Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-04-07T17:49:09Z No. of bitstreams: 1 cicerovieiratorresjunior.pdf: 823862 bytes, checksum: 5b3ecd7fe41efce93bef8120c2cc2c2f (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-04-11T11:33:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 cicerovieiratorresjunior.pdf: 823862 bytes, checksum: 5b3ecd7fe41efce93bef8120c2cc2c2f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-11T11:33:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 cicerovieiratorresjunior.pdf: 823862 bytes, checksum: 5b3ecd7fe41efce93bef8120c2cc2c2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-18 / Esta dissertação tem por objetivo investigar como se efetivou a implementação dos Laboratórios Básicos Padrão MEC/FNDE. Com a implantação do Programa Brasil Profissionalizado no Estado do Paraná, instituído pelo Decreto Nº 6.302 de 27 de dezembro de 2007, programa do Governo Federal, foram firmados convênios com a Secretaria de Estado da Educação – SEED-PR, com o intuito de modernizar as estruturas das escolas que ofertam a Educação Profissional da Rede Estadual. A partir dos estudos de demanda, exigências estabelecidas pelo programa, as escolas contempladas se propuseram a melhorar as condições de oferta da Educação Profissional e da qualidade na formação de seus alunos. Com a expansão da rede para a oferta da Educação Profissional e Tecnológica, também se fez necessária a adequação dos espaços escolares, proporcionando melhores condições de aprendizagem e a preparação dos profissionais para o desenvolvimento de suas atividades. Os autores que contribuíram para a fundamentação desta dissertação passam por especialistas na Educação Profissional e nos sistemas de avaliação. O instrumento utilizado para o desenvolvimento desta tarefa foi a avaliação executiva, processo pelo qual foi possível apresentar uma visão generalizada da implementação do programa na Rede Pública do Estado do Paraná, conforme as orientações e recomendações do Manual de Orientação e Preenchimento da Situação Escolar – MOPSE, composto por formulários que indicavam os aspectos de infraestrutura dos espaços escolhidos para a instalação dos laboratórios. O intento dessa dissertação é a preparação para o processo de uma avaliação de impacto, ou seja, a construção de um instrumento de investigação mais aprofundado desta ação, buscando conhecer o quanto a implementação dos laboratórios tem contribuído para a melhoria nas condições de oferta para a Educação Profissional. / This dissertation that aims to investigate how it effected the implementation of Basic Standard Laboratories MEC / FNDE. With the implementation of Brazil Professionalized Program in the State of Paraná, established by Decree No. 6302 of December 27, 2007, Federal Government program, agreements with the State Department of Education – SEED-PR, were signed, in order to modernize structures of schools that offer the Vocational Education of the State Network. From the studies of demand requirements established by the program, the schools in question proposed to improve the provision of Vocational Education and quality in the education of its students. With the expansion of the network for the provision of Vocational and Technological Education, also the adequacy of school spaces was needed, providing better learning and preparation of professionals for the development of its activities. The authors who contributed to the foundation of this dissertation are specialists in Vocational Education and evaluation systems. The instrument used for the development of this task was the executive assessment process by which it was possible to present a general overview of the implementation of the program on the Public System of the State of Paraná, as the guidelines and recommendations of the Manual of Guidance and Completion of School Situation - MOPSE composed of forms that indicated the aspects of infrastructure chosen for the installation of laboratories spaces. The intent of this dissertation is the preparation for the process of impact assessment, about the construction of a tool for further investigation of this action, seeking to know how the implementation of laboratories have contributed to the improvement in the conditions of an offer to Professional Education.

La part de l’irrationnel dans les processus de sélection des futurs dirigeants des grandes entreprises françaises. Cette thèse explore la part d’irrationalité intervenant dans les processus de sélection des futurs dirigeants français. Examinant les profils des dirigeants français du début du 21ème siècle, elle souligne la persistance d’une doxa cartésienne, c’est-à-dire la croyance en l’autorité de la conscience et de la raison dans la détection, la sélection ou la génération d’élites et plus particulièrement de dirigeants dans les organisations, réalisant en particulier un biais de sélection sociale précoce pour l’accès à la direction des grandes entreprises. Combinant les apports des théories de l’agence, des échelons supérieurs, et de la rationalité limitée, ce travail construit une vision intégrative des enjeux et paramètres de la sélection des futurs dirigeants à plusieurs niveaux (individus, systèmes, réseaux, organisation, culture), et analyse comment des processus rationnels peuvent être modifiés par des formes d’irrationalité, des premiers moments de détection et de fabrique des talents à celle, à la fois plus symbolique et signifiante, de la dirigeance. Le cadre conceptuel du leader transcendant permet de représenter une vision intégrative du leadership, et d’explorer les « nouvelles » qualités que les processus de sélection devront identifier, illustrant l’inadéquation des processus traditionnels aux enjeux des entreprises modernes. Ce travail met en lumière la nécessité de réévaluer les pratiques de la sélection des dirigeants au travers d’une rationalité procédurale plus en adéquation avec la réalité opératoire, à la fois sur le plan de la rationalité sous-jacente (les valeurs et critères du leadership), de ses outils (les méthodes d’évaluation), et de son objet (une articulation intégrative et continue du développement et de la sélection assumant une part d’irrationnel). / The purpose of this research work is to investigate how irrationality plays a significant role in selecting top executives in French corporates. Upon an in-depth review of the making of top executives in France at the beginning of the 21st century, it appears that a Cartesian rationale still prevails, based on the sheer belief that conscience and reason must be the unique dimensions used in selecting, promoting, and thus, perpetuating elites, from the early school years to the appointment of the C-suite in large organisations. Three theories are central in this research work: the agency theory, the upper echelon theory, as well as the bounded rationality theory. Combining them in an integrative conceptual framework allows to understand how strong rational patterns might be affected by forms and mechanisms of irrationality all along the process of identifying and developing future leaders to the more significant moment when they are appointed. Ultimately, the outcome of this research work shows that the model of « transcendent leadership » seems more effective than others to address the challenges of identifying and selecting executives in modern organisations. This leads to examining how to build more robust systems of executive selection at three levels of progress: (a) underlying values and patterns of leadership, (b) assessment tools and processes and (c) conscious acceptance of irrationality as a significant part of talent and executive spotting and development.