[pt] A reflexão profissional, para ser significativa, deve estar intrinsecamente ligada aos porquês dos envolvidos, segundo o viés proposto pela Prática Exploratória. Assim, esta tese traz sua colaboração para a área de formação continuada de professores de língua estrangeira ao focalizar o processo de co- construção de conhecimentos e de reflexão docente desenvolvido em um curso de idiomas no qual envolvi-me em uma consultoria exploratória com alguns colegas. A utilização dos princípios da Prática Exploratória para a condução do processo de reflexão eminentemente discursivo de fazer sentido da vida em sala de aula (e fora dela) permitiu que o mesmo priorizasse a qualidade de vida, o envolvimento e a busca da união de todos, o desenvolvimento mútuo, ainda que fosse possível mapear momentos de embate e de negociação de significados conflitantes. Ressalto que esse processo de trabalhar para entender tornouse híbrido na medida em que a pesquisa se fazia presente, envolvendo também os colegas. Dessa forma, a configuração discursiva das reuniões reflexivas ensejou discussões de nossas crenças, momentos de construção identitária, dentre outras questões, na medida em que tentávamos, enquanto grupo, fazer sentido da nossa prática docente. Sublinho que, neste trabalho, tomo o discurso em sua centralidade nos processos de negociação de entendimentos sobre quem somos e sobre o mundo social onde as práticas discursivas se configuram e, particularmente, para a construção discursiva da reflexão. Considerando o formato de nossos encontros - uma reunião para estudos e reflexão - narrativas e argumentações eram tecidas no tear da interação em conseqüência do uso de Atividades de Reflexão com Potencial Exploratório para darem início aos questionamentos. Portanto, a análise micro-discursiva que faço das interações tomam estes dois elementos como categorias fundamentais de análise para responder às questões ou puzzles que encaminham meu olhar de pesquisadora-consultora. Finalmente, ressalto ainda neste trabalho o olhar analítico não apenas à ação discursiva dos colegas, mas à minha também, especialmente no tocante à ação de consultora. Acredito que direcionar o foco de análise para minha ação discursiva contribui para a construção de um espaço no campo epistemológico da reflexão profissional voltado à reflexão do consultor sobre seu fazer profissional. / [en] According to the Exploratory Practice Principles, for professional reflection to be meaningful, it must be deeply related to the puzzling questions formulated by those involved in the process. Therefore, this thesis makes its contribution to the area of EFL in-service teacher education as it focuses on the process of co-construction of knowledge and professional reflection developed with some colleagues in a language course where I got involved in an exploratory consultancy activity. Using the principles of Exploratory Practice to carry out this inherently discursive reflection process of making sense of life in the classroom (and outside of it) allowed us to prioritize quality of life, everybody´s involvement and union, and mutual development - even though it was possible to spot moments of conflicting meaning negotiation. I emphasize that the process of working to understand became hybrid inasmuch as the academic research side was also present and involved my colleagues as well. Hence, the discursive configuration of our reflective sessions brought about discussion of our teaching and learning beliefs, identity construction moments, just to name a few issues, while we tried to make sense of our own teaching practice. Discourse is a central issue in this thesis in the meaning negotiation processes concerning who we are, the social world where discursive practices come to be, particularly, the discursive construction of reflection. Within the format of our reflective study sessions, narratives and argumentations were woven in the loom of interaction via Reflective Activities with Exploratory Potential to work for deeper understandings of our puzzles. Thus, the micro-discursive analysis of the face- to-face interactions took these two elements to respond to the questions or puzzles that led my research-consultant look. Finally, I also want to highlight that, in this thesis, I did not only direct my attention to my colleagues´ discursive action, but also to mine, especially in the consultant role. I believe that turning the focus to my discursive action has added to the construction of a space in the epistemological field that is devoted to professional consultant reflection on his/her own professional practice.

Cette thèse prend pour objet des situations d’apprentissage guidé du français, en face à face et en dehors de cadres institutionnels, se déroulant dans le contexte multilingue du Luxembourg. Elle décrit et analyse des interactions entre des locuteurs plurilingues adultes dont la première langue est le chinois ou le coréen et des locuteurs plurilingues agissant en tant qu’experts pour la langue française. Plus particulièrement, dans l’optique d’une analyse qualitative des données, ce travail s’efforce d’appliquer les outils de l’analyse conversationnelle d’inspiration plutôt anglo-américaine à une vision didactique de tradition de langue française. Pour ce faire, il est fait appel aux notions de compétence communicative (Hymes 1972), de dramatisation (Goffman 1991) et de rôle social (Cicurel 1988). L’analyse montre que dans des situations d’apprentissage-en-interaction, les apprenants et les experts ont recours à une diversité de ressources interactionnelles liées à des activités de dramatisation : le dialogue-en-situation, la voix, la séquence préfabriquée, la séquentialité discursive, la réparation, la séquence explicative, le récit préenregistré, l’évaluation, le récit enchâssé, l’identité, le récit conversationnel de l’expert, l’interview, le récit conversationnel de l’apprenant et le mode éditeur. Pour conclure, un rapprochement est opéré entre ces activités de dramatisation et la didactique du FLE, à plusieurs niveaux, sous la forme de recommandations suggestions. / The current thesis focuses on guided language learning exchanges in French, in a face-to-face non-institutional setting in the multilingual context of Luxembourg. It describes and analyzes interactions between adult plurilingual speakers whose first language is Chinese or Korean and multilingual speakers acting as experts for the French language. Taking a qualitative analysis approach, our work strives to apply the tools of conversation analysis of a rather Anglo-American origin to a vision of “didactique” corresponding to the French language tradition. To this end, we rely in particular on the notions of communicative competence(Hymes 1972), dramatization (Goffman 1991) and social role (Cicurel 1988). The analysis of learning-in-interaction data shows the enactment of a variety of dramatization-related interactional resources by both learners and experts: the situated dialogue, the voice, the formulaic language, the discursive sequentiality, the repair, the explanatory sequence, the pre-recorded conversational narrative, the evaluation, the embedded narrative, the identity, the conversational narrative of the expert, the interview, the conversational narrative of the learner and the editor mode. A few recommendations-suggestions are proposed in the conclusion, focusing on how these dramatization activities could inform, at different levels, the development of French teaching and learning.