The current study examined the role of coping self-efficacy (belief in one’s ability to effectively manage and cope with stressors), secondary traumatic stress (emotional duress that one may experience when exposed to the traumatic experiences of others), and compassion satisfaction (positive feelings or fulfillment one may experience in helping others) in the influencing the level of burnout (state of prolonged emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion) experienced among a sample of cultural brokers who work with refugees in educational settings. The study aimed to examine how secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction mediated the relationship between coping self-efficacy and burnout. Furthermore, the study investigated the reliability and factor structures of the Professional Quality of Life Scale, Version 5 (ProQOL 5, Stamm, 2010), the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI, Kristensen et al., 2005), and the Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES, Chesney et al., 2006). Data was collected nationwide from 260 cultural brokers who work with refugees in an educational setting through an online survey conducted in Fall 2023. Analyses conducted in this study supported the reliability of the ProQOL 5, CBI, and CSES. Additionally, path models were employed to explore the relationships between coping self-efficacy, secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, and burnout. A modified model, which removed two problematic items in the ProQOL 5 and one problematic item in the CBI, demonstrated an acceptable model fit through confirmatory factor analysis. These findings supported the use of the CSES, ProQOL 5, and CBI, highlighting their utility in capturing the constructs of burnout, secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, and perceived coping self-efficacy. Analyses demonstrated statistically significant direct effects between the domains of the ProQOL 5 (secondary traumatic stress and compassion satisfaction) and burnout. However, analyses did not yield significant direct and indirect effects between the CSES domains and burnout, which may suggest that perceived coping self-efficacy is not straightforwardly predictive of burnout levels among cultural brokers. These findings suggest that fostering compassion satisfaction, which in turn may increase job fulfillment, can be a crucial strategy or intervention in addressing or preventing burnout symptoms. Additionally, these findings suggest that understanding the relationship between secondary traumatic stress and burnout may be critical in addressing burnout symptoms and utilizing targeted interventions (e.g., trauma-informed training) to mitigate the effects of burnout among cultural brokers. Implications and future directions are discussed. / Psychological Studies in Education

Background: Current studies have found a higher risk of depression, coping self-efficacy, and quality of life, specifically among female college students and predominantly pharmacotherapy or cognitive therapy intervention have been adopted to improve depression or depressive symptoms, however, current research suggests an alternative strategy, such as exercise, may be an effective approach. Understanding the relationship between exercise, such as resistance training (RT), and other psychosocial outcomes such as depressive symptoms, coping self-efficacy, and quality of life may show the potential of utilizing RT amongst this understudied population and can provide insight on alternative or supplemental treatment options for depression. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample female college student aged 18-25 from the University of Central Florida utilizing inclusion/exclusion criteria. Individuals self-reported their physical activity modality (RT and aerobic training) and habits (number of minutes/day and number of days/week), depressive symptoms, coping self-efficacy, and quality of life utilizing the Becks Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Coping Self Efficacy Scale (CSE), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), respectively. Pairwise Pearson's correlations assessed for statically significant correlations between predictor variables and outcome variables. Two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum (Mann-Whitney) tests for non-normal data and independent sample t-tests for normal data was computed to test for statistically significant differences between the following subgroups: living and employment status, weight status, and race and ethnicity. Results: Sixty-eight (100% female, majority upperclassmen, 58.8% white, 32% minority) provided valid responses for analysis. There were no statistically significant correlations found between depressive symptoms, coping self-efficacy, and quality of life and exercise modality or habits amongst the studied population. Among subgroups individuals who reported High Quality of Life (QoL) in the psychological domain reported being .81 days more aerobically active than those who reported low psychological QoL (pConclusion:Our preliminary data suggests the need for future investigation of exercise modality variety and diversified participant characteristics. Due to study design limitations, pursuing a different study design for baseline prior to RT may be beneficial in providing causation. This study can advance knowledge for future studies pursuing resistance training as intervention for depressive symptoms amongst this understudied population.

Various scales have previously been developed to measure coping strategies (Taylor & Stanton, 2007; Devonport & Lane, 2006; Stapelberg, 1999) or self–efficacy (Carroll et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2001; Tipton & Worthington, 1984); and some of them have been validated in a South African context, but the validation of a coping self–efficacy scale as a single measurement has not been conducted in an African context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate Chesney et al.’s 2006 Coping Self–Efficacy Scale (CSE) in an African context. A multicultural convenience sample of 2 214 South African adolescents and adults, including both male and female participants, participated in this study. Measuring instruments such as the Coping Self–Efficacy Scale (CSE) (Chesney, Neilands, Chambers, Taylor & Folkman, 2006), the Mental Health Continuum - Short Form for adults (MHC–SF) (Keyes et al., 2008), the New General Self–Efficacy Scale (NGSE) (Chen, Gully & Eden, 2001; 2004), the Fortitude Questionnaire (FORQ) (Pretorius, 1998), the Patient Health Questionnaire: Depression Symptoms (PHQ–9) (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2001) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (Goldberg & Hillier, 1979) were used in this study. Criterion–related validity of the CSE was established. Construct validity was determined by conducting confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses as well as SEM on the CSE. Results indicated a Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of 0.87 and satisfactory inter–item correlations ranging from 0.19–0.21. Criterion–related validity was satisfactory. Confirmatory analysis indicated a good fit and exploratory factor analysis confirmed the three major factors similar to Chesney et al.’s (2006) findings. Construct validity was further supported by SEM analysis, which confirmed the three–factor structure. The CSE can be viewed as reliable and valid for use in further research in the African context. Future studies should validate this scale in various population groups, with translated versions of the scale and with randomly selected groups. / Thesis (M.A. (Research Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Various scales have previously been developed to measure coping strategies (Taylor & Stanton, 2007; Devonport & Lane, 2006; Stapelberg, 1999) or self–efficacy (Carroll et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2001; Tipton & Worthington, 1984); and some of them have been validated in a South African context, but the validation of a coping self–efficacy scale as a single measurement has not been conducted in an African context. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate Chesney et al.’s 2006 Coping Self–Efficacy Scale (CSE) in an African context. A multicultural convenience sample of 2 214 South African adolescents and adults, including both male and female participants, participated in this study. Measuring instruments such as the Coping Self–Efficacy Scale (CSE) (Chesney, Neilands, Chambers, Taylor & Folkman, 2006), the Mental Health Continuum - Short Form for adults (MHC–SF) (Keyes et al., 2008), the New General Self–Efficacy Scale (NGSE) (Chen, Gully & Eden, 2001; 2004), the Fortitude Questionnaire (FORQ) (Pretorius, 1998), the Patient Health Questionnaire: Depression Symptoms (PHQ–9) (Kroenke, Spitzer & Williams, 2001) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) (Goldberg & Hillier, 1979) were used in this study. Criterion–related validity of the CSE was established. Construct validity was determined by conducting confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses as well as SEM on the CSE. Results indicated a Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of 0.87 and satisfactory inter–item correlations ranging from 0.19–0.21. Criterion–related validity was satisfactory. Confirmatory analysis indicated a good fit and exploratory factor analysis confirmed the three major factors similar to Chesney et al.’s (2006) findings. Construct validity was further supported by SEM analysis, which confirmed the three–factor structure. The CSE can be viewed as reliable and valid for use in further research in the African context. Future studies should validate this scale in various population groups, with translated versions of the scale and with randomly selected groups. / Thesis (M.A. (Research Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

U.S. working mothers experience frequent daily hassles, yet little is known about how working mothers have disproportionate abilities to handle stress. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the extent to which coping self-efficacy mediated the effect that cumulative daily hassles had on working mothers' health outcomes (i.e., physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health). The transactional model of stress and coping, social cognitive theory, and self-efficacy theory provided the theoretical foundations for this study. Daily hassles were used for this study as an additional theoretical approach for measuring stress. A total of 235 working mothers completed the Daily Hassles Scale, Coping Self-Efficacy Scale, and Short Form 36 version 2 (SF-36v2) on a secure online website. The respondents reported moderate confidence in their abilities to cope with life despite experiencing an average of 44 daily hassles per month. Simple regressions confirmed repeated exposure to daily hassles was significantly associated with reduced coping self-efficacy and health outcomes. Mediation with multiple regression analysis revealed that coping self-efficacy partially mediated the relationship between cumulative daily hassles and health outcomes, suggesting coping self-efficacy was a protective psychosocial factor for working mothers. This study contributes to positive social change by aiding practitioners in identifying protective psychosocial factors and helping working mothers to implement the findings with the intention of reducing daily hassles and improving health outcomes.

No description available.

Background. The current study was conducted to increase understanding of factors that promote or deter post-combat adaptation. In total, five research questions were posed and tested, leading to examination of how difficulties with emotion regulation, post-deployment coping self-efficacy (PDCSE), and disrupted worldview work in-concert to influence post-combat adaptation (as measured by PTSD severity, depression severity, and quality of life perceptions). Methods. The final sample included cross-sectional data for 123 OEF/OIF veterans who were referred for assessment and/or treatment in an outpatient clinic in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Path analysis, employing bootstrapping re-sampling, was used to test hypotheses, yielding metrics for model fit, direct effects, and hypothesized indirect effects. Results. Overall findings demonstrated that each of the models tested were a good fit for explaining post-combat adaptation outcomes, with the final integrated model (including combat exposure, difficulties with emotion regulation, PDCSE, and negative worldview) explaining 49% of the variance in PTSD, 60% of the variance in depression severity, and 42% of the variance in quality of life, respectively. Findings across all models demonstrated that emotion dysregulation played a significant role in promoting worse post-combat adaptation, and that this effect primarily worked through alterations in PDCSE and negative worldview. Conclusions. This study concludes with interpretation of findings via theory and the extant literature. Future research and intervention implications are discussed, including the need to focus post-combat therapies on altering PDCSE and negative worldview, and more broadly, on factors that diminish meaningful life for combat veterans. / Ph. D.

Although self-efficacy has long been established as an important variable for psychological wellbeing across a range of contexts, coping self-efficacy, a subtype of self-efficacy specific to the function of coping, has only recently begun to receive research attention. In addition, despite support from both self-efficacy theory and coping theory, the relationship between coping self-efficacy and coping behaviour in the face of stressful events has not previously been considered. This thesis explores the importance of coping self-efficacy for psychological wellbeing in a new context, recovery after stroke, and investigates the relationship between coping self-efficacy and coping behaviour in the face of this stressor. Stroke was selected as a suitable context for this exploration given its high incidence, lengthy recovery period and the prevalence of significant post stroke psychological distress. The thesis explores four key questions: (i) is coping self-efficacy related to psychological wellbeing for people recovering from stroke, (ii) what types of coping behaviours are related to coping self-efficacy during recovery, (iii) does coping behaviour mediate the relationship between coping self-efficacy and psychological outcomes, and (iv) what is the role of individual dispositional traits (optimism and trait anxiety) in these relations. The implications of these relationships for clinical intervention were a secondary focus of the project.

This study aimed to examine the quality of life (QOL) and well-being of haemodialysis patients and the relationship of two components of perceived expressed emotion (criticism/hostility and emotional over-involvement) and other psychosocial resources within the Conservation of Resources Model. Demographic variables and haemodialysis related information of patients, classified as resources, were also included in the study. One hundred and six haemodialysis patients voluntarily participated in the study. Before the main study, for evaluating the psychometric properties of the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES), and Perceived Expressed Emotion Scale (PEES) a pilot study was conducted with the fifty-three haemodialysis patients. Results of the pilot study provided support for the reliability and validity of scales. For the main study, optimism, self-esteem, and perceived social support were taken as resources and were also included as measures. In order to test the main hypothesis of the studies a series of regression analyses were conducted. The results of the analysis revealed that predictors of well-being were age, self esteem, criticism/hostility factor of perceived expressed emotion and coping self-efficacy / predictors of physical health component of QOL were age, education, presence of additional diagnosis, and coping self-efficacy. Moreover, it was found that predictors of mental health component of QOL were the presence of additional diagnosis and coping self-efficacy / and predictors of the mean score of QOL were age, presence of additional diagnosis, self-esteem, and coping self-efficacy. Directions of the relationship between age, education, presence of additional diagnosis, and criticism/hostility were negative with the outcome variables, whereas, directions of the relationship between self-esteem and coping self-efficacy were positive with the outcome variables. The mediational role of coping self-efficacy in the association between resources and outcome variables were also investigated. Mediator effect of coping self-efficacy was found only for two variables. Firstly, the effect of duration of haemodialysis treatment was mediated by the coping self-efficacy for the well being measure. Second, coping self-efficacy carries the influence of the family income to the mean score of QOL. After discussing the findings of the present study in the light of the literature, the limitations and the clinical implications of the results and directions for the future studies were suggested.

Depression is a psychiatric disorder associated with severe impairment in physical, social and role functioning, and with higher health care utilization. Experiencing an event that causes physical or psychological stress may substantially increase a person's chances of developing depression. Coping has been defined as a response aimed at diminishing the physical, emotional and psychological burden that is associated with stressful life events. Coping is considered one of the core concepts in health psychology and is strongly associated with the regulation of emotions throughout the stress period and thus it is important that it is understood, especially in the South African context of future morbidity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between coping self–efficacy strategies and depression in an African context. Participants consisted of a convenience sample of 2 198 participants from both rural and urban areas. The rural group consisted of 182 adolescent Further Education and Training (FET) students between the ages of 16 and 21 years, and the urban group consisted of another 2 016 adolescent FET students between the ages of 16 and 21 years. Participants from both groups completed measurements on coping and depression. Two self–report measures were used: the Coping Self–Efficacy Scale (CSE) to determine a person's confidence or perceived self–efficacy in performing coping behaviors when facing life challenges or threats and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) to measure depression severity. Descriptive analysis results indicated that a relationship existed between coping selfefficacy strategies and depression and that levels of depression were very similar for both rural (9.23) and urban (9.25) groups. Coping strategies were very different in rural and urban areas; rural participants only used problem–focused coping and stop unpleasant thoughts and emotions, while urban participants used all three coping self–efficacy strategies: problemfocused coping, stopping unpleasant thoughts and emotions and support from friends and family. Rural participants did not use support from friends and family as a coping selfefficacy strategy; possibly due to the different relationships people living in rural areas have with one another, as opposed to the relationships of people living in urban areas. Rural people may not deem it socially acceptable to ask friends or family members or help when struggling with various stressors. Alternatively, rural areas may be more depleted of personal resources due to the strong urbanization process going on. It was concluded that there is an important relationship between coping strategies and level of depression, and in this study this relationship was found to be different in some ways for rural and urban groups. The results of this study have great implications for further research and clinical practice. / Thesis (M.A. (Research Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.