This diploma thesis deals with the different settings of the current social and political system in the Czech Republic and the People's Republic of China that affect the course of business negotiations between Czech and Chinese business negotiator. The thesis is divided into a theoretical and a practical part. The theoretical part consists of two chapters and the practical part of three chapters. The first chapter is based on the secondary data which characterize how the Czech and Chinese business negotiator perceive a commercial negotiation and its progress. The second chapter describes the effect of setting the current social and political system in the Czech Republic and the People's Republic of China on the personality of Czech and Chinese business negotiators on the individual (my chosen) period of life (offspring, education, marriage, employment and the impact of the welfare system, health system and pension system on the personality of the Czech and Chinese business negotiators) and suitable topics for conversation and maybe a taboo conversation between Czech and Chinese business partner. The third chapter describes how my own research, which was based on qualitative data collection through a questionnaire survey, was performed. The fourth chapter describes the research results. In the fifth chapter I propose how to use new gained knowledge.

Bakgrund: Internationella förhandlingar har länge varit en fundamental del av internationellt företagande, där den internationella förhandlingen påverkas av både kultur och förhandlingsstrategi. Den globala pandemin orsakad av Covid-19 har haft effekter på omvärlden, där viruset hanterats olika från land till land. Till följd av detta har fysiska möten i internationella förhandlingar minskat, vilket avsevärt kan tänkas ha påverkat förhandlingsprocessen. Syfte: Syftet med studien är att undersöka hur Covid-19 har påverkat den internationella förhandlingsprocessen samt undersöka om det finns något samband mellan förändringar i förhandlingsprocessen och dess enskilda faser. Utöver detta avser studien även att jämföra och undersöka om det finns någon skillnad mellan olika kontinenter i Covid-19s inverkan på den internationella förhandlingsprocessen. Metod: Studien är av kvantitativ karaktär med en deduktiv ansats och induktiva anslag. Empiriska data har insamlats med hjälp av en onlineenkät och analyserats med hjälp av statistiska metoder. Slutsats: Slutsatsen av studien påvisar att Covid-19 har påverkat hela förhandlingsprocessen men främst på stadiet av förberedelse och implementering, samt att det finns ett samband mellan förändringar i förhandlingsprocessen och dess enskilda faser. Utöver detta visar studien även på att det finns skillnader mellan Covid-19s påverkan på förhandlingsprocessen mellan olika kontinenter, där Europa skiljer sig från resterande. / Background: International negotiations serve as a fundamental part of international business where the process determines the outcome. The global pandemic caused by the virus Covid-19 has had a tremendous effect forcing the world to readjust and become more digitalized. As a result, the physical meeting in international business negotiations has decreased due to work done remotely. The physical meeting usually playing an important role in the cross-cultural world of international negotiations, the process might have been remarkably affected. Purpose: The purpose of this study investigate how Covid-19 has affected the international negotiation process, as well as if there is any connection between a change in the over negotiation process, and a change in the separate stages of the international negotiation process. Additionally, the study aims to investigate and compare if there are any differences between continents in how the pandemic has affected the international negotiation process. Method: This study is of quantitative nature with a deductive research approach including inductive elements. The empirical data is collected through an online survey and analyzed through statistical methods.  Conclusion: The result of the study shows that Covid-19 has affected the international negotiation process and argues for a close connection between a change in the overall negotiation process and a change in the pre-negotiation and face-to-face negotiation phase. Moreover, the study concludes differences between the continents in how Covid19 has affected the international negotiation process in the preparation and execution s

With our increasingly competitive globalized economy, we are experiencing an emerging trend of firms competing on new international business markets (Bell et al. 2001; Huang 2010). In order to successfully negotiate in an international context, cultural sensitivity needs to be taken into consideration (Manrai & Manrai 2010). This study aims to examine how and to what extent professionalnegotiators’ international negotiation process is influenced by different businesscultures. The study was made by in-depth interviews of five Swedish based professional negotiators and their experiences from negotiating in France, Brazil and Singapore. The mentioned negotiation process was based on Ghuari’s(2003) international business negotiation model which consists of a pre- negotiation stage, a face-to-face negotiation stage and a post-negotiation stage. These stages have been analyzed and interconnected with several cultural variables such as cultural intelligence, adaptation, communication, hierarchy and the Hofstede (2011) parameter of collectivistic versus individualistic cultures to substantiate our two research questions: 1) How does culture intervene in the different stages of the negotiation process? And 2) How are the negotiators adjusting their negotiation strategy to better accommodate the specific culture? The empirical findings showed that there are several differences in both theFrench, Brazilian and Singaporean business culture as well as the negotiators’experiences of their need of adapting to the culture they are negotiating with. The data highlighted the importance of cultural understanding and obtaining the knowledge in a pre-negotiation stage in order to prevent unnecessary misunderstandings which could obstruct the negotiation. The major differenceswhich required the negotiators’ understanding and adaptation was the crucialfactor of building a relationship with the Singaporean delegation, the French’stough negotiation approach and the hierarchical setting in Brazil. The conclusions demonstrated the benefits of cultural adaption as well as the potential pitfall of over-adapting and the imperative preparatory work needed in the pre-negotiation stage of the negotiation.