal, given the impossibility of changing a foundation clause.