Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Dept. of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, June 2001. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.

No description available.

The genetic function of Drosophila heterochromatin has been debated since its earliest description by Heitz (1933). To examine the genetic composition of the proximal region of chromosome 2 of Drosophila melanogaster, the generation of proximal deficiencies by the detachment of compound second autosomes appeared to be a promising method. Compound second autosomes were detached by gamma radiation. A fraction of the detachment products were recessive lethals owing to proximal deficiencies. Analysis of these detachment products by inter se complementation, pseudo-dominance tests with proximal mutations and alleleism tests with known deficiencies, provided evidence for at least two loci between the centromere and the light locus in 2L and one locus in 2R between the rolled locus and the centromere. These data in conjunction with cytological observations further demonstrate that rolled and light are located within the proximal heterochromatin of the second chromosome. To further this analysis, lethal alleles of the largest 2L and 2R proximal deficiencies were generated, employing, as a mutagen, ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS). Analysis of the 118 EMS induced recessive lethals and visible mutations recovered provided evidence for seven loci in the 2L heterochromatin and six loci in the 2R heterochromatin, with multiple alleles being obtained for most sites. Of these loci, one in 2L and two in 2R fall near the heterochromatic-euchromatic junction of 2L and 2R respectively. None of the 113 EMS lethals behaved as a deficiency, thereby confirming that, in Drosophila, the EMS mutagenesis method of Lewis and Bacher (1968) results in true "point" mutations. All of the heterochromatic loci uncovered in this study appear to be non-repetitive cistrons. Thus functional genetic loci are found in heterochromatin, albeit at very low density relative to euchromatin. / Science, Faculty of / Zoology, Department of / Graduate

A study was conducted to cytologically map certain subsets of constitutive heterochromatin onto specific portions of human chromosomes. This involved sequentially staining metaphase chromosomes from lymphocytes first with the Centromeric Dot, Giemsa-11, G-banding or Lateral Asymmetry staining techniques, which are cytochemical methods which stain particular chromosomes or chromosomal regions. Then those same metaphase chromosomes were stained using the C-banding technique, a method which is believed to denote constitutive heterochromatin. With the exception of the G-banding technique, areas depicted by the special staining techniques were found to reside only within the areas stained by the C-band technique and are thus believed to be subsets of constitutive heterochromatin. In addition to portions of the C-band regions, G-banding stained regions throughout the chromosome arms but, only those residing within the C-band regions were considered to be subsets of constitutive heterochromatin. It was found that those regions identified by the Giemsa-11, Centromeric Dot and G-banding techniques were mutually exclusive of one another and occupied discrete regions within the C-bands.

The distinct structural properties of heterochromatin accommodate a diverse group of vital chromosome functions, yet we have only rudimentary knowledge about its protein composition. One powerful tool for Drosophila biologists has been a group of genes that reverse the repressive effect of heterochromatin on the expression of a gene placed next to it ectopically. Several of these genes are known to encode proteins enriched in heterochromatin. The best characterized of these is the heterochromatin associated protein, HP1. HP1 has no known DNA-binding activity, hence its incorporation into heterochromatin is likely to be dependent upon other proteins. To examine HP1 interacting proteins, we isolated three distinct oligomeric species of HP1 from the cytoplasm of early Drosophila embryos and analyzed their compositions. The two larger oligomers resemble a fraction of that is tightly associated with the chromatin of interphase nuclei. Like the HP1 in these two cytoplasmic oligomers, this tightly bound nuclear fraction of HP1 is underphosphorylated and is associated with subunits of the origin recognition complex (ORC). We also found the localization of HP1 into heterochromatin to be disrupted in mutants for the ORC2 subunit. This phenotype supports a role for ORC in HP1 targeting and heterochromatin assembly. This proposed role for Drosophila ORC suggests striking similarities to the ability of ORC to recruit the Sir1 protein to silencing nucleation sites at the silent mating type loci in S. cerevisiae.

Most species of freshwater cyclopoid copepods follow a conventional course of DNA replication during gametogenesis, but certain species regularly undergo chromatin diminution during early embryogenesis, a process that is accompanied by the exclusion of large amounts of heterochromatic DNA from progenitor somatic cells and selective retention of this DNA by primordial germ cells after their segregation from the soma. We have used scanning microdensitometry and image analysis cytometry of individual Feulgen-stained nuclei to determine the DNA levels of individual somatic cell nuclei, oocytes, spermatocytes, and sperm for seven species, including Acanthocyclops brevispinosus, Acanthocyclops vernalis, Ectocyclops phaleratus, Eucyclops agilis, Eucyclops ensifer, Macrocyclops albidus, and Thermocyclops decipiens. The oocyte nuclei of these species have twice the DNA content of their diploid somatic cell nuclei. In specimens of Cyclops strenuus, Mesocyclops edax, Mesocyclops longisetus, Mesocyclops longisetus curvatus, and Metacyclops mendocinus, marked increases in DNA levels were noted in both female and male germ cells before meiosis. The appearance of enlarged nuclei with densely stained chromocenters is a distinguishing feature of oocytes and spermatocytes of cyclopoid species that exhibit excessive accumulations of DNA during gametogenesis and subsequently undergo chromatin diminution. The net increase in DNA content of the prediminution nuclei is 6-10 times the DNA level of their somatic cell nuclei and is largely attributable to increases in the amount of DNA associated with their heterochromatic chromocenters. The identification of a morphologically distinctive type of germ cell and its dramatic accumulation of large amounts of DNA before meiosis are discussed in terms of the selective elimination of heterochromatin during early cleavage stages in these cyclopoid species.

Mosquito borne diseases continue to be a big threat to human health worldwide. Despite using various vector control methods, we lose a great number of lives to this malicious disease in tropical and subtropical countries each year. Not surprisingly, mosquito is considered as the deadliest animal on the earth, because mortality rates from mosquito-vectored infections only lag behind other major diseases such as HIV and tuberculosis. Current approaches of vector control are mostly limited to using insecticidal bed nets, thus novel techniques are required to prevent a staggering loss to human health and quality of life. Advances in the genome sequencing in the past decade have helped to uncover numerous secrets of diverse genomes. The genome of malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae was first sequenced in 2002 and since then has been updated to include additional scaffolds, their orientations and correction of mis-assemblies. Yet, the greatest challenge remains in assembling the heterochromatin regions, that are repeat rich part and contain relatively low-gene density. Although previously neglected by scientific studies due to its characteristic paucity of genes, heterochromatin is now recognized to be crucial for several processes such as cell viability, chromosome pairing, meiosis, longevity etc. It is therefore not surprising that heterochromatin comprises of a significant portion of the genome in many species. The efforts to analyze the genome of malaria mosquito in order to identify potential new leads for vector control warrant a better understanding of the heterochromatin. Mosquitoes diploid chromosome number equal 6. While autosomes 2 and 3 are submetacentric and present in both sexes, females are homogametic with XX and males are heterogametic with XY sex chromosomes. To achieve a better understanding of the Anopheles heterochromatin, we investigated heterochromatic region of the X chromosome. Despite one arm of the X chromosome being completely heterochromatic, few studies have investigated the molecular content of this region. Protocols were developed for performing fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on mitotic X chromosomes in An. gambiae. Using cytogenetics and molecular biology techniques, we characterized the X chromosome heterochromatin in members of the An. gambiae complex. Specific satellite DNA and 18S ribosomal DNA probes (major components of heterochromatin) were mapped to X chromosomes enabling their differentiation and characterization in the An. gambiae complex. Microarray studies have highlighted the importance of X chromosome during investigation of nascent species An. gambiae and An. coluzzii. Here for the first time qualitative differences in heterochromatin in between nascent species are described. Cytogenetic idiograms are developed as to include the molecular and qualitative differences between the species of the An. gambiae complex. These idiograms are expected to provide a better resolution of the X chromosome heterochromatin for comparison in major malaria vectors, closing some of the gaps present due to poor sequencing of unassembled repeat rich regions in An. gambiae complex. The current understanding of Y chromosome for transgenic manipulation is poor and limited to very few genes. Due to its near total heterochromatic composition, it is the hardest part of the genome to assemble. In collaboration with other researchers, the Y chromosome content was characterized among sibling species of the An. gambiae complex. Our data revealed the swift changes the Y chromosome has undergone in a relatively short evolutionary time period. These include a rapid rate of turnover not only in heterochromatin but also in euchromatin. In addition to previously described repeats, a novel highly repetitive element called Zanzibar was discovered and mapped to the males of various Anopheles sibling species. Our data can form the basis for evolutionary studies in heterochromatin for male mosquitoes within the An. gambiae complex while also help identify novel targets to create successful transgenic male populations. Along with the X chromosome heterochromatin, to our knowledge this is the most extensive contribution to improve the understanding of mitotic chromosome heterochromatin in malaria mosquitoes. This study also investigated if epigenetics play role in mosquito development, fecundity and heterochromatin formation. DNA methylation, histone modifications and small noncoding RNAs are among the epigenetic mechanisms scrutinized in mammals. However, knowledge about epigenetic mechanisms and their effects is sparse in mosquitoes. A protocol for testing the various effects of epigenetics on different stages of malaria mosquito was developed. An epigenetic drug was utilized to probe the effects on immature and adult malaria mosquitoes. Different concentrations of DZNep, a histone methyltransferase inhibitor, were administered to An. coluzzii larvae. Total survivorship and pupation were compared for treated and untreated groups. The drug was also administered to adult blood feeding females to determine any effects on fecundity and egg morphology, revealing a negative association with an increase in drug concentration. A dose dependent decrease in SAH hydrolase concentration in An. coluzzii was also noticed. These results suggest epigenetics plays a critical role in mosquito pupation and ovarian development. Our work lays the groundwork for future investigations into the field of epigenetics in mosquitoes by revealing its effect on several important developmental stages in malaria mosquitoes. Although genomics and next-gen sequencing technology have come a long way in the last decade since the first Anopheles genome was sequenced, considerable gaps still exist in case characterization of heterochromatin function in an organism. Through our work, we have endeavored to elucidate a few of the major roles that heterochromatin may play in organization, evolution and adaptation of the malaria mosquitoes. / Ph. D.

Heterochromatin in S. cerevisiae is formed at telomeres, rDNA, and the mating type loci by the Silent Information Regulator (SIR) complex. Silencing requires the SIR complex that consists of Sir2, Sir3, and Sir4. The SIR proteins interact with each other, nucleosomes, and DNA binding proteins that are located at silencers. Although the interactions within the SIR complex are well defined, the requirements for each of these interactions during the nucleation and spreading of heterochromatin are not. This study uses genetic and biochemical techniques to assess silencing at various loci and to detect interactions between the SIR proteins. Asf2 (Anti-Silencing Factor 2) is a poorly characterized protein that interacts with Sir3 and is investigated in detail throughout this work. The overexpression of ASF2 disrupts silencing and does so by outcompeting Sir4 for Sir3 binding. ASF2 is a paralog of SIR4, and they share significant homology within their coiled-coil domains which is required for their interaction with Sir3. The Asf2 protein exists as a dimer that depends on Sir3 and may serve as a tool to alter Sir3 availability and impact heterochromatin stability. The evidence presented here categorizes the requirements for the Sir3-Sir4 interaction and the establishment of H4K16 acetylation in nucleation and spreading. Mutations in the AAA+ domain of Sir3 (sir3-4A) render it insufficient to nucleate heterochromatin but do not prevent Sir3-4A and Sir4 from spreading downstream of silencers. The Sir3-Sir4 interaction is therefore a nucleation-specific requirement. Cells lacking SAS2 are defective for telomere silencing, but silencing is partially restored by overexpressing SIR3 but not sir3-4A. Although the Sir3-Sir4 interaction is not required for Sir3 to spread on its own, Sir4/Sir2 are unable to spread without the establishment of H4K16 acetylation.

No description available.

HMG-Proteine sind nach den Histonen die zweithäufigste Superfamilie nukleärer Proteine. Sie binden an DNA und Nukleosomen und induzieren strukturelle Veränderungen im Chromatin. Sie spielen eine wichtige Rolle in der Dynamik des Chromatins und beeinflussen dadurch DNA-abhängige Prozesse, wie Transkription und Replikation. Proteine der HMGA-Familie sind charakterisiert durch konservierte DNA-Bindungsmotive, den AT-Hooks, welche eine Bindung an AT-reiche DNA-Sequenzen vermitteln und durch einen sauren C-Terminus. HMGA-Proteine sind verstärkt im Heterochromatin konzentriert und stehen in Verbindung mit der Expressionsregulation spezifischer Gene aufgrund der Stabilisierung von Nukleoproteinkomplexen, so genannten Enhanceosomen. HMGA-Proteine spielen des Weiteren eine entscheidende Rolle in verschiedenen Entwicklungsprozessen und bei der Tumorprogression . Um den Einfluss von HMGA1 auf die zelluläre Differenzierung und die Chromatinmodulation zu untersuchen, wurden C2C12 Maus-Myoblastenzellen verwendet. Die Induktion der Myogenese in diesen Zellen geht mit der Herunterregulierung von HMGA1 einher. Durch die Etablierung einer C2C12-Zelllinie, welche ein EGFP-markiertes HMGA1a stabil exprimierte, konnte gezeigt werden, dass eine anhaltende HMGA1-Expression spezifisch die Myogeneseprozess inhibierte, während die Osteogenese davon unbeeinflusst zu bleiben schien. Dieser hemmende Effekt kann durch die HMGA1-abhängige Fehlexpression verschiedener Gene, welche für eine einwandfreie Muskeldifferenzierung nötig sind und in die Zellzyklusregulation eingreifen, erklärt werden. Unter der Verwendung von RNAi konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Herunterregulierung von HMGA1-Proteinen für eine korrekte Genexpression und den Muskeldifferenzierungsprozess notwendig ist. Während der terminalen Differenzierung wird die Umorganisation des Chromatins durch die Fusion der Chromozentren offensichtlich. Fotobleichtechniken, wie „fluorescence recovery after photobleaching“ (FRAP) zeigten, dass HMGA1-Proteine mit dem Methyl-CpG-bindenden Protein 2 (MeCP2), welches eine wichtige Rolle in der Chromozentrenfusion spielt, um DNA-Bindungsstellen konkurriert und dieses vom Chromatin verdrängt. Diese dynamische Konkurrenz zwischen einem anhaltend exprimierten HMGA1 und MeCP2 trägt somit zur Inhibition der differenzierungsabhängigen Modulation des Chromatins während der späten Myogenese bei. Die Untersuchungen in C2A1a-Zellen lieferten weitere Hinweise dafür, dass der wesentlichste Umbau des Chromatins in einem Zeitfenster um den dritten Tag nach Induktion der Myogenese stattfindet, an welchem HMGA1 natürlicherweise nahezu vollständig herunterreguliert sind. In diesem Zeitraum kommt es zur Dissoziation der Chromozentren, zu veränderten Expressionsmustern in bestimmten Genen, zu Modulationen in Histonmodifikationen (H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K27me3), zur Replikations-unabhängigen Akkumulation von Histon H3 in den Chromozentren über ungefähr einen Zellzyklus hinweg und zu eine signifikanten Erhöhung der HP1-Dynamik. Durch den Einsatz von Bimolekularer Fluoreszenzkomplementierung (BiFC), die es erlaubt Protein-Protein-Interaktionen in vivo zu visualisieren, konnte gezeigt werden, dass der saure C-Terminus des HMGA mit der Chromodomäne (CD) des HP1 interagiert. Zusätzlich ist für diese Interaktion die korrekte DNA-Bindung des HMGA nötig. FRAP-Messungen mit HP1-EGFP-Fusionsproteinen in Zellen die wildtypisches oder ein mutiertes HMGA koexprimierten, bestätigten diese Daten und wiesen darauf hin, dass die HP1-Verweildauer im Heterochromatin maßgeblich von der Gegenwart eines funktionellen HMGA1 abhängig ist. Des Weiteren zeigten C2C12-Myoblasten, die HMGA1 natürlicherweise exprimieren, eine hohe HP1-Verweildauer, die nach HMGA1-knock down drastisch verringert ist. Umgekehrt ist die HP1-Verweildauer nach einer Herunterregulierung von HMGA1 an Tag 3 der Myogenese gering und steigt durch die Koexpression von HMGA1 auf das in Myoblasten gemessene Niveau an. Zusammengenommen zeigen diese Daten, dass die differenzielle Expression von HMGA1 und ihre Fähigkeit mit HP1 zu interagieren, sowie ihre Konkurrenz mit MeCP2 um DNA-Bindungsstellen einen entscheidende Rolle in der Regulation der Aufrechterhaltung und Plastizität des Heterochromatins während der Differenzierung spielen. Daher ist eine zeitlich festgelegte Herunterregulierung von HMGA1 notwendig, um die Modulation des Chromatins und dadurch den Differenzierungsprozess zu ermöglichen / HMG proteins are an abundant superfamily of nuclear proteins that bind to DNA and nucleosomes and induce structural changes in the chromatin fiber. These proteins play an important role in chromatin dynamics and thereby impact DNA-related processes like transcription and replication. Proteins of the HMGA family are characterized by conserved DNA-binding domains, the AT hooks, which mediate binding to AT-rich DNA, and an acidic c-terminal domain. HMGA proteins concentrate in heterochromatin and are linked to specific gene regulation by stabilizing nucleoprotein complexes called enhanceosomes. Furthermore, HMGA proteins play an important role in several developmental processes and in tumor progression. C2C12 mouse myoblast cells were used to explore the impact of HMGA1 proteins on differentiation and chromatin modulation. After induction of myogenesis HMGA1 proteins revealed a downregulation. By establishing a C2C12 cell line stably expressing an EGFP tagged HMGA1a (C2A1a) it could be shown that sustained HMGA expression inhibited specifically the myogenic process while osteogenesis seemed to be unaffected. This inhibition can be explained by an HMGA1-dependent misexpression of several genes that are required for proper myogenic differentiation and genes involved in cell cycle regulation. Using RNAi techniques it could be demonstrated that downregulation of HMGA1 proteins is required to restore proper gene expression and to enable the myogenic program. During terminal differentiation chromatin remodeling is apparent by fusion of chromocenters. Photobleaching experiments like “fluorescence recovery after photobleaching” (FRAP) revealed that HMGA1 proteins compete with the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), which plays an important role during the fusion of chromocenters, for DNA-binding sites. Thereby MeCP2 is displaced from chromatin. This dynamic competition between constitutively expressed HMGA1 and MeCP2 thereby leads to an inhibition of the differentiation dependent modulation of the chromatin during late myogenesis. Studies in C2A1a cells revealed a set of evidences indicating that further major chromatin remodeling occurs around day three after induction when HMGA1 proteins are downregulated. At this time-frame chromocenters dissociate, expression patterns of genes are switching, histone modifications are modulated (H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K27me3), histone H3 accumulates in a replication independent mode in chromocenters for approximately one cell cycle, and dynamics of HP1 proteins are significantly increased. Applying bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) that allows visualization of protein-protein interactions in living cells I could show that the acidic domain of HMGA interacts with the chromodomain (CD) of HP1. In Addition, the proper DNA-binding of HMGA1 is necessary to accomplish a functional interaction between HP1 and HMGA. FRAP measurements of HP1-EGFP in cells coexpressing wild type or mutated HMGAs corroborated theses findings and indicated that the HP1 residence time in heterochromatin strongly depends on the presence of functional HMGA proteins. Furthermore, HP1 residence time is high in C2C12 myoblasts which express HMGA1 but low after HMGA1 knock down. Vice versa, it is low in C2C12 cells at day 3 of differentiation when HMGA proteins are downregulated, but high when HMGA1 proteins are coexpressed. Together, these data indicate that the differential expression of HMGAs and their capacity to interact with HP1 proteins and compete with MeCP2 plays an important role in the regulation of heterochromatin maintenance and plasticity during differentiation. Therefore, the downregulation of HMGA1 proteins is required to allow chromatin remodeling and to enable the differentiation program.