21 |
Federalism attained : gubernatorial lobbying in Washington as a constitutional function /Nugent, John Douglas, January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 1998. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 370-382). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.
|
22 |
Executive decision-making in the stateConant, James K. January 1983 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1983. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 394-397).
|
23 |
In the shadow of John Connally : an examination of gubernatorial power in Texas /McCall, James Brian, January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Texas at Dallas, 2006 / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 167-173)
|
24 |
American state governors and their offices /Wyner, Alan Jay January 1967 (has links)
No description available.
|
25 |
The governor as policy maker in education : a case study /Heokstra, Ronald B. January 1973 (has links)
No description available.
|
26 |
The making of a public: a participant observation study of audience formation in a gubernatorial primary /Barkin, Steve Michael January 1979 (has links)
No description available.
|
27 |
Corporate governance in the new universities and colleges of higher educationBennett, Brian James January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
28 |
Networks, patronage and information in colonial governance : Britain, New South Wales and the Cape Colony, 1826-1843Laidlaw, Zoe January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
29 |
On their own initiative : how politicians use direct democracy in the United StatesLubbock, Tom January 2012 (has links)
The central purpose of this thesis is systematically to show why politicians use direct democracy in the US. By identifying multiple situations in which politicians make use of direct democracy, the argument that they use it for some gain is made irresistible and the reasons underlying this behaviour are brought out. Politicians are shown to use direct democracy in three arenas: before launching a candidacy for state-wide office, whilst running for state-wide office and whilst in government. Politicians are shown to do so to expand their public profile, to change campaign agendas, and at the level of the institutions of state government, to bypass another branch of government. These effects are shown using statistical tests of the occurrence of behaviour by state legislators and candidates in the first two instances. Multilevel models are used in the last two instances, to identify when state legislators and governors used direct democracy in battles over lawmaking between the branches of government. A test for the use of the legislative referral by state legislatures is particularly timely and has not been considered before. These uses together lay the groundwork for a new theory of the effects of direct democracy institutions on state government policy. The tests of policy responsiveness in later chapters reject existing theory that might provide an explanation of both why politicians use direct democracy and with what effects on state government and show on responsiveness increasing effect.
|
30 |
THE GOVERNOR AS CHIEF LEGISLATOR IN ARIZONAMorey, Roy Douglas, 1937- January 1964 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0216 seconds