M.A. / This study was conducted to ascertain whether there is a significant relationship between, parental pressure, stress levels and athletic performance in high school track and field athletes. The question can be asked whether parental pressure will result in increased stress levels in the athlete and therefore poorer performance? Sixty-six high school track and field athletes, between the ages of 13 and 18 years, were selected for the study. The athletes were taken from training groups and an Afrikaans high school to Provide a sample that included both elite and social athletes. The IPAT-Anxiety Scale, Sport Competition Anxiety Test (SCAT), SASOL junior tables and three self-designed questionnaires were used to determine the athletes' stress levels, amount of parental pressure and performance measurements. Significant relationships were found between parental pressure, increased stress levels and poorer performance. The more parental pressure experienced by the athlete the higher his stress levels and consequently the poorer his performance.

This study was designed to explore the effects of high school sport participation on female adolescent body image and self-esteem. This study also explored differences in body image and self-esteem among upperclassmen and underclassmen. The sample consisted of two adolescent female groups: 47 athletes (20 upperclassmen and 27 underclassmen) and 34 nonathletes (18 upperclassmen and 16 underclassmen). All participants took the Body Image Avoidance Questionnaire (BIAQ), Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (SES), and a Demographic Questionnaire. All data were analyzed by conducting t-tests. Results indicated nonathletes had significantly higher scores on body image avoidance than athletes, and underclassmen had significantly higher scores on body image avoidance than upperclassmen. There were no significant differences found on the self-esteem measure. Implications for research and practice are discussed. / Department of Counseling Psychology and Guidance Services

Determining the factors that contribute to mental toughness development in athletes has become a focus for researchers as coaches, athletes, and others extol its influence on performance success. In this study we examined a model of mental toughness development based on achievement goal theory, assessing the relations between motivational climates, goal orientations, and mental toughness. Five hundred ninety-nine varsity athletes, representing 13 different sports from six different high schools in a southwestern United States school district, participated in the study. Athletes completed self-report measures assessing parent, peer, and coach motivational climates, goal orientations, and their mental toughness. Initially, I examined the measurement model and found it fit the data well both in the exploratory (SRMR = .06; CFI = .94) and confirmatory (SRMR = .06; CFI = .95) samples. Second, the structural model was examined and found to fit the data well in both the exploratory (SRMR = .08; CFI = .93) and confirmatory samples (SRMR = .07, CFI = .95). Parent task-involving climate, (β = .55; p < .05) and coach task-involving climate (β = .32; p < .05), but not peer task-involving climate (β = .05), were associated with task goal orientation (R2 = .57). Ego goal orientation (R2 = .32) was explained by peer ego-involving climate (β = .15; p < .05), parent ego-involving climate (β = .39; p < .05), and coach ego-involving climate (β = .16; p < .05). Finally, only task goal orientation (β = .75; p < .05) was related to the athletes’ mental toughness (R2 = .56); the ego goal orientation pathway was not significant (β = .04). These results speak to the potential positive influence of parents and coaches on athletes’ mental toughness through their endorsement of task-involving messages and pursuits leading to the development of a task goal orientation.

Grit is defined as "perseverance and passion for long-term goals." Although studied in relation to various outcomes, such as retention and academic performance, few studies have examined variables that may contribute to grit's development. Further, few studies have examined this construct in relation to sport performance or within athletic environments, despite its clear connection to sport-related constructs like mental toughness and resilience. Thus, based in achievement motivation theory, this study examined the relations of the perceived motivational climate as defined by athletes' perceptions of the coaches' behaviors (task vs. ego), athletes' perceptions of their achievement goal orientation (task vs. ego), athletes' perceptions of their implicit theory (i.e., fundamental beliefs regarding whether or not ability can change; growth vs. fixed), and athletes' perception of their level of grit. Male varsity soccer players (N = 81; Mage = 15.80 ± .81) from a large metropolitan area in the south central U.S. completed questionnaires measuring these achievement motivation constructs. The full regression model was significant, accounting for 18% of the grit variance, F(6, 74) = 2.77, p = .017. Within the full model, having a growth mindset (β = .25, p = .035) and endorsing a task goal orientation (β = .36, p = .004) predicted higher levels of grit for the athletes. Neither the coach-created motivational climate, nor the athletes' ego orientation or fixed mindset, were significantly predicted their grit scores. Consistent with Dweck and Duckworth, components of achievement motivation theory, particularly related to a task or growth perspective, may play an important role in athletes' developing a perspective that allows them to work effectively and diligently toward long-term goals.

This study examined the effects of frame-by-frame video-computerized feedback on competitive state anxiety, self-efficacy, effort, and baseball performance of high school players. Players were randomly assigned to one of three feedback conditions: (a) Hitting score, (b) Hitting score and frame-by-frame analysis of a mechanically correct swing, (c) Hitting score and frame-by-frame analysis of participant's swing and a mechanically correct swing. Once per week for six weeks, the players completed three questionnaires: (a) Hitting Self-Efficacy Scale, (b) Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2C, and (c) Performance Effort Scale, and performed a hitting task. Results of the 3 (Group) x 6 (Trials) ANOVAs revealed no significant effects. This study does not support previous confidence-baseball hitting research.

Grounded in self-determination theory and achievement goal theory, the purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine the underlying motivational processes from social environments created by coaches, peers, and parents to motivational outcomes in high school athletes, with an emphasis on the relative influence of social agents in basic psychological needs (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness). The quantitative part of this study tested a hierarchical model of high school sport motivation in a final sample of 311 student athletes (204 boys, 107 girls) using structural equation modeling: social factors (coach-, peer-, and parent-created motivational climates) -> psychological mediators (need satisfaction and frustration) -> types of motivation (autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation) -> consequences (subjective vitality, athlete burnout, and intention to drop out). Invariance across gender and across team type (varsity vs. non-varsity) was also tested. Adequate model fits were achieved in separate "brighter side" and "darker side" models across the overall sample, gender, and team type. The follow-up qualitative part of this study explored "how" beyond "what" coaches, peers, and parents contribute to the social environments, need frustration, and negative motivational outcomes in sport in a subsample of 37 student athletes (24 boys, 13 girls) who reported high amotivation/burnout and higher than average dropout intentions in the quantitative survey. Content analysis and observation were conducted to interpret the focus group interview data among athletes across gender and team type. The results of both quantitative and qualitative parts were integrated and compared to summarize the roles of coaches, peers, and parents in the "brighter and darker sides" of athletic experience in high school athletes.

Ho, Wing-yee. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 70-82). / Text in English; abstracts in English and Chinese. / Ho, Wing-yee. / Abstract --- p.ii / Acknowledgments --- p.iv / List of Table --- p.viii / List of Figure --- p.ix / Chapter CHAPTER ONE --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Background information --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Purpose of the study --- p.7 / Chapter 1.3 --- Definition of terms --- p.7 / Chapter 1.4 --- Delimitations --- p.9 / Chapter 1.5 --- Limitations --- p.10 / Chapter 1.6 --- Significance of the study --- p.10 / Chapter CHAPTER TWO --- Review of Literature --- p.12 / Chapter 2.1 --- Global self-esteem --- p.12 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- Theoretical background --- p.12 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Self-esteem in children --- p.17 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- Self-esteem and sports --- p.19 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- Self-esteem and academic achievement --- p.20 / Chapter 2.1.5 --- Self-esteem and gender --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2 --- Attributional style --- p.24 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Theoretical background --- p.24 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Attributional style and academic level --- p.27 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Attributional style and sports --- p.28 / Chapter 2.3 --- Attribution and self-esteem --- p.29 / Chapter 2.4 --- Summary --- p.31 / Chapter CHAPTER THREE --- Method --- p.33 / Chapter 3.1 --- Participants --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2 --- Instrumentation --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- In assessing global self-esteem --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- In assessing general attributional style --- p.34 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- In assessing perceived sports competence --- p.35 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- In assessing sports specific attributional style --- p.36 / Chapter 3.3 --- Procedures --- p.37 / Chapter 3.4 --- Statistical analysis --- p.38 / Chapter CHAPTER FOUR --- Results --- p.40 / Chapter 4.1 --- Descriptive statistics --- p.40 / Chapter 4.2 --- Reliability for internal consistency --- p.41 / Chapter 4.3 --- The effect of gender and age on global self-esteem and attributions --- p.43 / Chapter 4.4 --- The effect of school banding and perceived sports competence on global self-esteem by gender --- p.45 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- The relationship between academic achievement and global self-esteem by gender --- p.46 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- The relationship between perceived sports competence and global self-esteem by gender --- p.47 / Chapter 4.5 --- The effect of school banding and perceived sports competence on general attributions --- p.48 / Chapter 4.5.1 --- The relationship between academic achievement and general attributions --- p.48 / Chapter 4.5.2 --- The relationship between perceived sports competence and general attributions --- p.49 / Chapter 4.6 --- The effect of school banding and perceived sports competence on sports specific attributions by high school level --- p.50 / Chapter 4.6.1 --- The relationship between academic achievement and sports specific attributions in junior high schools --- p.51 / Chapter CHAPTER FIVE --- Discussion --- p.53 / Chapter 5.1 --- The effect of gender and age on global self-esteem and attributions --- p.53 / Chapter 5.2 --- The effect of school banding and perceived sports competence on global self-esteem by gender --- p.56 / Chapter 5.2.1 --- The relationship between academic achievement and global self-esteem in high schools' female athletes --- p.57 / Chapter 5.2.2 --- The relationship between perceived sports competence and global self-esteem in high schools' athletes --- p.58 / Chapter 5.3 --- The relationship between school banding and general attributionsin high schools' athletes --- p.59 / Chapter 5.4 --- The relationship between perceived sports competence and general attributions in high schools' athletes --- p.63 / Chapter 5.5 --- The relationship between academic achievement and sports specific attributions in junior high schools' athletes --- p.65 / Chapter 5.6 --- Conclusion and Recommendations --- p.67 / References --- p.70 / Appendix A --- p.83 / Appendix B --- p.85 / Appendix C --- p.86 / Appendix D --- p.87 / Appendix E --- p.91 / Appendix F --- p.102 / Appendix G --- p.103 / Appendix H --- p.104 / Appendix I --- p.108