京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(医学) / 甲第24969号 / 医博第5023号 / 新制||医||1069(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院医学研究科医学専攻 / (主査)教授 溝脇 尚志, 教授 小濱 和貴, 教授 鈴木 実 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Medical Science / Kyoto University / DFAM

CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / O linfoma difuso de grandes cÃlulas B (LDGCB) corresponde a 50 % dos casos de linfoma nÃo-Hodgkin (LNH). Seu tratamento de escolha à a quimioterapia de associaÃÃo, em especial o esquema CHOP (ciclofosfamida, doxorrubicina, vincristina e prednisona), considerado o tratamento inicial padrÃo dos LDGCB. VariaÃÃes deste esquema, como o protocolo CHOP-Bleo (ciclofosfamida, doxorrubicina, vincristina, prednisona e bleomicina) tem sido utilizadas com a intenÃÃo de se obter maiores taxas de remissÃo completa pelos pacientes. No Brasil, pouco se conhece a respeito da incidÃncia, do comportamento clÃnico, da resposta Ãs terapÃuticas utilizadas e da sobrevida de pacientes com LDGCB. Este estudo teve como objetivos traÃar o perfil epidemiolÃgico dos pacientes portadores de linfoma difuso de grandes cÃlulas B, atendidos no Hospital UniversitÃrio Walter CantÃdio (HUWC), com data de primeiro atendimento de janeiro de 1989 a dezembro de 2003, e que fizeram uso dos esquemas quimioterÃpicos CHOP e/ou CHOP-Bleo; avaliar a eficÃcia e seguranÃa terapÃutica dos esquemas propostos atravÃs da anÃlise do tipo de resposta terapÃutica, achados clÃnicos e laboratoriais destes pacientes. A coleta dos dados foi realizada a partir dos prontuÃrios mÃdicos dos 31 pacientes analisados. Destes, 21 (67,74%) eram do sexo masculino e 10 (32,26%) do feminino, com idade mÃdia de 45,81  16,3 anos. A ocupaÃÃo trabalhador agrÃcola representou 25,82% (8/31). O estÃdio III da classificaÃÃo de Ann Arbor foi o mais freqÃente (32,26%), mas apenas 45% dos pacientes apresentaram sintomas B. A lactato desidrogenase (LDH) sÃrica de 49% dos pacientes encontrava-se elevada à Ãpoca do diagnÃstico, sendo que outros 16% dos pacientes nÃo apresentavam resultado desta enzima em seus prontuÃrios. Quanto ao IPI, 71% foram classificados como de risco baixo e intermediÃrio, 13% de alto risco intermediÃrio, nenhum dos pacientes do estudo apresentou IPI compatÃvel com de alto risco e em 16% dos pacientes nÃo foi possÃvel estabelecer a classificaÃÃo devido à ausÃncia de dados nos prontuÃrios. Quanto à utilizaÃÃo dos protocolos quimioterÃpicos, 58% (18/31) dos pacientes fizeram uso do esquema CHOP, 36% (11/31) utilizaram CHOP-Bleo e 6% (2/31) utilizaram os dois esquemas quimioterÃpicos. Entre os pacientes que utilizaram o esquema CHOP, 78% atingiram a remissÃo completa (RC), 17% apresentaram recidiva da doenÃa e apenas 5 % foram a Ãbito. No grupo que utilizou o esquema CHOP-Bleo, 63% atingiram a RC, 18% apresentaram recidiva da doenÃa e 19% foram a Ãbito. Os 2 pacientes que utilizaram os dois esquemas como tratamento apresentaram recidiva da doenÃa. Os valores de LDH dos pacientes apÃs a quimioterapia apresentam-se reduzidos tanto em pacientes que atingiram a remissÃo completa como naqueles que tiveram recidiva. Verificamos que a sobrevida global (SG) e a sobrevida livre de doenÃa (SLD) nÃo foram influenciadas pelo estÃdio clÃnico e LDH inicial dos pacientes. A regressÃo logÃstica nÃo mostrou significÃncia estatÃstica quando analisou a remissÃo completa dos pacientes a partir dos resultados das variÃveis em estudo pÃs QT, com exceÃÃo da proporÃÃo de reduÃÃo da LDH e a resposta ao tratamento. Os resultados mostraram a eficÃcia e seguranÃa dos esquemas terapÃuticos CHOP e CHOP-Bleo em nossa populaÃÃo de estudo. Os resultados demonstram ainda que se faz necessÃrio o estudo epidemiolÃgico de diferentes populaÃÃes com LDGCB para que haja seguranÃa na escolha de esquemas quimioterÃpicos, bem como a uniformidade em descrever e classificar os linfomas e os seus fatores prognÃstico por parte dos patologistas e oncologistas. / Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL) corresponds to 50% of non-Hodgkinâs lymphomas (LNH). Their treatment of choice is the association chemotherapy, in special the CHOP therapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) considered the standard treatment initial of the DLBCL. Variations of this therapy, with the CHOP-Bleo protocol (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone and bleomycin) have been used with the intention of obtaining complete response rates for the patients. In Brazil, little is known about the incidence, clinical behavior, response to therapy and survival of the patients with DLBCL. This study aimed to set out the epidemiological profile of patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphomas, who received medical care at Hospital UniversitÃrio Walter CantÃdio (HUWC), outline in Cearà state, with the first attendment from January 1989 to December 2003, who the used the CHOP and/or CHOP-Bleo therapy; Evaluating the security and efficiency of the protocols proposed by analysis of the kind of therapeutical response, clinical and laboratorial outcomes of these patients. The data collection was performed from medical recording of the 31 patients analyzed. These, 21 (67,74%) were the men and 10 (32,26%) women. The average age was 45,81  16,3 anos. Agriculturists represented 25,82% (8/31) of all patients. The stage III the Ann Arbor classification were the most frequent (32,26%), but only 45% of the patients had B symptoms. The values of lactate dehydrogenises (LDH) enzyme were elevated in 49% of the patients at diagnosis, but in 16% of the patients these values at diagnosis were unknown. As much as the IPI, 71% were classified as an IPI low and intermediate risk, 13% as an IPI intermediate-high risk, none of the study patients showed as an IPI high risk and 16% there is not possible the classification to establish due to the data is unknown. As much as the chemotherapy protocols used, 58% (18/31) of the patients was received CHOP chemotherapy, 36% (11/31) CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy and 6% (2/31) received CHOP associated with CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy. Among the patients who used CHOP chemotherapy, 78% was achieving complete response (CR), 17% was achieving relapse of the disease and only 5% were the death. In the group who used CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy, 63% was achieving RC, 18% was achieving relapse of the disease and 19% died. The 2 patients who used CHOP and CHOP-Bleo chemotherapy were achieving relapse of the disease. The values of the LDH after chemotherapy showed decreased in patients with RC as much as the relapsed patients. We verified that the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not influenced by the clinic stage and initial values of the LDH patients. The logistic regression did not show statistical differences when the complete response was analyzed comparing to outcomes the studied variables after QT, except for the proportion of reduction of LDH levels and response to the treatment. The results stress the security and efficiency of the protocols CHOP e CHOP-Bleo in our study population. The data obtained also the need epidemiological studies in different DLBCL populations for the security in the choice chemotherapy, well as standardized the classification and description of the DLBCL and prognoses factures by pathologists and oncologists.

Le traitement systémique adjuvant du cancer du sein infiltrant repose sur la chimiothérapie et l’hormonothérapie. Certains facteurs sont connus pour être pronostiques (âge, taille tumorale, statut ganglionnaire, grade tumoral, emboles vasculaires, statut des récepteurs hormonaux (RH) et de HER2) ou prédictifs de réponse aux traitements (RH et HER2) et influent sur nos décisions thérapeutiques. Cependant, certaines patientes récidivent malgré un traitement complet alors que d’autres vont recevoir un traitement qui aurait pu être évité de par leur bon pronostic « intrinsèque ». Nous avons cherché à identifier dans ce travail d’autres facteurs pronostiques et / ou prédictifs dans le cancer du sein infiltrant en situation néoadjuvante / adjuvante. Premièrement, nous montrons que le type histologique lobulaire, réputé pour être une histologie de cancer du sein de bon pronostic et peu chimiosensible, ne doit pas être un facteur décisionnel quant aux traitements systémiques. En situation adjuvante et concernant la chimiothérapie, la validité et l’utilité cliniques des tests génomiques nécessitent d’être évaluées spécifiquement dans ce sous-groupe. Ensuite, nous avons étudié la validité analytique, la validité clinique et l’utilité clinique de 2 classifications moléculaires des cancers du sein selon PAM50 et l’analyse immunohistochimique de biomarqueurs : récepteur œstrogène, HER2 et Ki67 avec un cut-off à 14%. Selon nos conclusions, il n’y a actuellement pas de données suffisamment robustes pour que ces 2 classifications modifient les décisions de traitement systémique. Nous avons mis en évidence un sous-groupe de tumeurs triples négatives exprimant le récepteur androgène et FOXA1 et se comportant comme des tumeurs luminales. Enfin, nous avons montré sur une large série néoadjuvante que la réponse histologique complète est un critère substitutif de survie pour les tumeurs RH négatifs / The adjuvant systemic treatment of invasive breast cancer is based on chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Several prognostic factors (age, tumoral size, nodal status, tumoral grade, vascular embols, hormonal receptors (HR), HER2) and predictive factors of response to treatment (HR and HER2) are described and have an impact on our therapeutic decisions. However, recurrences are frequent after a complete treatment and patients could avoid such treatment because of the good “intrinsic” prognosis. In this work, we aimed to identify other prognostic and / or predictive factors for the invasive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant / adjuvant settings. Firstly, we showed that the lobular histology, considered as histology of good prognosis and low chemo sensitive, should not be a decisive factor regarding systemic therapy. In the adjuvant setting, regarding chemotherapy, clinical validity and utility of the genomic tests need to be specifically evaluated in this subgroup. Then, we studied analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility of 2 molecular classification of breast cancer: PAM50 and a panel of 3 biomarkers in immunohistochemistry (estrogen receptor, HER2 and Ki-67 with a cut-off of 14%). We concluded that the data were not strong enough and that the therapeutic decisions should not be influenced by these classifications. We identified a subgroup of triple negative breast cancer that express androgen receptor and FOXA1 and which behave like luminal tumors. At last, we showed in a large neoadjuvant population, that the pathological complete response is a surrogate marker of survival in RH negative tumors