The Survival games genre is infamous for its lack of narrative. In this paper we look at thepossibility of emerging narrative in open world survival sandbox games. The survival aspectof a game is heavily tied to specific survival-centric mechanics that are frequently occurringin the genre. These mechanics and systems can in and of themselves give way to an unwrittennarrative for each individual player. By working with the concept of Narrative gamemechanics, we interviewed a pool of people about their stories and narrative experiences insurvival games. After analysing the results we found recurring patterns to indicate how certaintypes of survival-mechanics can lead to certain types of narrative situations.

The goal of this thesis is to answer the question of how does Subnautica (Unknown Worlds Entertainment, 2018) incorporate base building mechanics into its narrative progression? This research was conducted using a close reading methodology for the purpose of closely examining the key points of interest. The two authors conducted individual playthroughs of the game where they looked at the base building mechanics and narrative in Subnautica (Unknown Worlds Entertainment, 2018) using a lens constructed from theories of cognitive narratology, emergent narrative, and narrative gameplay mechanics. This lens used assemblage theory prominently as well to bridge the gaps between the previously mentioned theories. The results of the research describe in detail the inner workings of Subnautica’s (Unknown Worlds Entertainment, 2018) approach to base building mechanics and how it affects the different forms of narrative in the game. This research is beneficial for researchers and game developers that seek a deeper understanding of the impact that the integration of base building mechanics and narrative progression has on survival games.

This paper analyzes the Nemesis System in Middle Earth: Shadow of War (2017) developed by Monolith Productions and explores the system’s way of creating stories. For years, there has been a debate about whether or not stories belong in games, with supporters on all sides. There are different ways to provide stories in games and in this study, the focus has been on game mechanics, emergent narrative, and interactive storytelling. These three elements are all common ways of creating stories in games. Formal Analysis is the main method used in this paper. This specific method often pairs well with smaller systems of larger games rather than an entire game, as it examines specific elements closely and explains them in detail. The game was played one time by each author and the system’s behavior was documented to be able to examine it fully. This analysis aims to provide knowledge of how stories in games can be created, and it focuses specifically on how the Nemesis System manages to do so using mechanics, interactive storytelling, and emergent narrative.

Det finns ett antal berättarmetoder inom datorspel. De vanligaste formerna som används är linjärt och förgrenat berättande, men det finns en metod som inte används i samma utsträckning, kallad emergent berättande. Detta är en typ av berättande där spelaren själv baserat på samspelet mellan spelets system kan forma sitt egna narrativ. Det är dock inte helt definierat vad emergent berättande innebär. Denna studie använder sig av en artefakt för att utforska emergent berättande med hjälp av system kallade Drama Managers som syftar till att kontrollera händelseförloppet i ett spel så det bildar ett narrativ. Syftet med studien var att utforska om en förenklad Drama Manager kunde åstadkomma ett emergent narrativ eller om den enbart skulle producera ett förgrenat narrativ. Artefakten prövades på personer insatta inom ämnena spel och narrativ och de intervjuades om deras uppfattningar av artefakten. Slutsatsen är att element av emergens kunde identifieras, men inte till den grad att artefakten upplevdes innehålla ett emergent narrativ. Kunskapen ifrån studien skulle kunna hjälpa till att definiera skillnaden mellan emergenta narrativ och förgrenade narrativ. / There are a few storytelling methods for video games. The most common forms are linear and branching narratives, but there is one method not used to the same extent, known as emergent narrative. This study uses and artifact to explore emergent narrative using systems known as Drama Managers that aim to control the sequence of events in a game to create a narrative. The purpose of the study was to explore if a simplified drama manager could produce emergent narratives. The conclusion is that elements of emergence could be identified, but the artifact could not be considered to contain an emergent narrative. This knowledge could be used to help define the difference between emergent and branching narratives.

This study aims to define the area that fall in-between predetermined and emergent narratives and pitches the term of “co-authorial narrative” to describe it. Co-authorial narratives are defined by their design of splitting the responsibility of authorship between the developer and the player. The purpose of the study is to prove this concept, with the overall goal of broadening the understanding of emergent narrative.

This paper presents a comparative study on two Tabletop Roleplaying Games, Dungeons & Dragons and Blades in the Dark. This paper takes a look at the narrative differences within the two systems. More specifically investigate if Blades in the Dark is more playerdriven than Dungeons & Dragons. The two tested as closely as possible and will be compared with each other. This is a close reading on the rules and player agency rather than a one-on-one comparison. The comparisons were made regarding the mechanics and narrative differences within the systems rather than quality of the story. This study was conducted by running two sessions, one for each system, played by separate groups with the same game scenario and premise. Meaning that the background for both games, character and plot for the session were the same. Comparisons were made by observing player decisions, situations that arose and the influence that the gamemasters had on the game. It was found that there is a clear difference between the two systems, this difference regarding whether the players were reacting to the gamemaster, or the other way round. In Dungeons & Dragons, it was observed that the players reacted and acted according to what the gamemaster explained and played out, whereas in Blades in the Dark it appeared to be the opposite. Here we found that it was the Gamemaster who was reactive to the players instead. The paper concluded that Blades in the Dark is the more player-driven system. This short study could later be built upon and used by game developers to keep in mind and plan their future game systems around. Taking these observations on emergent narrative in Tabletop Role-playing Games into account can be used to create more player-centric and player-driven games. Meaning that the players are more in influence and decisions to make in the story and game. / I detta papper presenteras en jämförande undersökning av två rollspelssystem, Dungeons & Dragons och Blades in the Dark. Det här papperet kollar på skillnaderna när det kommer till spelar-drivet berättande inom de två spelen. Mer specifikt så utreds om Blades in the Dark är mer spelar-drivet än Dungeons & Dragons. De två kommer att testas så likt som möjligt och jämföras med varandra. Detta är en noggrann läsning av reglerna och spelarnas påverkan på spelets berättande, där vad som undersöks är spelets funktioner och skillnader i hur de berättas och presenteras, snarare än kvalitén på spelen eller berättelserna. Denna studie genomfördes genom att hålla två sessioner, en för varje system, spelad av separata grupper men med samma scenario och förutsättningar. Jämförelser gjordes genom att observera spelarbeslut, situationer som uppstod, samt det inflytande som spelmästare hade på spelet. En tydlig skillnad blev synlig mellan de två systemen var gällande huruvida spelarna reagerade på spelmästaren eller tvärtom. I Dungeons & Dragons observerades att spelarna reagerade och agerade enligt vad spelmästaren förklarade och spelade ut. I Blades in the Dark studerades en motsatt effekt, här upptäcktes att det var spelmästaren som reagerade på spelarna istället. Med denna undersökning kom vi fram till att Blades in the Dark är det mer spelar-drivna systemet. Den här studien kan i framtiden användas och byggas på av spelutvecklare för att göra nya spelsystem, med dessa observationer som framkom, kan komma till användning för att göra fler spel med mer spelar-drivet fokus. Vilket innebär att spelaren har mer inflytande på historiens som berättas och spelet i sig.