Spelling suggestions: "subject:"gemini advanced"" "subject:"gemini dvanced""
1 |
Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT-4and Gemini Advanced in ErroneousCode Detection and CorrectionSun, Erik Wen Han, Grace, Yasine January 2024 (has links)
This thesis investigates the capabilities of two advanced Large Language Models(LLMs) OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4 and Google’s Gemini Advanced in the domain ofSoftware engineering. While LLMs are widely utilized across various applications,including text summarization and synthesis, their potential for detecting and correct-ing programming errors has not been thoroughly explored. This study aims to fill thisgap by conducting a comprehensive literature search and experimental comparisonof ChatGPT-4 and Gemini Advanced using the QuixBugs and LeetCode benchmarkdatasets, with specific focus on Python and Java programming languages. The re-search evaluates the models’ abilities to detect and correct bugs using metrics suchas Accuracy, Recall, Precision, and F1-score.Experimental results presets that ChatGPT-4 consistently outperforms GeminiAdvanced in both the detection and correction of bugs. These findings provide valu-able insights that could guide further research in the field of LLMs.
|
2 |
A Method for Automated Assessment of Large Language Model Chatbots : Exploring LLM-as-a-Judge in Educational Question-Answering TasksDuan, Yuyao, Lundborg, Vilgot January 2024 (has links)
This study introduces an automated evaluation method for large language model (LLM) based chatbots in educational settings, utilizing LLM-as-a-Judge to assess their performance. Our results demonstrate the efficacy of this approach in evaluating the accuracy of three LLM-based chatbots (Llama 3 70B, ChatGPT 4, Gemini Advanced) across two subjects: history and biology. The analysis reveals promising performance across different subjects. On a scale from 1 to 5 describing the correctness of the judge itself, the LLM judge’s average scores for correctness when evaluating each chatbot on history related questions are 3.92 (Llama 3 70B), 4.20 (ChatGPT 4), 4.51 (Gemini Advanced); for biology related questions, the average scores are 4.04 (Llama 3 70B), 4.28 (ChatGPT 4), 4.09 (Gemini Advanced). This underscores the potential of leveraging the LLM-as-a-judge strategy to evaluate the correctness of responses from other LLMs.
|
Page generated in 0.0504 seconds