京都大学 / 0048 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(人間・環境学) / 甲第19078号 / 人博第731号 / 新制||人||175(附属図書館) / 26||人博||731(吉田南総合図書館) / 32029 / 京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科共生人間学専攻 / (主査)准教授 桒山 智成, 教授 丸橋 良雄, 准教授 髙谷 修, 教授 依田 義丸 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Human and Environmental Studies / Kyoto University / DGAM

Tomamos o trabalho de três dramaturgos brasileiros contemporâneos, a saber: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi e Roberto Alvim e suas respectivas peças Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (em coautoria com Victor Navas) e Pinokio na tentativa de apreender/identificar, a partir de uma perspectiva de análise estética e histórica, o que seria a nossa contemporaneidade, entendida aqui nos termos do que o teórico britânico Raymond Williams, principal referência de nosso estudo, chamou de estrutura de sentimento: um conteúdo de experiência e de pensamento que, histórico em sua natureza, encontra formalização nas obras de arte. É a partir de uma análise que tencione as formas ou convenções dramatúrgicas criadas por cada um dos autores de nosso corpus, inclusive os desvios que operam em relação ao modelo aristotélico-hegeliano de drama, e o conteúdo histórico-social que se precipita nessas formas, orientado, segundo o entendimento de Fredric Jameson, pelas dinâmicas do capitalismo enquanto sistema econômico vigente, que buscamos identificar, ainda que em termos imprecisos, o que seria a nossa contemporânea estrutura de sentimento. Amparam a nossa análise, em sua perspectiva formal, os estudos mais recentes sobre a poética do drama moderno e contemporâneo, que têm em Jean-Pierre Sarrazac seu principal organizador. Assim, buscamos compreender estética e historicamente os dramaturgos propostos e suas dramaturgias, guiando-nos pelo pensamento dos teóricos citados; e, como objetivo último, nos lançamos na tentativa de discernir a estrutura de sentimento dominante de nossa época e suas relações com as estruturas dramatúrgicas criadas no nosso presente histórico. / We take the work of three contemporary Brazilian dramatists: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi and Roberto Alvim and their respective plays Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (co-authored with Victor Navas) and Pinokio with the intend to see/identify, from an aesthetic‟s and historic‟s perspective of analysis, what is our contemporaneity, here understood by what the Britain theoretical Raymond Williams, our study‟s main reference, calls structure of feeling: a content of experience and thought which, historical in its own nature, it‟s embodied in art. From an analysis which puts in tension the dramaturgical forms or conventions created by each one of our corpus‟ authors, including the shifts they operate in Aristotelian-Hegelian drama standard, and the historical and social content that decants in these forms, guided, according to the Fredric Jameson‟s understanding, by the capitalist‟s dynamic as the present economic system, we intend to identify, even if in inaccurate terms, what is our contemporary structure of feeling. Support our analysis, in its formal perspective, the recent studies about modern and contemporary drama poetic, which have in Jean-Pierre Sarrazac its main organizer. Thus, we intend to understand aesthetically and historically the dramatists proposed and their dramaturgies, guiding ourselves by the above theoretical‟s thought; and, last but not at least, we throw ourselves in the attempt of distinguish the structure of feeling dominant in our time and its relations with the dramaturgical structures created in our historical present.

Tomamos o trabalho de três dramaturgos brasileiros contemporâneos, a saber: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi e Roberto Alvim e suas respectivas peças Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (em coautoria com Victor Navas) e Pinokio na tentativa de apreender/identificar, a partir de uma perspectiva de análise estética e histórica, o que seria a nossa contemporaneidade, entendida aqui nos termos do que o teórico britânico Raymond Williams, principal referência de nosso estudo, chamou de estrutura de sentimento: um conteúdo de experiência e de pensamento que, histórico em sua natureza, encontra formalização nas obras de arte. É a partir de uma análise que tencione as formas ou convenções dramatúrgicas criadas por cada um dos autores de nosso corpus, inclusive os desvios que operam em relação ao modelo aristotélico-hegeliano de drama, e o conteúdo histórico-social que se precipita nessas formas, orientado, segundo o entendimento de Fredric Jameson, pelas dinâmicas do capitalismo enquanto sistema econômico vigente, que buscamos identificar, ainda que em termos imprecisos, o que seria a nossa contemporânea estrutura de sentimento. Amparam a nossa análise, em sua perspectiva formal, os estudos mais recentes sobre a poética do drama moderno e contemporâneo, que têm em Jean-Pierre Sarrazac seu principal organizador. Assim, buscamos compreender estética e historicamente os dramaturgos propostos e suas dramaturgias, guiando-nos pelo pensamento dos teóricos citados; e, como objetivo último, nos lançamos na tentativa de discernir a estrutura de sentimento dominante de nossa época e suas relações com as estruturas dramatúrgicas criadas no nosso presente histórico. / We take the work of three contemporary Brazilian dramatists: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi and Roberto Alvim and their respective plays Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (co-authored with Victor Navas) and Pinokio with the intend to see/identify, from an aesthetic‟s and historic‟s perspective of analysis, what is our contemporaneity, here understood by what the Britain theoretical Raymond Williams, our study‟s main reference, calls structure of feeling: a content of experience and thought which, historical in its own nature, it‟s embodied in art. From an analysis which puts in tension the dramaturgical forms or conventions created by each one of our corpus‟ authors, including the shifts they operate in Aristotelian-Hegelian drama standard, and the historical and social content that decants in these forms, guided, according to the Fredric Jameson‟s understanding, by the capitalist‟s dynamic as the present economic system, we intend to identify, even if in inaccurate terms, what is our contemporary structure of feeling. Support our analysis, in its formal perspective, the recent studies about modern and contemporary drama poetic, which have in Jean-Pierre Sarrazac its main organizer. Thus, we intend to understand aesthetically and historically the dramatists proposed and their dramaturgies, guiding ourselves by the above theoretical‟s thought; and, last but not at least, we throw ourselves in the attempt of distinguish the structure of feeling dominant in our time and its relations with the dramaturgical structures created in our historical present.

Tomamos o trabalho de três dramaturgos brasileiros contemporâneos, a saber: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi e Roberto Alvim e suas respectivas peças Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (em coautoria com Victor Navas) e Pinokio na tentativa de apreender/identificar, a partir de uma perspectiva de análise estética e histórica, o que seria a nossa contemporaneidade, entendida aqui nos termos do que o teórico britânico Raymond Williams, principal referência de nosso estudo, chamou de estrutura de sentimento: um conteúdo de experiência e de pensamento que, histórico em sua natureza, encontra formalização nas obras de arte. É a partir de uma análise que tencione as formas ou convenções dramatúrgicas criadas por cada um dos autores de nosso corpus, inclusive os desvios que operam em relação ao modelo aristotélico-hegeliano de drama, e o conteúdo histórico-social que se precipita nessas formas, orientado, segundo o entendimento de Fredric Jameson, pelas dinâmicas do capitalismo enquanto sistema econômico vigente, que buscamos identificar, ainda que em termos imprecisos, o que seria a nossa contemporânea estrutura de sentimento. Amparam a nossa análise, em sua perspectiva formal, os estudos mais recentes sobre a poética do drama moderno e contemporâneo, que têm em Jean-Pierre Sarrazac seu principal organizador. Assim, buscamos compreender estética e historicamente os dramaturgos propostos e suas dramaturgias, guiando-nos pelo pensamento dos teóricos citados; e, como objetivo último, nos lançamos na tentativa de discernir a estrutura de sentimento dominante de nossa época e suas relações com as estruturas dramatúrgicas criadas no nosso presente histórico. / We take the work of three contemporary Brazilian dramatists: Newton Moreno, Fernando Bonassi and Roberto Alvim and their respective plays Dentro, Três cigarros e a última lasanha (co-authored with Victor Navas) and Pinokio with the intend to see/identify, from an aesthetic‟s and historic‟s perspective of analysis, what is our contemporaneity, here understood by what the Britain theoretical Raymond Williams, our study‟s main reference, calls structure of feeling: a content of experience and thought which, historical in its own nature, it‟s embodied in art. From an analysis which puts in tension the dramaturgical forms or conventions created by each one of our corpus‟ authors, including the shifts they operate in Aristotelian-Hegelian drama standard, and the historical and social content that decants in these forms, guided, according to the Fredric Jameson‟s understanding, by the capitalist‟s dynamic as the present economic system, we intend to identify, even if in inaccurate terms, what is our contemporary structure of feeling. Support our analysis, in its formal perspective, the recent studies about modern and contemporary drama poetic, which have in Jean-Pierre Sarrazac its main organizer. Thus, we intend to understand aesthetically and historically the dramatists proposed and their dramaturgies, guiding ourselves by the above theoretical‟s thought; and, last but not at least, we throw ourselves in the attempt of distinguish the structure of feeling dominant in our time and its relations with the dramaturgical structures created in our historical present.

No description available.

This thesis explores the work of three women practitioners in radio and examines the process of writing radio drama through a mixture of criticism and practice. It analyzes early theories about radio drama and compares them with those of today, in order to ascertain whether the early ideas are still relevant. Starkey points out that radio has been relatively undertheorized (2004: 204), so this evaluation of the practice of writing radio drama adds to knowledge of the medium as a whole. The work focuses on two women practitioners from the past: Hilda Matheson, whose book Broadcasting (1933), was the first single authored text on radio and broadcasting by a woman published in English (Crook 1999: 12) and Mabel Constanduros, who was a prolific writer and actress of the time, specialising in comedy. Matheson s ideas are compared with those of Val Gielgud and other early theorists, which were more accepted at the time. This analysis leads to close examination of a debate at the heart of radio drama, that being whether noises or dialogue are the best method of storytelling. Finally there is a consideration of the author s own writing practice, using three broadcast radio plays, 21 Conversations with a Hairdresser, 15 Ways to Leave Your Lover and Jesus, The Devil and a Kid Called Death. This provides insight into the changing methods of writing for radio. The findings create a story design for writing the Radio 4 Afternoon Drama. Final written drafts are included, along with audio copies of the plays as they were broadcast. Several different types of criticism create the theoretical base, including works on cultural theory, feminist theory and reception theory, as well as texts on radio, screen, play and comedy writing.

This is an outline of the journey of James Campese’s La Vita Nuova. It began as a raw script entitled Sunsets in Nantucket, which I originally encountered during the spring of 2006. After edits, research and meetings it became a successful work which was presented as a staged reading on March 1st, 2009. This thesis describes how I worked with James to transform the script into its final product, managing both the delicacy of the script and the writer. Included is research on New Play Dramaturgy that helped me find the most effective way to work with the script, then taking the final version and preparing it for a reading, inserting actors into the world James and I had created and exposing that world to an audience. The results were positive as we had a very receptive audience who enjoyed the play.

Orientador: Renata Soares Junqueira / Banca: Flávia Maria Corradin / Banca: Maria Heloísa Martins Dias / Resumo: Esta dissertação buscou explorar a produção de Luiz Francisco Rebello (n.1924), dramaturgo português, que marcou o início da moderna dramaturgia em seu país, cuja principal contribuição foi a de renovar a linguagem cênica. Para mostrá-la, optou-se por três peças escritas e representadas em diferentes momentos e meios e, sobretudo, com linguagens bem distintas: a primeira, O mundo começou às 5 e 46 escrita em 1946 especialmente para integrar o segundo espetáculo do Teatro-Estúdio do Salitre (1946-1950) - um agrupamento experimental fundado neste mesmo ano por Luiz Francisco Rebello, Gino Saviotti e Vasco de Mendonça Alves - que veio a representar o marco da dramaturgia moderna em Portugal; a segunda peça, intitulada Condenados à Vida de 1963, tematicamente afinada com o Teatro Existencialista, e que nos recursos formais recupera inúmeras técnicas advindas das experiências européias do início do mesmo século; e, por último, o telegrama Todo o Amor é Amor de Perdição, escrito e apresentado em 1990 pela RTP (Televisão Portuguesa), que encerra, não a produção do autor que continua em atividade, mas o objetivo desta pesquisa que foi o de apontar, por meio da evolução dramática de Luiz Francisco Rebello, os aspectos inovadores do seu teatro...(Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Mestre

En 1996, après avoir assisté à la dernière représentation de la septième édition du Centre National des Arts du Cirque, le journal parisien Libération prédit une troisième ère du Cirque : « Après les cirques traditionnels, puis les nouveaux cirques, il faut désormais compter avec le cirque contemporain. » Le pronostic devient réalité : la pièce du metteur en scène Joseph Nadj est considérée, en France comme ailleurs, comme le point de départ d’un nouveau genre dont la définition reste des plus vagues jusqu’à aujourd’hui : « Le cirque contemporain, lui, n’a strictement aucune unité formelle, ou disons, sans craindre le paradoxe, que c’est la diversité de ses formes qui l’unifie. » D’une part, cela s’explique par le fait que, dans le cirque contemporain, l’originalité est un moteur central et, d’autre part, que le genre se situe encore dans une phase de développement. Cela est en outre dû à l’absence jusqu’à aujourd’hui, dans la recherche scientifique, d’une analyse détaillée des représentations du cirque contemporain et qu’en plus on ne dispose pas d’un modèle d’analyse cohérente des représentations du genre. Le discours actuel autour du genre s’intéresse moins de savoir comment les spectacles de cirque contemporain engendrent du sens et quels sont les procédés caractéristiques qui les définissent. Au lieu de cela, on s’interroge sur ce qui devrait caractériser les pièces. Notre thèse tient compte de ce desiderata en développant pour la première fois une méthode pour analyser les représentations de cirque contemporain. En outre, elle explique et interprète résolument le genre au moyen d’une méthode solide, c’est-à-dire d’une description contextualisée de l’objet – à savoir la représentation – dans son contexte historique et culturel et fournit ainsi, au sens lessingien du terme, une dramaturgie du cirque contemporain qui, malgré la diversité des représentations, révèle des caractéristiques généralisables, le procédé fondamental, la structure des pièces et l'effet qu'elles produisent. Le développement du modèle de lecture pour les spectacles de cirque contemporain ainsi que l’évolution consécutive et la spécification du modèle s’appuient sur l'analyse textuelle de la poétique de la culture que justifie l’historien de la littérature Moritz Baßler dans son œuvre La fonction d’une poétique de la culture et l’archive sur la base du New Historicism conçu par Stephen Greenblatt. En outre, le travail présent se situe dans le domaine des théories de lecture relevant de la science du théâtre (Fischer-Lichte) et de la danse (Foster et Brandstetter). Le noyau de l‘argumentation se fonde sur l’hypothèse selon laquelle les représentations de cirque sont lisibles en tant que textes culturels. / In 1996, the Paris newspaper Libération predicted a third era of circus after visiting the seventh edition of the Centre National des Arts du Cirque: “After traditional and new circus, we now have to account for contemporary circus.” The prognosis became reality: nowadays, in France as elsewhere, the performance of Joseph Nadj is considered as the starting point of a new genre whose definition however remains vague: “The contemporary circus has no formal unity. It is paradoxically the diversity of its forms that unifies the genre.” On the one hand, this is explained by the fact that originality is a central motor in contemporary circus; on the other hand, the genre is still developing . A further reason for the lack of a clear definition lies in the absence of detailed analyses of contemporary circus performances in circus research, and in the desideratum regarding a coherent model for its interpretation. The current discourse dedicated to the genre is less interested in knowing how contemporary circus performances generate meaning and in outlining the characteristic techniques and processes. Instead, one wonders what should characterize the performances. The present thesis takes into account this desideratum by developing for the first time a method to analyse representations of contemporary circus. In addition, it resolutely explains and interprets the genre by means of a contextualized description of the object - namely representation - in its historical and cultural context. In the Lessingian sense of the term, the thesis therefore provides a dramaturgy of contemporary circus which, despite the diversity of representations, reveals generalizable characteristics of the genre, the fundamental techniques and structures of the performances. and the effects they produce. The development of a reading model for contemporary circus performances as well as the consequent evolution and the specification of the model are grounded in the textual analysis of poetics of culture that the literary scholar Moritz Baßler justifies in his work on the basis of the theory of New Historicism designed by Stephen Greenblatt. In addition, the present work situates itself in the field of reading theories pertaining to theatre (Fischer-Lichte ) and dance studies (Foster and Brandstetter ). The core of the argument is based on the assumption that circus performances are readable as cultural texts.

O teatro trans-ibérico: Raul Brandão e Valle-Inclán tem como objetivo: pesquisar, analisar e comparar a literatura dramática desses dois artistas e escritores contemporâneos; ambos representantes de suas gerações literárias, na península ibérica, e desencadeadores de uma moderna dramaturgia no início do século XX. Antes de apresentar o estudo comparativo do teatro português e espanhol, do início do século XX, faremos observar alguns aspectos históricos e sociais da contínua decadência peninsular deste período, questões que aproximam ambos ainda mais, e que enfaticamente influenciaram na formação dos temas, das concepções artísticas e literárias dos dramas desses dois autores de povos vizinhos. Um painel amplo e detalhado da vida e obra de cada autor, em seu respectivo contexto histórico, fez-se aqui necessário para vislumbrar o percurso realizado por cada um deles e o desenvolvimento de suas respectivas produções literárias. Testemunhas comprometidas com esse período, Raul Brandão e Valle-Inclán, ao término da Primeira Guerra Mundial (1914-1918), na plenitude literária de suas vidas, decidiram criar uma dramaturgia de vanguarda. Jesus Cristo em Lisboa (Brandão, 1927) e Los cuernos de Don Friolera (Valle-Inclán, 1921) são frutos do inconformismo de uma época conturbada; peças características de um teatro, que apostava em mudanças e, sobretudo, buscavam alguma reação sinestésica de suas respectivas sociedades. Elegemos os dois dramas mencionados, por serem considerados os precursores do teatro moderno, e por se tratarem de peças polêmicas, produções cinematográficas e de difícil encenação. Tratando-se também de estudo comparativo, recolhemos um conjunto de recepções críticas sobre nossos autores e suas respectivas obras dramáticas, em vida tanto quanto postumamente. Por fim, após investigação, conclui-se a respeito das diferenças e semelhanças desta dramaturgia ibérica, presente nas peças de Raul Brandão e Valle- Inclán. / The objective of O teatro trans-ibérico: Raul Brandão e Valle-Inclán is to research, to analyze and to compare those two artists\' dramatic literature and contemporary writers; both representatives of their literary generations, in the Iberian Peninsula, and provocative of a modern theater in the early century XX. Before presenting the comparative study of the Portuguese and Spanish theater, of the beginning of the century XX, we will observe some historical and social aspects of the continuous peninsular decadence of this period, subjects that approximate both still plus, and that emphatically they influenced in the formation of the themes, of the artistic and literary conceptions of those two authors\' of neighboring people dramas. A wide and detailed panel of the life and each author\'s work, in his/her respective historical context, was here necessary to glimpse the course accomplished by each one of them and the development of their respective literary productions. Witness committed with that period, Raul Brandão and Valle-Inclán, in the end of the First World War (1914-1918), in the literary fullness of their lives, they decided to create a vanguard theater. Jesus Cristo em Lisboa (Brandão, 1927) and Los cuernos de Don Friolera (Valle-Inclán, 1921) are the result of the dissatisfaction of a disturbed time; pieces characteristics of a theater, that it bet in changes and, above all, it looked for some reaction synesthésique of their respective societies. We chose the two mentioned dramas, because they are considered the precursors of the modern theater, and because they were controversial pieces, cinematographic productions and of difficult staging. As a comparative study, we collected a group of critical receptions about our authors and their respective dramatic works, in life as much as posthumous. Finally, after investigation, it is concluded regarding the differences and similarities of this Iberian theater, present in Raul Brandão\'s pieces and Valle-Inclán.