Global ETD Search

1	Chirurgické možnosti léčby degenerativního onemocnění thorakolumbální páteře: Význam morfologických a klinických klasifikací stenózy bederní páteře v předoperační rozvaze / The Surgical Treatment Options in Thoracolumbar Spine Degeneration: The Importance of Morphological and Clinical Classifications in Preoperative Decision Making Bludovský, David January 2019 (has links) The surgical treatment options in thoracolumbar spine degeneration: The importance of morphological and clinical classifications in preoperative decision making David Bludovský Abstract: Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the relations between subjective difficulties, clinical findings and the MR imaging in patients who have been operated for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and the possibility of using these relations for surgical treatment decision. Methods: Patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis in 2009-2010 were included in the study. Subjective difficulties were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the clinical symptoms with the modified Neurological Impairment Score for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (mNIS-LSS). We measured the spine canal area, dural sac area, and nerve root sedimentation classification on MR. By correlation analysis at significance level p <0.05, we tested the relations between these categories. 61 patients with a median age of 67 were included. Overall, we evaluated 162 spinal segments. Results: Median of ODI values were 48. Correlation coefficients for ODI, mNIS-LSS and graphical findings were less than 0.5. Correlation coefficients greater than 0.5 were between all the MR measurement methods. Conclusions: In the group of patients indicated...
2	Effectiveness of a Manual Therapy Approach in Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Ramadan, Haitham 01 January 2019 (has links) Background: The use of manual therapy for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has not been adequately systematically reviewed in an attempt to determine its effectiveness on patients with LSS. The lack of evidence in support ofcommonly used conservative interventions continues to result in a lack of clarity regarding what interventions should be used to manage patients with LSS. Objective: To use a randomized comparative trial to compare the functional clinical outcomes achieved by patients with LSS receiving two different physical therapy interventions. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, a total of40 participants diagnosed with LSS were randomized into two groups. Both groups received 6 weeks of treatment. Participants assigned to group 1 (EX Group) received impairment-based exercises. Participants assigned to group 2 (EXMT Group) received impairment-based exercises as well as manual physical therapy techniques. The evaluation parameters included (1) McGill Pain Questionnaire, (2) the original version of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), (3) double inclinometer measurement for measuring thoracolumbar flexion and extension, (4) self-pace walking test, (5) hip abductor and extensor strength, and (6) hip external rotation and extension range of motion. All participants were evaluated before starting treatment, once at the end of 6 weeks of treatment, and again at 6 weeks following the completion of treatment. Results: In terms of overall treatmentefficacy, there were notable improvements observed over time regardless of treatment group. Results indicated significant improvement in perceived disability using ODQ in the EXMT treatment group in comparison to the EX group at follow-up. For the EXMT group, there were notable improvements in comparison to the EX group in multiple objective functional improvement measures. Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that a multimodal approach using manual therapy and therapeutic exercises is an effective treatment option for providing clinically significant short-term reduction in back pain and disability, as well as improvements in back mobility in patients with LSS. Physical therapists should strongly consider the impairment-based approachof manual therapy and specific exercises program for lumbar spine and hips as a treatment option for patients with lumbarspinal stenosis. Health and environmental sciences Elderly Impairment based approach Lumbar spinal stenosis Manual therapy Physical therapy Therapeutic exercise Physical Therapy
3	Étude des effets d’un protocole de préadaptation sur la récupération de patients opérés pour une sténose lombaire Marchand, Andrée-Anne 09 1900 (has links) No description available. Sténose spinale lombaire Préadaptation Exercices Récupération Faisabilité Lumbar spinal stenosis Prehabilitation Exercise Recovery Feasibility
4	Lumbar spinal stenosis : Body mass index and the patient's perspective Knutsson, Björn January 2015 (has links) During recent decades, lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has become the most common indication for spine surgery, a change that coincides with a higher worldwide prevalence of overweight and obesity. Thus, surgical treatment of LSS in the overweight and obese population is common and increasing in scope. The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate whether body mass index (BMI) is related to the development of LSS, and whether BMI is linked to outcome after surgery for LSS. We further evaluated whether there are specific experiences of LSS from a patient perspective. Data were obtained for all patients registered in the Swedish Spine Register who had undergone surgery for LSS between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2008. After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, patients with obesity showed both poorer results after surgery and a higher rate of dissatisfaction than patients with normal weight (odds ratio 1.73; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.36-2.19). Furthermore, patients with obesity in the cohort reported modest weight loss at follow-up (2.0 kg; 95% CI, 1.5-2.4), and only 8% reported a clinical important weight loss 2 years after surgery. Our analysis of 389,132 construction workers, showed that overweight (incidence rate ratio, IRR 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.83) and obesity (IRR 2.18; 95% CI, 1.87-2.53) were associated with an increased future risk in developing LSS when compared with patients with normal weight. To gain insight into the patients' perspective of LSS, we performed interviews with 18 patients who were on a waiting list for LSS surgery. The transcripts, analyzed with content analysis, revealed that living with LSS is a physical, mental and social challenge in which resources to cope with the condition are of major importance. In summary, obesity is associated with poorer results after surgery, and patients with obesity report modest weight loss during follow-up. In addition, obesity is associated with an increased risk to develop LSS. Our findings revealed that being a patient with LSS, naturally involves considerable suffering and pain, but it also implies being a person with his or her own resources who is able to cope with these adverse conditions. Antonovsky back pain BMI body mass index Bygghalsan cohort study coping EQ-5D excess weight leg pain LSS lumbar spinal stenosis obesity ODI Oswestry disability index overweight patient-centered patient-physician relationship patient-perspective patient-related-outcome-measure PROMs qualitative study spinal stenosis salutogenesis salutogenic sciatica spine surgery suffering Swedish spine register Swespine VAS weight loss weight change

1

Page generated in 0.0618 seconds