Orientador: Nelson Antonio Pirola / Banca: Regina Maria Simões Puccinelli Trancredi / Banca: Rosana Giaretta Sguerra Miskulin / Resumo: A presente pesquisa investigou a utilização da Espistemologia Genética piagetiana através da análise das ações didáticas adotadas por quatro professores (sendo cada um pertencente às quatro séries iniciais do Ensino Fundamental) durante a abordagem dos conteúdos matemáticos. Além disso, observou-se como ocorreu a apropriação do construtivismo piagetiano à constituição da prática docente dos referidos professores. Configurando uma pesquisa qualitativa, do tipo estudo de caso, a coleta dos dados foi realizada por meio dos seguintes instrumentos/métodos: I - Entrevistas estruturadas, II - Questionários abertos, fechados e mistos, III - Observação de campo. Após dois meses de pesquisa de campo, em duas escolas pertencentes à Diretoria de Ensino da Região de Bauru, identificaram-se os seguints aspectos com relação às ações didáticas: as professoras da 1ª e 2ª séries utilizaram exclusivamente o método expositivo-transmissivo (caracteristicamente do Ensino Tradicional); a docente da 3ª série usou conjuntamente com a exposição-transmissão alguns elementos construtivistas (a operação sobre o material concreto, o questionamento visando à ocorrência do pensar sobre a ação, a interação entre alunos e professora); o professor da 4ª série foi o que mais apresentou estratégias didáticas construtivistas, tais como a dinâmica de grupo, a avaliação diagnóstica, a proposição de situações problema e questionamentos, permitindo aos estudantes tomarem consciência (em maior probabilidade) de suas ações. A respeito da apropriação da teoria de Piaget, observaram-se algumas compreensões "distorcidas", sendo possível afirmar que esta apropriação ocorreu de modo difuso/fragmentado e (em alguns casos) contraditório. Por fim, as 'idéias construtivistas' mais discursadas pelos quatro professores participantes foram: a construção contínua... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: The present study investigated the utilization of the Piaget's Genetic Epistemology through the analysis of the didactic actions adopted by four professors (being each one from the first four grades of the Elementary Education) during the teaching of elementary mathematics. In addition, it was observed the manner in which the Piaget's constructivist approach was developed within the teaching practice of these professors. Throughout a qualitative research, such as case study, the data gathering was realized through the following methods: I - Structured interviews, II - Opened, closed and mixed questionnaires, III - Field observation. After two months of field research in two different schools that belong to the Department of Education of the County of Bauru, the following aspects were observed regarding the teaching actions: the teachers of the '1 POT. st' and '2 POT. nd' grades utilized only the exposing method (characteristically to the traditional teaching method); the teacher of the '3 POT. rd' grade in addition to the exposing method utilized also a few constructivist elements (the operation of the concrete material, the questioning utilizing the thought processing over the action, as well as the interrelationship between the teacher and students); the '4 POT. th' grade teacher was the professional who most presented constructivist didactic strategies, such as the group dynamic, diagnostic evaluation, the presentation of problem-situations with questions that promotes students' conscientization (in higher probability) of their actions. Regarding the Piaget's theory approach, some "distorted" comprehensions were observed, which leaded us to conclude that it occurred in a diffused/fragmented manner and in some cases contradictory. Finally, the "constructivist ideas" most adopted by the four teachers were: the continue construction of the logical-mathematical knowledge and the necessity of concrete manipulation. / Mestre

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:24:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2009-03-13Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:32:19Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 caetano_rs_me_bauru.pdf: 3426394 bytes, checksum: 1e282fa710b2a0fc3cb679b2dc7d142d (MD5) / Secretaria da Educação de SP / A presente pesquisa investigou a utilização da Espistemologia Genética piagetiana através da análise das ações didáticas adotadas por quatro professores (sendo cada um pertencente às quatro séries iniciais do Ensino Fundamental) durante a abordagem dos conteúdos matemáticos. Além disso, observou-se como ocorreu a apropriação do construtivismo piagetiano à constituição da prática docente dos referidos professores. Configurando uma pesquisa qualitativa, do tipo estudo de caso, a coleta dos dados foi realizada por meio dos seguintes instrumentos/métodos: I - Entrevistas estruturadas, II - Questionários abertos, fechados e mistos, III - Observação de campo. Após dois meses de pesquisa de campo, em duas escolas pertencentes à Diretoria de Ensino da Região de Bauru, identificaram-se os seguints aspectos com relação às ações didáticas: as professoras da 1ª e 2ª séries utilizaram exclusivamente o método expositivo-transmissivo (caracteristicamente do Ensino Tradicional); a docente da 3ª série usou conjuntamente com a exposição-transmissão alguns elementos construtivistas (a operação sobre o material concreto, o questionamento visando à ocorrência do pensar sobre a ação, a interação entre alunos e professora); o professor da 4ª série foi o que mais apresentou estratégias didáticas construtivistas, tais como a dinâmica de grupo, a avaliação diagnóstica, a proposição de situações problema e questionamentos, permitindo aos estudantes tomarem consciência (em maior probabilidade) de suas ações. A respeito da apropriação da teoria de Piaget, observaram-se algumas compreensões distorcidas, sendo possível afirmar que esta apropriação ocorreu de modo difuso/fragmentado e (em alguns casos) contraditório. Por fim, as 'idéias construtivistas' mais discursadas pelos quatro professores participantes foram: a construção contínua... / The present study investigated the utilization of the Piaget's Genetic Epistemology through the analysis of the didactic actions adopted by four professors (being each one from the first four grades of the Elementary Education) during the teaching of elementary mathematics. In addition, it was observed the manner in which the Piaget's constructivist approach was developed within the teaching practice of these professors. Throughout a qualitative research, such as case study, the data gathering was realized through the following methods: I - Structured interviews, II - Opened, closed and mixed questionnaires, III - Field observation. After two months of field research in two different schools that belong to the Department of Education of the County of Bauru, the following aspects were observed regarding the teaching actions: the teachers of the '1 POT. st' and '2 POT. nd' grades utilized only the exposing method (characteristically to the traditional teaching method); the teacher of the '3 POT. rd' grade in addition to the exposing method utilized also a few constructivist elements (the operation of the concrete material, the questioning utilizing the thought processing over the action, as well as the interrelationship between the teacher and students); the '4 POT. th' grade teacher was the professional who most presented constructivist didactic strategies, such as the group dynamic, diagnostic evaluation, the presentation of problem-situations with questions that promotes students' conscientization (in higher probability) of their actions. Regarding the Piaget's theory approach, some distorted comprehensions were observed, which leaded us to conclude that it occurred in a diffused/fragmented manner and in some cases contradictory. Finally, the constructivist ideas most adopted by the four teachers were: the continue construction of the logical-mathematical knowledge and the necessity of concrete manipulation.

No description available.

La prévention situationnelle représente aujourd’hui dans de nombreux pays un secteur de recherche stratégique de la lutte contre le crime. Apparue au milieu des années 1970 au sein du laboratoire de recherche du ministère de l’intérieur britannique, cette nouvelle spécialité a pris la forme d’une ingénierie dont l’objectif est de développer des solutions techniques empêchant le passage à l'acte des délinquants, par une intervention sur les situations particulières lors desquelles des délits semblables sont commis ou pourraient l'être (cambriolage, vol de véhicule, vandalisme, etc.). Ce que l’on appelle désormais la « science du crime » se fonde sur l’assemblage d’une pluralité de savoirs pratiques, évolue entre des laboratoires de recherche et des secteurs professionnels variés (police, urbanistes, etc.), s’appuie sur des modalités d’administration de la preuve qui passent par la déduction mathématique (modélisation statistique) et intègre ses inventions théoriques dans des innovations sociotechniques (des dispositifs de prévention et de réduction des risques). Cette thèse retrace le développement de la prévention situationnelle en se déplaçant dans l’espace et le temps afin d’atteindre les lieux de sa fabrication et de rentrer dans l’intimité des controverses à travers lesquelles elle prend forme. En décrivant cette science du crime en train de se faire - des laboratoires gouvernementaux jusqu’à sa standardisation technique dans les instances de normalisation européenne, en passant par les politiques de recherche et le travail d’instrumentation - nous rendons visibles toutes les entités (théories, chercheurs, gouvernement, instruments, catégories statistiques, modèles de risque, délinquants, victimes, normes techniques, etc.) auxquelles la prévention situationnelle s’attache et se détache. Nous montrons ainsi que les liens concrets tissés entre les chercheurs et leurs différents alliés vont bien au-delà des relations entre les personnes. Ils vont jusqu’à toucher le contenu même de la prévention situationnelle. Au final, il s’agit de représenter la prévention situationnelle sous la forme d’un collectif assumant sa responsabilité politique. / In many countries today, situational crime prevention is a strategic research sector in the battle against crime. Originating within the Home Office Research Unit in the UK during the mid 1970s, this ‘new technology’ has the purpose of developing crime prevention solutions by intervening in situations where crime commonly occurs. What has now come to be called “crime science” is based on an array of practical knowledge, evolves between research laboratories and various professional sectors (police, town planning, etc.), uses evidence-based research, and implements its theoretical discoveries in socio-technical innovations (prevention and risk reduction systems). This thesis retraces the development of situational crime prevention technology to have a closer look at the controversies from which it takes its shape. By describing this crime science-in-the-making, from state laboratories and international policy transfers, from research studies and instrumentation, we reveal all the entities (researchers, government, theories, instruments, statistical classes, risk models, offenders, victims, technical standards, etc.) to which situational crime prevention has become tied, and untied. Thus, we demonstrate that concrete links weaved between researchers and their different allies go far beyond personal relationships, touching the very core of the technology. As such, situational crime prevention is constituted as a collective, political entity.

Cette analyse porte sur le schématisme des concepts purs de l’entendement, tel que présenté par Emmanuel Kant dans la Critique de la raison pure et interprété par Martin Heidegger. La lecture proposée par Heidegger est critiquée par un bon nombre de commentateurs dans la mesure où ils considèrent que son interprétation ne lui sert qu’à faire valoir ses propres théories philosophiques au sujet du Dasein et de l’ontologie fondamentale. Notre approche se distingue de la leur dans la mesure où nous tentons de comprendre les raisons qui ont poussé Heidegger à défendre l’interprétation du schématisme qui est la sienne. Notre étude s’attarde au texte de Kant de manière à en souligner les éléments qui ont permis à Heidegger d’établir sa lecture, telle qu’il la présente dans son ouvrage de 1929, ayant pour titre Kant et le problème de la métaphysique. La méthode utilisée est comparative, car notre but est de démontrer la valeur de l’interprétation heideggérienne contre celle des commentateurs qui le critiquent pour des raisons insuffisantes. Bref, le thème du schématisme kantien est analysé de long en large et la conclusion à laquelle nous parvenons est que Heidegger a permis des avancées philosophiques considérables par son herméneutique de la Critique et qu’il est nécessaire de leur accorder l’attention qui leur est due. / The subject of this analysis is the schematism of the pure concepts of understanding, as presented by Emmanuel Kant in The Critique of Pure Reason and interpreted by Martin Heidegger. The reading proposed by Heidegger is criticized by a large number of commentators because they consider that his interpretation only serves to give value to his own philosophical theories on Dasein and on fundamental ontology. Our approach is different from theirs in that we are trying to understand the reasons that justify Heidegger in his interpretation of schematism. Our study dwells on Kant's text in order to extract the elements that allowed Heidegger to build up his thoughts, as he presented them in 1929 in Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. The method used is comparative, since our goal is to demonstrate the relevance of Heidegger's interpretation against the commentators who have insufficient reasons to criticize him. In short, the theme of Kant's schematism is analyzed thoroughly and the conclusion we come to is that Heidegger allowed for considerable philosophical progress with his hermeneutics of the Critique and that it is necessary to give them the attention they deserve.