Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-27T13:48:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leocimar Rodrigues Barbosa.pdf: 740464 bytes, checksum: 0a770ff285d2e11b389c0f4cc7c285be (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005-08-30 / The text exceeds the relations of religions fundamentalists with the modernity and their crisis, emphaticine the social project of construction the other reality. Aprroaching historicly the fundamentalist since the american protestant fundamentalist and nominating his peculiars ard understanding his ideology and behaviour of fundamentalist current. The defiance is to perceive tha the fundamentalists look for to cive awswers to human necessity, asserting though of an utopia to moderns societs. / O texto destaca as relações dos fundamentalismos religiosos com a modernidade e suas crises, dando ênfase ao projeto social de construção de uma outra realidade. Abordando historicamente o fundamentalismo protestante americano, nomeando sua característica, pode-se compreender a ideologia e o comportamento dos movimentos fundamentalistas. O desafio é tentar perceber que os fundamentalismos procuram dar respostas aos anseios e necessidades humanas, na afirmação de uma utopia para as sociedades modernas.

El presente artículo analiza desde una perspectiva de la filosofía política, el pensamiento de Joseph Ratzinger en dos de sus problemas en los que más ha abundado a lo largo de su producción intelectual: el fundamentalismo religioso y el laicisimo político. Para hacerlo, acomete una profundización de lo que llama «ensanchamiento de la razón» para de esta manera dialogar con la filosofía política moderna, sin que se renuncie a los principios que defiende, lo que ha constituido en una manera muy aguda de acercar la geopolítica vaticana a los diferentes estados del mundo, y de influir en sus actores políticos más representativos / This article analyzes from the perspective of political philosophy , the thought of Joseph Ratzinger in two of its most problems has abounded throughout his intellectual production: religious fundamentalism and political laicisimo . To do so, undertakes a deeper he calls " broadening of reason" in this way dialogue with modern political philosophy , without surrender the principles defended , which has become a very acute way to approach the Vatican geopolitics the different states of the world , and to influence its most representative political actors / Trabajo de investigación

El estudio busca conocer la influencia que tienen las imágenes de Dios en la relación entre el autoritarismo de derecha y las actitudes hacia población homosexual (e.g., unión civil, adopción de niños y existencia de homosexuales) en una muestra de peruanos creyentes (N=365). Se identifica desde el cristianismo una dicotomía en la representación de Dios; por una parte, sería representado como una entidad benevolente; por otra, aparecería como un juez castigador del pecado. Los resultados muestran que, de forma independiente, ambas imágenes se asocian positivamente con el autoritarismo de derecha, aunque es con la visión castigadora de Dios donde se aprecia una mayor magnitud de la relación. Del mismo modo, ambas imágenes se asocian inversamente con las actitudes positivas hacia la homosexualidad, observándose nuevamente que la magnitud de la relación es mayor con la imagen castigadora de Dios. Sendos análisis de mediación establecen que la relación entre el autoritarismo de derecha y las actitudes negativas hacia la homosexualidad están mediadas por la imagen castigadora de Dios, pero no por la imagen benevolente. Finalmente, una segmentación de los participantes a partir de un cluster analysis, utilizando el nivel de acuerdo con ambas imágenes de Dios, identificó dos grupos de creyentes. El primer grupo denominado no fundamentalista reportó un nivel alto de acuerdo con la imagen benevolente y un nivel bajo de acuerdo con la imagen castigadora, mientras que el segundo grupo, nombrado como fundamentalista, reportó altos niveles de acuerdo tanto con la imagen benevolente cuanto con la imagen castigadora de Dios. Las comparaciones entre los dos grupos muestran que los segundos son sistemáticamente más autoritarios y reportan actitudes más negativas hacia la homosexualidad. La discusión retoma la idea de que la religión, a partir de las representaciones de Dios, tiene un efecto paradójico en el prejuicio siendo el componente castigador de la visión fundamentalista el que actúa como un factor de riesgo en la valoración de la homosexualidad. / The study seeks to know the influence of the images of God in the relationship between rightwing authoritarianism and attitudes toward the homosexual population (eg, civil union, adoption of children and existence of homosexuals) in a sample of Peruvian believers in God (N = 365). A dichotomy in the representation of God has been identified from Christianity; on the one hand, God would be represented as a benevolent entity; on the other hand, he would appear as a judge who punishes the sin. The results show that, independently, both images are positively associated with right-wing authoritarianism, although it is with the punishing vision of God that a greater magnitude of the relationship is seen. In the same way, both images are inversely associated with positive attitudes towards homosexuality, observing again that the magnitude of the relationship is greater with the punishing image of God. Both mediation analyzes establish that the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and negative attitudes towards homosexuality are mediated by the punishing image of God, but not by the benevolent image. Finally, a segmentation of the participants from a cluster analysis, using the level of agreement with both images of God, identified two groups of believers. The first group called non-fundamentalist reported a high level of agreement with the benevolent image and a low level of agreement with the punishing image, while the second group, named as fundamentalist, reported high levels of agreement with both the benevolent image and the punishing image of God. Comparisons between the two groups show that the latter are systematically more authoritarian and report more negative attitudes toward homosexuality. The discussion returns to the idea that religion, based on representations of God, has a paradoxical effect on prejudice, being the punishing component of the fundamentalist vision that acts as a risk factor in the assessment of homosexuality.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-03T12:20:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Robson_Costa_Souza.pdf: 870191 bytes, checksum: f7d6975615cab8cdcd7da815347658cc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-01-29 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / In several occasions, Presbyterian Church of Brazil s leaders have revealed the desire of equal distance between fundamentalist and liberal extremes. However, the discourses and practices of this ecclesiastical institution contrast with this official positioning. Moreover, such assumed position of equal distance between fundamentalist and liberal extremes does not denote strict boundaries, but it is an effective device for legitimizing power at moments of changes in religious field, mainly in situations of internal crises. Likewise, after redemo-cratization of Brazil and the consequent increase of religious pluralism, there was a change in Brazilian social field, causing difficulties in more conservatives sections of this institu-tion. Nowadays, it is sought to revitalize religious tradition before the threats of dissolution which was imposed by modern process of emancipation and by secular and supposedly atheistic conceptions of life (such as feminism, the fight in defense of reproductive rights, civil union between same-sex people, the so called ―movement of lesbian, gays, bisexuals, transvestites and transgenders, etc.). In religious field, the immediate results of that attitude of reaction before social changes which was imposed by modernity are: (1) misogyny; (2) manifestation of religious-political activism in a conservative way that is, Protestants with fundamentalist trend, whose expansion in Brazil are growing decades ago in a very known speedy rhythm, based on a pattern of successful proselytism among the poorest layer of Brazilian population, throughout domestic territory.(AU) / Em diversas ocasiões, os líderes da Igreja Presbiteriana do Brasil revelaram o desejo de uma eqüidistância teológica dos extremos liberais e fundamentalistas. Entretanto, os dis-cursos e as práticas dessa instituição eclesiástica contrastam com esse posicionamento ofici-al. Além disso, essa pretensa posição de eqüidistância dos extremos liberais e fundamenta-listas não denota fronteiras rígidas, mas é um instrumento eficaz de legitimação do poder nos momentos de reconfiguração do campo religioso, principalmente em situações de crises internas. Outrossim, após a redemocratização do Brasil e o conseqüente aumento de plura-lismo religioso, houve a transformação do campo social brasileiro, provocando dificuldades em setores mais conservadores dessa instituição. Atualmente, procura-se revitalizar a pró-pria tradição religiosa diante das ameaças de sua dissolução impostas pelos processos e-mancipatórios modernos e pela influência das concepções seculares e supostamente atéias da vida (como o feminismo, a luta em defesa dos direitos reprodutivos, a união civil entre pessoas do mesmo sexo, o chamado ―movimento de lésbicas, gays, bissexuais, travestis e transgêneros‖ etc.). No campo religioso, os resultados imediatos dessa postura de reação em face das transformações sociais impostas pela modernidade são: (1) misoginia; (2) aquela manifestação de ativismo político-religioso de caráter conservador os protestantes de pen-dor fundamentalista, cuja expansão no Brasil se vem processando há muitas décadas, em ritmo sabidamente veloz, com base em um modelo de proselitismo muito bem-sucedido entre as camadas mais pobres da população brasileira, por todo território nacional.(AU)

El presente artículo analiza desde una perspectiva de la filosofía política, el pensamiento de Joseph Ratzinger en dos de sus problemas en los que más ha abundado a lo largo de su producción intelectual: el fundamentalismo religioso y el laicisimo político. Para hacerlo, acomete una profundización de lo que llama «ensanchamiento de la razón» para de esta manera dialogar con la filosofía política moderna, sin que se renuncie a los principios que defiende, lo que ha constituido en una manera muy aguda de acercar la geopolítica vaticana a los diferentes estados del mundo, y de influir en sus actores políticos más representativos / This article analyzes from the perspective of political philosophy , the thought of Joseph Ratzinger in two of its most problems has abounded throughout his intellectual production: religious fundamentalism and political laicisimo . To do so, undertakes a deeper he calls " broadening of reason" in this way dialogue with modern political philosophy , without surrender the principles defended , which has become a very acute way to approach the Vatican geopolitics the different states of the world , and to influence its most representative political actors / Trabajo de investigación