Although emerging technologies offer the construction industry many opportunities for IT-enabled collaboration environments, the companies adopting these technologies usually fail. in achieving the full benefits from their implementations. The reason for this is found as focusing too much on the technical factors and ignoring or underestimating the factors related to change, implementation, human and organizational factors, and the roles of the management and end-users. Each new information technology implementation involves some change for the organization and the employees, and is therefore a source of resistance and confusion unless special attention is paid to managing this change. This research aims to find how to introduce collaboration environments to construction organizations and how to manage the changes required in order to obtain the full benefits from their implementation. In order to achieve this aim, the theoretical concepts and previous work on collaboration environment implementations in construction industry, and change management with a focus on organizational change management are reviewed. The perspective of the construction organizations on the implementation of collaboration environments are investigated conducting case studies. Based on the findings from the literature review and the case studies, an organizational change management framework is developed for implementing collaboration environments. A computer based prototype is also developed in order to automate the framework. The framework and the prototype are evaluated by the industry professionals.

Throughout secondary education, students are given opportunities to hone their leadership and collaboration skills with one another. Unfortunately, these opportunities are few and far between in the elementary school classroom. Since there are few leadership curriculum options available for teachers of elementary students, this study attempts to offer a fourth grade curriculum on leadership and collaboration within the context of the social studies curriculum. The study is comprised of a piece of historical fiction, journal prompts, and group activities. The text taught students about the colonization of Jamestown with a unique focus on collaboration between the Native Americans and Jamestown colonists. Small groups of students worked together to complete group activities where they were able to improve upon their ability to collaborate. This thesis provides insight toward the need for leadership curriculum in the elementary classroom and one curricular option with which to do so.

Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die Entwicklung von RDF-Wissensbasen in verteilten kollaborativen Szenarien zu unterstützen. In dieser Arbeit wird eine neue Methodik für verteiltes kollaboratives Knowledge Engineering – „Quit“ – vorgestellt. Sie geht davon aus, dass es notwendig ist, während des gesamten Kooperationsprozesses Dissens auszudrücken und individuelle Arbeitsbereiche für jeden Mitarbeiter bereitzustellen. Der Ansatz ist von der Git-Methodik zum kooperativen Software Engineering inspiriert und basiert auf dieser. Die Analyse des Standes der Technik zeigt, dass kein System die Git-Methodik konsequent auf das Knowledge Engineering überträgt. Die Hauptmerkmale der Quit-Methodik sind unabhängige Arbeitsbereiche für jeden Benutzer und ein gemeinsamer verteilter Arbeitsbereich für die Zusammenarbeit. Während des gesamten Kollaborationsprozesses spielt die Data-Provenance eine wichtige Rolle. Zur Unterstützung der Methodik ist der Quit-Stack als eine Sammlung von Microservices implementiert, die es ermöglichen, die Semantic-Web-Datenstruktur und Standardschnittstellen in den verteilten Kollaborationsprozess zu integrieren. Zur Ergänzung der verteilten Datenerstellung werden geeignete Methoden zur Unterstützung des Datenverwaltungsprozesses erforscht. Diese Managementprozesse sind insbesondere die Erstellung und das Bearbeiten von Daten sowie die Publikation und Exploration von Daten. Die Anwendung der Methodik wird in verschiedenen Anwendungsfällen für die verteilte Zusammenarbeit an Organisationsdaten und an Forschungsdaten gezeigt. Weiterhin wird die Implementierung quantitativ mit ähnlichen Arbeiten verglichen. Abschließend lässt sich feststellen, dass der konsequente Ansatz der Quit-Methodik ein breites Spektrum von Szenarien zum verteilten Knowledge Engineering im Semantic Web ermöglicht.:Preface by Thomas Riechert Preface by Cesare Pautasso 1 Introduction 2 Preliminaries 3 State of the Art 4 The Quit Methodology 5 The Quit Stack 6 Data Creation and Authoring 7 Publication and Exploration 8 Application and Evaluation 9 Conclusion and Future Work Bibliography Web References List of Figures List of Tables List of Listings List of Definitions and Acronyms List of Namespace Prefixes / The aim of this thesis is to support the development of RDF knowledge bases in a distributed collaborative setup. In this thesis, a new methodology for distributed collaborative knowledge engineering – called Quit – is presented. It follows the premise that it is necessary to express dissent throughout a collaboration process and to provide individual workspaces for each collaborator. The approach is inspired by and based on the Git methodology for collaboration in software engineering. The state-of-the-art analysis shows that no system is consequently transferring the Git methodology to knowledge engineering. The key features of the Quit methodology are independent workspaces for each user and a shared distributed workspace for the collaboration. Throughout the whole collaboration process data provenance plays an important role. To support the methodology the Quit Stack is implemented as a collection of microservices, that allow to integrate the Semantic Web data structure and standard interfaces with the distributed collaborative process. To complement the distributed data authoring, appropriate methods to support the data management process are researched. These management processes are in particular the creation and authoring of data as well as the publication and exploration of data. The application of the methodology is shown in various use cases for the distributed collaboration on organizational data and on research data. Further, the implementation is quantitatively compared to the related work. Finally, it can be concluded that the consequent approach followed by the Quit methodology enables a wide range of distributed Semantic Web knowledge engineering scenarios.:Preface by Thomas Riechert Preface by Cesare Pautasso 1 Introduction 2 Preliminaries 3 State of the Art 4 The Quit Methodology 5 The Quit Stack 6 Data Creation and Authoring 7 Publication and Exploration 8 Application and Evaluation 9 Conclusion and Future Work Bibliography Web References List of Figures List of Tables List of Listings List of Definitions and Acronyms List of Namespace Prefixes

In this dissertation, we base our experience of carrying out participation in 4 EU-funded projects: EUROFETUS (Cost-Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies); MOMS-B (MOther Mortality and Severe morbidity); PERISTAT(Monitoring and evaluating perinatal health) and EUPHRATES (EUropean Project on obstetric Haemorrhage Reduction: Attitudes, Trial, and Early warning System), an online questionnaire survey for researchers and a literature review, to provide results which will help us to understand the added value and the challenges of the EU collaboration research and the challenges of EU collaboration research in improving the quality and the accessibility of reproductive healthcare. The EUROFETUS project showed that, despite the fact that the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies has been declining during the last twenty years, they are still a major cause of perinatal mortality and childhood disability in Europe. Congenital heart defects were among the most frequent and the most severe malformations, but were the least diagnosed prenatally. There was large variation between and within countries regarding the proportion of cases diagnosed prenatally and the proportion of cases resulting in termination of pregnancy. From the data available in Eurofetus, such variation might result from the cultural differences underling policy or on ultrasonographer’s expertise, or on differing interpretation of scientific evidence in the design and implementation of screening. The MOMS-B project allowed population-based comparisons between countries by using the standardised definition that showed the three conditions (pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis) selected to as markers of acute severe maternal morbidity are not rare in Europe. Severe haemorrhage was the most common of severe maternal morbidity condition, but its incidence varied widely between European countries. The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths. The EUPHRATES project on a survey of current practice in relation to management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in 14 European countries showed that there were considerable differences in policies for managing the third stage of labour between and within the countries studied. The online questionnaire survey for researchers showed that almost all researchers were satisfied with their participation in EU-funded project; the main benefits for them were transfer and sharing of experience and knowledge between researchers, but the administrative procedures should be simplified in the future. The description of the process needed to obtain ethical approval for a cluster randomized trial in the EUPHRATES project showed that there was considerable variation in time required and the criteria used amongst 14 European countries, with consequential delay in research and exclusion of one country from the trial. Overall, we conclude that Community Framework programmes offer new opportunities to connect researchers from all over Europe to share expertise and resources, including computing tools, and make a real contribution to the creation of the European research area. The added value of EU collaborative research is particularly well positioned for improving foetal and maternal health, from the perspective of harmonizing case definitions, collecting the necessary number of cases within a limited period of time, comparing data between regions and countries, meeting the specific needs of the EU and giving a common response to European reproductive health questions. On the other hand, epidemiological data from multiple countries has advanced our understanding of important health-risks and their geographical distributions across Europe and provided the evidence to help people make better decisions about healthcare in the field of reproductive health for the future research. We focus on reproductive health but believe that this approach could be adapted to other fields when appropriate./Dans cette thèse, nous avons basé notre expérience sur notre participation dans 4 projets européens (EUROFETUS, MOMS-B, PERISTAT et EUPHRATES), un questionnaire en ligne vers les chercheurs, et une revue de la littérature pour fournir les résultats qui nous aideront à comprendre la valeur ajoutée qu’apporte la recherche collaborative et les défis de cette recherche pour l’amélioration de la qualité et de l’accessibilité de la santé reproductive. Le projet EUROFETUS montre que, en dépit du fait que la prévalence des anomalies congénitales à la naissance diminue depuis une vingtaine d’années, elles restent une cause majeure de mortalité périnatale et de handicaps infantiles. Les malformations cardiaques congénitales sont parmi les plus fréquentes et les plus sévères des malformations, mais aussi les moins diagnostiquées. Il y a de larges différences entre et à l’intérieur des pays concernant la proportion de cas diagnostiqués en prénatal et la proportion de cas résultant en interruption de grossesse. D’après les données disponibles dans EUROFETUS, de telles variations pourraient résulter de politiques de santé différentes, reflétant des divergences culturelles, de variations dans l’expertise des échographistes, ou encore d’interprétations divergentes de preuves scientifiques dans la conception ou la mise en place du screening. Le projet collaboratif européen sur la Mortalité et la Morbidité Maternelle sévère (MOMB-B) a permis des comparaisons en population entre pays en utilisant une définition standardisée qui a montré que les trois pathologies sélectionnées (pré-éclampsie, hémorragie, sepsis) comme marqueurs de la morbidité maternelle sévère n’étaient pas rares en Europe. L’hémorragie sévère était la pathologie la plus fréquente, mais son incidence variait très fort d’un pays à l’autre. The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths. Le projet EUPHRATES, par une enquête de pratique concernant le management de la troisième phase du travail et du management immédiat de l’hémorragie du postpartum dans 14 pays européens, a montré qu’il y avait des différences considérables dans les pratiques entre et à l’intérieur des pays en Europe. Le questionnaire en ligne auprès des chercheurs a montré que la plupart étaient satisfaits de leur participation à des projets européens, les principaux bénéfices étaient le transfert et le partage d’expériences et de connaissances entre chercheurs mais que les procédures administratives devraient être simplifiées dans le futur. La description de l’utilisation des comités d’éthique dans l’essai EUPHRATES a montré de très grandes divergences. En général, nous concluons que les programmes-cadres européens offrent de nouvelles opportunités aux chercheurs européens de partager l’expertise et les moyens, en ce compris les outils informatiques et contribuent à la création d’un espace européen de la recherche. La valeur ajoutée de la recherche collaborative est particulièrement importante pour améliorer la santé fœtale et maternelle par l’harmonisation de la définition des cas, la collecte du nombre nécessaire de cas dans une période déterminée, la comparaison des données entre les régions et pays, pour rencontrer les besoins spécifiques de l’Union Européenne et donner une réponse commune aux questions de santé reproductive en Europe. D’autre part, les données épidémiologiques de nombreux pays ont fait avancer notre compréhension de risques importants de santé maternelle et leur distribution géographique à travers l’Europe et apporté la preuve de la nécessité d’aider les gens à prendre la meilleure décision en ce qui concerne les soins en santé reproductive pour de futures recherches. Nous nous sommes concentrés sur la santé reproductive mais nous croyons que cette approche pourrait être adaptée à d’autres domaines.

In this dissertation, we base our experience of carrying out participation in 4 EU-funded projects: EUROFETUS (Cost-Effectiveness of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies); MOMS-B (MOther Mortality and Severe morbidity); PERISTAT(Monitoring and evaluating perinatal health) and EUPHRATES (EUropean Project on obstetric Haemorrhage Reduction: Attitudes, Trial, and Early warning System), an online questionnaire survey for researchers and a literature review, to provide results which will help us to understand the added value and the challenges of the EU collaboration research and the challenges of EU collaboration research in improving the quality and the accessibility of reproductive healthcare.<p>The EUROFETUS project showed that, despite the fact that the birth prevalence of congenital anomalies has been declining during the last twenty years, they are still a major cause of perinatal mortality and childhood disability in Europe. Congenital heart defects were among the most frequent and the most severe malformations, but were the least diagnosed prenatally. There was large variation between and within countries regarding the proportion of cases diagnosed prenatally and the proportion of cases resulting in termination of pregnancy. From the data available in Eurofetus, such variation might result from the cultural differences underling policy or on ultrasonographer’s expertise, or on differing interpretation of scientific evidence in the design and implementation of screening.<p>The MOMS-B project allowed population-based comparisons between countries by using the standardised definition that showed the three conditions (pre-eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis) selected to as markers of acute severe maternal morbidity are not rare in Europe. Severe haemorrhage was the most common of severe maternal morbidity condition, but its incidence varied widely between European countries.<p>The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths.<p>The EUPHRATES project on a survey of current practice in relation to management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in 14 European countries showed that there were considerable differences in policies for managing the third stage of labour between and within the countries studied.<p> The online questionnaire survey for researchers showed that almost all researchers were satisfied with their participation in EU-funded project; the main benefits for them were transfer and sharing of experience and knowledge between researchers, but the administrative procedures should be simplified in the future. The description of the process needed to obtain ethical approval for a cluster randomized trial in the EUPHRATES project showed that there was considerable variation in time required and the criteria used amongst 14 European countries, with consequential delay in research and exclusion of one country from the trial. <p>Overall, we conclude that Community Framework programmes offer new opportunities to connect researchers from all over Europe to share expertise and resources, including computing tools, and make a real contribution to the creation of the European research area. The added value of EU collaborative research is particularly well positioned for improving foetal and maternal health, from the perspective of harmonizing case definitions, collecting the necessary number of cases within a limited period of time, comparing data between regions and countries, meeting the specific needs of the EU and giving a common response to European reproductive health questions. On the other hand, epidemiological data from multiple countries has advanced our understanding of important health-risks and their geographical distributions across Europe and provided the evidence to help people make better decisions about healthcare in the field of reproductive health for the future research.<p>We focus on reproductive health but believe that this approach could be adapted to other fields when appropriate./Dans cette thèse, nous avons basé notre expérience sur notre participation dans 4 projets européens (EUROFETUS, MOMS-B, PERISTAT et EUPHRATES), un questionnaire en ligne vers les chercheurs, et une revue de la littérature pour fournir les résultats qui nous aideront à comprendre la valeur ajoutée qu’apporte la recherche collaborative et les défis de cette recherche pour l’amélioration de la qualité et de l’accessibilité de la santé reproductive.<p>Le projet EUROFETUS montre que, en dépit du fait que la prévalence des anomalies congénitales à la naissance diminue depuis une vingtaine d’années, elles restent une cause majeure de mortalité périnatale et de handicaps infantiles. Les malformations cardiaques congénitales sont parmi les plus fréquentes et les plus sévères des malformations, mais aussi les moins diagnostiquées. Il y a de larges différences entre et à l’intérieur des pays concernant la proportion de cas diagnostiqués en prénatal et la proportion de cas résultant en interruption de grossesse. D’après les données disponibles dans EUROFETUS, de telles variations pourraient résulter de politiques de santé différentes, reflétant des divergences culturelles, de variations dans l’expertise des échographistes, ou encore d’interprétations divergentes de preuves scientifiques dans la conception ou la mise en place du screening.<p>Le projet collaboratif européen sur la Mortalité et la Morbidité Maternelle sévère (MOMB-B) a permis des comparaisons en population entre pays en utilisant une définition standardisée qui a montré que les trois pathologies sélectionnées (pré-éclampsie, hémorragie, sepsis) comme marqueurs de la morbidité maternelle sévère n’étaient pas rares en Europe. L’hémorragie sévère était la pathologie la plus fréquente, mais son incidence variait très fort d’un pays à l’autre.<p>The PERISTAT project on the indicators of unfavourable maternal health outcome showed that the maternal mortality ratios (per 100, 000 live births) for early obstetric death ranged from 2.8 to 11.4 across European countries studied. Such variation reflected different resources and systems in place with varying level of ascertainment in addition to difference in the number of maternal deaths.<p>Le projet EUPHRATES, par une enquête de pratique concernant le management de la troisième phase du travail et du management immédiat de l’hémorragie du postpartum dans 14 pays européens, a montré qu’il y avait des différences considérables dans les pratiques entre et à l’intérieur des pays en Europe.<p>Le questionnaire en ligne auprès des chercheurs a montré que la plupart étaient satisfaits de leur participation à des projets européens, les principaux bénéfices étaient le transfert et le partage d’expériences et de connaissances entre chercheurs mais que les procédures administratives devraient être simplifiées dans le futur. La description de l’utilisation des comités d’éthique dans l’essai EUPHRATES a montré de très grandes divergences.<p>En général, nous concluons que les programmes-cadres européens offrent de nouvelles opportunités aux chercheurs européens de partager l’expertise et les moyens, en ce compris les outils informatiques et contribuent à la création d’un espace européen de la recherche. La valeur ajoutée de la recherche collaborative est particulièrement importante pour améliorer la santé fœtale et maternelle par l’harmonisation de la définition des cas, la collecte du nombre nécessaire de cas dans une période déterminée, la comparaison des données entre les régions et pays, pour rencontrer les besoins spécifiques de l’Union Européenne et donner une réponse commune aux questions de santé reproductive en Europe. D’autre part, les données épidémiologiques de nombreux pays ont fait avancer notre compréhension de risques importants de santé maternelle et leur distribution géographique à travers l’Europe et apporté la preuve de la nécessité d’aider les gens à prendre la meilleure décision en ce qui concerne les soins en santé reproductive pour de futures recherches. <p>Nous nous sommes concentrés sur la santé reproductive mais nous croyons que cette approche pourrait être adaptée à d’autres domaines.<p><p> / Doctorat en Sciences de la santé publique / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished