Denna uppsats skall genom granskningar av domstolsprotokoll, och dess beslutsgrundande motiveringar, undersöka hur tvångsingripande åtgärder vid missbruk enligt LVM-lagstiftningen tillämpas. Intentionen är försöka finna de underliggande och uppbyggda formuleringar som rättfärdigar den svenska staten, att via socialtjänst och förvaltningsrätter frihetsberöva och tvångsvårda medborgare mot den enskildes vilja. Är det inte den fria medborgarens rättighet att leva sitt liv som den önskar även om det anses som ett destruktivt leverne? Empirin är av mig uppbyggd utifrån de diskurser som blottläggs vid undersökningen. Syftet med sammanställningen av de olika diskurserna och begreppen som förekommer i dessa domstolsbeslut är att ge insyn i en verksamhet som med stor säkerhet går allmänheten förbi. Detta kan förklaras med att detta rör en sådan i periferin existerande grupp av människor. Jag vill vidare påvisa ett kritiskt tänkande kring fenomenet och slutligen ge förslag till en förändring av företeelsen. / This investigation will examine, through audits of court protocols, and its motivational reasons, how enforcement measures are applied in the event of abuse under the LVM legislation. To try to find the underlying and also the case-formulated formulations that justify the Swedish state, through its municipalities' social services and administrative rights, to the detention of the individual's detention and coercion for citizens. Is not it the free citizen's right to live his life as it wishes even if it is  considered a destructive delivery? The empirin is built on the basis of the discourses exposed to the investigation. The intention of compiling the different discourses and concepts contained in these court decisions is to provide insight into an activity that surely passes the public when it comes to such a peripheral group of people as well as to demonstrate critical thinking about the phenomenon and finally suggest a change of the phenomenon

This study involves a critical appraisal of the legal implications of South Africa’s withdrawal from the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the context of its international and regional human rights obligations. The dissertation also investigates the history and formation of the ICC, South Africa’s involvement and its role as a guardian of international and regional human rights obligations in Africa. The study reviews the circumstances leading to South Africa’s notice of withdrawal from the ICC, including the legal implications and international human rights obligations. This inquiry considers South Africa’s proposed withdrawal from the ICC which is supported by points of departure and a comprehensive literature review. The decision to withdraw from the ICC is considered to be a political one. However, this study raises questions about the executive’s withdrawal in regard to its domestic, regional and international human rights obligations, irrespective of whether it is a member of the ICC. The study surveys the background to South Africa’s participation in the ICC, its membership of the African Union and the implications of ICC membership including the obligations imposed on member states. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL. M.