Spelling suggestions: "subject:"foreign binvestment colicy"" "subject:"foreign binvestment bpolicy""
1 |
馬來西亞外資政策研究(1957-2000) / Study on Malaysian Foreign Investment Policy (1957-2000)蘇俊翔, So, Choon-Siang Unknown Date (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
陸資來台投資政策與規範之探討 / A study on the policy and regulation of Mainland China investment in Taiwan曾碧雲 Unknown Date (has links)
2009年6月30日政府開放陸資來台投資,經濟部統計至2012年4月止,累計核准陸資來臺投資件數為246件,核准投(增)資金額計2億8千萬美元。陸資來台基本上仍處小規模、試探性階段。在兩岸經貿關係逐步深化之後,政府未來是否有比照僑外投資方式開放陸資來台投資之可能,使陸資來台投資,轉化為我國經濟發展的正面能量,值得探討。因而,本研究之目的如下:(一)探討陸資來台投資之動機(二)陸資與外資來台投資政策及規範之比較分析(三)提出具體建議提供政府擬定陸資來台投資政策之參考。
本研究以文獻分析及個案深度訪談方法,就陸資來台投資之製造業、服務業中選出具代表性個案,計4家陸資企業進行訪談;另為陸資與外資來台投資政策及規範之比較分析,選定2家具代表性外資企業進行訪談,以為本研究之目的進行探討,並提出具體政策建議。
研究發現陸資來台投資動機主要為獲取先進技術與經營管理經驗、響應中國大陸政府對台投資政策、拓展市場,擴大出口,進行全球化佈局等,來台投資除企業對外投資經濟層面動機外,尚有響應中國大陸政策,積極推動陸資企業來台投資佈局之政策性動機存在。而就陸資與外資來台投資政策差異,政府主要對陸資採「先緊後鬆、循序漸進、先有成果、再行擴大」的原則政策,對外資則採獎勵投資、減少外人投資障礙之開放政策;在陸資來台投資項目係採正面表列,所開放的項目係以國內發展成熟且不會對國內經濟造成負面衝擊的產業為主;而外資來台投資項目則採負面表列方式管理,除少數基於國家安全、公共秩序、善良風俗或國民健康考量及法律明定或國際協定予以禁止以及部分特許行業加以有條件限制外,均予以開放,開放程度已達95%以上。
本研究提出具體建議提供政府擬定陸資來台投資政策之參考,建議政府可參照開放外資投資政策,擴大開放陸資來台投資政策,將陸資來台投資項目從正面表列改以開放的負面表列管理,惟就擴大開放陸資來台投資政策下,政府對相關可能造成負面衝擊之影響,建議亦應有相關配套產業政策:如推動兩岸新型產業合作、輔導弱勢產業轉型與升級,以因應未來擴大開放趨勢、關鍵技術產業智慧財產權之保障、儘速簽署投資保障協議等,以為因應,降低衝擊之影響。另就陸資來台投資法令規範,建議建立完善投資審查機制,以防衛國家安全及因應關鍵技術流失之不利衝擊,另建議放寬大陸人員來台進出之法令、陸資購置不動產相關法令,以利陸資來台投資。 / Taiwan’s Government deregulated the investment capital of Mainland China in Taiwan on June 30, 2009. According to the statistical data of Ministry of Economic Affairs, up to April 2012, Mainland China investment in Taiwan has accumulated to 246 cases and the accumulated amount of investment (incl. capital increase) is US$280 million. Basically, the Mainland China capital investment in Taiwan is still in small scale. Following the gradual deepening of cross-strait economic and trading relationship, it is worthwhile to probe into the possibility of treating the Mainland China capital investment in Taiwan as ordinary foreign investment in Taiwan and turning it into positive energy of the economic development of Taiwan. The purposes of this research are such as following:
1) The motive of Mainland China capital investing in Taiwan,
2) Comparison and analysis of the policies and regulation of Mainland China capital and traditional foreign investment, and
3) Proposing practical suggestions for reference of the government in formulating Mainland China capital investment policy.
By Literature Analysis Approach and in Case Interview Method, the research selected representing cases of Mainland China investment in manufacturing and in services industries. There were 4 Mainland China capital enterprises interviewed. Also by comparative analysis on the policies and regulations of traditional foreign investment and Mainland China capital investment, two representing foreign invested enterprises were interview. The efforts pointed directly to the purposes of the research as well as providing practical policy suggestions.
It is found that the motives of Mainland China capital investment in Taiwan are mainly in obtaining advance techniques and operating and management experience, echoing the Taiwan Investment Policy of Mainland China government, developing market, expanding export and globalization deployment. Besides the economic motives in foreign investment of the Mainland China enterprises, they are also echoing the policy of mainland China government and actively to deploy their investment in Taiwan. In the difference of policies of Taiwan Government toward Mainland China capital and traditional foreign capital, Taiwan government is working in the principle of “Tight firstly then loose, Moving progressively, See the result before expansion” to the Mainland China capital investment, while it is in encouraging and reducing barrier to foreign investment to the traditional foreign investment. Under the control of Mainland China capital, it is subject to positive listing, and the items opened is the industries that are matured and will not result in negative impact on the domestic economy. In addition, under the control of foreign capital investment, it is rather in negative listing, that only the industries are excluded based on national security, public order, decent customs or national health, or those forbidden specifically under law or international treaty, or the charter business, all others are opened and the level of open reached 95%.
This research provided practical suggestions for the reference of government in formulating the Mainland China capital investment. We suggest that the government shall take reference of policy for opening foreign investment to expand the scope for Mainland China capital investment and turn the positive listing to negative listing in administration, but under the expanding liberalization of Mainland China capital investment, the government shall guard off the negative impacts with packaged industry policy such as new cross-strait industry cooperation, assisting the transformation or upgrading of disadvantage industry to cope with future expansion, Key techniques industry and intellectual property right protection and speed up investment protection treaty, so as to reduce the impact. In the part of legislation and regulatory of investments of Mainland China Capital, it is suggested to build complete investment review mechanism to defend national security and to cope with the unfavorable impact resulted from loss of key techniques. We will also suggest deregulating the purchasing of real estate to induce the investment of Mainland China capital under the control of the entry and exit of Mainland China people.
|
Page generated in 0.085 seconds