This work deals with electrolytes and ionic liquids for Li-ion batteries. Following interaction of electrolytes and ionic liquids to electrodes material. In the theoretical part attention is focused on the description of battery electrolytes and ionic liquids for lithium-ion batteries.

Commercial lithium ion batteries use liquid electrolytes because of their high ionic conductivity (>10-3 S/cm) over a broad range of temperatures, high dielectric constant, and good electrochemical stability with the electrodes (mainly the cathode cathode). The disadvantages of their use in lithium ion batteries are that they react violently with lithium metal, have special packing needs, and have low lithium ion transference numbers (tLi+ = 0.2-0.3). These limitations prevent them from being used in high energy and power applications such as in hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), plug in electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage on the grid. Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) will be good choice for replacing liquid electrolytes in lithium/lithium ion batteries because of their increased safety and ease of processability. However, SPEs suffer from RT low ionic conductivity and transference numbers. There have been many approaches to increase the ionic conductivity in solid polymer electrolytes. These have focused on decreasing the crystallinity in the most studied polymer electrolyte, polyethylene oxide (PEO), on finding methods to promote directed ion transport, and on the development of single ion conductors, where the anions are immobile and only the Li+ ions migrate (i.e. tLi+ = 1). But these attempts have not yet achieved the goal of replacing liquid electrolytes with solid polymer electrolytes in lithium ion batteries. In order to increase ionic conductivity and lithium ion transference numbers in solid polymer electrolytes, I have focused on the development of multi-ionic lithium salts. These salts have very large anions, and thus are expected to have low tanion- and high tLi+ transference numbers. In order to make the anions dissociative, structures similar to those formed for mono-ionic salts, e.g. LiBF4 and lithium imides have been synthesized. Some of the multi-ionic salts have Janus-like structures and therefore can self-assemble in polar media. Further, it is possible that these salts may not form non-conductive ion pairs and less conductive ion triplets. First, we have prepared nanocomposite electrolytes from mixtures of two polyoctahedral silsesquioxanes (POSS) nanomaterials, each with a SiO1.5 core and eight side groups. POSS-PEG8 has eight polyethylene glycol side chains that have low glass transition (Tg) and melt (Tm) temperatures and POSS-phenyl7(BF3Li)3 is a Janus-like POSS with hydrophobic phenyl groups and -Si-O-BF3Li ionic groups clustered on one side of the SiO1.5 cube. The electron-withdrawing POSS cage and BF3 groups enable easy dissociation of the Li+. In the presence of polar POSS-PEG8, the hydrophobic phenyl rings of POSS-phenyl7(BF3Li)3 aggregate and crystallize, forming a biphasic morphology, in which the phenyl rings form the structural phase and the POSS-PEG8 forms the conductive phase. The -Si-O-BF3- Li+ groups of POSS-phenyl7(BF3Li)3 are oriented towards the polar POSS-PEG8 phase and dissociate so that the Li+ cations are solvated by the POSS-PEG8. The nonvolatile nanocomposite electrolytes are viscous liquids that do not flow under their own weight. POSS-PEG8/POSS-phenyl7(BF3Li)3 at O/Li = 16/1 has a conductivity, σ = 2.5 x 10-4 S/cm at 30°C, 17 x greater than POSS-PEG8/LiBF4, and a low activation energy (Ea ~ 3-4 kJ/mol); σ = 1.6 x 10-3 S/cm at 90°C and 1.5 x 10-5 S/cm at 10°C. The lithium ion transference number was tLi+ = 0.50 ± 0.01, due to reduced mobility of the large, bulky anion and the system exhibited low interfacial resistance that stabilized after 3 days (both at 80°C). Secondly, solid polymer electrolytes have been prepared from the same salt, POSS-phenyl7(BF3Li)3 and polyethylene oxide (PEO). These exhibit high ambient temperature conductivity, 4 x 10-4 S/cm, and transference number, tLi+ = 0.6. A two-phase morphology is proposed in which the hydrophobic phenyl groups cluster and crystallize, and the three -BF3- form an anionic pocket, with the Li+ ions solvated by the PEO phase. The high ionic conductivity results from interfacial migration of Li+ ions loosely bonded to three -BF3- anions and the ether oxygens of PEO. Physical crosslinks formed between PEO/Li+ chains and the POSS clusters account for the solid structure of the amorphous PEO matrix. The solid polymer electrolyte has an electrochemical stability window of 4.6 V and excellent interfacial stability with lithium metal. In order to further enhance the ionic conductivity of solid polymer electrolytes, we have made two improvements. First, we have used so called half cube structures, T4-POSS, that contain 4 phenyl groups on one side of a Si-O- ring, and 4 ionic groups on the other side, and so are true Janus structures. They contain a 4/4 ratio of phenyl/ionic groups, unlike the previous structures that contain 7 phenyl groups/3 ionic groups. At the same O/Li ratio, the ionic conductivity of [PhOSi(OLi)]4 with POSS-PEG8 is higher than POSS-phenyl7Li3 because of more Li+ dissociation in the former case. Second, we have increased the dissociation of the lithium salts by replacing the Si-O-BF3Li groups with Si-(C3H4NLiSO2CF3)4. Both T4-POSS-(C3H4NLiSO2CF3)4 and POSS-(C3H4NLiSO2CF3)8 have been synthesized and characterized, with some preliminary conductivity data obtained. / Chemistry

Solubility enhancement of poorly-soluble active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) remains a scientific challenge and poses a practical issue in the pharmaceutical industry. The emergence of pharmaceutical cocrystals has contributed another dimension to the diversity of crystal forms available at the disposal of the pharmaceutical scientist. That pharmaceutical cocrystals are amenable to the design principles of crystal engineering means that the number of crystal forms offered by pharmaceutical cocrystals is potentially greater than the combined numbers of polymorphs, salts, solvates and hydrates for an API. The current spotlight and early-onset dissolution profile ("spring-and-parachute" effect) exhibited by certain pharmaceutical cocrystals draw attention to an immediate question: How big is the impact of cocrystals on aqueous solubility? The scientific literature and in-house data on pharmaceutical cocrystals that are thermodynamically stable in water are reviewed and analyzed for trends in aqueous solubility and melting point between the cocrystal and the cocrystal formers. There is poor correlation between the aqueous solubility of cocrystal and cocrystal former with respect to the API. The log of the aqueous solubility ratio between cocrystal and API has a poor correlation with the melting point difference between cocrystal and API. Structure-property relationships between the cocrystal and the cocrystal formers remain elusive and the actual experiments are still necessary to investigate the desired physicochemical properties. Crystal form (cocrystals, polymorphs, salts, hydrates and solvates) diversity is and will continue to be a contentious issue for the pharmaceutical industry. That the crystal form of an API dramatically impacts its aqueous solubility (a fixed thermodynamic property) is illustrated by the histamine H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine hydrochloride and HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir. For more than a century, the dissolution rate of a solid has been shown to be directly dependent on its solubility, cçterîs paribus. A century later, it remains impossible to predict the properties of a solid, given its molecular structure. If delivery or absorption of an API are limited by its aqueous solubility, aqueous solubility then becomes a critical parameter linking bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of an API. Since the majority of APIs are Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) Class II (low solubility and high permeability) compounds, crystal form screening, optimization and selection have thus received more efforts, attention and investment. Given that the dissolution rate, aqueous solubility and crystal form of an API are intricately linked, it remains a scientific challenge to understand the nature of crystal packing forces and their impact upon physicochemical properties of different crystal forms. Indeed, the selection of an optimal crystal form of an API is an indispensable part of the drug development program. The impact of cocrystals on crystal form diversity is addressed with molecular and ionic targets in ellagic acid and lithium salts. A supramolecular heterosynthon approach was adopted for crystal form screening. Crystal form screening of ellagic acid yields molecular cocrystals, cocrystal solvates/hydrates and solvates. Crystal form screening of lithium salts (chloride, bromide and nitrate salts) afforded ionic cocrystals and cocrystal hydrates.

Limiter le vieillissement des accumulateurs lithium-ion est un challenge pour optimiser leur utilisation notamment dans le domaine spatial. La qualité de la couche de passivation (SEI), formée à la surface de l’électrode négative de graphite lors des premiers cycles de vie de la batterie, est déterminante pour ses performances futures. Celle-ci est composée de polymères et de divers sels de lithium dont la dissolution, la précipitation et la migration affectent les performances. Cette étude vise à comprendre l’impact de ces composés sur la cyclabilité et de proposer des solutions à l’effet néfaste de ces sels sur le bon fonctionnement et le vieillissement de l’accumulateur Li-ion. La première partie de ce travail aborde l’impact de divers sels de lithium de la SEI (LiF, Li2CO3, LiOH, LiOCH3, LiOC2H5) sur le comportement en cyclage des accumulateurs. Par la suite, nous avons proposé des solutions pour améliorer le comportement qu’engendre la présence de ces sels sur les performances à travers deux approches. La première concerne l’utilisation de co-solvants complexants de la famille des glymes. La seconde approche consiste à modifier les propriétés interfaciales électrodes/électrolyte par l’ajout d’additifs tensioactifs à l’électrolyte. Les résultats montrent dans les deux cas des améliorations notables de la cyclabilité des dispositifs en demi-pile et en cellule complète. / Limiting the lithium-ion batteries ageing is a challenge to overcome in the field of spatial applications. The quality of the solid electrolyte interfaces (SEI), created at the electrode surface during the first cycles of the battery, is decisive for its future performances. The SEI is composed of polymers and several lithium salts which are able to dissolve, precipitate and migrate in the electrolyte and hence modify the battery performances. This study aims to understand the impact of the dissolution of these compounds on the cell cycling ability and to propose solutions to avoid the harmful effects of these salts on the battery ageing. The first part of this study is devoted to the study of the effect of dissolved SEI lithium salts (LiF, LiOH, Li2O, Li2CO3 , LiOCH3, LiOC2H5) on the cycling ability of half and full cells.In order to improve the battery performances in spite of the presence of these SEI salts in the electrolyte, two solutions have been examined. The first one is to add a co-solvent belonging to the glyme family which is able to form complexes with lithium ions and the second to use a surfactant additive which will modify the interfacial electrode/electrolyte properties. Results show that in both cases an improvement in half-cell or full-cell cycling ability was achieved.

No description available.

No description available.