Global warming and environmental impact are topics that have received increased attention in recent years. Research suggests that companies should take more responsibility for this impact. Scholars have expressed contradicting opinions on whether these sustainability initiatives result in new risks and thereby lead to worse financial performance or will benefit the organization. This qualitative multiple case study uses an abductive approach to examine how risks associated with environmental sustainability initiatives are perceived to impact financial performance as well as how these risks can be managed in practice. Based on existing literature on environmental sustainability, risk management, and financial performance combined with interviews conducted with six representatives from three different companies in the Swedish manufacturing industry, a framework is developed. The framework presents a link from sustainability initiatives to risks, which can result in negative impacts on financial performance. The study further shows a positive relation between sustainability and financial performance, indicating that financial benefits can be gained from working with sustainability. Additionally, it is found that sustainability-related risks should be managed differently than business-related risks in organizations. The presented framework therefore indicates a necessity of establishing sustainability risk management strategies. The four main strategies identified were i) creating a shared mindset which allows for understanding of risks in the organization, ii) increasing communication and collaboration across departments, iii) actively working with risk identification to understand its behavior, and iv) establishing constant revision of risk management strategies.

This study examines the implementation of ESG ratings and their impact on the Swedishstock market within the real estate, banking, and industrial sectors. ESG ratings assesscompanies' sustainability based on environmental impact, social responsibility, and corporategovernance. The aim is to analyze the relationship between ESG ratings and stockperformance, as well as investors' behavior in investment decisions. The study focuses onlarge companies within the Large Cap segment in the Swedish market during the period of2016-2019. The methods include qualitative interviews to gather investors' perspectives anddescriptive analysis to quantitatively examine returns based on ESG scores. The study findsno statistically significant relationship between ESG and companies returns. Investors'decisions are not solely based on ESG ratings but also on other factors.

Purpose: Examine the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and financial performance in Swedish publicly traded companies in the years 2006-2009. Hypothesis: H1: There is a positive linear relationship between a company's CSR performance and its accounting based financial performance (represented by ROA). H2: There is a positive linear relationship between a company's CSR performance and its market based financial evaluation (represented by Tobin's Q) H3: Industry moderates the relationship between CSR and financial performance. H4: Firm size moderates the relationship between CSR and financial performance. Theoretical framework: CSR and previous research. Methodology: Longitudinal study, Secondary analysis.  Conclusion: Hypothesis 1 may be rejected. Hypothesis 2 may be rejected. Hypothesis 3 may be rejected. Hypothesis 4 may be rejected. / Syfte: Undersöka relationen mellan företags sociala ansvar och dess finansiella resultat på Svenska börsnoterade företag under åren 2006-2009. Hypoteser: H1: Det är ett positivt linjärt samband mellan ett företags CSR utförande och dess bokföring baserad på finansiella resultat (representerad av ROA). H2: Det är ett positivt linjärt samband mellan ett företags CSR utförande och dess markandsbaserad finansiella värdering (representerad av Tobin's Q). H3: Industri modererar relationen mellan CSR och finasiellt resultat. H4: Företagsstorlek modererar relationen mellan CSR och finansiellt resultat. Teoretiskt ramverk: CSR och tidigare forskning. Metod: Longitudinell studie, Sekundär analys. Slutsats: Hypotes 1 kan avvisas. Hypotes 2 kan avvisas. Hypotes 3 kan avvisas. Hypotes 4 kan avvisas.

In this thesis, we explore the proprietary Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) scores and analyze their impacts on firm valuation using the sample of 166 companies operating in 35 emerging and frontier markets. Three methods of ESG scores, Principal Component Analysis and regression analysis are used. The results indicate an economically significant relationship between the overall ESG measure and firm value mainly driven by the “Environmental” and “Capital allocation” sub-scores. An exploratory principal component analysis and an extensive list of firm characteristics is also employed in our regression analysis to address problems identified in previous studies - construct validity and endogeneity. The PCA revealed dominance of Environmental and Social components in the variance of the total ESG score. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of proprietary ESG score and PCAderived index are recognized based on sector- and region level comparison and the opportunities to improve the ESG scorecard framework are identified. / In den uppsatsen, forskning går på Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) poäng och analyserar deras påverkan på företagsvärdering genom att använda ett urval av 166 företag som verkar i 35 frontier och tillväxtmarknader. Tre metoder av ESG mätning, Principal Component Analysis och regressionsanalyser tillämpades. Resultat tyder på ett ekonomiskt signifikant förhållande mellan totala ESG mätning och företagsvärdering vilket drivs av miljö och kapitalallokering delpoäng. Principalkomponentanalys och en utförlig lista av företagsegenskaper tillämpades också i våra regressionsanalyser för att adressera problem identifierade i tidigare studier - begreppsvaliditet och endogenitetsproblem. PCA tydde på dominans av miljöoch sociala aspekter i varians av den totala ESG poängen. Avslutningsvis, styrkor och svagheter av ESG-poäng och PCA-härlett index baserat på bransch- samt regionaljämförelser och möjligheterna för förbättring av ESG-mätning ramverk identifierades.