A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce (specialising in Taxation) / Tampon tax is a colloquial term in common usage describing taxes levied on female menstrual hygiene products that are taxed as luxury goods in spite of the fact these items are considered necessities such as food and medicine, which are either exempted or taxed at 0% in some countries. Tampon tax in South Africa is the levying of value-added tax (VAT), to female menstrual hygiene products. Internationally, activists have initiated various campaigns and protests for the removal of tampon tax as it is not regarded as a luxury but rather a necessity, and South Africa has followed suit. There have been various campaigns and initiatives towards making female menstrual hygiene products more affordable and/ or accessible to the females from low-income households in South Africa. Reduction in sales tax rates, removal of goods and services tax on female menstrual hygiene products and the utilisation of the income earned from sales tax on female menstrual hygiene products are options available to negate the economic effects of tampon tax on females in their reproductive years. This paper discusses tampon tax and its effect on social, health and the economic well-being of South Africa. The paper will include comparative analyses to what is being done in some countries to alleviate the negative effects of the tampon tax. This paper will also examine the value-added tax in South Africa. Arguments in favour of and against tampon tax are also discussed. / NG (2020)

Includes bibliographical references (leaves 138-139). / By comparing the income tax allowances and deductions for private investors in film production funds in Germany and in South Africa, the author aims to show how the governments of these two countries are taxing private individuals who invest in film funds, i.e. what incentives are offered to such venturesome investors. The tax incentives examined here provide the taxpayer with a deferment of his tax payments. By making the comparison the author intends examine what role a domestic film fund can play as an instrument for financing domestic and export films and how the government can promote film production in this way.

Section 24J is regarded to be one of the most complex provisions in the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962. This study specifically focuses on the income tax treatment of section 24Jinstruments denominated in a foreign currency, specifically with regards to whether such instruments are fixed or variable rate instruments for purposes of section 24J and the interaction between section 24J, section 25D (foreign currency translation rules) and section 24I (gains and losses on foreign exchange transactions).The basic concepts surrounding the incurral and accrual of interest for income tax purposes, as well as of some of the general issues faced when section 24J is practically applied are discussed. Importantly it is found that although the definition of 'instrument' includes all debt instruments, regardless of whether such instruments are interest-bearing, the application of section 24J would have no impact on the issuer or holder of an instrument that is a non-interest bearing debt instrument. Also, the section 24J definition of 'interest' is wider than the common law meaning of the same term. However, as 'interest'is defined with reference to itself, the common law meaning is still very relevant. It is confirmed that section 24J poses various interpretational uncertainties which are especially highlighted when some of the key provisions of section 24J are applied in determining the interest accrual amounts based on the yield to maturity method. Applying the rules of statutory interpretation and with the aid of hypothetical examples, itis argued that foreign exchange rates would fall within the definition of a variable rate for purposes of section 24J. However, an instrument denominated in a foreign currency would be regarded as a fixed rate instrument to the extent that the amounts payable are fixed amounts specified in the applicable foreign currency or the calculation of the amount payable in the applicable foreign currency does not involve the application of a 'variable rate' (as defined).Further is it argued that section 24J merely provides for a single accrual or incurral event during each year of assessment in relation to each instrument. Therefore, where accrual amounts be denominated in a foreign currency it should be translated at the spot rate on the last day of the year of assessment (or on the date of redemption/transfer in the instance where the instrument was transferred/redeemed during the year of assessment) for purposes of determining the sum of the accrual amounts to be included in taxable income. It is also argued that the timing of the accrual and incurral of interest amounts in terms of section 24J is applied in establishing the 'transaction date' of the interest amount owing for purposes of determining 'exchange differences' at the end of any year of assessment in terms of section 24I.

No description available.

The system described in this research report computes 1975 Federal income tax for those who itemize deductions. The system user calls the program, written in FORTRAN IV, from a computer terminal, and then types answers to questions asked by the program. The user is given the opportunity to make corrections in the answers, and then the system calculates and prints out information necessary the complete IRS Form 1040 and Schedule A. The paper contains a description of the system, and explanation of the program, recommendations for future revision, and suggestions for expansion of the system. Four appendices contain IRS Form 1040 and Schedule A, sample cases, a complete program listing, and the gas tax and sales tax tables and tax rates schedules X, Y, and Z in which the tax is found.

M.S.

This thesis sets forth a guaranteed minimum income proposal which would close part of the "poverty gap"--the gap between the income of poor families and individuals and the income they need in order to maintain a standard of living above the poverty level. The proposal, called negative rates income taxation, combines into a single program the giving and taking of income by the federal government. The negative income tax proposal is distinguished from other guaranteed income programs in two primary respects: (1) the focus on filling part of the poverty gap, that is, a marginal tax rate (negative) of less than 100 per cent; and (2) the emphasis upon income in relation to family size in determining whether an individual or family is eligible for allowances. This means that the benefits of the plan are income-based rather than being based upon such present characteristics as age(OASI), occupation (farm price supports), status (veterans benefits), etc. The scope of the thesis attempts to cover the various subjects related to the negative income tax, although this is an almost impossible task. For example, subjects such as early utopian ideas, past federal legislation, and present socio-economic problems are related to the concept of the proposal, Also, the principles of negative taxation, the cost and administration of the plan. and economic results of the plan are vital to appraising its applicability. / Master of Science

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. / The purpose of this work is to examine the basic characteristics of the federal corporate income tax and to ascertain the importance of legislative proposals aimed at alleviating inequities and problems caused by the tax. This study is focused on the period 1954 to 1964 and subjects to economic analysis the proposed legislative amendments to the federal corporate income tax law. The several advocates of corporate tax reform concentrated their efforts on (1) Proposals to provide relief to small and new business, including measures to regulate corporate size and activities, and to modify the rate structure in order to eliminate or reduce various tax-induced inequities; (2) Proposals to reduce the disparity of tax treatment between competing enterprises and the use of tax incentives to encourage and direct United States investment abroad; (3) Proposals to encourage modernization and expansion of the nation's productive facilities and to increase the competitiveness of the United States in world markets; (4) Proposals for tax reduction and reform to achieve a higher rate of economic growth and full employment in relation to government fiscal policy. The most important findings of this study regarding the merits of the corporate tax in aiding either small business or curbing big business relate to its effect on investment, savings and consumption. It is shown in this study that authoritative opinion is divided on the proper techniques to be utilized and the answers to be obtained. To the extent that the tax is not shifted it tends to curtail business growth. If the tax is shifted, it is held to be regressive and opposed to sound tax principles. To the extent corporations can shift the tax, its effectiveness as a curb on monopoly is reduced. It is the conclusion of this study that none of the bills analyzed can adequately perform the regulatory functions advocated by their proponents. The taxation of competing enterprises relates particularly to the case of taxing cooperatives. The tax advantage enjoyed by cooperatives stems from the Corporation Tax Statute of 1909 which exempted them from taxation. The various proposals to tax cooperatives studied in this work would produce a marked improvement in tax equality but they would not end tax inequality completely. During the 1950's, the taxation of income from foreign sources became a controversial subject in the United States. Various bills exempting foreign-source income or lowering the applicable rate were introduced, but all were defeated. One of the more significant bills was introduced in 1959 by Congressman Hale Boggs. He wished to stimulate foreign investment by United States corporations and to eliminate the use of "tax haven" companies. Although the importance of the Boggs bill was recognized, the Revenue Act of 1962 failed to achieve the objectives of that bill. In 1961, the investment tax credit was proposed as a device to encourage expansion and modernization of the productive facilities of the United States. The economic effect of the credit device has had some measure of success in other countries and up to now seems to have had a degree of success also in the United States. With the growing recognition of the indictments against the corporation income tax, the use of indirect taxation should receive more attention as an available alternative. / 2031-01-01

No description available.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2009. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In November 2006 section 103(1) of the Act was abolished and replaced by a new Part IIA, containing sections 80A to 80L, which targets impermissible tax avoidance arrangements. Section 80A(c)(ii) introduced a new concept to the South African tax law: a misuse or abuse of the provisions of the Act, including Part IIA thereof. The objective of this study was to establish the origin, meaning, application and effect of section 80A(c)(ii) of the Act. The evolution of section 80A(c)(ii) was therefore examined where after the enacted version was analyzed. It was essential to determine the origin of section 80A(c)(ii) in order to establish some point of reference from which inferences could be drawn as to the possible application and effect thereof. Case law, practice statements and articles relating to its proposed root was then examined. A ‘misuse or abuse’ of a provision, it was found, implies, frustrating or exploiting the purpose of the provision. This contention was confirmed by existing Canadian precedent. Such an interpretation, however, has a strong resemblance to the words in which the draft version of section 80A(c)(ii) was couched. It is therefore in contrast to the presumption that different words (in the enacted version) imply a different meaning. The precise meaning of the words ‘misuse or abuse’ is thus still elusive. It was established that section 80A(c)(ii) has its roots in section 245 of the Canadian Act. Section 245(4) was regarded as an effective comparative to section 80A(c)(ii) as it also contained a so-called misuse or abuse rule. The application of this rule in the Canadian tax environment required the following process: - Interpret (contextually and purposively) the provisions relied on by the taxpayer, to determine their object, spirit and purpose. - Determine whether the transaction frustrates or defeats the object, spirit or purpose of the provisions. Section 245(4) had the effect of reviving the modern approach (a contextual and/or purposive theory) to the interpretation of statutes in Canada. Reference to the ‘spirit’ of a provision (above) was found not to extend the modern approach to statutory interpretation: it does not require of the court to look for some inner and spiritual meaning within the legislation. As section 245(4) was regarded as an effective comparative to section 80A(c)(ii) it was contented that it would have a similar effect, than that of its Canadian counterpart, on the approach to statutory interpretation in South Africa. However, it was established that a modern approach to statutory interpretation was already authoritative in South Africa. This finding led the author to the conclusion that section 80A(c)(ii) could at best only reinforce the case for applying such an approach. Such a purpose for section 80A(c)(ii) was however found to be void in the light of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, which was enacted in 1996, and provides a sovereign authority for the application of the modern approach. It was also found that the practical burden of showing that there was a ‘misuse or abuse of the provisions of this Act (including the provisions of this Part)’ will rest on the shoulders of the Commissioner, notwithstanding section 82 of the Act. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Artikel 103(1) van die Inkomstebelastingwet is herroep in November 2006 en vervang deur Deel IIA, bestaande uit artikels 80A tot 80L, wat daarop gemik is om ontoelaatbare belastingvermydingsreëlings te teiken. Artikel 80A(c)(ii) het ‘n nuwe konsep in die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstebelastingreg ingebring: ‘n misbruik of ‘n wangebruik van die bepalings van die Wet, insluitende Deel IIA. Die doel van hierdie studie was om die oorsprong, betekenis, toepassing en uitwerking van artikel 80A(c)(ii) vas te stel. Die ontwikkeling van artikel 80A(c)(ii) is daarom ondersoek waarna die verordende weergawe daarvan geanaliseer is. ‘n Sleutelaspek van die analise was om die oorsprong van artikel 80A(c)(ii) vas te stel. Hierdie oefening het ‘n verwysbare bron daargestel waarvan afleidings rondom die moontlike toepassing en uitwerking van artikel 80A(c)(ii) gemaak kon word. Hofsake, praktyknotas en artikels rakende die voorgestelde oorsprong is vervolgens ondersoek. Daar is vasgestel dat ‘n ‘misbruik of wangebruik’ van ‘n bepaling neerkom op die frustering of uitbuiting van die doel van ‘n bepaling. Hierdie bewering is bevestig deur bestaande Kanadese presedent. So ‘n interpretasie is egter soortgelyk aan die woorde waarin die konsepweergawe van artikel 80A(c)(ii) uitgedruk is. Dit is daarom in teenstelling met die vermoede dat ‘n wysiging van die woorde (in die verordende weergawe) ‘n gewysigde betekenis impliseer. Die presiese betekenis van die woorde ‘misbruik of wangebruik’ is dus steeds ontwykend. Daar is bevind dat artikel 80A(c)(ii) waarskynlik sy ontstaan in artikel 245 van die Kanadese Inkomstebelastingwet gehad het. Artikel 245(4) van die Kanadese Inkomstebelastingwet is beskou as ‘n effektiewe vergelykende artikel vir artikel 80A(c)(ii), aangesien dit ook oor ‘n sogenaamde misbruik of wangebruik reël beskik. Die toepassing van hierdie reël in die Kanadese belastingmilieu vereis die volgende werkswyse: - Interpreteer (kontekstueel en doeldienend) die bepalings waarop die belastingpligtige steun, ten einde die oogmerk, gees en doel daarvan vas te stel. - Bepaal of die transaksie, deur die belastingpligtige aangegaan, die oogmerk, gees of doel van die bepalings frustreer. Artikel 245(4) het aanleiding gegee tot die herstel van die moderne benadering (‘n kontekstuele en/of doeldienende teorie) tot die interpretasie van wetgewing in Kanada. Daar is bevind dat die verwysing na die ‘gees’ van ‘n bepaling (hierbo) nie aanleiding gee tot die uitbreiding van die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg nie: dit vereis nie dat die hof moet soek na die innerlike of geestelike betekenis van die wetgewing nie. Aangesien artikel 245(4) as ‘n effektiewe vergelykende artikel vir artikel 80A(c)(ii) beskou is, is daar aangeneem dat dit ‘n soortgelyke uitwerking, as sy Kanadese eweknie, op wetsuitleg in Suid Afrika sal hê. By nadere ondersoek is daar egter bevind dat ‘n moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg alreeds gesaghebbend in Suid Afrika is. Hierdie bevinding het die skrywer tot die gevolgtrekking gebring dat artikel 80A(c)(ii), in beginsel, slegs die saak vir die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg in Suid Afrika sal versterk. Indien hierdie die doel is wat die wetgewer gehad het met die verordening van artikel 80A(c)(ii), sal dit egter niksseggend wees in die lig van die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid Afrika, wat verorden is in 1996, en ‘n oppermagtige gesag bied vir die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg. Daar is ook vasgestel dat die onus op die Kommissaris rus om te bewys dat daar ‘n ‘misbruik of wangebruik van die bepalings van hierdie Wet (waarby ingesluit die bepalings van hierdie Deel)’ was, ondanks artikel 82 van die Wet.