No description available.

This thesis deals with legal regulation of entering into business contracts under the Czech private law. It contains explanation of contractual relationships, explanation of the term business contract and explanation of single examples of entering into contracts. The main legal regulation of contract settlement for business contracts is included in the Civil Code and the Commercial Code contains differences for business relations. The Civil Code regulates typical process of entering into contracts between two parties - offeror and offeree. The Commercial Code follows this legal regulation from the Civil Code and in addition it contains other possibilities of contracting in the form of public proposal and public tender. The Civil Code contains legal regulation of the contract on future contract. The Commercial Code contains this regulation as well, but it is more detailed. This could be the reason, why the draft of the new Commercial Code is in the matter of contract on the future contract inspired by the Commercial Code. Regarding the current situation in legislative process, the current Civil Code will be replaced with the new one, which, of course, will affect law of contracts according to the Commercial Code. The new Civil Code will displace duality of law of contracts, which was created by...

(in English): The final thesis deals with the analysis of selected principles of the Czech and English contract law. The aim of the final thesis was to highlight common and different features of the Czech and English law based on the selected principles and simultaneously to illustrate the differences in legal reasoning between the two countries. The author describes the significance of the English law in the first chapter, followed by the chapter concerning formation of a contract in the Czech and English law. Attention is being paid to an offer, further analysis includes the possibility of revocation of an offer and the different approaches adopted to these problems in the legal frameworks of the Czech Republic and England. The author than proceeds to the description of acceptance of an offer, formation and conclusion of a contract and effectiveness of an acceptance in the case of distance dealing between the parties. Comparison with PECL and UNIDROIT is being made and the author concludes, that both the Czech and English contract law adopt the same solutions for an acceptance and conclusion of a contract, which, however, do not coincide with the rules laid down in PECL and UNIDROIT. Critical assessment of the provisions concerning the offer and acceptance in the Czech Civil Code Bill, which...

no / Singapore commercial contract law has taken an Asian perspective in respect of express terms of good faith in the negotiation of contract. In general, however, it adheres to the English contract law orthodoxy regarding good faith. More specifically, Singapore, like England, does not recognize a general duty or principle of good faith and it is reluctant to imply a duty of good faith into a contract. However, as a hub of international trade and a rising forum for commercial dispute resolution, Singapore will have a stronger need to reconcile the differences in good faith in contract law between the English/Commonwealth and the European-Asian legal traditions. Conventional wisdom and international commercial law instruments in this respect are not as helpful as one would expect for such a need. Instead, to an enlightening but limited extent, the “organizing principle” approach in Bhasin v Hrynew could be useful for setting up a framework for reconciling the differences. This framework could consist of an organising principle of (honouring) reasonable expectations, a duty of honesty, and a duty of fair dealing. The framework realistically concretises good faith into the three components, all of which are essentially objective and ascertainable in specific factual matrix and are well-recognised in both common law and civil law.

No description available.