"Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de maîtrise en droit option droit des affaires". Ce mémoire a été classé parmi les 15% des mémoires de la discipline. / Il se pose présentement un problème de compréhension du concept de malhonnêteté en matière de fraude. Pour fms de rappel, la fraude peut être commise par mensonge, par supercherie ou par tout autre moyen dolosif. Cette dernière notion, selon l'état actuel de la jurisprudence sera évaluée selon un critère objectif. C'est donc en fonction de la personne raisonnable que l'on se référera afin de déterminer du caractère malhonnête de la conduite. Or, la notion de malhonnêteté n'étant pas défmie, il en résulte incertitude et confusion surtout en matière de crimes économiques. Considérant que les administrateurs sont assujettis en droit des sociétés à une obligation de loyauté et d'honnêteté, il s'agira de s'inspirer des principes développés en cette matière afm de dégager certaines constantes qui nous permettront de déterminer ce qui constitue une conduite malhonnête. La première partie se veut un exposé sommaire des grands principes régissant le droit corporatif. Y sont décrites certaines conduites considérées comme malhonnêtes en droit des sociétés. De cette analyse, il ressort que la malhonnêteté est davantage définie en relation au projet commun des investisseurs qu'en fonction d'un droit de propriété. La notion se divise ainsi autour de deux grands axes, à savoir, les conflits horizontaux et les conflits verticaux. La deuxième partie se concentre sur le droit criminel. Y sont repris, en matière de fraude les conduites considérées comme faisant partie de la catégorie des «autres moyens dolosifs» et décrites par la juge Mclachlin. Au besoin, une référence aux principes du droit corporatif est faite. D'autres infractions, telles les commissions secrètes, les délits d'initiés et le vol sont examinées. La malhonnêteté en droit criminelle est davantage définie en relation avec le droit de propriété. Toutefois, le manque de loyauté se voulant également dénoncé, la notion d'intérêt de la compagnie, comme en matière de droit corporatif présente toute sa pertinence. / There presently is a problem regarding the comprehension of the concept of dishonesty relating to fraud. Fraud can be the result of deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means. This last notion is determined objectively, by reference to what a reasonable person would consider to be a dishonest act. Considering that the notion of dishonesty has no definition, a confusion exists especially when it cornes to economic crimes. Due to the fact that directors are compelled to respect an obligation of good faith and loyalty, we will refer to the general principles that exist in corporate law in order to define what can be qualified as dishonest behaviour. The first part is a summary of the general principals relating to corporate law. In fuis part we describe sorne behaviours which are considered as dishonest. From this analysis, we have come to the conclusion that dishonesty is understood as being an obstacle to the common project ofthe investors, and not in relation to property. The second part relates to criminal law. Some of the behaviours that were described as being part of other fraudulent means by justice McLachlin are analyzed. A reference to the general principles of corporate law is made when needed. Other offences like secret commissions and insider trading are also part of the analysis. Dishonesty pertaining to criminal law is described in relation to property. However, a lack of loyalty being also denounced, the notion of the best interest of the company, as in corporate law, remains relevant.

Thesis (M.A.) --University of Limpopo, 2012 / The study deals with ubuntu as reflected in the selected novels of Magau, A.W and Maumela, E.T. Qualitative research method was employed. The study has discovered that ubuntu appears in many forms in Tshivenḓa such as respect for the dignity and worth of human beings, honesty, compassion, solidarity, generosity and forgiveness and reconciliation. The findings also reveal that Tshivenḓa puts more emphasis on activities which signify ubuntu than material wealth. The study also found that there are activities that are emical to ubuntu such as disrespect, dishonesty, cruelty, selfishness and greed and lack of forgiveness and reconciliation. Ubuntu occupies a central position amongst the Vhavenḓa and anyone who negates what ubuntu promotes and upholds has been regarded as non-human.

The focus of the current dissertation was on the construction and validation of a situational judgment test (SJT) assessing lying/dishonesty in the workplace. The scale was designed to have two dimensions corresponding to two needs based on Socioanalytic Theory: (1) the need to get along and (2) the need to get ahead. Three studies were undertaken in order to create items, pilot test items, and assess both the construct and criterion-related validity of the scale. The result of Study 1 was a pilot-tested scale with six SJT items corresponding to each of the two SJT dimension (12 items total). The dimensions of the new SJT are referred to in the paper as LAl (lying to get along) and LAh (lying to get ahead). Study 2 examined convergent and discriminant validity as well as the nomological network of other individual difference variables expected to be related to LAl and/or LAh. The results of Study 2 largely supported the construct validity of the overall scale but many of the personality constructs based on the Five Factor Model (FFM) were not related to LAl or LAh. In Study 3, LAl and LAh were unrelated to several aspects of supervisor rated performance as well turnover intentions and objective career outcomes (e.g., promotions). The primary contribution of the dissertation was the creation of a construct valid SJT measuring lying in organizations whose dimensions could be assessed reliably using coefficient alpha as opposed to test-retest reliability. Future research directions and limitations of the study are discussed in the final section of the dissertation.

Much work and research has been carried out on effective school cultures, accountability and relationships. Underlying all that happens in schools, is the notion of trust. But what do we understand about trust? Is the definition of trust consistent amongst everyone? How is trust defined? Is trust a valued or even an identified component of successful leadership? Does trust underpin all that we do and what, if any, are the commonalities of trust? Central to this thesis is the notion that trust and trusting relationships play a pivotal role in the culture of a school and that without trust a school ceases to be as effective as it has the potential to be. The purpose of this study was to consider existing research and information and to attempt to establish a definition of trust, while identifying the place that trust is perceived to have in an effective school culture. While seeking to establish a baseline understanding of trust and peoples' perceptions of trust, it was also the purpose of this study to examine the dichotomy of trust and accountability. This looked at the challenge of building and maintaining trust while meeting individual and school accountability tasks. Consideration was also given to high-trust/low-trust situations and to whether they are actually the same situation, just seen through different eyes. The literature review examined what an effective school culture might look like and how trust impacts on this culture and, ultimately, on student learning. The literature review also defined trust and the skills, actions or emotions which contribute to trust and for whom these aspects of trust are a reality. The understanding that trust in the school situation is based on having common values and goals was evident in the literature. Trust was defined as being critical in the role of leadership and it is inherent in the way that principals act and lead and that it impacts greatly on the effectiveness of the relationships within a school and on student learning. Eight principals from a range of school sizes, with a gender balance of participants, took part in this research. All were involved in separate, semi-structured interviews, which provided the data for grounded theory analysis. Three distinct findings emerged from this process. These were the notion of what it means to be trustworthy, the role of the principal in extending trust and the dichotomy of trust. The results of this qualitative study suggested that the modelling of trust through daily actions and the empowering of staff were found to be important aspects in developing and maintaining trust within schools as was the competence, experience and knowledge of the principal. Walking the talk and valuing staff as individuals as well as professional members of the school organisation, were critical aspects to effective leadership. Prior experiences in which low trust was evident, informed the practice of these principals to develop philosophies of high trust. Within the final chapter in the Recommendations for Further Study which could add to current research by considering in more depth, specific relationships involving high trust. Six recommendations for further study were discussed in this final section. This study concludes that trust is significant in effective school cultures. It is a fragile emotion and action that can quickly be undermined and decimated and conversely, needs to be actively worked on to be maintained and developed to a high trust model. Being aware of and considering trust will assist principals and their colleagues to enhance effective school cultures, which will impact positively on student learning outcomes.

In online shopping buyers do not have enough information about sellers and cannot inspect the products before purchasing them. To help buyers find reliable sellers, online marketplaces deploy Trust and Reputation Management (TRM) systems. These systems aggregate buyers’ feedback about the sellers they have interacted with and about the products they have purchased, to inform users within the marketplace about the sellers and products before making purchases. Thus positive customer feedback has become a valuable asset for each seller in order to attract more business. This naturally creates incentives for cheating, in terms of introducing fake positive feedback. Therefore, an important responsibility of TRM systems is to aid buyers find genuine feedback (reviews) about different sellers. Recent TRM systems achieve this goal by selecting and assigning credible advisers to any new customer/buyer. These advisers are selected among the buyers who have had experience with a number of sellers and have provided feedback for their services and goods. As people differ in their tastes, the buyer feedback that would be most useful should come from advisers with similar tastes and values. In addition, the advisers should be honest, i.e. provide truthful reviews and ratings, and not malicious, i.e. not collude with sellers to favour them or with other buyers to badmouth some sellers. Defining the boundary between dishonest and honest advisers is very important. However, currently, there is no systematic approach for setting the honesty threshold which divides benevolent advisers from the malicious ones. The thesis addresses this problem and proposes a market-adaptive honesty threshold management mechanism. In this mechanism the TRM system forms a feedback system which monitors the current status of the e-marketplace. According to the status of the e-marketplace the feedback system improves the performance utilizing PID controller from the field of control systems. The responsibility of this controller is to set the the suitable value of honesty threshold. The results of experiments, using simulation and real-world dataset show that the market-adaptive honesty threshold allows to optimize the performance of the marketplace with respect to throughput and buyer satisfaction.

Il se pose présentement un problème de compréhension du concept de malhonnêteté en matière de fraude. Pour fms de rappel, la fraude peut être commise par mensonge, par supercherie ou par tout autre moyen dolosif. Cette dernière notion, selon l'état actuel de la jurisprudence sera évaluée selon un critère objectif. C'est donc en fonction de la personne raisonnable que l'on se référera afin de déterminer du caractère malhonnête de la conduite. Or, la notion de malhonnêteté n'étant pas défmie, il en résulte incertitude et confusion surtout en matière de crimes économiques. Considérant que les administrateurs sont assujettis en droit des sociétés à une obligation de loyauté et d'honnêteté, il s'agira de s'inspirer des principes développés en cette matière afm de dégager certaines constantes qui nous permettront de déterminer ce qui constitue une conduite malhonnête. La première partie se veut un exposé sommaire des grands principes régissant le droit corporatif. Y sont décrites certaines conduites considérées comme malhonnêtes en droit des sociétés. De cette analyse, il ressort que la malhonnêteté est davantage définie en relation au projet commun des investisseurs qu'en fonction d'un droit de propriété. La notion se divise ainsi autour de deux grands axes, à savoir, les conflits horizontaux et les conflits verticaux. La deuxième partie se concentre sur le droit criminel. Y sont repris, en matière de fraude les conduites considérées comme faisant partie de la catégorie des «autres moyens dolosifs» et décrites par la juge Mclachlin. Au besoin, une référence aux principes du droit corporatif est faite. D'autres infractions, telles les commissions secrètes, les délits d'initiés et le vol sont examinées. La malhonnêteté en droit criminelle est davantage définie en relation avec le droit de propriété. Toutefois, le manque de loyauté se voulant également dénoncé, la notion d'intérêt de la compagnie, comme en matière de droit corporatif présente toute sa pertinence. / There presently is a problem regarding the comprehension of the concept of dishonesty relating to fraud. Fraud can be the result of deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means. This last notion is determined objectively, by reference to what a reasonable person would consider to be a dishonest act. Considering that the notion of dishonesty has no definition, a confusion exists especially when it cornes to economic crimes. Due to the fact that directors are compelled to respect an obligation of good faith and loyalty, we will refer to the general principles that exist in corporate law in order to define what can be qualified as dishonest behaviour. The first part is a summary of the general principals relating to corporate law. In fuis part we describe sorne behaviours which are considered as dishonest. From this analysis, we have come to the conclusion that dishonesty is understood as being an obstacle to the common project ofthe investors, and not in relation to property. The second part relates to criminal law. Some of the behaviours that were described as being part of other fraudulent means by justice McLachlin are analyzed. A reference to the general principles of corporate law is made when needed. Other offences like secret commissions and insider trading are also part of the analysis. Dishonesty pertaining to criminal law is described in relation to property. However, a lack of loyalty being also denounced, the notion of the best interest of the company, as in corporate law, remains relevant. / "Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de maîtrise en droit option droit des affaires". Ce mémoire a été classé parmi les 15% des mémoires de la discipline.

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 68-80) Also available in print.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 1999. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 173-181). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Georgia State University, 2009. / Title from file title page. Lynn Hannan, committee chair; Galen Sevcik, Kristy Towry, Larry Brown, Tim Mitchell, committee members. Description based on contents viewed Sept. 14, 2009. Includes bibliographical references (p. 79-82).

We study an additive perturbation theorem for substochastic semigroups which is known as Kato's Theorem. There are two previously-known generalisations of Kato's Theorem, namely for abstract state spaces and for KB-spaces. We prove a version of Kato's Theorem for a class of spaces which encompasses both, namely ordered Banach spaces with generating cone and monotone norm. We also study a property of the perturbed semigroup in Kato's Theorem known as honesty of the semigroup. We add a few results to the fairly extensive existing theory of honesty for Kato's Theorem for abstract state spaces. In light of our new generalisation of Kato's Theorem to ordered Banach spaces with monotone norm, we investigate generalising the theory of honesty to these spaces as well. The results for the general case are less complete as many of the results for the case of abstract state spaces depend on the additive norm structure of the space. We also consider some new applications of honesty theory in abstract state spaces. We begin by applying honesty theory to the study of the heat equation on graphs. We prove that honesty of the heat semigroup coincides with a concept known as stochastic completeness of the graph which has been studied independently of honesty. We then look at the application of honesty theory to quantum dynamical semigroups. We show that honesty is the natural generalisation of the concept of conservativity of quantum dynamical semigroups. Conservative quantum dynamical semigroups are known to have certain "nice" properties. We show that similar properties hold for honest semigroups using honesty theory results. Finally, we consider a form of boundary perturbations in the context of transport semigroups. There exists an analogous theory of honesty for this set-up. We formulate a general result from which honesty results of both Kato's Theorem and transport semigroups can be derived.