This paper will examine the history of Hart Island, what led up to it being established, how it functioned as an institutional landscape in addition to a burial site, and what options are available for its preservation. Using Hart Island as a case study of the intersecting topics of politics, poverty, and preservation I hope to uncover what factors lead to the successful preservation of marginalized landscapes. Exploring how they come to be and how we as a society choose to remember them. / 0 / SPK / specialcollections@tulane.edu

Submitted by JOSIANE SANTOS DE OLIVEIRA (josianeso) on 2018-01-31T12:22:59Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Vinícius Borges Santos_.pdf: 624651 bytes, checksum: 29ea7a5adce22046f92d66f585d69ea1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-31T12:22:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Vinícius Borges Santos_.pdf: 624651 bytes, checksum: 29ea7a5adce22046f92d66f585d69ea1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-10-30 / Nenhuma / Pretende-se analisar, nesta dissertação, as razões de punir sob o prisma da teoria mista de H. L. A. Hart, observando para isso em que medida Hart adota as teorias utilitarista e retributivista, especialmente em Bentham e Kant. Para tanto, observa-se o pensamento filosófico na conceituação da finalidade da punição e nas razões pelas quais se deve punir. Objetiva-se, com isso, examinar as teorias da pena com o intuito de encontrar respostas às questões: o que justifica a prática geral da punição? A quem pode a punição ser aplicada? Como nós podemos punir? A pesquisa é eminentemente bibliográfica, desenvolvida a partir da identificação, leitura, análise e interpretação dos escritos dos maiores defensores destas escolas filosóficas. O utilitarismo projeta a função da pena para o futuro, objetivando a prevenção de novos delitos. Sob outra perspectiva, o retributivismo, ao enxergar a pena como consequência do delito, volta sua visão para o passado, apontando como seu fundamento o merecimento e o castigo do infrator. Hart defende a integração das duas teorias mais importantes do pensamento filosófico, considerando a teoria utilitarista quanto ao objetivo geral justificador, e a retributivista no que concerne à distribuição. Da análise da teoria mista de Hart observa-se que, diante da complexidade do instituto da punição, a razão de punir se revela num sistema misto e equilibrado, que abrange tanto a retribuição ao infrator pelo mal cometido como a prevenção de novos delitos. / This dissertation purpose is to analyze the reasons for punishing from the point of view of the H. L. A. Hart's mixed theory, observing to what extent Hart adopts utilitarian and retributivist theories, especially in Bentham and Kant. For this, one observes the philosophical thought in the conceptualization of the aim of the punishment and the reasons by which one must punish. The purpose is to examine the theories of punishment in order to find answers to the questions: what justifies the general practice of punishment? To whom may punishment be applied? How may we punish? The research is eminently bibliographical, developed from the identification, reading, analysis and interpretation of the writings of the greatest defenders of these philosophical schools. Utilitarianism projects the justification of punishment for the future, aiming at the prevention of new crimes. From another perspective, retributivism, when seeing the penalty as a consequence of crime, returns its view to the past, pointing as its foundation the merit and punishment of the offender. Hart defends for the integration of the two most important theories of philosophical thought, considering the utilitarian theory as to the general justifying aim, and the retributivist as far as distribution is concerned. From the analysis of Hart's mixed theory it is observed that, faced with the complexity of the institute of punishment, the reason for punishing is revealed in a mixed and balanced system, which includes both retribution to the offender for wrongdoing and the prevention of new offenses.

No description available.

Proefschrift Universiteit Maastricht. / Met bibliogr., lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Met lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Met bibliogr., lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Met lit. opg., bibliogr. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Auteursnaam op omslag: Angelique Jansen. Met lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Met lit. opg. - Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.

Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam. / Met samenvatting in het Nederlands.