Spelling suggestions: "subject:"codependency."" "subject:"dependency.""
1 |
Codependency and spirituality a recovery process /Chevalier, Dennis M., January 1993 (has links)
Thesis (M.T.S.)--Catholic Theological Union of Chicago, 1993. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
2 |
Mede-afhanklikheid en identiteit : 'n pastorale studie / A.M. SteenkampSteenkamp, Anna Magrietha January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (M.A. (Pastoral))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.
|
3 |
Mede-afhanklikheid en identiteit : 'n pastorale studie / A.M. SteenkampSteenkamp, Anna Magrietha January 2007 (has links)
Co-dependency is an addiction that has not yet been well-researched and established in South Africa. This concept indicates a person's predisposition to put the dependent family member's needs above that of himself and to do so to such an extent that his own preferences, dislikes, feelings and desires are disregarded or ignored. The co-dependent's opinion and self-image largely depend on the extent to which he is able to satisfy the other person, care for him or solve his problems.
The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between the identity of the person and his co-dependency and to accompany the person pastorally toward the restoration of his identity.
Research done in the auxiliary sciences indicates that identity-forming is a process that stretches over several years. When a person experiences that he belongs to others, is valuable and has potential, it is possible for that person to develop optimally and associate in a mature and responsible way with himself, his fellow-man and his environment. However, when these experiences are not internalised under the pressure that the dependent family member places on the co-dependent, a negative view of the self is integrated and the person is unable to bind meaningfully with God, himself, others and his environment. An "I" deprivation occurs and the person chooses to use co-dependent thinking and acting patterns to deploy himself meaningfully in societal regard.
As a result of the co-dependent's intense need for security, love and acceptance, he drives himself to the outmost in an attempt to attain it. The person becomes caught in a downward spiral of dependency where he is always attempting to obtain control.
An empirical survey with five (5) participants has indicated the co-dependent's interaction with his life space. It was found that these persons are inclined to internalise negative thinking and acting patterns under the pressure that is put on them.
A basis-theoretical study of Scriptural perspectives has indicated that man was created in God's image, that this identity was distorted by man's sin, and that the person could by virtue of the propitiatory sacrifice of Jesus Christ through the Holy Ghost be guided towards restoration of his identity.
Practice-theoretical guidelines for the pastoral guidance of the co-dependent were established based on the meta- and basis theory. / Thesis (M.A. (Pastoral))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.
|
4 |
Mede-afhanklikheid en identiteit : 'n pastorale studie / A.M. SteenkampSteenkamp, Anna Magrietha January 2007 (has links)
Co-dependency is an addiction that has not yet been well-researched and established in South Africa. This concept indicates a person's predisposition to put the dependent family member's needs above that of himself and to do so to such an extent that his own preferences, dislikes, feelings and desires are disregarded or ignored. The co-dependent's opinion and self-image largely depend on the extent to which he is able to satisfy the other person, care for him or solve his problems.
The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between the identity of the person and his co-dependency and to accompany the person pastorally toward the restoration of his identity.
Research done in the auxiliary sciences indicates that identity-forming is a process that stretches over several years. When a person experiences that he belongs to others, is valuable and has potential, it is possible for that person to develop optimally and associate in a mature and responsible way with himself, his fellow-man and his environment. However, when these experiences are not internalised under the pressure that the dependent family member places on the co-dependent, a negative view of the self is integrated and the person is unable to bind meaningfully with God, himself, others and his environment. An "I" deprivation occurs and the person chooses to use co-dependent thinking and acting patterns to deploy himself meaningfully in societal regard.
As a result of the co-dependent's intense need for security, love and acceptance, he drives himself to the outmost in an attempt to attain it. The person becomes caught in a downward spiral of dependency where he is always attempting to obtain control.
An empirical survey with five (5) participants has indicated the co-dependent's interaction with his life space. It was found that these persons are inclined to internalise negative thinking and acting patterns under the pressure that is put on them.
A basis-theoretical study of Scriptural perspectives has indicated that man was created in God's image, that this identity was distorted by man's sin, and that the person could by virtue of the propitiatory sacrifice of Jesus Christ through the Holy Ghost be guided towards restoration of his identity.
Practice-theoretical guidelines for the pastoral guidance of the co-dependent were established based on the meta- and basis theory. / Thesis (M.A. (Pastoral))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2008.
|
5 |
Developing a measure of co-dependent behavioral intentionsGarrett, Cynthia Lynn 01 January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
The use and misuse of labels: Codependency as a self-handicapping strategy.Chatel, Deborah Kaye Coussons. January 1994 (has links)
A self-handicapping conceptualization of the function of the self-applied codependent label is presented. It was proposed that the self-appellation of the codependent label would function as a self-handicap when used by women who were not children of an alcoholic (COAs). It was also proposed that such a use of this label constituted a tendency to self-handicap and that these women would be more likely to employ self-handicapping strategies in situations involving interpersonal evaluations than: (1) controls who are not COAs or codependent; (2) COAs who describe themselves as codependent; or (3) COAs who do not endorse codependency. Additionally, in situations which involved interpersonal evaluations by males portrayed as either exploitive or nurturant, it was predicted that women who were COAs (with or without the codependent label) would likely to rate the exploitive male positively. The results did not support the self-handicapping hypothesis for women who labeled themselves codependent. The evidence suggests that COAs may self-handicap more than non-COAs. In addition, those women who endorsed the codependent label regardless of COA status did not distinguish between exploitive and nurturant males in liking, and non-codependent COAs liked the exploitive male least.
|
7 |
Relationship issues a curricular response /Poindexter-Bryant, Vivian. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (D. Min.)--Trinity International University, 2002. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 224-237).
|
8 |
Relationship issues a curricular response /Poindexter-Bryant, Vivian. January 2002 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (D. Min.)--Trinity International University, 2002. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 224-237).
|
9 |
Relationship issues a curricular response /Poindexter-Bryant, Vivian. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (D. Min.)--Trinity International University, 2002. / Abstract. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 224-237).
|
10 |
Codependency : a review of the feminist critique and other voicesElliott, William 12 1900 (has links)
Thesis (MA)--University of Stellenbosch, 2002. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This review begins by tracing the history and initial formulations of codependency,
followed by the presentation of ten main themes distilled from the feminist critique of
codependency: disparate and problematic definitions of codependency; viewing
codependency as a disease; the use of codependency as a label; codependency as
blaming the victim; codependency as a plot against women; codependency has an attack
on femininity and traditional female roles; issues of individualism, narcissism and
interdependence; lack of research in the field; over simplification of complex realities; and
codependency as big business. These themes are presented along with recent
developments and other perspectives in the field. The review concludes with a number
of alternative formulations of codependency, as well as a recommendation of a number
of criteria against which to evaluate future conceptualisations of the concept. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie werkstuk begin met h uiteensetting van die geskiedenis en vroeë formuleringe
van mede-afhanklikheid, gevolg deur h voorlegging van tien hoof temas gedistilleer uit
die feministiese kritiek van mede-afhanklikheid: disparate en problematiese omskrywings
van mede-afhanklikheid; die bedinking van mede-afhanklikheid as h siekte; die gebruik
van mede-afhanklikheid as h etiket; die gebruik van mede-afhanklikheid om slagoffers
te blameer; die gebruik van mede-afhanklikheid om vroue te onderdruk; die gebruik van
mede-afhanklikheid teen vroulikheid en die tradisionele vroue-rol; narsisme en interafhanklikheid;
gebrek aan navorsing; oor-vereenvoudiging van komplekse realiteit; en
mede-afhanklikheid en groot besigheid. Hierdie temas word uiteengesit tesame met
huidige ontwikkelinge en ander perspektiewe in hierdie gebied. Hierdie werkstuk word
afgesluit met met h aantal alternatiewe formuleringe van mede-afhanklikheid, sowel as
aanbeveelings van kriteria wat in die toekoms as h maatstaf gebruik kan word om nuwe
konseptualiserings te evalueer.
|
Page generated in 0.0587 seconds