<p>The aim of this study was to find out if the use of the concepts ‘terrorism' and ‘organized crime' has changed after the event on 11 September, 2001 when terrorists attacked World Trade Center and Pentagon. In this study I make use of discourse theory in a way which is inspired by the writings of Winther Jorgensen and Phillips. Knowledge acquired through this research has been primarily generated from two Swedish Government Official Reports concerning questions arising from introducing secret police surveillance. In these reports, there are many opinions from authorities whom have given their thoughts on introducing new ways of policing which are very interesting to analyze. The results shows that the ways the concepts have been used have changed after the terrorists attacks. The same holds true for how the authorities describe their will to combat crime. Terrorism has been described as something that pose a near none existent problem before the terrorist attack, afterwards it is described as a risk that poses a major threat to the whole society. The organized crime has been described as something which has been going from a relatively controllable problem to one that undermines the judicial system and the democratic state.</p>

The aim of this study was to find out if the use of the concepts ‘terrorism' and ‘organized crime' has changed after the event on 11 September, 2001 when terrorists attacked World Trade Center and Pentagon. In this study I make use of discourse theory in a way which is inspired by the writings of Winther Jorgensen and Phillips. Knowledge acquired through this research has been primarily generated from two Swedish Government Official Reports concerning questions arising from introducing secret police surveillance. In these reports, there are many opinions from authorities whom have given their thoughts on introducing new ways of policing which are very interesting to analyze. The results shows that the ways the concepts have been used have changed after the terrorists attacks. The same holds true for how the authorities describe their will to combat crime. Terrorism has been described as something that pose a near none existent problem before the terrorist attack, afterwards it is described as a risk that poses a major threat to the whole society. The organized crime has been described as something which has been going from a relatively controllable problem to one that undermines the judicial system and the democratic state.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:24:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rogerio Batista Gabbelini.pdf: 881576 bytes, checksum: 6eeab25bb7db1777889cdcd11c9ff8c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-09 / The theme of this thesis refers to the study of crime of terrorism in light of the Federal Constitution of 1988 with an analysis of the criminalization of express mandates provided for in Article 5, item XLIII which determines the criminal standard editing to typify the crime of terrorism. Composed of six chapters, it presents, in the first, brief study in international law with the various forms that presents terrorism. The second chapter, in turn, presents the criminal constitutional principles in the face of new criminal methods. The third chapter assesses the legal interests emphasizing the aspect of collective protection of these interests and under the perspective of constitutional interpretation, thus providing a correct interpretation of the criminal standard. The draft of the 2012 penal code transacts before the Senate House with classification proposal of terrorism crime in Articles 239, 240, 241 and 242 being what this is all about in the fourth chapter. The fifth chapter analyzes Law 7.170/83, called National Security Law and issued during the military period and its non-responsiveness to existing constitutional principles. The sixth chapter examines the terrorist crime of political boundaries under the aspect of international law, thus presenting the issues of religious and racial intolerance, setting so the consequent violations of the guarantees of fundamental civil rights / O tema desta dissertação refere-se ao estudo do delito de terrorismo à luz da Constituição Federal de 1988, a partir da análise dos mandados expressos de criminalização previstos no artigo 5º, XLIII, que determinam a edição de norma penal para tipificar o delito de terrorismo. Composta por oito capítulos, apresenta, após a Introdução, em seu segundo capítulo, um breve estudo de direito comparado, revelando as diversas formas pelas quais o terrorismo se apresenta. O terceiro capítulo, por sua vez, apresenta os princípios constitucionais penais diante das novas modalidades criminosas. Os bens jurídicos são avaliados no quarto capítulo, que enfatiza o aspecto de proteção coletiva desses bens e a perspectiva da interpretação constitucional, proporcionando assim uma correta interpretação da norma penal. O anteprojeto do código penal de 2012 tramita perante o Senado Federal com proposta de tipificação do delito de terrorismo em seus artigos 239, 240, 241 e 242; este é o assunto tratado no quinto capítulo desta pesquisa. O sexto analisa a Lei nº7.170/83, denominada Lei de Segurança Nacional, editada no período militar, e sua receptividade pelos princípios constitucionais vigentes. Por fim, antecedendo a Conclusão desta pesquisa, são examinadas, no sétimo capítulo, as delimitações políticas do delito de terrorismo sob o aspecto do direito comparado, a partir da análise de questões de intolerância religiosa e racial que configuram violações às garantias dos direitos civis fundamentais