Background: The consequences of hearing loss vary and can include both emotional and social impacts, such as social isolation and decreased self-confidence. Communication limitations resulting from hearing loss can also affect participation in social relationships, which can lead to social withdrawal. Previous research has shown that audiological rehabilitation can be an effective method to help individuals manage their hearing loss and increase their self-confidence. Studies have shown that women with hearing loss reported higher levels of stress and anxiety compared to men with hearing loss. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate how perceived disability due to hearing impairment affected individuals socially and emotionally among men and women in the age group of 18-64 years. Furthermore, potential gender differences in this impact were examined, as well as the relationship between perceived benefits of audiological rehabilitation and the use of hearing aids. Method: Method: In this quantitative cross-sectional study, a questionnaire survey was conducted using the HHIE instrument, supplemented with demographic and background questions. The survey was distributed through HRF's associations, online forums, groups for individuals with hearing impairment, and informational pamphlets containing a QR code for the survey were distributed in the waiting areas of audiological clinics and the Audiological Clinic's Education Reception (AudU) in Örebro. Statistical software SPSS was employed for data analysis. Mann-Whitney U-test was utilized to investigate potential differences between men and women in their emotional and social experiences related to hearing impairment. To examine the correlation between perceived benefits of hearing aids, perceived benefits of rehabilitation, the social subscale, and the emotional subscale, Spearman's correlation was employed. Results: The results of the current study showed no significant difference between men and women in how they experience the impact of hearing impairment emotionally and socially. However, there was a significant positive correlation between perceived benefit of hearing aids, perceived benefit of rehabilitation, and the subscales in HHIE. These findings indicated a relationship between the perceived benefit of hearing aids and rehabilitation, leading to an improved emotional and social function among individuals with hearing impairment. Conclusions: The study found no significant difference between men and women regarding how hearing impairment affected them socially and emotionally. However, the study did find a significant positive correlation between perceived benefits of hearing aids, audiological rehabilitation, and subscales in the HHIE instrument. / Bakgrund: Konsekvenserna av hörselnedsättning varierar och kan inkludera både emotionella och sociala påverkningar, såsom social isolering och minskat självförtroende. Begränsningar i kommunikationen till följd av hörselnedsättning kan också påverka delaktigheten i sociala relationer, vilket kan leda till socialt tillbakadragande. Det finns studier som har visat att kvinnor med hörselnedsättning rapporterade högre nivåer av stress och ångest jämfört med män med hörselnedsättning. Tidigare forskning har visat att audiologisk rehabilitering kan vara en effektiv metod för att hjälpa personer att hantera sin hörselnedsättning och öka deras självförtroende. Syfte: Syftet med studien var att undersöka hur upplevt funktionshinder på grund av hörselnedsättning bland män och kvinnor i åldersgruppen 18-64 år påverkade dem socialt och emotionellt. Vidare undersöktes eventuella könsskillnader i denna påverkan samt sambandet mellan upplevd nytta av audiologisk rehabilitering och upplevd nytta av hörapparaterna. Metod: I denna kvantitativa tvärsnittsstudie utfördes en enkätstudie som använde mätinstrumentet HHIE, kompletterat med demografiska och bakgrundsfrågor. Enkäten publicerades i HRF:s föreningar, online-forum, grupper för personer med hörselnedsättning samt informationsblad med en QR-kod till enkäten delades ut till audiologiska kliniken och audiologiska klinikens utbildningsmottagnings (AudU) väntrum i Örebro. För analys av resultaten användes statistikprogrammet SPSS. Mann-Whitney U-test användes för att undersöka eventuella skillnader mellan män och kvinnor i deras emotionella och sociala upplevelser av hörselnedsättning. För att undersöka om det fanns samband mellan upplevd nytta av hörapparaterna, upplevd nytta av rehabilitering, sociala delskalan och emotionella delskalan användes Spearmans korrelation. Resultat: Resultaten av den aktuella studien visade ingen signifikant skillnad mellan män och kvinnor i hur de upplever påverkan av hörselnedsättning emotionellt och socialt. Däremot fanns det en signifikant positiv korrelation mellan upplevd nytta avhörapparat/er, upplevd nytta av rehabilitering och delskalorna i HHIE. Dessa resultat indikerade att det fanns ett samband mellan upplevd nytta av hörapparat/er och rehabilitering, vilket ledde till en förbättrad emotionell och social funktion hos personer med hörselnedsättning. Slutsatser: Studien fann ingen signifikant skillnad mellan män och kvinnor gällande hur hörselnedsättningen påverkade dem socialt och emotionellt. Däremot fann studien att det fanns en signifikant positiv korrelation mellan upplevd nytta avhörapparat/er, audiologisk rehabilitering och delskalor i mätinstrumentet HHIE.

AIMS: This study investigated the perception of generic and disease-specific Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) for adults living with hearing impairment (HI) in Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ). This study aimed to answer three questions: (1) What is the perception of HRQoL amongst adults with hearing impairment in NZ? (2) How do these perceptions compare to adults with HI living in other countries for which we have data? (3) What are the demographic and audiometric variables related to device ownership? METHOD: HRQoL, demographic, and audiometric information was collected from 126 adults in NZ. The following demographic information was collected: age, relationship length, hours worked per week, income, ancestry, sex, level of education, city size, and sexual orientation. The following audiologic information was also collected: ownership of hearing aids (HA), ownership of hearing assistance technology (HAT), better-ear pure-tone average (BEPTA), worse-ear pure-tone average (WEPTA), and signal-to-noise ratio loss (SNR loss). HRQoL information was collected using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36; Ware & Sherbourne, 1992), and the Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI) for both elderly (HHIE) and adults (HHIA; Ventry & Weinstein, 1982; Newman, Weinstein, Jacobson, & Hug, 1991). Variables discriminating HA and HAT owners from non-owners were also analysed. RESULTS: The relationship between demographic variables and HRQoL scores revealed that only age and income were significant. Audiometric variables had significant relationships with disease-specific HRQoL scores, as well as HA and HAT ownership. Finally, disease-specific HRQoL scores and all audiometric variables differentiated HA owners from non- owners, but demographic variables did not. Generic HRQoL scores and all audiometric variables differentiated HAT owners from non-owners. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the negative impacts of HI on HRQoL as reported overseas are also present in NZ, and that not only do audiometric variables including SNR loss are related to HRQoL, but HRQoL is a significant predictor for HA and HAT ownership. Further QoL research is warranted amongst the HI population in NZ to identify and understand any causal relationships present amongst these variables. Furthermore, HRQoL instruments and a test of speech understanding in noise have been shown to provide additional meaningful information, and therefore clinicians might consider including them during consultation.