本研究探討台灣於 2013 年接軌國際會計準則（IFRS）後，上市公司對於關係人交易揭露情形之改變。整體而言，財務報表附註之關係人交易段落中揭露的文字大幅減少，透過檢視公報規範及 2013 年實務上之揭露情形，可發現揭露方式的改變是導致關係人資訊驟減的主要原因，大部分上市公司不再提供個別重要關係人之交易資訊。 另外，本文實證研究發現，股權的偏離、負債比率及公司的規模，會讓揭露字數衰減的幅度更為嚴重，但是獨立董事比例愈高的公司，衰減的幅度會被減緩。進一步迴歸分析則指出，就交易事項而言，造成揭露字數下降最關鍵的因素是關係人銷貨和關係人應收（付）帳款票據。具體言之，國內採行 IFRS 並未提升關係人交易揭露品質，且公司各層面的因素對其品質有所影響，主管機關應該加強上市櫃公司關係人交易之審查以及個別重要關係人資訊之揭露。

Considerable energy and resources continue to be expended on accounting rule-making, particularly through standard setting. This has been the case both at the national and international (global) level for a long time. Despite this, there is continuing dissatisfaction with what has been achieved. Criticism continues to be expressed over the rule-makers, their processes of setting rules as well as the rules being produced. Based on a detailed longitudinal case study of one process of setting an international accounting standard this study suggests a comprehensive model for understanding the (international) accounting standard setting process. In addition to the previously emphasised role of politics, it also recognises the potential significance of learning and executive concerns, as well as significant interactions between these three sub-processes of accounting standard setting. In doing this the suggested model provides a framework for approaching concerns regarding the prospects of, and problems involved in, accounting standard setting as a means of achieving (more) standardised accounting practices. A significant part of this book provides a detailed account explaining why the IASC published a standard on income tax requiring the balance sheet liability method in 1996. This case is especially interesting, not only because income tax constitutes a considerable expense for most companies, but also because the revised standard implied a change in financial accounting practices in most countries. The appendix contains several numerical examples illustrating the difference between alternative methods of accounting for income tax / Diss. Stockholm : Handelshögskolan, 2005

Universiẗat, Diss.--Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, 2005.

Zugl.: Oestrich-Winkel, European Business School (EBS), Oestrich-Winkel, Diss., 2007.

Zugl.: Köln, Universiẗat, Diss., 2007. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 367-399) and index.

Univ., Diss.--München, 2002. / Literaturverz. S. 235 - 278.

Universiẗat, Diss.--St. Gallen, 2002.

The title of this thesis is: Explanatory Power of Financial Statements Prepared in conditions of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Ac-cepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP). This thesis compares the differences between Czech accounting legislation, International Financial Reporting Standards, and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP), regarding financial state-ments. The work is divided into a theoretical and practical part. The theoretical part of the work mainly describes the requirements for individual financial statements com-piled according to Czech accounting standards as well as IFRS and US GAAP. Then it defines the main differences in the statements compiled by various accounting sys-tems. The aim of the practical part is to apply theoretical knowledgeon practical examples in a company called Moravské kovárny, a. s. (=Moravian smithy, joint-stock company). First, the procedure for preparation of financial statements in accordance with CAS in society is described in detail, and subsequently, problematic parts are selected, where there is a fundamental difference in reporting compared to IFRS and US GAAP, and a transition to statements corresponding to the requirements of these accounting systems is implemented on them. Using a practical application, it is possible to track specific examples, how individual accounting operations affect profits and the structure of balance sheet items.

Made available in DSpace on 2009-11-18T19:01:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 mgreco.pdf: 2850772 bytes, checksum: 581ce608dc9749c8dcb57032e5d4fc31 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / With the globalization of the economy and the growing participation of several world investors in financial markets, combining the political, economical and social differences of each country, the varying Accounting Statements based on principles, standards, procedures or idiosyncratic accounting patterns become inadequate to provide comprehensible and useful financial information to the users at international level. Considering a country¿s conditions, peculiarities and the stage of development, the need to promote the convergence of the effective accounting practices in the public sector with the emerging international accounting standards is imperative as the public entities endeavor to provide transparent and comparable accounting information that can be understood by financial analysts, investors, auditors and other users, independent of their origin and location. Consequently, the objective of this research was described through the following questions: Which are the main differences between the international and local accounting norms applicable to the public sector in Brazil? Which are the main differences between the applicable international accounting norms and the practices adopted by the Brazilian public sector? And, which are the main differences between the practices adopted by the entities of the Brazilian public sector and the practices adopted by entities of the public sector of countries that formally follow the international accounting norms? The methodology adopted in this research was the one of comparative analysis between standards and practices. To provide a basis for the comparative analysis, the Brazilian standards were used for the public sector and the international standards were identified by consulting with the main international accounting committees. In the comparative analyses of norms adopted in national accounting statements the financial accounting statements of the Municipal districts of Rio de Janeiro and of São Paulo were used, and compared with the international accounting statements of New Zealand. The results of these comparative analyses provide important conclusions about the convergence and harmonization processes in accounting norms and practices for the public sector mainly as they demonstrate some of the conflicts among the recent efforts to base and harmonize accounting practices in the near future, but today significant differences remain between the norms and practices. It was also noticed that, in practice, the divergence in Brazilian accounting practices from the international standards are accentuated by the recognition of the registrations of the budgetary execution in the patrimonial accounting; and, the comparison with the practices adopted by New Zealand demonstrated that the foreign country¿s advances towards harmonizing its standards to the international norms and practices in such an important way that New Zealand independently overcomes the minimum exigencies of harmonization, which in practice, is more complete than the practices currently adopted in Brazil. / Com a globalização da economia e a crescente participação de diversos investidores mundiais no mercado financeiro, somadas as diferenças políticas, econômicas e sociais de cada país, as Demonstrações Contábeis baseadas nos princípios, normas, procedimentos ou padrões contábeis idiossincráticos se tornaram inadequadas para prestar informações financeiras úteis aos usuários a nível internacional, no que se refere à compreensividade. A necessidade de promover a convergência das práticas contábeis vigentes no setor público com as normas internacionais de contabilidade tendo em vista as condições, peculiaridades e o estágio de desenvolvimento do nosso país torna imperativo que os entes públicos disponibilizem informações contábeis transparentes e comparáveis que possam ser entendidas e compreendidas por analistas financeiros, investidores, auditores e demais usuários, independentemente de sua origem e localização. Diante disso, o problema desta pesquisa foi descrito através das seguintes questões: Quais são as principais diferenças entre os padrões contábeis internacionais e os aplicáveis ao setor público no Brasil? Quais são as principais diferenças entre os padrões internacionais aplicáveis ao setor público no Brasil e as práticas efetivamente adotadas no setor público brasileiro? E, quais são as principais diferenças entre as práticas efetivamente adotadas pelas entidades do setor público brasileiro em relação às práticas adotadas por entidades do setor público de países que formalmente seguem os padrões internacionais? A metodologia adotada nesta pesquisa foi a de análise comparativa entre normas e práticas. Para entendimento da análise comparativa e a amostra, foram utilizadas as atuais normas brasileiras para o setor público, e para as normas internacionais foram identificados e consultados os principais comitês internacionais. Nas análises comparativas que adotaram demonstrações contábeis nacionais foram utilizadas as demonstrações financeiras dos Municípios do Rio de Janeiro e de São Paulo, que foram confrontados com as demonstrações contábeis internacionais da Nova Zelândia. As análises comparativas e análise de resultados gerou conclusões importantes sobre o processo de convergência e harmonização contábil para o setor público principalmente por demonstrarem que o confronto entre os padrões evidenciaram o surgimento recente de uma nova ordem para fundamentar práticas contábeis harmônicas no futuro próximo, mas hoje ainda guarda significativa diferença entre os padrões. Percebeu-se também que na prática contábil brasileira as divergências entre os padrões internacionais é bastante acentuada e sofre influência dos aspectos do reconhecimento dos registros da execução orçamentária na contabilidade patrimonial; e o confronto com as práticas adotadas pela Nova Zelândia demonstrou que o país estrangeiro avança em direção a harmonizar seus padrões aos internacionais de forma tão importante que por conta própria supera as exigências mínimas de harmonização, alcançando conjunto mais completo na prática e com isso distancia-se ainda mais da prática por hora adotada no Brasil.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar as práticas de divulgação do EBITDA como métrica de desempenho operacional no gerenciamento de segmentos, no período de 2010 a 2012. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo com abordagem qualitativa e quantitativa dos dados realizada por meio da Análise de Conteúdo das Notas Explicativas e do Relatório da Administração. A amostra objetiva é composta por 260 empresas com situação ativa na BM&FBOVESPA em 2013 e distribuídas entre 20 setores da economia. O ano inicial de pesquisa foi determinado pelo fato de ser o primeiro ano da obrigatoriedade de divulgação das Informações por Segmento conforme o pronunciamento técnico do CPC 22. Inicialmente, foram analisadas 780 notas explicativas. Em seguida, a partir da investigação das divulgações das Informações por Segmento pelo CPC 22 em notas explicativas a amostra de trabalho foi constituída por 185; 198 e 203 entidades, respectivamente, em 2010, 2011 e 2012. Deste modo, foram observados nesses três anos 586 relatórios da administração. Os resultados desta pesquisa demonstram que as práticas de divulgação do EBITDA com métrica de desempenho operacional no gerenciamento de Segmentos possui uma representatividade de evidenciação entre os relatórios financeiros de 18%; 16% e 17% respectivamente em 2010, 2011 e 2012. O relatório financeiro com maior participação na divulgação do EBITDA no gerenciamento de negócios foi o Relatório da Administração com 11% em 2010, 10% em 2011 e 11% em 2012. Conclui-se que, em média, 83% das companhias abertas brasileiras não utilizaram o EBITDA como métrica de desempenho operacional no gerenciamento dos segmentos no período de 2010 a 2012. / The aim of this study is to analyze the practices of disclosure of EBITDA as operating performance metric threads management, during the period from 2010 to 2012. This is a descriptive study, with qualitative and quantitative data approach, carried out through the analysis of content of the explanatory notes and the management report. The objective sample consists of 260 companies with active situation at BM&FBOVESPA in 2013 and distributed among 20 sectors of the economy. The initial year of research was determined by the fact of being the first year of mandatory disclosure of Information by segment as the CPC technical pronouncement n 22. Initially, 780 explanatory notes were analyzed. Then, from the investigation of disclosures of information by segment by the CPC 22 in explanatory notes, the working sample was made up of 185, 198 and 203 entities, respectively, in 2010, 2011 and 2012. In this way, were observed in those three years, 586 administration reports. The results of this research show that the practices of disclosure of EBITDA as operating performance metrics in managing threads have a representativeness of evidencing between financial reports 18%, 16% and 17% respectively in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The financial report with greater involvement in the disclosure of EBITDA in business management was the management report with 11% in 2010, 10% in 2011 and 11% in 2012. It is concluded that, on average, 83% of Brazilian listed companies did not use EBITDA as operating performance metric in the management of the segments during the period from 2010 to 2012.