<p>Background: China is one of the most popular countries to relocate and outsource production units to. This country has a big advantage when it comes to the manual working cost which is very low. This difference between Sweden and China is huge; the cost of the manual working force is less than one twentieth of the Swedish.</p><p>Problem: Massive global relocation of production units can affect some countries in a negative way. One of the most important foundations in the society is that there is a high level of employment and this also contributes for economic growth. This is in terms of both tax incomes for the public society as well as self-esteem for the people.</p><p>Purpose: The purpose with this thesis is to examine the differences in total production costs, including allocation of overhead costs for product development and production in Sweden vs. China at a company, in this thesis referred to as Manufacturer AB.</p><p>Method: Case study approach with in-depth interviews, phone calls and e-mail follow up. In total 9 respondents consisting of managers in leading positions at Manufacturer AB in Sweden.</p><p>Conclusion: The manufacturing cost in the Chinese production unit is about 40-60 per cent compared to the Swedish unit. In the current situation the overhead allocation is 4 % overhead of MC at the Chinese production unit and 133 % at the Swedish unit. The total production costs are not reflected in a correct way per unit. To do a more true allocation, the overhead costs in the Company Group must be identified and allocated in the right proportions on their respective production unit.</p><p>By creating an average- and in next step an estimated allocation model we succeeded to do a more justified allocation of the overhead costs on the production units in Sweden and China. This model should be relative simple to implement on product- or unit level and gives a more correct allocation than the current.</p><p>However, it is the decision of Manufacturer AB to allocate their overhead as they like, but the estimated allocation model gives a base for strategic decisions on production unit level, referring to; where to locate the production units to reach competitive advantage.</p> / <p>Bakgrund: Kina är ett av de mest populära länderna att utlokalisera och outsourca produktionsenheter till. Detta land har en stor fördel när det gäller kostnaden för manuellt arbete, som är väldigt låg. Skillnaden mellan Sverige och Kina är enorm; kostnaden för den manuella arbetstiden är ca en tjugondel av den svenska.</p><p>Problem: Massiva globala omflyttningar av produktionsanläggningar kan påverka vissa länder negativt. En av de viktiga grundpelarna i samhället är att det finns en hög sysselsättningsgrad som bidrar till ekonomisk tillväxt. Detta gäller såväl skatteintäkter till staten som självkänsla hos folket.</p><p>Syfte: Syftet med den här uppsatsen är att undersöka skillnaderna i den totala produktionskostnaden, inkluderat fördelning av overheadkostnader för produktutveckling och produktion i Sverige jämfört med Kina vid ett företag som i denna uppsats refereras till Manufacturer AB.</p><p>Metod: Fallstudie är gjord med hjälp av personliga djupintervjuer, uppföljande telefonsamtal och elektronisk post. Totalt deltog 9 respondenter bestående av tjänstemän i ledande positioner på Manufacturer AB i sverige.</p><p>Slutsats: Tillverkningskostnaden i den Kinesiska produktionsenheten är ungefär 40-60 procent jämfört med motsvarande enhet i Sverige. I nuläget är overheadpålägget 4% på produktionsenheten i Kina och 133% på enheten i Sverige. Den totala produktionskostnaden speglas inte på ett rättvist sätt per produktionsenhet. För att göra en mer rättvis fördelning så måste koncernens totala overheadkostnad identifieras och mätas och sedan allokeras i de rätta proportionerna på respektive produktionsenhet.</p><p>Genom att skapa en genomsnittlig och i nästa steg en uppskattad fördelningsmodell lyckades vi att göra en mer rättvis fördelning av overheadkostnaderna på produktionsenheterna i Sverige och Kina. Denna modell borde vara ganska enkel att implementera på produkt- eller enhetsnivå och ger en mer korrekt fördelning än den nuvarande.</p><p>Hursomhelst, är det upp till Manufacturer AB att fördela deras overheadkostnader som de vill, men den ”uppskattade” modellen ger en bas för strategiska beslutsunderlag på produk-tionsenhetsnivå, som svarar på frågor som; var ska man lokalisera produktionsenheter för att nå konkurrensfördelar.</p>

Goal of this diploma thesis is to analyze calculations and their managing in Friall s. r. o. At first the costs are examined from the global angle -- their structure and evidence is described. The rest of thesis is connected with calculations. It analyzes present calculation system and draws up remaining two calculations method that are recommended in the latest theoretical sources. At the end of the thesis some modifications that follow from the done computation are suggested.

Background: China is one of the most popular countries to relocate and outsource production units to. This country has a big advantage when it comes to the manual working cost which is very low. This difference between Sweden and China is huge; the cost of the manual working force is less than one twentieth of the Swedish. Problem: Massive global relocation of production units can affect some countries in a negative way. One of the most important foundations in the society is that there is a high level of employment and this also contributes for economic growth. This is in terms of both tax incomes for the public society as well as self-esteem for the people. Purpose: The purpose with this thesis is to examine the differences in total production costs, including allocation of overhead costs for product development and production in Sweden vs. China at a company, in this thesis referred to as Manufacturer AB. Method: Case study approach with in-depth interviews, phone calls and e-mail follow up. In total 9 respondents consisting of managers in leading positions at Manufacturer AB in Sweden. Conclusion: The manufacturing cost in the Chinese production unit is about 40-60 per cent compared to the Swedish unit. In the current situation the overhead allocation is 4 % overhead of MC at the Chinese production unit and 133 % at the Swedish unit. The total production costs are not reflected in a correct way per unit. To do a more true allocation, the overhead costs in the Company Group must be identified and allocated in the right proportions on their respective production unit. By creating an average- and in next step an estimated allocation model we succeeded to do a more justified allocation of the overhead costs on the production units in Sweden and China. This model should be relative simple to implement on product- or unit level and gives a more correct allocation than the current. However, it is the decision of Manufacturer AB to allocate their overhead as they like, but the estimated allocation model gives a base for strategic decisions on production unit level, referring to; where to locate the production units to reach competitive advantage. / Bakgrund: Kina är ett av de mest populära länderna att utlokalisera och outsourca produktionsenheter till. Detta land har en stor fördel när det gäller kostnaden för manuellt arbete, som är väldigt låg. Skillnaden mellan Sverige och Kina är enorm; kostnaden för den manuella arbetstiden är ca en tjugondel av den svenska. Problem: Massiva globala omflyttningar av produktionsanläggningar kan påverka vissa länder negativt. En av de viktiga grundpelarna i samhället är att det finns en hög sysselsättningsgrad som bidrar till ekonomisk tillväxt. Detta gäller såväl skatteintäkter till staten som självkänsla hos folket. Syfte: Syftet med den här uppsatsen är att undersöka skillnaderna i den totala produktionskostnaden, inkluderat fördelning av overheadkostnader för produktutveckling och produktion i Sverige jämfört med Kina vid ett företag som i denna uppsats refereras till Manufacturer AB. Metod: Fallstudie är gjord med hjälp av personliga djupintervjuer, uppföljande telefonsamtal och elektronisk post. Totalt deltog 9 respondenter bestående av tjänstemän i ledande positioner på Manufacturer AB i sverige. Slutsats: Tillverkningskostnaden i den Kinesiska produktionsenheten är ungefär 40-60 procent jämfört med motsvarande enhet i Sverige. I nuläget är overheadpålägget 4% på produktionsenheten i Kina och 133% på enheten i Sverige. Den totala produktionskostnaden speglas inte på ett rättvist sätt per produktionsenhet. För att göra en mer rättvis fördelning så måste koncernens totala overheadkostnad identifieras och mätas och sedan allokeras i de rätta proportionerna på respektive produktionsenhet. Genom att skapa en genomsnittlig och i nästa steg en uppskattad fördelningsmodell lyckades vi att göra en mer rättvis fördelning av overheadkostnaderna på produktionsenheterna i Sverige och Kina. Denna modell borde vara ganska enkel att implementera på produkt- eller enhetsnivå och ger en mer korrekt fördelning än den nuvarande. Hursomhelst, är det upp till Manufacturer AB att fördela deras overheadkostnader som de vill, men den ”uppskattade” modellen ger en bas för strategiska beslutsunderlag på produk-tionsenhetsnivå, som svarar på frågor som; var ska man lokalisera produktionsenheter för att nå konkurrensfördelar.

This thesis is focused on a field of calulation methods used in trading activity. The theoretical part offers an overview of full and direct costing, including their advantages and disadvantages for various ekonomic decisions. The practical part describes and evaluates the costing system of the business company and evaluates the profitability of each range of products using marginal costing.

This thesis deals with the costing. The first chapter is devoted to the basic concepts of the costing. Chapter 2 deals with the matching of the costs to the object of the calculation. Chapter 3 is devoted to the modern calculation methods - activity based costing - and strategic costing - target costing and life cycle costing. The practical part follows, which aims to enhance the existing costing and calculation system of a specific company. After the existing calculation system is analyzed and the problematic and questionable areas are found, the thesis tries to find a solution how to sort out these deficiencies and propose costing and the whole calculation system which would fit that specific company. The practical part includes particular exams of activity based costing, target costing and life cycle costing too.

The aim of this master’s thesis is to find an optimal solution of intradepartmental accounting system in the selected firm. The solution is based on analysis of theoretical methods and present conditions in the company. It focuses on problems of allocation of indirect costs and implementation of variable costing method. The proposed solution should be able to supports better decision making in sales and evaluation of production rate of the whole firm.

While costing methods have developed over time, they are often static in nature and ill-suited to the dynamic nature of production lines. Static costing systems are often developed for long-term analysis. Due to this, they lack the ability to aid short-term decision-making. In addition, the use of averaged data prohibits a static costing system from accurately tracing the cost effects of changing system behavior like random downtime events. A dynamic costing system, however, can capture the cost effects of changing system behavior in a manner that can aid short-term operational management. The proposed methodology is a dynamic activity-based costing method that relies on real-time production line data to track costs, specifically the added costs of unused capacity and downtime events. The methodology aims to trace these costs to responsible cost centers on the production line to give a better representation of the total cost of production, specifically in regards to normal production costs, added downtime costs, and added costs from unused capacity. In addition to monetary costs, the methodology provides a framework for tracking environmental costs, such as energy use, in order to aid plant managers with determining the environmental impact of their operations. The methodology addresses a gap between activity-based costing and downtime costing by combining the two under a single methodology. It traces both monetary and environmental costs to cost centers on the manufacturing line to aid continuous improvement efforts and the allocation of resources. By using real-time data, the methodology alerts management to changing system performance in a shorter time frame than static costing systems. The methodology will be shown in a case study of an automotive assembly plant. The case study will model the resource use of an automotive paint shop and trace this resource use to line segments in order to highlight areas of possible improvement.

No description available.

This study identifies the various elements and factors that a financial services company needs to consider when implementing activity-based costing. This study evaluates the appropriateness of activity-based costing for financial services and proposes an implementation framework for activity-based costing in this environment. Management, in today’s constant changing and competitive world, needs management information to support strategic and pricing decisions. Traditional financial accounting information sometimes hides the economic reality of client profitability and product costs, and does not supply sufficient information for pricing decisions. This study confirmed that activity-based costing can assist in addressing this problem. Activity-based costing was originally developed for the manufacturing environment. By studying available literature, this study proved that activitybased costing can be used successfully in a financial services environment. A manufacturing environment has a higher direct cost input than a services environment. The cost structure in a services environment allows a higher percentage of cost to be allocated by identifying activities and using cost drivers to allocate these costs to cost objects. Activity-based costing models add value to management by supplying them with information that supports strategic decisions, pricing decisions, understanding client profitability and product costs. This study points out that there are crucial success factors that need to be considered before embarking on the implementation of activity-based costing. Finally the study proposes that activity-based costing be implemented in a financial services environment to support management decision making. / Prof. A.L. Boessenkool

A life cycle study was undertaken to assess the economic impact arising from internalised embodied greenhouse gas emissions (GGE) costs for a commercial office building. A limited range of design and materials re-cycling strategies were investigated for their abatement potential. GGE quantities were determined by a hybrid process analysis where input-output data was supplemented with national average data to increase completeness whereby all upstream emissions arising from material inputs to the point of extraction, as well as non-material inputs (e.g. goods and services) into the design and construction process are accounted for. The hypothesis proposed abatement potential of 30%, as measured against the Benchmark Design (BM) would be economically viable in absence of the benefit of early-action credits. The hypothesis was disproved with 15% abatement shown at zero additional capital cost. A Stretch Technology (ST) scenario was investigated which showed 32% abatement potential however the associated marginal capital cost could not be determined. The GGE intensity per meter square of Net Lettable Area (m2 NLA) for the case study building was found to be 5,258 kg CO2-e. The theoretical value of abatement credits was determined at $12 to $1,031 / m2 NLA (depending on price) and is shown to present a reasonable economic and market transformation opportunity at medium range values. The results demonstrate that the cost-push inflation risk posed to commercial office construction is large where the price of embodied GGE is internalised in the economic system. Gross Construction Cost (GCC) increase per square meter is shown to be between 1.5% and 61% (with associated negative IRR impacts between -0.1 to -7%) depending on the GGE price level. An unsustainable cost impact is demonstrated at GGE prices greater than AUD$50 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (AUD$50/ tonne CO2-e). Internalised GGE studies have been largely limited to the operational cost impact arising from GGE of direct end-use rather than from the perspective of total embodied final demand. The results demonstrate the critical nature of embodied abatement strategies for commercial buildings if the internationally accepted 60% global GGE abatement is to be achieved within the relevant timeframe. An average kg CO2-e intensity per dollar of GCC is proposed for the three building models that may be applied to general scenario planning. The scale of economic benefit available for embodied credits is significant and the determination of viable credit mechanisms worthy of further research.