隨著生產內容的殊異及分工的日趨細密，當代的經濟活動，已走入一個市場高度分化而生產部門化的階段，我們已無法再以單一的「國家--市場」的模式，來探究政治與經濟的關係。在現實世界中，國家對經濟的管制，是透過政府與市場中各個權力與利益殊異產業部門的互動而完成的，每一個產業部門，基於不同的生產特性、行銷策略、產業結構乃至市場地位，都會形成一個獨特的政策範疇，來規限(或強化)國家機關權力的行使，或對政策工具造成不同程度的扭曲(或擴大)，從而使得政府在面對該產業時，扮演特定的角色及功能。然而在政治經濟學的研究中，我們卻仍傾向從宏觀的角度，以「國家--市場」的二元結構，來試圖賦予政府在整體產業活動中一個一致性的描述，也此造成在解釋及預測上的侷限。在這樣的觀 點下，本研究乃試圖運用「產業管治機制」的概念，來針對台灣的電子工業中的電子零件業、家電業、個人電腦業及積體電路業，進行一跨部門的分析，希望能透過對不同產業部門與政府間互動關係檢視，來對既有的研究途徑進行檢證，並釐清府在產業活動中的實際角色。 / Mordern economic activity is highly differentiation in producing and marketing processes by sectors.We can no longer take an unique "state-market" mode to observe and interpretation the complex relationship between state andmarket.In the real world, any government restrictions on economic activityis in fact an interaction between power of the state and businesses' interest incemtives.In diffenent industry sectors,as they have differentprocuct elements,marketing strategies,industy structures and market status,every industry sectors will have its own significant governance mechanismand policy content.It will restrict (or reinforce) the autonomy and capacityof state and make the government play a specific role in industry activity.Takeing that point of view, in this paper the author take Taiwan's electronicindusty as a subject to proceed a sectoral analysis.After a careful examnation we find that even a strong state as KMT regime in Taiwan,the state didn't always have a highly autonomy and capacity to discipline the businesses.Most of time, state's power is not only restrict by some internal structuralfactors and outside enviorment like some statists have disserted,the nature of different goverance mechanisms have is also an important factor on that.