Three clinical investigations together with a combined editorial and review of the cardiovascular physiology of spinal anaesthesia in normal and preeclamptic pregnancy form the basis of a thesis to be submitted for the degree of Doctor of Medicine at the University of St Andrews. First, the longstanding consensus that spinal anaesthesia could cause severe hypotension in severe preeclampsia was examined using three approaches. The doses of ephedrine required to maintain systolic blood pressure above predetermined limits were first compared in spinal versus epidural anaesthesia. The doses of ephedrine required were then similarly studied during spinal anaesthesia in preeclamptic versus normal control subjects. The principal outcome of these studies, that preeclamptic patients were resistant to hypotension after a spinal anaesthetic, was then further investigated by studying pulse transit time (PTT) changes in normal versus preeclamptic pregnancy. PTT was explored both as beat-to-beat monitor of cardiovascular function and also as an indicator of changes in arterial stiffness. The cardiovascular physiology of obstetric spinal anaesthesia was then reviewed in the light of the three clinical investigations, developments in reproductive vascular biology and the regulation of venous capacitance. It is argued that the theory of a role for vena caval compression as the single cause of spinal anaesthetic induced hypotension in obstetrics should be revised.

O transplante hepático com a técnica convencional envolve a ressecção da veia cava inferior retrohepática como parte da hepatectomia do receptor e conseqüente clampeamento da mesma acima e abaixo do fígado, bem como o clampeamento da veia porta durante a fase anepática. Este procedimento pode se caracterizar por alterações hemodinâmicas importantes, disfunção renal e maior sangramento em áreas de dissecção submetidas a um regime de maior pressão. Pacientes idosos, previamente instáveis do ponto de vista hemodinâmico ou muito graves, gealmente, não toleram esta situação. Para evitar estes distúrbios, um \"bypass\" venovenoso, é habitualmente utilizado, permitindo com que o sangue da veia porta e da veia cava inferior retorne à circulação sistêmica através da veia axilar. O \"bypass\" venovenoso, foi adotado por muitos centros transplantadores como procedimento de rotina, enquanto outros empregavam este apenas quando o clampeamento da veia cava inferior determinasse grave alteração hemodinâmica, buscando assim, redução do custo, do tempo de operação e das complicações em função do uso \"bypass\", tais como: hipotermia, coagulopatia e fenômenos tromboembólicos. Outra alternativa técnica, que consiste na preservação da veia cava inferior durante a hepatectomia foi descrita com o intuito de preservar o fluxo na veia cava inferior durante a fase anepática. Além disto, uma anastomose porto-cava temporária pode ser confeccionada para evitar o clampeamento da veia porta e conseqüente congestão esplâncnica. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados imediatos do transplante hepático com preservação da veia cava inferior e anastomose porto-cava temporária, ou com o uso do \"bypass\" venovenoso. De outubro de 1999 a outubro de 2001, 104 pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático foram analisados retrospectivamente. O \"bypass\" venovenoso foi utilizado em 50 pacientes e a técnica de \"piggy back\" em 54. Ambos os grupos foram comparáveis em termos de idade, sexo, diagnóstico e grau de função hepática pré-operatória. Nosso estudo demonstrou não haver diferença entre as duas técnicas em relação à duração da hepatectomia, à duração da operação e à necessidade de transfusão de hemoderivados. Observou-se uma fase anepática mais breve e um menor tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva no período pós operatório dos pacientes submetidos à técnica que reserva a veia cava inferior, além disto o estudo aponta para uma tendência à redução no tempo de internação, no índice de insuficiência renal pós-operatória e para um melhor funcionamento do enxerto quando os fluxos da veia cava inferior e da veia porta são preservados. / The liver transplant with conventional technique involves the resection of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava as part of the recipient hepatectomy and consequent clamping of the same above and below the liver, as well as the clamping of the portal vein during the anhepatic phase. This procedure can be characterized by critical hemodynamic alterations, renal disfunction and greater bleeding in dissection areas submitted to higher pressure conditions. Elderly patients, previously unstable on a hemodynamic point of view or in very serious conditions, usually do not tolerate this situation. In order to avoid these disturbances, a venovenous bypass is commonly applied, allowing blood from the portal vein and inferior vena cava to return to the systemic circulation through the axilar vein. The venovenous bypass has been adopted by many transplant centers as a routine procedure, while others have applied this procedure only when clamping of the inferior vena cava determines a serious hemodynamic alteration, eeking, in this way, cost cutting, reduction of operation time and complications caused by usage of the bypass, such as: hypothermy, coagulopathy and romboembolic phenomenae. Another technical alternative, which consists of preservation of the inferior vena cava during the hepatectomy was described focusing preservation of the inferior vena cava flow during the anhepatic phase. Besides, a temporary portocaval shunt can be made to avoid clamping of the portal vein and consequently splanchnic congestion. The objective of this study was compare the immediate results of the liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation and temporary portocaval shunt or using the venovenous bypass. From October 1999 to October 2001, 104 patients submitted to an liver transplantat were analyzed retrospectively. The venovenous bypass was applied in 50 patients and the \"piggy back\" technique in 54. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, diagnosis and preoperative hepatic conditions. Our study has demonstrated that there was no difference between the two techniques in relation to the hepatectomy and operation time and the need of hemoderivate transfusion. As a result, a shorter anhepatic phase was observed, as well as a shorter stay in intensive care unit during the postoperative period, in relation to patients submitted to the technique that preserves the inferior vena cava. Additionally, the study points out a trend towards reduction of hospital stay, postoperative renal insufficiency, and a better graft function when the inferior cava and portal veins are preserved.

Der Wasserhaushalt von Dialysepatienten bewegt sich ondulierend zwischen Überwässerung vor der Behandlung und gezielter Dehydratation nach der Dialyse. Das Ziel der Behandlung ist ein e Flüssigkeitsbalance. Das Gewicht nach der Dialyse bei dem dieser Zustand erreicht ist, wird als Trockengewicht oder Dialysezielgewicht bezeichnet. Zur Zeit ist kein einzelner Parameter verfügbar, von dem sich ein adäquates Trockengewicht der Dialysepatienten ableiten ließe. Die Einschätzung des Trockengewichtes von dialysepflichtigen Kindern stützt sich auf die sorgfältige klinische Untersuchung. Die Bioimpedanzanalyse und die Messung des Durchmessers der Vena cava inferior sind zwei nicht invasive Verfahren, die bereits an erwachsenen Dialysepatienten untersucht und zur Beurteilung des Trockengewichtes sowie des Extrazellulärvolumens angewandt werden. Für Kinder sind keine Referenzwerte für beide Verfahren verfügbar. Aus diesen Grund entschlossen wir uns, Normalwerte für diese Altersgruppe (6,8 bis 16 Jahre) zu erheben. Es zeigte sich ein enger Zusammenhang zwischen Resistanz (BIA) und Durchmesser der Vena cava inferior auf der einen und Werten wie z.B. Alter, Gewicht und Körperoberfläche auf der andren Seite. Resistanz und Durchmesser stehen ebenfalls in enger Beziehung zueinander. Bei der Untersuchung von 31 Dialysepatienten zeigten sich Wachstumsverzögerung und verspätete Pubertät. Daraus wird deutlich das altersbezogene Referenzwerte zu einer falschen Einschätzung des Wasserhaushaltes führen würden. Die kombinierte Anwendung beider Verfahren mit der Körperoberfläche als Bezugswert, kann im Vergleich zu den Veränderungen des Körpergewichtes wertvolle Informationen zur Optimierung des Trockengewichtes geben. / The hydration state of a dialysis patient reflects the balance between fluid overload, normovolemia and underhydration. The goal of the treatment is a fluid balance that is close to normal. The weight after dialysis in which this is achieved is the so called "dry weight". However, there is no single parameter to define the adequate dry body weight of a dialysis patient. In the assessment of dry body weight in dialysis-dependent children one must rely on careful and repeated clinical observation. Bioimpedance analysis and inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) have been evaluated and utilized in adults as noninvasive parameters for the assessment of dry weight and extracellular volume. Since there are no data available for normal children, we performed a prospective study to establish reference standards for a pediatric population (111 females and 95 males, aged 6.8-16 years). We found strong correlations of both resistance (BIA) and IVCD with age, height, weight, and, in particular, with body surface area. IVCD and resistance also correlated with each other. We also investigated 31 pediatric dialysis patients who showed growth retardation and delayed puberty. Applying age-related reference intervals to pediatric dialysis patients resulted in an underestimation of overhydration. The combination of both methods using body surface area-corrected values with the clinical features of deviation of dry weight will serve as an adjunct to the assessment of post-dialysis dry weight.

O transplante hepático com a técnica convencional envolve a ressecção da veia cava inferior retrohepática como parte da hepatectomia do receptor e conseqüente clampeamento da mesma acima e abaixo do fígado, bem como o clampeamento da veia porta durante a fase anepática. Este procedimento pode se caracterizar por alterações hemodinâmicas importantes, disfunção renal e maior sangramento em áreas de dissecção submetidas a um regime de maior pressão. Pacientes idosos, previamente instáveis do ponto de vista hemodinâmico ou muito graves, gealmente, não toleram esta situação. Para evitar estes distúrbios, um \"bypass\" venovenoso, é habitualmente utilizado, permitindo com que o sangue da veia porta e da veia cava inferior retorne à circulação sistêmica através da veia axilar. O \"bypass\" venovenoso, foi adotado por muitos centros transplantadores como procedimento de rotina, enquanto outros empregavam este apenas quando o clampeamento da veia cava inferior determinasse grave alteração hemodinâmica, buscando assim, redução do custo, do tempo de operação e das complicações em função do uso \"bypass\", tais como: hipotermia, coagulopatia e fenômenos tromboembólicos. Outra alternativa técnica, que consiste na preservação da veia cava inferior durante a hepatectomia foi descrita com o intuito de preservar o fluxo na veia cava inferior durante a fase anepática. Além disto, uma anastomose porto-cava temporária pode ser confeccionada para evitar o clampeamento da veia porta e conseqüente congestão esplâncnica. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados imediatos do transplante hepático com preservação da veia cava inferior e anastomose porto-cava temporária, ou com o uso do \"bypass\" venovenoso. De outubro de 1999 a outubro de 2001, 104 pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático foram analisados retrospectivamente. O \"bypass\" venovenoso foi utilizado em 50 pacientes e a técnica de \"piggy back\" em 54. Ambos os grupos foram comparáveis em termos de idade, sexo, diagnóstico e grau de função hepática pré-operatória. Nosso estudo demonstrou não haver diferença entre as duas técnicas em relação à duração da hepatectomia, à duração da operação e à necessidade de transfusão de hemoderivados. Observou-se uma fase anepática mais breve e um menor tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva no período pós operatório dos pacientes submetidos à técnica que reserva a veia cava inferior, além disto o estudo aponta para uma tendência à redução no tempo de internação, no índice de insuficiência renal pós-operatória e para um melhor funcionamento do enxerto quando os fluxos da veia cava inferior e da veia porta são preservados. / The liver transplant with conventional technique involves the resection of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava as part of the recipient hepatectomy and consequent clamping of the same above and below the liver, as well as the clamping of the portal vein during the anhepatic phase. This procedure can be characterized by critical hemodynamic alterations, renal disfunction and greater bleeding in dissection areas submitted to higher pressure conditions. Elderly patients, previously unstable on a hemodynamic point of view or in very serious conditions, usually do not tolerate this situation. In order to avoid these disturbances, a venovenous bypass is commonly applied, allowing blood from the portal vein and inferior vena cava to return to the systemic circulation through the axilar vein. The venovenous bypass has been adopted by many transplant centers as a routine procedure, while others have applied this procedure only when clamping of the inferior vena cava determines a serious hemodynamic alteration, eeking, in this way, cost cutting, reduction of operation time and complications caused by usage of the bypass, such as: hypothermy, coagulopathy and romboembolic phenomenae. Another technical alternative, which consists of preservation of the inferior vena cava during the hepatectomy was described focusing preservation of the inferior vena cava flow during the anhepatic phase. Besides, a temporary portocaval shunt can be made to avoid clamping of the portal vein and consequently splanchnic congestion. The objective of this study was compare the immediate results of the liver transplantation with inferior vena cava preservation and temporary portocaval shunt or using the venovenous bypass. From October 1999 to October 2001, 104 patients submitted to an liver transplantat were analyzed retrospectively. The venovenous bypass was applied in 50 patients and the \"piggy back\" technique in 54. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, diagnosis and preoperative hepatic conditions. Our study has demonstrated that there was no difference between the two techniques in relation to the hepatectomy and operation time and the need of hemoderivate transfusion. As a result, a shorter anhepatic phase was observed, as well as a shorter stay in intensive care unit during the postoperative period, in relation to patients submitted to the technique that preserves the inferior vena cava. Additionally, the study points out a trend towards reduction of hospital stay, postoperative renal insufficiency, and a better graft function when the inferior cava and portal veins are preserved.

Au sein des unités de médecine d'urgence, l'état de choc est une condition courante et par le fait même, une cause majeure de mortalité en Amérique du nord. Il est donc essentiel d'en rechercher rapidement les causes. Dans cette recherche, l'évaluation clinique, l'examen des signes vitaux et les tests de laboratoire se révèlent souvent imprécis car ils ne permettent pas d'évaluer de façon optimale le statut hémodynamique des patients instables. Or, le risque d'une évaluation insuffisante de l’état hémodynamique conduit à l'instauration d'un traitement inapproprié dont la conséquence peut être fatale. Une simple surestimation du besoin de remplissage vasculaire peut entraîner des complications telles que l'œdème pulmonaire et inversement, la sous-estimation peut avoir pour conséquence une hypovolémie persistante avec une hypoperfusion ou un état de choc non reconnu susceptible de générer une insuffisance des organes cibles. Actuellement, pour évaluer le statut hémodynamique, les méthodes les plus utilisées sont la pression veineuse centrale (PVC), les cathéters de Swan-Ganz et l’échocardiographie transoesophagienne. Bien que déjà difficiles à réaliser à l’urgence, toutes ces méthodes sont invasives et conservent un potentiel élevé de morbidité. Il existe toutefois des méthodes alternatives valides qui permettent d'obtenir une estimation non invasive de la pression moyenne de l'oreillette droite, entre autre l’échographie sous-costale avec les mesures échographiques de la collapsibilité de la veine cave inférieure (VCI) et les mesures de Doppler échographiques sur la veine hépatique (VH). Il convient cependant de noter que la mesure de la collapsibilité de la VCI n’a pas réussi à devenir un standard d’évaluation de la volémie parce qu’elle reste sujette à plusieurs facteurs confondants.   La mesure du flot de la VH, quant à elle, semble être une option plus intéressante pour mieux évaluer la pression de remplissage de l’oreillette droite. En effet, l'échographie Doppler de la veine hépatique reste donc un instrument potentiellement prometteur qui peut bien refléter les pressions de l’OD et donc de la pression veineuse centrale. Il importe de souligner que pour le patient instable, chaque minute est précieuse et qu’un gain de temps inestimable contribue à éliminer les facteurs susceptibles de compromettre le pronostic vital. L’objectif principal de notre étude, étant la mesure du temps nécessaire pour l’acquisition d’images ; nous avons comparé la durée de l'acquisition d'images entre l'échographie de la VCI et le Doppler de la VH chez des sujets sains. Le temps moyen d'acquisition d'images de la VCI était de 89,1 secondes et de 117,8 pour la VH. La différence de la moyenne de temps était de 28,6 secondes (IC95% -73,2 · +15,8 ; t=1.33, 24 dl ; p=0.196). La différence de délai pour le temps d’acquisition d’images était inférieure à 30 secondes. En pratique, nous pensons que cette différence peut être considérée comme cliniquement acceptable pour une prise de décision rapide. En ce qui concerne le taux d’échec entre les deux techniques, nous n’avons pas trouvé de différence significative : 1 échec pour la VCI et 5 échecs pour la VH avec une différence de 13% (0.133), p=0.09 ; alors que le taux de réussite est le même, soit 25 pour chacune. L’évaluation de la veine hépatique par échographie était faisable, simple et rapide dans la majorité des volontaires sélectionnés dans notre étude. Mots-clés : échographie Doppler, veine cave inférieure, veines hépatiques, état de choc, statut hémodynamique. / Shock is a common condition and a major cause of death in emergency units. Clinical evaluation, vital signs and laboratory tests can lack specificity to identify the cause of shock and do not allow an optimal evaluation of the hemodynamic status of unstable patients. A poor evaluation of the hemodynamic state could lead to inappropriate treatment and the consequence may be fatal. Overestimation of the need for vascular filling can lead to complications such as pulmonary edema; while underestimation may give rise to persistent hypovolemia with hypoperfusion or unrecognized shock resulting in multi-organ failure. The current methods used to assess hemodynamic status are central venous pressure, Swan-Ganz catheters, and trans-esophageal echocardiography. Although already difficult to perform in the emergency department, all of these methods are invasive and retain a high potential for morbidity. However, there are valid alternative methods for obtaining a non-invasive estimate of the average pressure of the right atrium, including subxiphoid ultrasound with measurements of the inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility and ultrasound Doppler measurements of the hepatic veins (HV). However, the measurement of the collapsibility of the IVC is subject to several confounding factors and has failed to become a standard of care for evaluating patients’ volemic status. Measuring the flow of the hepatic vein, on the other hand, seems to be a more interesting option for better assessing the filling pressure of the right atrium. Indeed, the Doppler ultrasound of hepatic veins remains a potentially promising instrument that may well reflect the pressures of the right atrium and thus of the central venous pressure. It is important to emphasize that for the unstable patient, every minute is precious and that saving time contributes to eliminate factors likely to compromise the vital prognosis.   The main objective of our study is to measure the time it takes to acquire images. We compared the duration of image acquisition between IVC ultrasound and HV Doppler in healthy volunteers. The average image acquisition time for the IVC and HV was 89.1 and 117.8 seconds respectively. The difference in mean time was 28.6 seconds (95% CI -73.2 · + 15.8, t = 1.33, 24 dL, p = 0.196). The difference for image acquisition time was less than 30 seconds. In practice, we believe that this difference can be considered clinically acceptable for rapid decision-making. Regarding the failure rate between the two techniques, we did not find any significant difference: 1 failure for IVC and 5 failures for HV with a difference of 13% (0.133), p = 0.09; while the success rate is the same, 25 for each. The evaluation of the hepatic vein by ultrasonography was feasible, simple and fast in the majority of volunteers selected in our study. Key words: Doppler ultrasonography, inferior vena cava, hepatic veins, shock, hemodynamic status