No description available.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, School of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, Discipline of Physiology, 2004. / Includes list of papers arising from this thesis. "July 2004" Includes bibliographical references (leaves 253-297). Also available online.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Adelaide, School of Molecular and Biomedical Sciences, Discipline of Physiology, 2004. / Includes list of papers arising from this thesis. "July 2004" Includes bibliographical references (leaves 253-297). Also available in print form.

The aim of this thesis was to examine fetal behavioural responses to auditory and tactile stimulation. Responses were examined for the second- and third-trimester fetuses (second-trimester ≤ 27 gestational weeks (wGA), third- trimester >27 wGA), in both experiments, respectively. Experiment 1 of this thesis examined fetal behavioural responses to the mother’s recorded and live voice, contrasting findings to an environmental sound and silent control conditions. Behavioural responses of 30 fetuses trimester (20-33 wGA, N = 13 in the 2nd and N = 17 in the 3rd trimester) Were examined in the following conditions were explored: (1) mother’s live, (2) and recorded voice, (3) an environmental sound, and (4) a silent control condition. Findings showed the strongest responses to maternal sounds as well as differential responses between gestational age groups. Younger fetuses displayed an arousal response to maternal voice, whereas third-trimester fetuses displayed an orientating response. The aim of Experiment 2 was to examine whether fetuses can differentiate between different human sources of tactile stimulation of the maternal abdomen. Behavioural responses of 28 fetuses (20-33 wGA, N = 15 in the 2nd and N = 13 in the 3rd trimester) were examined across four conditions: (1) mother’s, (2) father’s, and (3) stranger’s touch, as well as a (4) silent control condition. Differential responses to the tactile stimulation were found, especially in reaching of the uterine wall, and self- touch across the four conditions. Third- trimester fetuses touched the uterus wall for significantly longer than fetuses in the second-trimester. The strongest responses were found to the mother’s touch. Further differential responses were found between age groups, with third-trimester fetuses clearly differentiating between different sources of tactile stimulation, while second-trimester fetuses hardly showed differentiated responses. It is suggested that maturational differences in both experiments are due to the fetal development of the central nervous system, and might indicate the emergence of a proprioceptive self-awareness by the 3rd trimester.

Thesis (M.D.)--Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, 1970. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 284-298).

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 182-187) Also available in print.

In this dissertation, we base our experience of carrying out participation in 4 EU-funded projects: EUROFETUS (Cost-Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies); MOMS-B (MOther Mortality and Severe morbidity); PERISTAT(Monitoring and evaluating perinatal health) and EUPHRATES (EUropean Project on obstetric Haemorrhage Reduction: Attitudes, Trial, and Early warning System), an online questionnaire survey for researchers and a literature review, to provide results which will help us to understand the added value and the challenges of the EU collaboration research and the challenges of EU collaboration research in improving the quality and the accessibility of reproductive healthcare. The EUROFETUS project showed that, despite the fact that the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies has been declining during the last twenty years, they are still a major cause of perinatal mortality and childhood disability in Europe. Congenital heart defects were among the most frequent and the most severe malformations, but were the least diagnosed prenatally. There was large variation between and within countries regarding the proportion of cases diagnosed prenatally and the proportion of cases resulting in termination of pregnancy. From the data available in Eurofetus, such variation might result from the cultural differences underling policy or on ultrasonographer’s expertise, or on differing interpretation of scientific evidence in the design and implementation of screening. The MOMS-B project allowed population-based comparisons between countries by using the standardised definition that showed the three conditions (pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis) selected to as markers of acute severe maternal morbidity are not rare in Europe. Severe haemorrhage was the most common of severe maternal morbidity condition, but its incidence varied widely between European countries. The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths. The EUPHRATES project on a survey of current practice in relation to management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in 14 European countries showed that there were considerable differences in policies for managing the third stage of labour between and within the countries studied. The online questionnaire survey for researchers showed that almost all researchers were satisfied with their participation in EU-funded project; the main benefits for them were transfer and sharing of experience and knowledge between researchers, but the administrative procedures should be simplified in the future. The description of the process needed to obtain ethical approval for a cluster randomized trial in the EUPHRATES project showed that there was considerable variation in time required and the criteria used amongst 14 European countries, with consequential delay in research and exclusion of one country from the trial. Overall, we conclude that Community Framework programmes offer new opportunities to connect researchers from all over Europe to share expertise and resources, including computing tools, and make a real contribution to the creation of the European research area. The added value of EU collaborative research is particularly well positioned for improving foetal and maternal health, from the perspective of harmonizing case definitions, collecting the necessary number of cases within a limited period of time, comparing data between regions and countries, meeting the specific needs of the EU and giving a common response to European reproductive health questions. On the other hand, epidemiological data from multiple countries has advanced our understanding of important health-risks and their geographical distributions across Europe and provided the evidence to help people make better decisions about healthcare in the field of reproductive health for the future research. We focus on reproductive health but believe that this approach could be adapted to other fields when appropriate./Dans cette thèse, nous avons basé notre expérience sur notre participation dans 4 projets européens (EUROFETUS, MOMS-B, PERISTAT et EUPHRATES), un questionnaire en ligne vers les chercheurs, et une revue de la littérature pour fournir les résultats qui nous aideront à comprendre la valeur ajoutée qu’apporte la recherche collaborative et les défis de cette recherche pour l’amélioration de la qualité et de l’accessibilité de la santé reproductive. Le projet EUROFETUS montre que, en dépit du fait que la prévalence des anomalies congénitales à la naissance diminue depuis une vingtaine d’années, elles restent une cause majeure de mortalité périnatale et de handicaps infantiles. Les malformations cardiaques congénitales sont parmi les plus fréquentes et les plus sévères des malformations, mais aussi les moins diagnostiquées. Il y a de larges différences entre et à l’intérieur des pays concernant la proportion de cas diagnostiqués en prénatal et la proportion de cas résultant en interruption de grossesse. D’après les données disponibles dans EUROFETUS, de telles variations pourraient résulter de politiques de santé différentes, reflétant des divergences culturelles, de variations dans l’expertise des échographistes, ou encore d’interprétations divergentes de preuves scientifiques dans la conception ou la mise en place du screening. Le projet collaboratif européen sur la Mortalité et la Morbidité Maternelle sévère (MOMB-B) a permis des comparaisons en population entre pays en utilisant une définition standardisée qui a montré que les trois pathologies sélectionnées (pré-éclampsie, hémorragie, sepsis) comme marqueurs de la morbidité maternelle sévère n’étaient pas rares en Europe. L’hémorragie sévère était la pathologie la plus fréquente, mais son incidence variait très fort d’un pays à l’autre. The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths. Le projet EUPHRATES, par une enquête de pratique concernant le management de la troisième phase du travail et du management immédiat de l’hémorragie du postpartum dans 14 pays européens, a montré qu’il y avait des différences considérables dans les pratiques entre et à l’intérieur des pays en Europe. Le questionnaire en ligne auprès des chercheurs a montré que la plupart étaient satisfaits de leur participation à des projets européens, les principaux bénéfices étaient le transfert et le partage d’expériences et de connaissances entre chercheurs mais que les procédures administratives devraient être simplifiées dans le futur. La description de l’utilisation des comités d’éthique dans l’essai EUPHRATES a montré de très grandes divergences. En général, nous concluons que les programmes-cadres européens offrent de nouvelles opportunités aux chercheurs européens de partager l’expertise et les moyens, en ce compris les outils informatiques et contribuent à la création d’un espace européen de la recherche. La valeur ajoutée de la recherche collaborative est particulièrement importante pour améliorer la santé fœtale et maternelle par l’harmonisation de la définition des cas, la collecte du nombre nécessaire de cas dans une période déterminée, la comparaison des données entre les régions et pays, pour rencontrer les besoins spécifiques de l’Union Européenne et donner une réponse commune aux questions de santé reproductive en Europe. D’autre part, les données épidémiologiques de nombreux pays ont fait avancer notre compréhension de risques importants de santé maternelle et leur distribution géographique à travers l’Europe et apporté la preuve de la nécessité d’aider les gens à prendre la meilleure décision en ce qui concerne les soins en santé reproductive pour de futures recherches. Nous nous sommes concentrés sur la santé reproductive mais nous croyons que cette approche pourrait être adaptée à d’autres domaines.

Background: Prenatal alcohol consumption is one of the leading preventable causes of birth defects, including fetal alcohol syndrome and learning disabilities. Although there is strong evidence of the benefits of screening and alcohol brief interventions (ABIs) in reducing hazardous and harmful drinking among the primary care population, evidence of its effectiveness with the antenatal care population is limited. Nevertheless, the Scottish Government is incorporating an alcohol screening and ABI programme as part of the routine antenatal care provided to women in a bid to protect the health and safety of the unborn child and improve subsequent health and developmental outcomes. This research therefore seeks to increase understanding of the factors that are likely to influence the effectiveness of this recently implemented programme. It also aims to explore the extent to which contemporary issues such as change in guidelines regarding alcohol consumption during pregnancy influences perceptions and attitudes, and the possible implications of these on the screening and ABI delivery. Methods: The study described in this thesis employed a realistic evaluation methodology. Realistic evaluation is a theory-driven approach to investigating social programmes. It is concerned with hypothesising, testing and refining programme theories by exploring the interaction of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. To identify the relevant screening and ABI programme theories, two separate systematic reviews, a critical review and four face-to-face interviews were undertaken with health policy implementers. The findings were used to construct context, mechanism and outcomes propositions. The propositions were then tested by conducting individual interviews with seventeen pregnant women and fifteen midwives, a further six midwifery team leaders were involved in a focus group discussion. A thematic approach using a hybrid of inductive and deductive coding and theme development informed the qualitative analysis. Results: In the context of uncertainties regarding the threshold of drinking that causes fetal harm, pregnant women reported that screening assessment helped them to reflect on their drinking behaviour and facilitate behaviour change. For women who drank at hazardous and harmful levels before attending the booking appointment, screening and ABI may be helpful in terms of eliciting behaviour change. However, they may not be very beneficial in terms of reducing harm to the fetus as it has been found that drinking during the first trimester poses the most risk to the fetus. Training and resources provided to midwives as part of the screening and ABI programme were found to be facilitating mechanisms that midwives indicated improved their skills and confidence. However, most of the midwives had not subsequently employed the motivational interviewing skills required for the ABI delivery, as many of the pregnant women reported that they reduced or abstained from alcohol consumption once pregnancy was confirmed. The outcome noted was that midwives confidence decreased leading to missed opportunities to appropriately deliver the ABI to eligible women. The small numbers of women being identified for ABI meant midwives rarely delivered the ABI. This negatively influenced midwives attitudes as they then accorded ABI low priority in their workload. Other disenabling mechanisms noted to be hampering the implementation of the screening and ABI initiative included midwives contending with competing priorities at the booking appointments, and the lack of adequate rapport between midwives and pregnant women at the booking appointment to discuss alcohol issues appropriately, leading to women providing socially desirable responses to screening questions. Conclusions: The findings of this study has generated greater explanations of the working of the screening and ABI programme in antenatal care setting and has provided transferable lessons that can be used by others intending to implement similar programmes in other settings.

In this dissertation, we base our experience of carrying out participation in 4 EU-funded projects: EUROFETUS (Cost-Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies); MOMS-B (MOther Mortality and Severe morbidity); PERISTAT(Monitoring and evaluating perinatal health) and EUPHRATES (EUropean Project on obstetric Haemorrhage Reduction: Attitudes, Trial, and Early warning System), an online questionnaire survey for researchers and a literature review, to provide results which will help us to understand the added value and the challenges of the EU collaboration research and the challenges of EU collaboration research in improving the quality and the accessibility of reproductive healthcare.<p>The EUROFETUS project showed that, despite the fact that the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies has been declining during the last twenty years, they are still a major cause of perinatal mortality and childhood disability in Europe. Congenital heart defects were among the most frequent and the most severe malformations, but were the least diagnosed prenatally. There was large variation between and within countries regarding the proportion of cases diagnosed prenatally and the proportion of cases resulting in termination of pregnancy. From the data available in Eurofetus, such variation might result from the cultural differences underling policy or on ultrasonographer’s expertise, or on differing interpretation of scientific evidence in the design and implementation of screening.<p>The MOMS-B project allowed population-based comparisons between countries by using the standardised definition that showed the three conditions (pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis) selected to as markers of acute severe maternal morbidity are not rare in Europe. Severe haemorrhage was the most common of severe maternal morbidity condition, but its incidence varied widely between European countries.<p>The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths.<p>The EUPHRATES project on a survey of current practice in relation to management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in 14 European countries showed that there were considerable differences in policies for managing the third stage of labour between and within the countries studied.<p> The online questionnaire survey for researchers showed that almost all researchers were satisfied with their participation in EU-funded project; the main benefits for them were transfer and sharing of experience and knowledge between researchers, but the administrative procedures should be simplified in the future. The description of the process needed to obtain ethical approval for a cluster randomized trial in the EUPHRATES project showed that there was considerable variation in time required and the criteria used amongst 14 European countries, with consequential delay in research and exclusion of one country from the trial. <p>Overall, we conclude that Community Framework programmes offer new opportunities to connect researchers from all over Europe to share expertise and resources, including computing tools, and make a real contribution to the creation of the European research area. The added value of EU collaborative research is particularly well positioned for improving foetal and maternal health, from the perspective of harmonizing case definitions, collecting the necessary number of cases within a limited period of time, comparing data between regions and countries, meeting the specific needs of the EU and giving a common response to European reproductive health questions. On the other hand, epidemiological data from multiple countries has advanced our understanding of important health-risks and their geographical distributions across Europe and provided the evidence to help people make better decisions about healthcare in the field of reproductive health for the future research.<p>We focus on reproductive health but believe that this approach could be adapted to other fields when appropriate./Dans cette thèse, nous avons basé notre expérience sur notre participation dans 4 projets européens (EUROFETUS, MOMS-B, PERISTAT et EUPHRATES), un questionnaire en ligne vers les chercheurs, et une revue de la littérature pour fournir les résultats qui nous aideront à comprendre la valeur ajoutée qu’apporte la recherche collaborative et les défis de cette recherche pour l’amélioration de la qualité et de l’accessibilité de la santé reproductive.<p>Le projet EUROFETUS montre que, en dépit du fait que la prévalence des anomalies congénitales à la naissance diminue depuis une vingtaine d’années, elles restent une cause majeure de mortalité périnatale et de handicaps infantiles. Les malformations cardiaques congénitales sont parmi les plus fréquentes et les plus sévères des malformations, mais aussi les moins diagnostiquées. Il y a de larges différences entre et à l’intérieur des pays concernant la proportion de cas diagnostiqués en prénatal et la proportion de cas résultant en interruption de grossesse. D’après les données disponibles dans EUROFETUS, de telles variations pourraient résulter de politiques de santé différentes, reflétant des divergences culturelles, de variations dans l’expertise des échographistes, ou encore d’interprétations divergentes de preuves scientifiques dans la conception ou la mise en place du screening.<p>Le projet collaboratif européen sur la Mortalité et la Morbidité Maternelle sévère (MOMB-B) a permis des comparaisons en population entre pays en utilisant une définition standardisée qui a montré que les trois pathologies sélectionnées (pré-éclampsie, hémorragie, sepsis) comme marqueurs de la morbidité maternelle sévère n’étaient pas rares en Europe. L’hémorragie sévère était la pathologie la plus fréquente, mais son incidence variait très fort d’un pays à l’autre.<p>The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths.<p>Le projet EUPHRATES, par une enquête de pratique concernant le management de la troisième phase du travail et du management immédiat de l’hémorragie du postpartum dans 14 pays européens, a montré qu’il y avait des différences considérables dans les pratiques entre et à l’intérieur des pays en Europe.<p>Le questionnaire en ligne auprès des chercheurs a montré que la plupart étaient satisfaits de leur participation à des projets européens, les principaux bénéfices étaient le transfert et le partage d’expériences et de connaissances entre chercheurs mais que les procédures administratives devraient être simplifiées dans le futur. La description de l’utilisation des comités d’éthique dans l’essai EUPHRATES a montré de très grandes divergences.<p>En général, nous concluons que les programmes-cadres européens offrent de nouvelles opportunités aux chercheurs européens de partager l’expertise et les moyens, en ce compris les outils informatiques et contribuent à la création d’un espace européen de la recherche. La valeur ajoutée de la recherche collaborative est particulièrement importante pour améliorer la santé fœtale et maternelle par l’harmonisation de la définition des cas, la collecte du nombre nécessaire de cas dans une période déterminée, la comparaison des données entre les régions et pays, pour rencontrer les besoins spécifiques de l’Union Européenne et donner une réponse commune aux questions de santé reproductive en Europe. D’autre part, les données épidémiologiques de nombreux pays ont fait avancer notre compréhension de risques importants de santé maternelle et leur distribution géographique à travers l’Europe et apporté la preuve de la nécessité d’aider les gens à prendre la meilleure décision en ce qui concerne les soins en santé reproductive pour de futures recherches. <p>Nous nous sommes concentrés sur la santé reproductive mais nous croyons que cette approche pourrait être adaptée à d’autres domaines.<p><p> / Doctorat en Sciences de la santé publique / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished