published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of continuous assessment within the written curriculum in a grade 5 class with Afrikaans as first language.

by Lee Kam-hung. / Thesis (M.A.Ed.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1993. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 135-142). / TABLE OF CONTENTS --- p.i / LIST OF TABLES --- p.iv / LIST OF FIGURES --- p.v / ABSTRACT --- p.vii / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- INTRODUCTION --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Background of the Study --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Purpose of the Study --- p.4 / Chapter 1.3 --- Significance of the Study --- p.5 / Chapter CHAPTER 2 --- REVIEW OF LITERATURE --- p.6 / Chapter 2.1 --- Emphasis of Writing Instruction --- p.6 / Chapter 2.2 --- Stage Models of Writing --- p.7 / Chapter 2.3 --- Significance of Revision --- p.10 / Chapter 2.4 --- Definition of Revision --- p.10 / Chapter 2.5 --- Measurement of Revision --- p.25 / Chapter 2.6 --- Empirical Findings in Revision --- p.34 / Chapter 2.7 --- Definition of Metacognition --- p.42 / Chapter 2.8 --- Research on Metacognition and its Application --- p.49 / Chapter 2.9 --- Metacognitive View of Revision --- p.51 / Chapter 2.10 --- Intervention Studies on Revision --- p.55 / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- DESIGN OF THE STUDY --- p.63 / Chapter 3.1 --- Hypotheses --- p.63 / Chapter 3.2 --- Pilot Study --- p.63 / Chapter 3.3 --- Subjects --- p.78 / Chapter 3.4 --- Procedure --- p.79 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- Pretest --- p.79 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- The Training Programme --- p.80 / Chapter 3.4.3 --- Posttest --- p.84 / Chapter 3.5 --- Quality Rating --- p.84 / Chapter 3.6 --- Data Analysis --- p.86 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- RESULTS --- p.89 / Chapter 4.1 --- Results from Data Analysis and Quality Rating --- p.89 / Chapter 4.2 --- Results from Observation --- p.104 / Chapter 4.3 --- Results from Retrospective Interviews --- p.110 / Chapter CHAPTER 5 --- DISCUSSION --- p.122 / Chapter CHAPTER 6 --- CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS --- p.132 / BIBLIOGRAPHY --- p.135 / APPENDICES / APPENDIX A Integrated Learning Strategies Curriculum --- p.143 / APPENDIX B Learning Strategies Taught in the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approcah (CALLA) --- p.145 / APPENDIX C The Writing Task Used in the Pilot Study and the Pretest (Writing Task1) --- p.147 / APPENDIX D Questions Asked in the Interview after the Completion of the Writing Task --- p.148 / APPENDIX E Part of a Sample Essay with Revision Marks Analyzed with reference to Stages --- p.149 / APPENDIX F Questions Asked in the Interview after the Revision Session --- p.150 / APPENDIX G The Quality Rating Scales --- p.151 / APPENDIX H Quality Assessment Form Adapted from Bernhardt's Quality Rating Scales --- p.152 / APPENDIX I Examples of Verbal Protocols in the Interview --- p.153 / APPENDIX J A Comparison between the Performance of the Performance of the School Involved in the Study in English Language (Syllabus B)in the 1991 Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination (the HKCEE) with the Overall Performance in Hong Kong --- p.154 / APPENDIX K Essential Components of Revision --- p.155 / APPENDIX L Correcting Faults in Usage --- p.156 / APPENDIX M Revision Guidelines --- p.157 / APPENDIX N The Writing Task Used in the Posttest (Writing Task2) --- p.158 / APPENDIX O Numbers of Revisions (per 100 words) of the Subjects in the Main Study at Different Stages --- p.159 / APPENDIX P Numbers of Different Types of Revisions (per 100 words) of the Subjects in the Main Study throughout the Three Stages --- p.160 / APPENDIX Q Breakdown of the Stage III Revisions (per 100 words) of the Subjects in the Main Study by Type --- p.161 / APPENDIX R Percentages of Good Revisions of the Subjects in the Main Study at Different Stages --- p.162 / APPENDIX S Excerpts of the Retrospective Protocols of the Subjects in the Main Study --- p.163

張秋芳. / "2006年8月" / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2006. / 參考文獻(leaves 81-100). / "2006 nian 8 yue" / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Zhang Qiufang. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2006. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 81-100). / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1-4 / Chapter 1.1 --- 研究背景 --- p.1-2 / Chapter 1.2 --- 硏究目的 --- p.2-3 / Chapter 1.3 --- 研究意義 --- p.3-4 / Chapter 第二章 --- 文獻綜述 --- p.5-9 / Chapter 2.1 --- 作文批改的硏究 --- p.5-8 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- 硏究作文批改的方法 --- p.6 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- 硏究作文批改的焦點 --- p.5-6 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- 硏究作文批改的評語 --- p.6-8 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- 小結 --- p.7-9 / Chapter 2.2 --- 後設認知的理念(The concept of metacognition) --- p.9-18 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- 理念源起 --- p.9-10 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- "後設認知知識(knowledge of the cognition, metacognitive knowledge)" --- p.10-14 / Chapter (1) --- 陳述性知識(declarative knowledge) --- p.10-11 / Chapter I. --- 個體知識(person category) --- p.11 / Chapter II. --- 課業知識(task category) --- p.11-12 / Chapter III. --- 策略知識(strategy category) --- p.12 / Chapter (2) --- 程序性知識(procedural knowledge) --- p.12-13 / Chapter (3) --- 條件性知識(conditional knowledge) --- p.13-14 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- 後設認知調控(regulation of cognition) --- p.14-18 / Chapter (1) --- 計劃(planning) --- p.15 / Chapter (2) --- 信息處理策略（information management strategy) --- p.15-16 / Chapter (3) --- 監控(monitoring) --- p.16-17 / Chapter (4) --- 清除障礙策略(debugging strategies) --- p.17-18 / Chapter (5) --- 評估(evaluation) --- p.18 / Chapter 2.2.4 --- 小結 --- p.18 / Chapter 2.3 --- 後設認知的硏究方法及本硏究模式的依據 --- p.18-25 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- 問卷量表的模式 --- p.18-19 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- 訪談模式 --- p.19-23 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- 有聲思考模式 --- p.23-24 / Chapter 2.3.4 --- 小結 --- p.24-25 / Chapter 2.4 --- 文獻綜述總結 --- p.25-26 / Chapter 第三章 --- 研究方法 --- p.27-36 / Chapter 3.1 --- 研究對象 --- p.27-32 / Chapter 3.2 --- 研究工具 --- p.27-32 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- 批改工具：學生作文樣本 --- p.27-29 / Chapter (1) --- 作文次數 --- p.27-28 / Chapter (2) --- 年級 --- p.28 / Chapter (3) --- 水平 --- p.28 / Chapter (4) --- 體裁 --- p.28 / Chapter (5) --- 文體字數 --- p.28 / Chapter (6) --- 實驗前樣本處理 --- p.28-29 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- 分析工具：訪談問題 --- p.29-32 / Chapter (1) --- 訪談問題的理念依據 --- p.29-30 / Chapter (2) --- 訪談問題的設計特色 --- p.30 / Chapter (3) --- 訪談問題的樣本 --- p.31-32 / Chapter 3.3 --- 硏究程序 --- p.33-34 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- 教師批改作文的程序 --- p.33 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- 硏究員現場觀察記錄 --- p.33 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- 提問問題 --- p.34 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- 攝影及錄音 --- p.34 / Chapter 3.4 --- 硏究資料分析架構 --- p.34-35 / Chapter 3.5 --- 訪談資料的處理 --- p.36 / Chapter 3.5.1 --- 書面轉譯 --- p.36 / Chapter 3.5.2 --- 建立後設認知分析指標及編碼的過程 --- p.36 / Chapter 3.5.3 --- 後設認知分析指標及編碼的信度 --- p.36 / Chapter 第四章 --- 硏究結果報告及討論 --- p.37-72 / Chapter 4.1 --- 受試者個人的後設認知表現 --- p.37-52 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- 教師甲的個人檔案 --- p.37-40 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- 教師乙的個人檔案 --- p.40-43 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- 教師丙的個人檔案 --- p.43-48 / Chapter 4.1.4 --- 教師丁的個人檔案 --- p.48-52 / Chapter 4.1.5 --- 小結 --- p.52 / Chapter 4.2 --- 四位受試者相同、不同的後設認知表現 --- p.53-72 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- 非在線相同、不同的後設認知表現 --- p.53-59 / Chapter (1) --- 陳述性知識(declarative knowledge) --- p.53-59 / Chapter I. --- 個體知識(person category) --- p.53-54 / Chapter II. --- 課業知識(task category) --- p.55-56 / Chapter III. --- 策略知識(strategy category) --- p.56-57 / Chapter (2) --- 程序性知識(procedural knowledge) --- p.57-58 / Chapter (3) --- 條件性知識(conditional knowledge) --- p.58-59 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- 小結 --- p.59 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- 在線相同、不同的後設認知表現 --- p.60-72 / Chapter (1) --- 計劃(planning) --- p.60-61 / Chapter (2) --- 訊息處理策略(information management strategy) --- p.61-63 / Chapter (3) --- 監控(monitoring) --- p.63-67 / Chapter (4) --- 清除障礙策略(debugging strategy) --- p.67-71 / Chapter (5) --- 評估(evaluation) --- p.71-72 / Chapter 4.2.4 --- 小結 --- p.72 / Chapter 4.3 --- 後設認知硏究在作文批改範疇的獨特之處 --- p.73-75 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- 教師對批改對象的獨特之處 --- p.73-74 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- 教師對課業理解的獨特之處 --- p.74-75 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- 小結 --- p.75 / Chapter 4.4. --- 第四章總結 / Chapter 第五章 --- 總結 --- p.77-80 / Chapter 5.1 --- 硏究結果撮要 --- p.77_79 / Chapter 5.2 --- 硏究限制 --- p.80 / Chapter 5.3 --- 建議 --- p.79-80 / 參考書目 --- p.81-92 / 表格 / 表一 Straub(2000)歸納教師的批改的焦點及方式 --- p.7 / 表二 後設認知闡述以及教師批改作文行爲的後設認知槪念闡述 --- p.19-20 / 表三 訪談問題 --- p.31-32 / 表四 本硏究的程序以及模式 --- p.33 / 表五 資料分析架構 --- p.34-35 / 附錄文件 / 附錄一 Schraw &Dennison(1994)後設認知覺知指標（Metacognitive Awareness Inventory，MAI) --- p.93-95 / 附錄二 受訪者的分析結果 --- p.4份 / 註釋　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 --- p.96-100

The purpose of the project is to develop and evaluate a writing unit that could be used to teach adult students in a drug court program. The project is based on theories behind narrative therapy, its use in the treatment of persons with addiction problems, and how the reframing of students' own life stories through writing can bring about change. By using writing prompts as both therapeutic and educational tools, the author hoped to improve the students' life-coping skills and their writing abilities. The unit consists of paragraph writing, essay writing, reflective writing that focused on past events, and using computers to compose and format texts. The author evaluated a preliminary draft of the unit by submitting it to four education professionals with a questionnaire. Data was also collected from the author's students by means of surveys, interviews, and writing samples. Feedback from the professionals and the students guided the revision of the unit. The questionnaire, survey, and interview questions used in the project and the preliminary and final revised drafts of the teaching unit are included.

This project researcher designed, implemented and collected data on an integrated approach to writing instruction for her third grade students in the Etiwanda School District. The literature review showed the importance of teaching students the purpose for writing, the traits of writing and the process of writing. Research showed the effectiveness of teaching students the six traits of writing and the writing process as indicated by student writing achievement scores.

published_or_final_version / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Linguistics / Master / Master of Arts in Applied Linguistics