Spelling suggestions: "subject:"eukaryotic cyclogenetics"" "subject:"eukaryotic epigenetics""
1 |
Genetic and epigenetic factors affecting adaptation in eukaryotesJoseph, Sarah Beth 28 August 2008 (has links)
Not available / text
|
2 |
Regulation of heterochromatin formation by the JmjC-domain protein Epe1Bao, Kehan January 2021 (has links)
In eukaryotic cells, DNA wraps around histones to form nucleosomes, which are the basic units of chromatin. Chromatin is classified as active euchromatin or repressive heterochromatin, depending on the modifications on histones and DNA. Heterochromatin, which is defined by the presence of histone modifications such as H3K9 methylation, serves important functions in cells such as silencing transposable elements, preventing aberrant recombination, and regulating gene expression.The fission yeast, which shares basic chromatin modification pathways with higher eukaryotes, is a premier model system for study heterochromatin formation. One important heterochromatin regulator is the JmjC-domain protein Epe1. It contains a conserved JmjC domain, which is commonly found in active demethylases. Despite that no in vitro demethylase activity has been demonstrated, Epe1 has been regarded as an H3K9 demethylase based on genetic evidence. However, the mechanism of its regulation is unclear at the beginning of my studies.
In this thesis, I investigated the regulation of Epe1 through an unbiased genetic screen to identify factors important for Epe1 functions. From the screen, I identified multiple subunits within a transcriptional coactivator SAGA complex.
I determined that Epe1 physically recruits SAGA to heterochromatin to promote histone acetylation and transcription, which provides a mechanism for a long-standing paradox regarding heterochromatin at repetitive DNA elements: heterochromatin normally represses transcription but the formation of heterochromatin requires transcription of the repeats. While past results suggest a role of Epe1 in promoting transcription of repeats, our results demonstrate how Epe1 promotes transcription.
From this screen, I also identified multiple genes in the cAMP signaling pathway that are important for Epe1 function. I demonstrated that the cAMP signaling pathway regulates Epe1 protein levels post-transcriptionally, and this effect was also seen in cells experiencing glucose starvation, which dampens the cAMP signaling. This study uncovers another layer of control of Epe1 and provides a critical link between nutrient conditions and heterochromatin regulation.
Altogether, my studies identified both a mechanism by which Epe1 promotes transcription within heterochromatin and a layer of Epe1 regulation by the glucose-sensing cAMP signaling pathway. These results will help future studies on Epe1 functions and how it is involved in epigenetic adaptation to changing nutrient conditions.
|
3 |
Watching the Replisome: Single-molecule Studies of Eukaryotic DNA ReplicationDuzdevich, Daniel January 2017 (has links)
The molecules of life are small to us—billionths of our size. They move fast too, and in the cell they crowd together impossibly. Bringing that strange world into ours is the trick of molecular biology. One approach is to harness many copies of a molecule and iterate a reaction many times to glimpse what happens at that small, foreign scale. This is a powerful way to do things and has provided major insights. But ultimately, the fundamental unit of molecular biology is the individual molecule, the individual interaction, the individual reaction. Single-molecule bioscience is the study of these phenomena.
Eukaryotic DNA replication is particularly interesting from the single-molecule perspective because the biological molecules responsible for executing the replication pathway interact so very intricately. This work is based on replication in budding yeast—a model eukaryote. The budding yeast genome harbors several hundred sequence-defined sites of replication initiation called origins. Origins are bound by the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC), which recruits the ring-shaped Mcm2-7 complex during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. A second Mcm2-7 is loaded adjacent to the first in a head-to-head orientation; this Mcm2-7 double hexamer encircles DNA and is generally termed the Pre-Replicative Complex, or Pre-RC. Mcm2-7 loading is strictly dependent on a cofactor, Cdc6, which is expressed in late G1. Much less is known about the details of downstream steps, but a large number of factors assemble to form active replisomes.
Origin-specific budding yeast replication has recently been reconstituted in vitro, with cell cycle dependence mimicked by the serial addition of purified Pre-RC components and activating kinases. This work introduces the translation of the bulk biochemical replication assay into a single-molecule assay and describes the consequent insights into the dynamics of eukaryotic replication initiation. I have developed an optical microscopy-based assay to directly visualize DNA replication initiation in real time at the single-molecule level: from origin definition, through origin licensing, to replisome formation and progression. I show that ORC has an intrinsic capacity to locate and stably bind origin sequences within large tracts of non-origin DNA, and that ordered Pre-RC assembly is driven by Cdc6. I further show that the dynamics of the ORC-Cdc6 interaction dictate the specificity of Mcm2-7 loading, and that Mcm2-7 double hexamers form preferentially at a native origin sequence. This work uncovers key variables that control Pre-RC assembly, and how directed assembly ensures that the Pre-RC forms properly and selectively at origins.
I then characterize replisome initiation and progression dynamics. I show that replication initiation is highly precise and limited to Mcm2-7 double hexamers. Sister replisomes fire bidirectionally and simultaneously, suggesting that previously unidentified quality control mechanisms ensure that a complete pair of replisomes is properly assembled prior to firing. I also find that single Mcm2-7 hexamers are sufficient to support processive replisome progression. Moreover, this work reveals that replisome progression is insensitive to DNA sequence composition at spatial and temporal scales relevant to the replication of an entire genome, indicating that separation of the DNA strands by the replicative helicase is not rate-limiting to replisome function.
I subsequently applied this replication assay to the study replisome-replisome collisions, a fundamental step in the resolution of convergent replication forks. I find that, surprisingly, active replisomes absolutely lack an intrinsic capacity to displace inactive replisomes. This result eliminates the simplest hypothesized mechanism for how the cell resolves the presence of un-fired replisomes and has prompted and guided the development of alternate testable hypotheses. Taken together, these observations probe the molecular basis of eukaryotic inheritance in unprecedented detail and offer a platform for future work on the many dynamic aspects of replisome behavior.
|
4 |
Noncoding translation mitigationKesner, Jordan January 2022 (has links)
In eukaryotes, sequences that code for the amino acid structure of proteins represent a small fraction of the total sequence space in the genome. These are referred to as coding sequences, whereas the remaining majority of the genome is designated as noncoding. Studies of translation, the process in which a ribosome decodes a coding sequence to synthesize proteins, have primarily focused on coding sequences, mainly due to the belief that translation outside of canonical coding sequences occurs rarely and with little impact on a cell. However, recently developed techniques such as ribosome profiling have revealed pervasive translation in a diverse set of noncoding sequences, including long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), introns, and both the 5’ and 3’ UTRs of mRNAs. Although proteins with amino acid sequences derived partially or entirely from noncoding regions may be functional, they will often be nonfunctional or toxic to the cell and therefore need to be removed. Translation outside of canonical coding regions may further expose the noncoding genome to selective pressure at the protein level, leading to the generation of novel functional proteins over evolutionary timescales.
Despite the potentially significant impact of these processes on the cell, the cellular mechanisms that function to detect and triage translation in diverse noncoding regions, as well as how peptides that escape triage may evolve into novel functional proteins, remain poorly understood.This thesis will describe novel findings that offer new insight into the process of noncoding translation mitigation revealed by a combination of high-throughput systems-based approaches and validated by biochemical and genetic approaches.
Chapter 1 will discuss general concepts in the translation of noncoding sequences and the relevant cellular systems and impacts on human health. Chapter 2 will discuss the results of a high-throughput reporter assay investigating translation in thousands of noncoding sequences from diverse sources. The results discussed in this chapter revealed two factors involved in the mitigation of proteins derived from noncoding sequences: C-terminal hydrophobicity and proteasomal degradation. Chapter 3 will build on Chapter 2 and discuss the results of a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screen that identified the BAG6/TRC35/RNF126 membrane protein chaperone complex as a key cellular pathway in the detection and degradation of proteins with translated noncoding sequences. Having identified the BAG6 complex as targeting a specific reporter of translation of the 3’ UTR in the AMD1 gene, a series of knockout cell lines validated these results and demonstrated the participation of two additional genes, SGTA and UBL4A.
Through coimmunoprecipitation western blots and rescue assays with flow cytometry as a readout, we confirmed physical interaction between BAG6 and the 3’ UTR of AMD1, and a similar experiment confirmed interaction between BAG6 and a readthrough mutant of the SMAD4 tumor suppressor gene. Finally, by combining our high-throughput reporter library with our BAG6 knockout cell line, we demonstrated that BAG6 targets hydrophobic C-terminal tails in many noncoding sequences of diverse origin. Finally, Chapter 4 will discuss the evolutionary perspective of noncoding translation through analyses of the sequence content of human and mouse genomes. The findings of this chapter demonstrate a significant trend for increased uracil content in noncoding regions of the genome, which frequently results in the translation of hydrophobic amino acids. We also find that many functional translated noncoding peptides localize to membranes, providing a theoretical link between the shuttling of translated noncoding sequences to a protein complex involved in membrane protein quality control and the emergence of newly evolving proteins from the noncoding genome.
|
5 |
Mammalian translation termination intermediates captured using PDMS microfluidics-based time-resolved cryo-EM (TRCEM)Dadhwal, Prikshat January 2024 (has links)
Termination of translation in eukaryotes occurs when a translating ribosome encounters a stop codon (UAA, UAG, or UGA) in its A site. This triggers the recruitment of translation termination factors eRF1, a tRNA-mimicking protein responsible for decoding the stop codon and catalyzing peptide release, and eRF3, a translational GTPase that stimulates peptide release in a GTP-hydrolysis-dependent manner. Upon successful stop codon decoding by eRF1, eRF3 carries out GTP hydrolysis and dissociates from the ribosome. eRF1 subsequently gets accommodated into the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) and catalyzes the release of the nascent peptide. The structures for the pre-accommodated eRF1 with eRF3 trapped on ribosome using non-hydrolysable GTP analogs as well as for the PTC-accommodated eRF1 have been solved using cryogenic electron-microscopy (cryo-EM). The structures reveal the binding mode and interactions between the release factors and the pre-termination complex. However, the mechanism of eRF3 GTPase activation and subsequent eRF1 accommodation into the PTC remains poorly understood.
To address this knowledge gap, we used single-particle time-resolved cryo-EM (TRCEM) to capture the structures of intermediates formed during the termination process. For our TRCEM experiments, we first developed a Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based modular microfluidic mixing-spraying device with a SiO₂ internal coating. The device has a SiO₂-coated PDMS-based 3D splitting-and-recombination (SAR) micro-mixer capable of mixing two fluids within 0.5 ms with more than 90% efficiency. The SiO₂coating strengthens the PDMS channels and acts as a hydrophilic barrier preventing sample adsorption to the PDMS surface. The micro-mixer is connected to a glass microcapillary that acts as the reaction channel. Channels of different lengths can be used to vary the overall reaction time between 10 ms and 1000 ms. The microcapillary is connected to a 3D micro-sprayer for generating a 3D plume of sprayed droplets. A cryo-EM grid is passed through the spray cone to collect droplets and is rapidly plunged into liquid cryogen for vitrification.
By using TRCEM as well as the conventional blotting method for cryo-EM sample preparation, we captured the reaction between a pre-termination (pre-TC) mimic and the ternary complex of eRF1, eRF3, and GTP at reaction times of 450 ms, 900 ms, 15 s, and 10 min. Classification of the cryo-EM data resulted in maps for five distinct factor-bound classes. Four maps belonged to intermediates with densities for eRF1 and eRF3 bound to the pre-TC in varying conformations. The fifth map had a density matching the PTC-accommodated eRF1. Population analysis allowed us to arrange the classes chronologically and track the events leading to GTPase activation during the termination process. Atomic model building and refinement allowed us to determine the hydrolysis state of the eRF3-bound GTP and revealed the catalytic mechanism for GTP-hydrolysis. The models revealed a potential mechanism for GDP dissociation post-GTP-hydrolysis.
|
6 |
Studies on Eukaryotic Pre-mRNA 3'-End Processing: Insights into PAS Recognition and the U7 snRNP activityGutierrez Tamayo, Pedro A. January 2023 (has links)
This dissertation focuses on pre-mRNA 3'-end processing in eukaryotes, a crucial step in defining the 3'end of most protein-coding mRNAs. In vertebrates, two distinct molecular machines are involved: the canonical machinery, consisting of a Cleavage Factor (CF) module, Polyadenylation Specificity (PSF) module, Cleavage Stimulation Factor, and other complexes, and the U7 snRNP machinery (U7 machinery), which consist of a core U7 snRNP complex and the Histone Cleavage Complex (HCC). U7 snRNP is involved in replication-dependent histone pre-mRNA 3'-end processing. Interestingly, the cleavage modules of the canonical and U7 machinery share an endonuclease, CPSF73, that catalyzes the cleavage reaction for 3’-end processing of pre-mRNAs. CPSF73 also possesses 5’-3’ exonuclease activity in the U7 machinery. CPSF73 has been identified as a potential target for anticancer and antimalarial small-molecule inhibitors.
Traditionally, CPSF73 nuclease activity has been demonstrated using a gel-based end-point assay, using radio-labeled or fluorescently labeled RNA substrates. In Chapter Two (Ch. 2) of this dissertation introduces a novel, real-time fluorescence assay to investigate CPSF73 nuclease activity. This efficient and high-throughput assay holds potential for identifying new CPSF73 inhibitors.
Chapter Three (Ch. 3) of this dissertation delves into the structural characterization of the mammalian PSF (mPSF) module in complex with the second most frequent PAS variants, AUUAAA. Structure studies have revealed the molecular mechanism underlying mPSF recognition of the most common PAS sequence, AAUAAA. This study presents a cryo-EM structure of mPSF in complex with AUUAAA. While the binding modes remain highly similar between the two PAS variants, we observed conformational differences in the A1 and U2 nucleotides in AUUAAA compared to the A1 and A2 of AAUAAA.
Furthermore, CPSF30 displayed conformational changes near the U2 nucleotide of AUUAAA. Attempts to explore the binding modes of two rare PAS sequences, AAGAAA and GAUAAA, were inconclusive due to a lack of RNA density in the EM maps. An atomic model of the ternary structure (CPSF160, WDR33, CPSF30) was produced using the EM map of the AAGAAA sample. The ternary structure revealed PAS recognizing residues to be disordered in CPSF30 (ZF2 and ZF3) and WDR33.
Overall, this dissertation provides insights into the intricate mechanisms of pre-mRNA 3'-end processing in mammals, laying the groundwork for future studies and potentially leading to the development of novel inhibitors targeting CPSF73.
|
7 |
In Vitro and In Silico Analysis of Osteoclastogenesis in Response to Inhibition of De-phosphorylation of EIF2alpha by Salubrinal and GuanabenzTanjung, Nancy Giovanni January 2013 (has links)
Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / An excess of bone resorption over bone formation leads to osteoporosis, resulting in a reduction of bone mass and an increase in the risk of bone fracture. Anabolic and anti-resorptive drugs are currently available for treatment, however, none of these drugs are able to both promote osteoblastogenesis and reduce osteoclastogenesis. This thesis focused on the role of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2alpha), which regulates efficiency of translational initiation. The elevation of phosphorylated eIF2alpha was reported to stimulate osteoblastogenesis, but its effects on osteoclastogenesis have not been well understood. Using synthetic chemical agents such as salubrinal and guanabenz that are known to inhibit the de-phosphorylation of eIF2alpha, the role of phosphorylation of eIF2alpha in osteoclastogenesis was investigated in this thesis.
The questions addressed herein were: Does the elevation of phosphorylated eIF2alpha (p-eIF2alpha) by salubrinal and guanabenz alter osteoclastogenesis? If so, what regulatory mechanism mediates the process? It was hypothesized that p-eIF2alpha could attenuate the development of osteoclast by regulating the transcription factor(s) amd microRNA(s) involved in osteoclastogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we conducted in vitro and in silico analysis of the responses of RAW 264.7 pre-osteoclast cells to salubrinal and guanabenz.
First, the in vitro results revealed that the elevated level of phosphorylated eIF2alpha inhibited the proliferation, differentiation, and maturation of RAW264.7 cells and downregulated the expression of NFATc1, a master transcription factor of osteoclastogenesis. Silencing eIF2alpha by RNA interference suppressed the downregulation of NFATc1, suggesting the involvement of eIF2alpha in regulation of NFATc1. Second, the in silico results using genome-wide expression data and custom-made Matlab programs predicted a set of stimulatory and inhibitory regulator genes as well as microRNAs, which were potentially involved in the regulation of NFATc1. RNA interference experiments indicated that the genes such as Zfyve21 and Ddit4 were primary candidates as an inhibitor of NFATc1.
In summary, the results showed that the elevation of p-eIF2alpha by salubrinal and guanabenz leads to attenuation of osteoclastogenesis through the downregulation of NFATc1. The regulatory mechanism is mediated by eIF2alpha signaling, but other signaling pathways are likely to be involved. Together with the previous data showing the stimulatory role of p-eIF2alpha in osteoblastogenesis, the results herein suggest that eIF2alpha-mediated signaling could provide a novel therapeutic target for treatment of osteoporosis by promoting bone formation and reducing bone resorption.
|
Page generated in 0.0673 seconds