Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes are being increasingly used in the field of fire safety engineering. They provide, amongst other things, velocity, species and heat flux distributions throughout the computational domain. The various sub-models associated with these have been developed sufficiently to reduce the errors below 10%-15%, and work continues on reducing these errors yet further. However, the uncertainties introduced by using material properties as an input for these models are considerably larger than those from the other sub-models, yet little work is being done to improve these. Most of the data for these material properties comes from traditional (standard) tests. It is known that these properties are not intrinsic, but are test-specific. Thus, it can be expected that the errors incurred when using these in computations can be significant. Research has been held back by a lack of understanding of the basic factors that determine material flammability. The term “flammability” is currently used to encompass a number of definitions and “properties” that are linked to standardised test methodologies. In almost all cases, the quantitative manifestations of “flammability” are a combination of material properties and environmental conditions associated with the particular test method from which they were derived but are not always representative of parameters linked intrinsically with the tested material. The result is that even the best-defined parameters associated with flammability cannot be successfully introduced into fire models to predict ignition or fire growth. The aim of this work is to develop a new approach to the interpretation of standard flammability tests in order to derive the (intrinsic) material properties; specifically, those properties controlling ignition. This approach combines solid phase and gas modelling together with standard tests using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), mass fraction of flammable gases and lean flammability limits (LFL). The back boundary condition is also better defined by introducing a heat sink with a high thermal conductivity and a temperature dependant convective heat transfer coefficient. The intrinsic material properties can then be used to rank materials based on their susceptibility to ignition and, furthermore, can be used as input data for fire models. Experiments in a standard test apparatus (FPA) were performed and the resulting data fitted to a complex pyrolysis model to estimate the (intrinsic) material properties. With these properties, it should be possible to model the heating process, pyrolysis, ignition and related material behaviour for any adequately defined heating scenario. This was achieved, within bounds, during validation of the approach in the Cone Calorimeter and under ramped heating conditions in the Fire Propagation Apparatus (FPA). This work demonstrates that standard flammability and material tests have been proven inadequate for the purpose of obtaining the “intrinsic” material properties required for pyrolysis models. A significant step has been made towards the development of a technique to obtain these material properties using test apparatuses, and to predict ignition of the tested materials under any heating scenario. This work has successfully demonstrated the ability to predict the driving force (in-depth temperature distribution) in the ignition process. The results obtained are very promising and serve to demonstrate the feasibility of the methodology. The essential outcomes are the “lessons learnt”, which themselves are of great importance to the understanding and further development of this technique. One of these lessons is that complex modelling in conjunction with current standard flammability test cannot currently provide all required parameters. The uncertainty of the results is significantly reduced when using independently determined parameters in the model. The intrinsic values of the material properties depend significantly on the accuracy of the model and precision of the data.

Tetrabromobisphenol A, (TBBPA or Br4BPA), is a widely used brominated flame retardant (BFR). Although TBBPA and its breakdown products been found in river sediments, the environmental impact of their contamination is largely unknown. One breakdown product of TBBPA is bisphenol A (BPA), which has been studied intensively for its toxicology because it is used in the manufacturing of plastics and leaches from food containers, water bottles and pipes. Other breakdown products of TBBPA include tribromobisphenol A (Br3BPA), dibromobisphenol A (Br2BPA), and monobromobisphenol A (BrBPA) but little is known about their toxicology. Since TBBPA is toxic, there is a need to search for an alternative BFR, with one being tetrabromobisphenol A bis(2,3-dibromopropylether) or TBBPA-DBPE. However, almost nothing is known about the toxicology of this compound. Hence, two rainbow trout cell lines, RTL-W1 from liver and RTgill-W1 from gill, were used to evaluate the cellular toxicity of TBBPA, BPA, BrBPA, Br2BPA, Br3BPA and TBBPA-DBPE. The cells were exposed to these compounds for 24 h in the basal medium, L-15, to study their cytotoxicity and in L-15 with fetal bovine serum (FBS) to evaluate their capacity to induce 7-ethoxyresorufin o-deethylase (EROD) activity. Viability was measured with three fluorometric indicator dyes: Alamar Blue (AB) for metabolism, 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl (CFDA AM) for cell membrane integrity, and Neutral Red (NR) for lysosomal activity. The concentrations causing a 50 % reduction in viability (EC50) as measured with these three dyes were used to compare the relative cytotoxicity of these chemicals. For both cell lines and with all viability endpoints, TBBPA was the most cytotoxic, with EC50s ranging from 2.33 to 3.11 ug/ml. BPA, BrBPA, Br2BPA, and Br3BPA also caused dose-dependent declines in cell viability but showed no consistent order of potency. None of the six compounds induced EROD activity, which suggests that they do not activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Regardless of the endpoint or cell line, TBBPA-DBPE was not cytotoxic. This suggests that, from a toxicological perspective, this compound may be a suitable replacement for TBBPA as a BFR. BPA stood out from the other compounds in two regards. BPA caused a dose-dependent decline in cell viability for cultures in L-15 with FBS, whereas for the other compounds, little or no change in viability was seen in cultures with FBS. BPA elicited a decline in the ability of cells to reduce AB almost immediately upon its addition to cultures in a simple buffer, whereas as for other compounds a decline took time to develop. These results suggest that BPA exerts its cytotoxicity by a different mechanism different from the other compounds.

Brominated flame retardants (BFR) such as hexachlorocyclopentadienyl-dibromocyclooctane (HCDBCO), bis(2-ethylhexyl)tetrabromophthalate (BEHTBP), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE) and decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) are contaminants of environmental concern. These BFRs are replacement alternatives for some of the major production BFRs, which have been restricted from the marketplace due to their adverse health effects. Their presence in environmental matrices, including wild birds, suggests they should be tested for possible toxic effects. BFR alternatives have been detected in the eggs of colonial fish-eating birds, suggesting maternal transfer during ovogenesis and the potential for these chemicals to bioaccumulate through the food chain. However, information regarding the toxicity of HCDBCO, BEHTBP, BTBPE and DBDPE exposure in birds is lacking. This thesis consisted of a combined in vitro/in ovo approach to determine: 1) the concentration-dependent effects of these four BFR alternatives in chicken embryonic hepatocytes (CEH), and 2) the dose-dependent effects of HCDBCO and BTBPE in chicken embryos following injection into the air cell of eggs prior to incubation. Changes in the mRNA expression levels of genes previously found to be responsive to other BFRs were assessed in CEH and liver tissue, in addition to examining overt toxicity (i.e. cytotoxicity, pipping success). None of the BFRs tested were cytotoxic up to 60 µM HCDBCO, 60 µM BEHTBP, 1.4 µM BTBPE or 0.2 µM DBDPE in CEH. Injection doses up to 50 µg/g egg HCDBCO and 10 µg/g egg BTBPE had no effect on embryonic pipping success. The accumulation of HCDBCO and BTBPE was variable in liver and did not follow a linear uptake pattern with respect to injection dose, due in part to difficulties with the solubility of these chemicals in the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle. In, CEH, HCDBCO caused a decrease in CYP1A4/5 mRNA at all concentrations tested, while CYP2H1 and CYP3A37 were induced only at 10 µM. In contrast, only TTR mRNA was down-regulated in hepatic tissue at all injection concentrations of HCDBCO. The highest concentration of BTBPE induced CYP1A4/5 mRNA to 115- and 18-fold in CEH, and 6.5- and 1.8-fold in liver tissue. In vitro and in ovo exposure to BTBPE caused a concentration-dependent decrease in DIO3 mRNA, while CYP3A37 was down-regulated 2-fold at 10 µg/g in liver tissue. In CEH, DBDPE induced CYP1A4/5 mRNA to a maximum of 29- and 59-fold at 0.2 µM, and increases in DIO1 mRNA and decreases in CYP3A37 mRNA were also observed. None of the gene targets were responsive to BEHTBP exposure in CEH. This is the first study to report on the toxicological and molecular effects of HCDBCO, BEHTBP, BTBPE and DBDPE in an avian species. Using this combined in vitro/in ovo approach has permitted the characterization of these four BFR alternatives by defining possible mechanisms of biological action in a model avian species, the chicken.

Brominated flame retardants (BFR) such as hexachlorocyclopentadienyl-dibromocyclooctane (HCDBCO), bis(2-ethylhexyl)tetrabromophthalate (BEHTBP), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE) and decabromodiphenylethane (DBDPE) are contaminants of environmental concern. These BFRs are replacement alternatives for some of the major production BFRs, which have been restricted from the marketplace due to their adverse health effects. Their presence in environmental matrices, including wild birds, suggests they should be tested for possible toxic effects. BFR alternatives have been detected in the eggs of colonial fish-eating birds, suggesting maternal transfer during ovogenesis and the potential for these chemicals to bioaccumulate through the food chain. However, information regarding the toxicity of HCDBCO, BEHTBP, BTBPE and DBDPE exposure in birds is lacking. This thesis consisted of a combined in vitro/in ovo approach to determine: 1) the concentration-dependent effects of these four BFR alternatives in chicken embryonic hepatocytes (CEH), and 2) the dose-dependent effects of HCDBCO and BTBPE in chicken embryos following injection into the air cell of eggs prior to incubation. Changes in the mRNA expression levels of genes previously found to be responsive to other BFRs were assessed in CEH and liver tissue, in addition to examining overt toxicity (i.e. cytotoxicity, pipping success). None of the BFRs tested were cytotoxic up to 60 µM HCDBCO, 60 µM BEHTBP, 1.4 µM BTBPE or 0.2 µM DBDPE in CEH. Injection doses up to 50 µg/g egg HCDBCO and 10 µg/g egg BTBPE had no effect on embryonic pipping success. The accumulation of HCDBCO and BTBPE was variable in liver and did not follow a linear uptake pattern with respect to injection dose, due in part to difficulties with the solubility of these chemicals in the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) vehicle. In, CEH, HCDBCO caused a decrease in CYP1A4/5 mRNA at all concentrations tested, while CYP2H1 and CYP3A37 were induced only at 10 µM. In contrast, only TTR mRNA was down-regulated in hepatic tissue at all injection concentrations of HCDBCO. The highest concentration of BTBPE induced CYP1A4/5 mRNA to 115- and 18-fold in CEH, and 6.5- and 1.8-fold in liver tissue. In vitro and in ovo exposure to BTBPE caused a concentration-dependent decrease in DIO3 mRNA, while CYP3A37 was down-regulated 2-fold at 10 µg/g in liver tissue. In CEH, DBDPE induced CYP1A4/5 mRNA to a maximum of 29- and 59-fold at 0.2 µM, and increases in DIO1 mRNA and decreases in CYP3A37 mRNA were also observed. None of the gene targets were responsive to BEHTBP exposure in CEH. This is the first study to report on the toxicological and molecular effects of HCDBCO, BEHTBP, BTBPE and DBDPE in an avian species. Using this combined in vitro/in ovo approach has permitted the characterization of these four BFR alternatives by defining possible mechanisms of biological action in a model avian species, the chicken.

No description available.

No description available.

Poly Brominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) are known flame retardants with highly persistent and lipophilic in nature. The continued usage of PBDE in various products amplifies the human burden of PBDEs. It is therefore, important to study the potential toxicological and/or biological effects of PBDE exposure in human. In this study we investigated the mode of action of PBDE induced toxicity in human liver by exposing human hepatocarcinoma cells in a time (24-72h) and dose (0-100μM) dependent manner. The highest test dose caused an inhibition in cell viability up to 50% after 72h, whereas lower doses (<50μM) showed slight increase in cell viability. Likewise, higher doses caused significant accumulation of intracellular ROS over time. Further, increase in caspase-3 enzyme levels and DNA fragmentation showed that, lower brominated PBDEs induce liver toxicity through accumulation of toxic metabolites and reactive oxygen species over time leading to caspase-mediated apoptotic cell death.

Phthalate esters (PEs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs) are common indoor pollutants frequently detected in environmental (dust, air), personal (hand wipes, diet) and human matrices (urine, serum etc.). In this thesis, mathematical models were used to establish links between intake and body burden for a comprehensive dataset based on a Norwegian study population. Also, the relative importance of different PE uptake pathways was assessed and discussed. Furthermore, the suitability of human nails as an alternative, non-invasive biomonitoring matrix for PEs was investigated. Additionally, information regarding alternative plasticizers to PEs was collected and presented extensively. Results showed that for PEs (paper II), daily intakes based on external exposure media agree with back-calculations using urinary metabolite concentrations, leading to the conclusion that human exposure for the general adult population is well understood and that the most important uptake routes were captured. Overall intake levels are comparable or lower than level presented in recent comprehensive studies and hazard quotients were well below 1 (low risk). As expected, diet was found to be the most important uptake route for all PEs. For lower molecular weight PEs, inhalation becomes a strong contributing pathway whereas for higher molecular weight PEs, dust ingestion was also important. Daily intake based on hand wipes was found to be much lower than the estimated total dermal intake based on air, dust and personal care products, questioning the relevance of hand wipes to represent total dermal exposure. Human nails were found to be unsuitable for replacing urine as a biomonitoring matrix for PEs as internal intake (from blood) cannot explain measured nail concentrations and uptake from air is too slow to reach observed concentrations within a realistic time frame (paper III). Hence, the kinetic links between intake and nail concentrations could not be established. Although exposure to traditional PEs is decreasing, use and body burden of some alternatives are increasing (paper I). Fortunately, most alternative plasticizers have favorable toxicological properties, resulting in low risk for humans. In contrast to PEs, OPEs still remain a group of poorly studied substances in terms of human exposure (paper IV). Due to lack of information regarding human metabolism, reliable links between intake and concentrations in serum and urine could not be established. Modelling results showed that concentrations in serum, and to some extent, urine, were underestimated for 2 compounds. It is likely that a combination of missing intake and suboptimal biomarkers were the cause for this under-prediction. Because of this, further studies regarding human metabolism should be performed for OPEs and potentially more specific biomarkers identified in the future. For PEs, there is a need for more comprehensive datasets to study exposure for high risk groups such as infants and children. Furthermore, dermal uptake remains poorly understood and the uptake of PEs into human nails should be studied in more detail to establish the kinetic links between exposure and body burden. / <p>At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Manuscript. Paper 4: Manuscript.</p>

Les retardateurs de flamme bromés sont des agents ignifuges utilisés dans de nombreux produits manufacturés. Les plus courants sont les polybromodiphényl éther (PBDE), le tétrabromo-bisphénol A (TBBPA) et l'hexabromocyclododécane (HBCD). Ces composés considérés comme des polluants organiques persistants (POPs) sont désormais retrouvés dans l'environnement et chez l'Homme, et sont suspectés, ainsi que leurs métabolites, d'être des perturbateurs endocriniens. Des développements analytiques basés sur la spectrométrie de masse ont été engagés afin d'étudier le métabolisme in vitro du TBBPA et des PBDE et rechercher les composés parents et leurs métabolites dans différents prélèvements d'origine humaine. Les métabolites formés chez l'Homme ont ainsi été identifiés comme étant des conjugués pour le TBBPA, et des dérivés hydroxylés, dihydrodiol et conjugués pour les PBDE. La plupart de ces métabolites ont été identifiés et quantifiés dans les fluides biologiques humains, démontrant ainsi l'exposition du foetus et du nouveau-né à ces composés, à des niveaux similaires à ceux retrouvé dans d'autres pays. D'un point de vue qualitatif, la présence de métabolites potentiellement actifs sur des cibles cellulaires a été mise en évidence, ainsi que le passage des résidus vers le lait (TBBPA, HBCD) et/ou au travers de la barrière placentaire (TBBPA et PBDE). Un métabolite spécifique, présent en importantes (octa-BDE hydroxylé) pourrait être un bon biomarqueur d'exposition, et son potentiel toxique devrait par ailleurs être étudié / Brominated Flame Retardants are widely used for the manufacture of fire-proofed industrial products and consumer goods. Major BFRs are polybromodiphenyl ether (PBDE), tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Considered as persistent organic pollutants (POPs), they are detected in various environmental compartments and human samples. Parent compounds as well as several metabolites could act as endocrine disruptors. Methodological developments based on mass spectrometry, in vitro approaches (TBBPA, PBDE) and an extensive review of the available literature have been used to sharpen our current knowledge of the fate of BFR, and to identify both parent compounds and metabolite in human samples. Results obtained in vitro using human primary hepatocyte cultures as well as human cell lines show that human cells biotransform TBBPA into conjugated metabolites and PBDE into hydroxylated, dihydrodiol and conjugated metabolites. Those metabolites were detected in human samples, demonstrating foetal and newborn exposition. BFR and some of their metabolites, including bioactive compounds, are transferred through the placental barrier (TBBPA, PBDE) and/or into milk (TBBPA, HBCD). Even though the monitored concentration levels were found to be low, one of these metabolites, namely (OH-octaBDE) was found to be abundant in almost all serum samples, and appears to be a relevant candidate biomarker of exposure

La câblerie est un secteur industriel gros consommateur de polymères. Dans ce domaine, les normes imposent cependant de limiter le risque incendie et donc d'ignifuger les matériaux polymères utilisés, sources importantes de combustibles. De nombreux travaux ont porté sur leur ignifugation par utilisation d'additifs retardateurs de flammes, mais peu d'entre eux ont étudié l'influence de la morphologie des mélanges polymères chargés sur la stabilité thermique et le comportement au feu. Cette thèse fait suite à un précédent projet qui avait démontré une influence significative de la morphologie sur le comportement au feu d'un mélange polymère binaire (PC/PBT). Elle a pour but d'améliorer la compréhension de cette influence dans le cas de formulations plus complexes (ternaires ou quaternaires) à matrice éthylène méthylacrylate (EMA). Pour cela, la première stratégie adoptée a été l'identification d'un système ignifugeant comprenant un polyester capable de charbonner lors de l'ajout d'un RF. Une fois ce système identifié (PBT+MDH), il a été incorporé en matrice EMA en faisant varier la composition et la morphologie (dispersion sélective, taille des particules…). Cette approche a mis en évidence des différences significatives entre les différentes formulations et des résultats très intéressants ont été obtenus en termes de réaction au feu à l'échelle laboratoire. Cependant, le passage à l'échelle pilote (test de propagation de flamme) n'a pas permis de valider ces formulations pour des applications câbles. Au vu de ces constatations, une dernière partie a été proposée pour essayer d'améliorer la cohésion du résidu par ajout de polyphosphate d'ammonium. / The cable industry is a major consumer of industrial polymers. In this area, the standards impose to limit the fire risk and thus to enhance the fireproof of the polymeric materials which are important sources of fuel. Many studies have focused on their flame retardancy by using additive flame retardants, but few of them have studied the influence of the morphology of filled polymer blends on the thermal stability and the fire behavior. This thesis follows a previous project which demonstrated a significant influence of the morphology on the fire behavior of a binary polymer blend (PC / PBT). It aims to improve the understanding of this influence in the case of more complex formulations (ternary or quaternary) with ethylene methylacrylate (EMA) matrix. The first strategy was the identification of a flame retardant system including polyester that is able to char when a flame retardant is added. Once the system is identified (PBT + MDH), it was incorporated in EMA matrix by varying the composition and the morphology (selective dispersion, particle size ...). This approach showed significant differences between the different formulations and very interesting results have been obtained in terms of fire reaction at the laboratory scale. However, the scale-up approach (flame spread test) did not validate these formulations for cables applications. Therefore, the last part has been proposed to try to improve the cohesion of the residue by adding ammonium polyphosphate.