Pasirinkta tema yra aktuali todėl, kad narkomanija yra plintantis reiškinys tarp jaunimo. Beveik netirtos ir charakterio savybės, lemenčios narkotinių medžiagų vartojimą. Aktualu pasirinktą temą nagrinėti dėl to, kad žinant paauglių charakterio nukrypimus ir sąsajas su narkotinių medžiagų vartojimu galima būtų efektyviau taikyti narkotinių medžiagų prevencines programas. Tyrimo objektas: Paauglių požiūris į narkotines medžiagas ir jų vartojimą bei paauglių charakterio nukrypimai. Tyrimo tikslas: Išsiaiškinti paauglių žinias apie narkotines medžiagas, nustatyti charakterio nukrypimus bei atskleisti, kiek turimos žinios ir charakterio nukrypimas lemia narkotinių medžiagų vartojimą. Tyrimo metodologija metodai, imtis: Empiriniai: 1. Įvertinti paauglių žinias apie narkotinių medžiagų poveikį sveikatai, narkotikų poveikį paauglių būklei nustatyti naudota anketa. 2. Paauglių charakterio nukrypimams nustatyti naudotas testas. Matematinės statistikos metodais atliktas duomenų įvertinimas. Tyrimo metu buvo apklausti 8, 9, 10, 11 klasių moksleiviai. Tiriamieji pasirinkti atsitiktinės atrankos principu. Atrankos vienetas - klasė. Tyrimui pasirinktos miesto mokyklos. Tyrimo metu apklausta 130 moksleivių, iš jų 66 mergaitės ir 64 berniukai. Mokinių apklausa buvo anoniminė. Tyrimui buvo panaudota Verygos A., Sutkutės G., Dūdonio M. (2000) anketa, skirta nustatyti alkoholio, rūkymo ir narkotikų vartojimo paplitimui bei šių faktorių įtaka psichosocialinei būklei, bei G. Šmišeko (2002)... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / The chosen topic is very important, because drug abuse has become popular among teenagers and personal reasons such as character divergencies when choosing drugs practically have not been investigated. It is important to investigate this topic, because knowing the divergences of teenagers' character and their connection with the consumption of drugs antidrugs prevention programmes can be effectively applied. Subject of investigation: The affect of divergences of teenagers' character and the knowledge about drugs on the consumption of drugs. Aim of investigation: To clarify the teenagers' knowledge about drugs and to identify character divergencies and how much these factors affect drugs consumption. Methods and the scope of investigation: Empyric methods: 1. to assess the teenagers' knowledge about drugs and their affect on health, a questionnaire was used to identify the psychosocial affect of drugs on teenagers 2. A test was used to identify the teenagers' character divergencies. 8, 9, 10, 11 class students were investigated. The respondents were chose at random. The chosen unit is a class of students. The town schools were chosen for the investigation.130 schoolchildren participated in the investigation, among them 66 girls and 64 boys. The questionnaire was anonymous. Questionnaire by A. Veryga, G. Sutkute, M. Dudonis (2000) to identify alcohol, smoking and drugs consumption popularity and affect on psychosocial status and a test by G. Shmishek (2002) to clarify the... [to full text]

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:27:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Adriano Cesar Braz Caldeira.pdf: 1061457 bytes, checksum: ae0cab21c651ef05d3d78ff6ec83675f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-08-12 / This essay has as purpose a legal institution that is subject of frequent controversies amongst law scholars and case law, to wit, lis pendens between collective actions, and between the latter and individual ones. In spite of the existence of excellent works mentioned in the bibliography hereof on lis pendens among such kinds of actions, they are very limited as regards individual actions. We understood that dealing with collective action complying with merely and strictly those rules applicable to individual lawsuits is a mistake, with all due respect. This paper aims at analyzing which are those actions that may be considered as collective indeed. Thus, Civil Public Action, Popular Action, Collective Mandamus, Collective Injunction Order, Direct Unconstitutionality Action, Action for Declaration of Constitutionality, Argumentation of a Basic Principle Breach, Action against Dishonesty in Administration. This paper carries out a preliminary analysis of issues like legitimacy, the very concept of party, the internal formation of lawsuits (parties, claim, and cause of action), the effects resulting from the decision, so that the main issue may be eventually dealt with. It is concluded that there are two criteria of setting lis pendens between those institutions: one of them, traditional, characterized whenever the same internal elements of a lawsuit are present; another, that takes into account the claim s identity, although some internal elements may be different. This thesis points out further contrarily from what is observed in lis pendens for individual actions that in collective actions the lawsuit should not be dismissed, but rather gathered together, by virtue of a possible higher extent thereof, as it can occur with the cause of action, and as a way of preventing the other action s holder s free access to the Judiciary / O trabalho, que ora se apresenta, tem por objeto tratar de uma figura, objeto de constantes polêmicas na doutrina e na jurisprudência, qual seja, a litispendência entre as demandas coletivas e entre estas e as individuais. Nada obstante tenhamos na bibliografia excelentes obras, cuidando da figura da litispendência entre estas espécies de demandas, fazem-no, salvo raras exceções, restritivamente com relação ao processo individual. Entendemos que tratar do processo coletivo com olhos fixos nas regras de processo individual, data maxima venia, configura um erro. O trabalho procura analisar quais são as demandas verdadeiramente coletivas e, assim, encontramos a Ação Civil Pública, Ação Popular, Mandado de Segurança Coletivo, Mandado de Injunção Coletivo, Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade, Ação Declaratória de Constitucionalidade, Argüição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental, Ação de Improbidade Administrativa. Procura analisar de modo prévio as questões da legitimidade, do conceito de parte, da formação interna das demandas (partes, pedido e causa de pedir), os efeitos decorrentes da decisão, para que, ao final, possa tratar do tema principal. Conclui que existem dois critérios de configuração da litispendência entre estas figuras: um, tradicional, que se verifica quando da presença dos mesmos elementos internos da demanda; outro que leva em consideração a identidade de pretensão, ainda que distintos alguns dos elementos internos. Observa ainda que, diferentemente do que se verifica na litispendência entre demandas individuais, entre as demandas coletivas, o processo não deve ser extinto, mas reunido, em razão da eventual amplitude, como pode ocorrer com a causa de pedir, e como forma de negar ao titular da outra demanda a liberdade do acesso à justiça