Abstract Background and Objectives: Since 1894, open appendectomy (OA) has been the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. In 1981 Semm performed the first laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). More than 2 decades later, the benefits of LA are still controversial. The goal of the present investigation was to compare the effectiveness of LA and OA based on a large administrative (The Bureau of National Health Insurance, BNHI) Research Database. The source of data analyzed was the administrative claims data from the BNHI Research Database. Methods: The objective of this retrospective study was based on the ICD-9-CM procedure code of 4701 (Laparoscopic appendectomy, LA) and 4709 (Open appendectomy, OA) respectively from a database of 20 million insurance population, Separate analyses were performed for uncomplicated (ICD-9-CM, 540.9) and complicated (presence of appendiceal perforation or abscess; ICD-9-CM 540.0 and 540.1) appendicitis. Exclusive criteria were: (1) Average length of stay exceeds 3 S.D. (n=1,262). (2) Gender unmentioned (n=243). All these data will analyze in multiple dimensions including length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and rate of routine discharge between laparoscopic (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) based on The Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) database. Results: We enrolled 11,118 patients underwent LA and 47,725 patients underwent OA during 2004 to 2007. The prevalence of LA increases gradually from 6.97 per 100,000 populations in 2004 to 21 per 100,000 populations in 2007. The prevalence of OA decreases gradually from 57.5 per 100,000 populations in 2004 to 44.86 per 100,000 populations in 2007. Patients underwent LA (3.25¡Ó1.51day) have significant lower length of hospital stay than OA (3.57¡Ó1.49 day) (p<0.001). We also found the trend that the annual medical expenditure of LA increases gradually but OA decreases gradually. In general, LA spends higher medical expenditure than OA. With respect to medical expenditure, higher length of hospital stay and co-morbidity are associated with more medical expenditure significantly. Conclusions: LA is the current developing trend of surgical treatments for appendicitis. LA can reduce length of hospital stay significantly. OA can reduce the medical expenditure in Taiwan. In our opinion, the results represent the native data in Taiwan and are very important for a good administration of public resources distribution.

Der chronische Unterbauchschmerz stellt den behandelnden Arzt vor erhebliche differentialdiagnostische Probleme. Die vorgestellte Studie soll den Wert der Laparoskopie im diagnostischen Konzept aufzeigen. Dazu führten wir zwischen Oktober 1993 und Juni 1998 bei 100 Patienten mit der klinischen Diagnose «chronischer Unterbauchschmerz» eine Laparoskopie durch. Bei 14 Patienten ließ sich ein morphologisches Korrelat unabhängig von der Appendix finden. 86 Patienten wurden appendektomiert, wobei die histologische Untersuchung des Präparats in 82 Fällen (95,3%) einen pathologischen Befund aufwies. 80 Patienten (93%) blieben auch während der Nachuntersuchungen beschwerdefrei. Die Laparoskopie stellt ein sicheres Verfahren zur Diagnostik und Behandlung chronischer Unterbauchschmerzen dar. Bei fehlendem Korrelat für die Beschwerden sollte in gleicher Sitzung die laparoskopische Appendektomie durchgeführt werden. / The differential diagnosis chronic lower abdominal pain can be problematic, and this symptom may lead to several diagnostic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of laparoscopy in the diagnostic concept. From October 1993 to June 1998 we performed 100 laparoscopies in patients with chronic or recurrent lower abdominal pain. In 14 patients we found a substrate for the reported pain, which was independent of the appendix. In 86 patients we performed an appendectomy. In 62 of the specimens (95.3%) the histological study showed pathological findings. 80 patients (93%) reported no further complaints during follow-up. Laparoscopy is a safe procedure for diagnostics and treatment of patients with chronic lower abdominal pain. If no other explanation for the symptoms is found, laparoscopic appendectomy should be performed. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

INTRODUCTION: There currently exists a wide variation in anesthesia perioperative management for pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this retrospective chart review is to compare outcome indicators by using patient demographics. This study aims to establish evidence based guidelines for safe, efficient and effective anesthetic management for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomies by analyzing selected outcome indicators and metrics in relation to Surgical-End-to-Transport (SET) time: defined as the time from the end of surgical time until the patient is ready to exit the operating room. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, all laparoscopic appendectomies performed from 2012 through 2014 (n=790) were queried. Using the median SET time of 14 minutes, two groups were established as follows: Group A (n=431), SET time between 0 and 14 minutes, and Group B (n=338), SET time of 14 minutes and longer. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare readmissions by American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status and reports of high pain with PACU (Post-Anesthesia Care Unit) duration, gender, age, and surgical duration using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21.0, IBM, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: To limit confounding variables, patients over the age of 21 and those assigned an ASA Physical Status Classification 3 or 4 were excluded. Remaining cases (n=769) were then used to calculate readmission incidence. The median SET time for the study population was 14 minutes, while the median surgical and PACU durations were 58 minutes and 59 minutes, respectively. The readmission incidence rate was 300 per 10,000 (n=23, 3%). The study population consisted of 56% males and 44% females. Females had a higher incidence of readmission (n=13, 3.8%) than males (n=10, 2.3%), while males had longer SET times than females (Group A Males 52.33% vs. Group B Males 60.30%, p=0.0276). There was no difference in readmission incidence rates between ASA I (n=473) and ASA II (n=296) patients (ASA I readmits 3.2 % vs. ASA II readmits 2.7%, p=.711). Patients who reported high postoperative pain (n=75) were more than twice as likely to be readmitted than patients who did not report high pain (p=.071). Ethnicity frequencies were collected as follows: 60.3% White, 6.8% Black or African American, 3.6% Asian, and 29.1% Other. DISCUSSION: Males had significantly longer durations in SET times, and they experienced fewer readmissions than females. There were no significant findings related to the ethnic demographics. Further analysis identifying intraoperative and postoperative anesthesia management for both groups will be performed. This study was subject to the following limitations: retrospective design, incomplete data acquisition, and inconsistent EMR documentation. The correlations and results are preliminary in nature and will serve as a framework for future analyses.

Der chronische Unterbauchschmerz stellt den behandelnden Arzt vor erhebliche differentialdiagnostische Probleme. Die vorgestellte Studie soll den Wert der Laparoskopie im diagnostischen Konzept aufzeigen. Dazu führten wir zwischen Oktober 1993 und Juni 1998 bei 100 Patienten mit der klinischen Diagnose «chronischer Unterbauchschmerz» eine Laparoskopie durch. Bei 14 Patienten ließ sich ein morphologisches Korrelat unabhängig von der Appendix finden. 86 Patienten wurden appendektomiert, wobei die histologische Untersuchung des Präparats in 82 Fällen (95,3%) einen pathologischen Befund aufwies. 80 Patienten (93%) blieben auch während der Nachuntersuchungen beschwerdefrei. Die Laparoskopie stellt ein sicheres Verfahren zur Diagnostik und Behandlung chronischer Unterbauchschmerzen dar. Bei fehlendem Korrelat für die Beschwerden sollte in gleicher Sitzung die laparoskopische Appendektomie durchgeführt werden. / The differential diagnosis chronic lower abdominal pain can be problematic, and this symptom may lead to several diagnostic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of laparoscopy in the diagnostic concept. From October 1993 to June 1998 we performed 100 laparoscopies in patients with chronic or recurrent lower abdominal pain. In 14 patients we found a substrate for the reported pain, which was independent of the appendix. In 86 patients we performed an appendectomy. In 62 of the specimens (95.3%) the histological study showed pathological findings. 80 patients (93%) reported no further complaints during follow-up. Laparoscopy is a safe procedure for diagnostics and treatment of patients with chronic lower abdominal pain. If no other explanation for the symptoms is found, laparoscopic appendectomy should be performed. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.