Le mix instrumental de la politique alimentaire française induit une responsabilisation des acteurs de l’industrie agroalimentaire. Toutefois, ce partage d’enjeux est traversé par des logiques contradictoires. Dans cette étude, nous proposons d’analyser dans quelle mesure les instruments de l’action publique liée à l’alimentation interagissent avec les stratégies des entreprises de l’industrie alimentaire française.Pour y parvenir, nous nous appuyons en particulier sur la logique instrumentale de la politique alimentaire, l’approche par les parties prenantes et la théorie néo-institutionnelle. Nous analysons, grâce à la méthode de l’étude de cas unique, enchâssée, les réactions stratégiques d’une pluralité d’acteurs autour de la politique alimentaire.Cette étude contribue à l’analyse des politiques publiques, dans une perspective organisationnelle en l’appliquant au domaine de l’alimentation.Cette recherche a aussi permis d’identifier des modalités de renouvellement de l’action publique, avec une figure étatique qui se renforce. L’Etat, grâce à la mobilisation intelligente de ces parties prenantes, augmente sa capacité d’influence sur certains pans de la société et de la vie quotidienne des citoyens. Finalement, il semblerait que le désengagement observé de l’Etat soit dans certains domaines à relativiser. Derrière un effacement apparent, l’Etat continue à jouer son rôle mais selon des modalités renouvelées, sans doute plus adaptées au contexte actuel. / The instrumental mix of French food policy induces a responsibility to the players in the food industry . However, this share issue is crossed by conflicting logics. In this study , we propose to analyze to what extent the instruments of public policy related to food interact with the business strategies of the French food industry.To achieve this, we rely particularly on the approach by stakeholders . We analyze , using the method of the single case study , embedded , strategic reactions of a plurality of actors around food policy.This study contributes to the analysis of public policies, an organizational perspective by applying it to the field of nutrition.This research also identified renewal terms of public policy , with a state figure is increasing. The State, through intelligent engagement of these stakeholders , increases its influence on some sections of society and daily life of citizens.Finally , it seems that the disengagement of the state is observed in some areas relative. Behind an apparent deletion, the state continues to play its role, but in a manner renewed, probably more suited to the current context.

A ausência de investimentos em políticas habitacionais nas décadas passadas, aliada ao crescimento demográfico e às deficiências estruturais dos domicílios, eleva a grandes patamares a demanda por habitação nos estratos mais pobres da população o que evidencia a necessidade de intervenção do Estado. A presente dissertação, ao focalizar a Habitação de Interesse Social (HIS), representada especialmente pela faixa 1 do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV), considera a política habitacional como integrante de um sistema maior de proteção social e que busca garantir o direito social à moradia, conforme assegurado pela Constituição Federal de 1988. A faixa em referência, atendida por meio do Fundo de Arrendamento Residencial (FAR), é a parte do Programa que fornece o maior percentual de subsídios e atende àquelas pessoas que não teriam acesso à moradia caso não contassem com o suporte governamental. Com base nessa realidade, esta dissertação de mestrado tem como objetivo principal analisar as formas de articulação do PMCMV-FAR com outras estratégias de intervenção urbana no nível municipal e investigar se, e como, o Programa exerce influência na provisão de equipamentos públicos complementares à habitação. Para tanto foi utilizada uma abordagem qualitativa, com o estudo de caso comparativo entre os municípios de Guarulhos e Itaquaquecetuba. O objetivo estabelecido pode ser justificado pela relevância do tema para a redução da vulnerabilidade social, pelo destaque que vem ocupando na agenda pública e por lacunas identificadas na literatura e, consequentemente, possibilidade de contribuição ao debate já existente e ao avanço do conhecimento. A perspectiva teórica utilizada é ao mesmo tempo histórica e sociológica e busca nas teorias da implementação uma complementariedade das perspectivas top down e bottom up para o desenvolvimento do estudo comparativo. Com a perspectiva top down foram consideradas as diretrizes, instrumentos e recursos direcionados ao programa, como é próprio de uma política de formulação federal cuja implementação se dá no âmbito municipal. Já a perspectiva bottom up serviu de base para a investigação das realidades municipais na implementação da política, das adaptações observadas (ou não) aos contextos locais, das formas de constituição e articulação das relações entre as diversas organizações e atores envolvidos e compreensão dos modos de articulação existentes (ou não) entre o PMCMV-FAR e outras estratégias de desenvolvimento urbano. Após a investigação realizada nos municípios selecionados, foram identificados desafios específicos à provisão de infraestrutura social associada à provisão de moradia com a falta de efetividade de alguns dos instrumentos estabelecidos pelo governo federal. Apesar das diferentes características e realidades históricas dos municípios estudados, foi possível observar limitações semelhantes em alguns dos aspectos da implementação do Programa / The lack of investments in housing policies in the past decades, combined with the demographic growth and structural housing deficiencies, rose greatly the demand for dwellings of the needy population, which shows the need of government intervention. This dissertation, by especially focusing on families from the lowest income group of the Housing Program Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV) considers the housing policy as part of a larger social protection system that seeks to ensure the social right to housing, as assured by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. The part of the program studied, served through the Residential Leasing Fund (Fundo de Arrendamento Residencial - FAR), is the one that provides the highest percentage of subsidies and serves those people who would not have access to housing if they could not count on the government support. Based on this reality, the main objective of this Masters dissertation is to analyze the forms of articulation of the PMCMV-FAR with other strategies of urban intervention at the municipal level and to investigate if and how the Program exerts influence in the provision of complementary public equipments for housing. Therefore, a qualitative approach was used, with a comparative case study between the cities of Guarulhos and Itaquaquecetuba. The established objective can be justified by the relevance of the theme to the reduction of social vulnerability, by its prominent place on the public agenda and by gaps identified in the literature and, consequently, the possibility of contributing to the already existing debate and the advancement of knowledge. The theoretical perspective used is both historical and sociological and seeks in the implementation theories a complementarity of the top down and bottom up perspectives for the development of the comparative study. With the top down perspective, the guidelines, instruments and resources directed to the program were considered, as it is characteristic of a federal formulation policy whose implementation occurs at the municipal level. On the other hand, the bottom up perspective has served as a basis for the investigation of municipal realities in the policy implementation, adaptations observed (or not) to local contexts, forms of the relations constitution and articulation between the several organizations and actors involved and understand the forms of articulation between PMCMVFAR and other urban development strategies exist (or not). After the research carried out in the selected cities, specific challenges were identified for the provision of social infrastructure associated with the provision of housing with the lack of effectiveness of some of the instruments established by the federal government. Despite the different characteristics and historical realities of the cities studied, it was possible to observe similar limitations in some aspects of the Program implementation

A ausência de investimentos em políticas habitacionais nas décadas passadas, aliada ao crescimento demográfico e às deficiências estruturais dos domicílios, eleva a grandes patamares a demanda por habitação nos estratos mais pobres da população o que evidencia a necessidade de intervenção do Estado. A presente dissertação, ao focalizar a Habitação de Interesse Social (HIS), representada especialmente pela faixa 1 do Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV), considera a política habitacional como integrante de um sistema maior de proteção social e que busca garantir o direito social à moradia, conforme assegurado pela Constituição Federal de 1988. A faixa em referência, atendida por meio do Fundo de Arrendamento Residencial (FAR), é a parte do Programa que fornece o maior percentual de subsídios e atende àquelas pessoas que não teriam acesso à moradia caso não contassem com o suporte governamental. Com base nessa realidade, esta dissertação de mestrado tem como objetivo principal analisar as formas de articulação do PMCMV-FAR com outras estratégias de intervenção urbana no nível municipal e investigar se, e como, o Programa exerce influência na provisão de equipamentos públicos complementares à habitação. Para tanto foi utilizada uma abordagem qualitativa, com o estudo de caso comparativo entre os municípios de Guarulhos e Itaquaquecetuba. O objetivo estabelecido pode ser justificado pela relevância do tema para a redução da vulnerabilidade social, pelo destaque que vem ocupando na agenda pública e por lacunas identificadas na literatura e, consequentemente, possibilidade de contribuição ao debate já existente e ao avanço do conhecimento. A perspectiva teórica utilizada é ao mesmo tempo histórica e sociológica e busca nas teorias da implementação uma complementariedade das perspectivas top down e bottom up para o desenvolvimento do estudo comparativo. Com a perspectiva top down foram consideradas as diretrizes, instrumentos e recursos direcionados ao programa, como é próprio de uma política de formulação federal cuja implementação se dá no âmbito municipal. Já a perspectiva bottom up serviu de base para a investigação das realidades municipais na implementação da política, das adaptações observadas (ou não) aos contextos locais, das formas de constituição e articulação das relações entre as diversas organizações e atores envolvidos e compreensão dos modos de articulação existentes (ou não) entre o PMCMV-FAR e outras estratégias de desenvolvimento urbano. Após a investigação realizada nos municípios selecionados, foram identificados desafios específicos à provisão de infraestrutura social associada à provisão de moradia com a falta de efetividade de alguns dos instrumentos estabelecidos pelo governo federal. Apesar das diferentes características e realidades históricas dos municípios estudados, foi possível observar limitações semelhantes em alguns dos aspectos da implementação do Programa / The lack of investments in housing policies in the past decades, combined with the demographic growth and structural housing deficiencies, rose greatly the demand for dwellings of the needy population, which shows the need of government intervention. This dissertation, by especially focusing on families from the lowest income group of the Housing Program Minha Casa Minha Vida (PMCMV) considers the housing policy as part of a larger social protection system that seeks to ensure the social right to housing, as assured by the Brazilian Federal Constitution of 1988. The part of the program studied, served through the Residential Leasing Fund (Fundo de Arrendamento Residencial - FAR), is the one that provides the highest percentage of subsidies and serves those people who would not have access to housing if they could not count on the government support. Based on this reality, the main objective of this Masters dissertation is to analyze the forms of articulation of the PMCMV-FAR with other strategies of urban intervention at the municipal level and to investigate if and how the Program exerts influence in the provision of complementary public equipments for housing. Therefore, a qualitative approach was used, with a comparative case study between the cities of Guarulhos and Itaquaquecetuba. The established objective can be justified by the relevance of the theme to the reduction of social vulnerability, by its prominent place on the public agenda and by gaps identified in the literature and, consequently, the possibility of contributing to the already existing debate and the advancement of knowledge. The theoretical perspective used is both historical and sociological and seeks in the implementation theories a complementarity of the top down and bottom up perspectives for the development of the comparative study. With the top down perspective, the guidelines, instruments and resources directed to the program were considered, as it is characteristic of a federal formulation policy whose implementation occurs at the municipal level. On the other hand, the bottom up perspective has served as a basis for the investigation of municipal realities in the policy implementation, adaptations observed (or not) to local contexts, forms of the relations constitution and articulation between the several organizations and actors involved and understand the forms of articulation between PMCMVFAR and other urban development strategies exist (or not). After the research carried out in the selected cities, specific challenges were identified for the provision of social infrastructure associated with the provision of housing with the lack of effectiveness of some of the instruments established by the federal government. Despite the different characteristics and historical realities of the cities studied, it was possible to observe similar limitations in some aspects of the Program implementation

L’étude de l’ingénierie territoriale dans les Pays du Beaujolais et du Roannais en Rhône Alpes, en liaison avec de nombreux autres dispositifs (Contrats d’agglomération, Contrats Territoriaux Emploi Formation, Leader) met en lumière une tendance forte à la recentralisation de la gestion publique territoriale.L’ingénierie territoriale est une bureaucratie professionnelle territoriale coincée entre les injonctions autoritaires de l’État et les velléités d’autonomie du pouvoir local. D’un côté, on observe que l’Europe, les services centraux de l’État diffusent des représentations et les bonnes pratiques aussi strictes que les règles impersonnelles du modèle bureaucratique wébérien. De l’autre côté, les pouvoirs locaux, face aux insuffisances des services déconcentrés de l’État structurent une ingénierie territoriale composite pour se doter de l’expertise nécessaire à leur stratégie de développement. Paradoxalement, c’est dans le cadre des politiques constitutives, que le pouvoir local en se dotant d’un appareil d’expertise, gage d’autonomie, crée les conditions de son propre contrôle et de sa soumission au régime d’agence qui s’impose comme nouveau mode de régulation de l’action publique au détriment de la négociation contractuelle.En d’autres termes, les instruments d’action publique et les savoir mobilisés par l’ingénierie territoriale dans la démarche de projet participent d’une technologie de gouvernement qui ne met pas fin à la rationalité bureaucratique, elle la transforme. / The study of territorial engineering in two “Pays” (rural areas) of the Rhône-Alpes Region – the “Beaujolais” and the “Roannais”, linked to a number of other measures (urban area contracts, territory/employment/training contracts, Leader) reveals a strong trend towards re-centralising the public management of territories.Territorial engineering is a professional bureaucracy caught between authoritarian dictates from the State and local authority desires for autonomy. On one hand, Europe and central State services convey representations and good practices as strict as the impersonal rules of Weber’s model of bureaucracy. On the other hand, local authorities, faced with the insufficiencies of decentralised State services construct their own composite territorial engineering to acquire the expertise necessary for their development strategies. Paradoxically, it is in the context of constitutive policies that local authorities, in acquiring a system of expertise – guarantee of autonomy, create the conditions of their own control and their submission to an agency system which asserts itself as the new way of regulating public action to the detriment of contractual negotiation.In other words, the instruments of public action and the expertise mobilized by territorial engineering in project planning participate in a technology of governance which, rather than bringing bureaucratic rationality to an end, transform it.