Adult literature has shown that quality of patient-physician relationships is associated with better patient adherence to treatment recommendations across chronic illnesses. However, few studies have examined this in youth with type 1 diabetes, particularly those of Hispanic origin. Evidence indicates that minority youth with type 1 diabetes are at higher risk for poorer metabolic control and experience less satisfaction in patient-provider relationships compared to their white, non-Hispanic counterparts. This study examined the association between satisfaction with the physician-patient relationship and regimen adherence and glycemic control in 120 Hispanic youth with type 1 diabetes. Most caregivers who participated were mothers (82.5%) and youths were primarily female (51.7%). Children ranged in age from 10 to 17 (M age = 13.63 ± 2.18 years). Mean duration of diabetes was 6.26 ± 3.72 years. Most caregivers were married (64.7%). Mothers? highest level of education included 35.3% who had a high school education or less, 34.5% who had some college, and 30.2% who completed college. Mean HbA1c level on recruitment date was 7.68 ± 3.56. Adolescents and their parents independently completed an adapted version of the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-21) (Meakin & Weinman, 2002), which assessed their personal satisfaction with their endocrinologist?s consultation, and the Diabetes Self Management Profile (DSMP) (Harris et al., 2000), which measures adherence over the past 3 months across multiple self-care domains. Spanish translations of both forms were used when appropriate in obtaining caregiver report. Also, physicians rated their patients? regimen adherence using an average of eight items concerning patient adherence. Youth and parents shared similar perceptions concerning youth regimen adherence, as measured by the DSMP (r=.68, p<.001). Youth and parent report of their relationship with their endocrinologist was modestly correlated (r=.27, p<.01). Due to high concordance between parent and child adherence scores, further analyses used a combined DSMP score, while separate scores were used for parent and child reports of satisfaction. Age, mother?s education, and single parent status were used as control variables and were correlated with parent and child satisfaction and a combined DSMP score. Including control variables, parent and child satisfaction did not significantly predict glycemic control (R2∆=.02, p<.10). Parent and child satisfaction also did not significantly predict adherence (R2∆=.02, p=.06). Due to these unexpected findings, further exploratory analyses were conducted. Parent and child satisfaction did not predict physician report of adherence. Interestingly, parent and child report of satisfaction with communication comfort with the physician predicted physician report of adherence (R2∆=.05, p<.01). More specifically, child report of communication comfort predicted physician report of adherence (ß=.26, p<.01), while parent report did not. No subscales of the satisfaction measure (MISS) or the adherence measure (DSMP) predicted glycemic control. Findings suggested that more positive patient-physician relationships are associated with better physician-reported regimen adherence, but not with family report of adherence. However, it is unclear whether better patient-physician relationships enhance adherence or whether more adherent patients are likely to be satisfied with their provider. Further studies are needed to prospectively examine the directionality of these relationships, as well as examine methods to improve the quality of physician-patient relationships in order to increase positive health outcomes.

The medical profession in recent decades has made culture and cross-cultural competence an issue for patient – physician relationships. Many in the profession attribute the necessity of cross-cultural competence to increased diversity, globalization, and health disparities; however, a historical analysis of medicine indicates that culture’s relevancy for health care and outcome is not new. The rise of clinics, which can be traced to 17th century France, the professionalization of physicians in 18th century U.S., and the civil rights movement of the 20th century illustrate that medicine, throughout its history, has grappled with culture and health. While medicine has a history of discussing cultural issues, the profession has not defined culture cogently. Medicine’s ambivalence in defining culture raises questions about how effectively medical educators prepare residents to be cross-culturally competent. Some medical educators have expressed that many didactic and experiential efforts result in stereotyping patients. Definitions of culture and their impact on stereotyping patients are the central problems of this study. Specifically, this study hypothesized that cultural beliefs impact ones willingness to accept stereotypes. Thus, this study sought to learn how faculty members and residents define culture. Faculty members also were compared to residents to glean the impact of cross-cultural education. This study used an explanatory mixed method design where quantitative and qualitative methods work complementarily to examine a complex construct like culture. A valid and reliable survey provided quantitative data to compare the two groups, while open-ended questions and interviews with faculty members provided context. The statistical results reveal that faculty members and residents share a philosophy of culture; however, when the two groups’ definitions are contextualized, they have many different beliefs. Differences also emerged with respect to predictability; cultural beliefs predict stereotyping among residents, but not faculty members. Faculty members attribute these differences to experiences, while residents believe that they do not learn about culture during their professional education.

The purpose of this thesis is to identify common themes presented in several illness narratives with specific attention paid to the relationship between patients and their physicians and patients and their families. Only illness narratives written in America and Western Europe were used for this thesis so the topic could be narrowed to the experience within the western biomedical field. While most research on illness narratives focuses on defining illness and illustrating the importance of introspective work, this thesis identifies patterns in a way that can shape the future treatment of chronically ill patients. This thesis also allows me to creatively explore a personal illness narrative, reinforcing these themes and contributing to the discussion of what physicians and families can do to make the illness experience more bearable for the patient.

Information in the transition to the late palliative phase is not a well-studied area, especially not from the perspective of patients and family members. The aim of this thesis was to describe how cancer patients, family members and physicians experience information during the transition from a curative or early palliative phase to a late palliative phase, i.e. when tumour-specific treatment could not be offered. Cancer patients (n=30) admitted to palliative hospital based home care, family members (n=20) of cancer patients, and physicians (n=30) working with cancer patients in different settings were included in order to create a maximum variation sampling. Tape-recorded, semi-structured interviews and qualitative, phenomenographic analyses were done in all the studies. Patients described the physician as an expert (study I), an important person during this event, despite characterising him/her in different ways ranging from the empathetic professional to the rough and ready expert. Their relationship with the physician was also stressed. Their own resources, i.e. a sense of well being, a sense of security and individual strength, and their previous knowledge, were important components regarding their ability to take part in the communication (study II). Patients interpret words and phrases carefully and can perceive them as forewarnings, as being emotionally trying, and as fortifying and strengthening (study III). The overall message could be interpreted as either focused on quality if life, on treatment or on death and threat. Family members wanted to protect the patient during this period and could be very active and prominent in their protective role (study IV). However, other family members described themselves as being in the background more or less involuntarily. Family members also felt that there were expectations regarding their behaviour, either that they should take over in terms of communication, or that they should restrict their participation. When giving information, the physicians had a clear goal - to make the patient understand while being as considerate toward the patient as possible. However, the strategies for reaching this goal differed and included: explaining and convincing, softening the impact and vaguely suggesting, preparing and adapting. Some physicians had a main strategy while others mixed different strategies depending on the context. The experience of receiving and providing information about discontinuing tumour specific treatment is like crossing a border, where patients experience the behaviour of the physician and the words they express of great significance. Family members assume the role of protectors. Physicians use different strategies in order to help patients cross the border. / On the day of the public defence the status of the article II was: In press and the title was: Patient interpretation of verbal expressions when given information about ending cancer treatment.; the status of article V was: Submitted.

A philosophical and scientific eclectic, Dr. Friedrich Hoffmann (1660-1742) brought together the wisdom of ancient writers with the new science and philosophy of his day. In the Medicus Politicus (The Politic Physician) (1738) he applied his concepts to medicine and medical ethics. The Medicus Politicus contains the lecture notes of Hoffmann as first professor of medicine at the University of Halle. The work is divided into three parts: the personal characteristics required by the new politic physician; the physician's relationship with other members of the medical community (often competitors); and the patient-physician relationship. This dissertation provides the first comprehensive English-language philosophical analysis and commentary on this work. It addresses two issues found in the Medicus Politicus: Hoffmann's model for the new physician and the medical ethics required in the patient-physician relationship. The political, intellectual and religious upheavals of the Long Eighteenth Century inform the work of Hoffmann. Physicians were not yet considered professionals and competed with the untrained. The new Hoffmannian physician would change that and would develop the personal qualities that were found in the professions of theology and law. Specifically, the Hoffmannian physician would be moral, rational and clinically competent. Hoffmann provided two independent but harmonious foundations to justify these requirements: one theological and one rational. Specifically, Hoffmann was an enthusiastic Pietist, a Natural Law theorist and an evidence-based scientist. His applied ethics is one of the most complete systems ever found in the medical clinical setting as it addresses each stage of the healing process. The focus of the patient-physician relationship is trust and trustworthiness. The physician is trustworthy when he is compassionate and competent. Patient and physician work together towards a mutual goal of the patient's healing. The judgments of both patient and physician are directed by prudence--seeking that which preserves society and individuals. This very mature concept of the ethics of the patient-physician relationship founded on trust and trustworthiness is the basis of modern concepts of patient, fiduciary trust, medical ethics and medicine as a profession. / text

The patient-physician relationship is established when a doctor provides care for their patient. This interpersonal interaction consists of perspectives on health issues, treatment plans, confidentiality, and support. Trust is also a component of the patient-physician relationship. Existing findings show that patient-physician trust is critical for achieving compliance and higher satisfaction rates with medical care (Cohen, 2002). Previous studies have investigated the physician's emotional intelligence as a factor in patient-physician trust, as well as the health locus of control on outlook, religious viewpoints on patient outcomes, and vulnerable attachment styles on the patient trust of the patients in determining the patient-physician trust. However, this study addresses the collective role of these variables from the patient's perspective in the patient-physician relationship. Past literature focuses on the physician's perspective and health outcomes. This study aims to understand how college students as patients view their relationship with their physicians. Consistent with existing literature, it was concluded that higher scores on emotional intelligence, internal health locus of control, and ease of vulnerability were associated with higher levels of patient-physician trust. However, a significant association between religious locus of control and patient-physician trust was not found. These findings regarding patients from the population of college students can inform college administrators to develop and implement plans to enhance the quality of care that physicians provide for college students. Further research can then be conducted to optimize these factors and ultimately improve the patient-physician relationship.

No description available.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / No atual contexto da prática médica no Brasil, observa-se o predomínio de uma comunicação de caráter informativo, normativo e com pouca ênfase na promoção da autonomia dos pacientes, secundarizando o diálogo e a compreensão do paciente sobre o processo saúde-doença-cuidado. Esse tipo de prática baseia-se fortemente no Modelo Biomédico, que enfoca prioritariamente a doença e as lesões orgânicas, o que em muitas situações colabora para a medicalização, a (super)especialização e fragmentação do cuidado, comprometendo a qualidade da relação médico-paciente e a resolutividade das ações de saúde. Em contrapartida, uma prática médica centrada no paciente e que valorize a compreensão de sua interpretação da saúde-doença favorece a construção da integralidade do cuidado e a maior efetividade das ações. A presente pesquisa exploratória, predominantemente qualitativa com componente quantitativo investiga as práticas comunicacionais na relação médico-paciente na consulta homeopática, pautada pelo paradigma Vitalista. Nessa especialidade médica oferecida desde 1988 pelo Sistema Único de Saúde, e desde 2006, integrante da Polícia Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares do Ministério da Saúde, compreender múltiplas dimensões da existência e adoecer humanos demanda competência narrativa para a prática de sua semiologia, baseada na escuta atenta e implicada dos contextos biopatográficos, valorizadora dos sentidos atribuídos às vivências pelos sujeitos. Foram gravadas oito consultas de primeira vez realizadas num ambulatório-escola por médicos experientes, transcritas e submetidas à Análise de Conteúdo, que permitiram analisar como os fundamentos da racionalidade homeopática podem contribuir para a produção compartilhada de sentidos. Os resultados estão organizados nas categorias: Tomada de Turnos e Controle de Tópicos, Concepção de Saúde-Doença-Cuidado, Itinerários Terapêuticos, Ethos científico e Ethos do Mundo da Vida, Capacidade empática (atitudes de apoio, legitimação e polidez) e O Papel do Médico. Observa-se que a comunicação que estabelecida nesse tipo de prática em saúde avança na construção da integralidade da atenção e pode contribuir para a maior resolutividade do cuidado em saúde na medida em que minimiza a dicotomia entre mental e somático, individual e social. / The predominance of informative and normative communication is observed in the current context of medical practice in Brazil. This practice relies on Biomedical Model focus on disease and organ damage, with little emphasis on dialogue and understanding of the patient on the health-illness care, which in many cases contributes to the social medicalization, the medical specialization and fragmentation of care, negatively affecting the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on promoting patient autonomy and the solving of health actions. In contrast, a patient-centered medical practice that enhances understanding of their interpretation of health-disease favors a holistic care and a greater effectiveness of actions. This exploratory research, predominantly qualitative with quantitative component investigates the communicative practices in the doctor-patient relationship in homeopathic consultation, is guided by vitalist paradigm. Looking broadly at the patient and the illness, homeopathic practice provides the means to understand the personal connections between patient and physician to improve the effectiveness of their work. This medical specialty offered since 1988 by SUS, and since 2006, included in PNPIC, requires narrative competence to practice their semiotics. Eight inquiries were first recorded performed in a clinic-school by experienced doctors, transcribed and submitted to content analysis, allowing to analyze how the foundations of homeopathic rationality can contribute to the health care. The results are organized into categories shifts: Topics Control, Health-Disease-Cares Concept, Therapeutic Itineraries, Scientific Ethos and Life Ethos, Empathic Capacity (attitudes of support, legitimacy and politeness) and The Role of the Physician. It is observed that the communication established in this type of health practice advances in the construction of an integral care and can contribute to the better resolution of care in that it minimizes the dichotomy between mental and somatic, individual and social.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / No atual contexto da prática médica no Brasil, observa-se o predomínio de uma comunicação de caráter informativo, normativo e com pouca ênfase na promoção da autonomia dos pacientes, secundarizando o diálogo e a compreensão do paciente sobre o processo saúde-doença-cuidado. Esse tipo de prática baseia-se fortemente no Modelo Biomédico, que enfoca prioritariamente a doença e as lesões orgânicas, o que em muitas situações colabora para a medicalização, a (super)especialização e fragmentação do cuidado, comprometendo a qualidade da relação médico-paciente e a resolutividade das ações de saúde. Em contrapartida, uma prática médica centrada no paciente e que valorize a compreensão de sua interpretação da saúde-doença favorece a construção da integralidade do cuidado e a maior efetividade das ações. A presente pesquisa exploratória, predominantemente qualitativa com componente quantitativo investiga as práticas comunicacionais na relação médico-paciente na consulta homeopática, pautada pelo paradigma Vitalista. Nessa especialidade médica oferecida desde 1988 pelo Sistema Único de Saúde, e desde 2006, integrante da Polícia Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares do Ministério da Saúde, compreender múltiplas dimensões da existência e adoecer humanos demanda competência narrativa para a prática de sua semiologia, baseada na escuta atenta e implicada dos contextos biopatográficos, valorizadora dos sentidos atribuídos às vivências pelos sujeitos. Foram gravadas oito consultas de primeira vez realizadas num ambulatório-escola por médicos experientes, transcritas e submetidas à Análise de Conteúdo, que permitiram analisar como os fundamentos da racionalidade homeopática podem contribuir para a produção compartilhada de sentidos. Os resultados estão organizados nas categorias: Tomada de Turnos e Controle de Tópicos, Concepção de Saúde-Doença-Cuidado, Itinerários Terapêuticos, Ethos científico e Ethos do Mundo da Vida, Capacidade empática (atitudes de apoio, legitimação e polidez) e O Papel do Médico. Observa-se que a comunicação que estabelecida nesse tipo de prática em saúde avança na construção da integralidade da atenção e pode contribuir para a maior resolutividade do cuidado em saúde na medida em que minimiza a dicotomia entre mental e somático, individual e social. / The predominance of informative and normative communication is observed in the current context of medical practice in Brazil. This practice relies on Biomedical Model focus on disease and organ damage, with little emphasis on dialogue and understanding of the patient on the health-illness care, which in many cases contributes to the social medicalization, the medical specialization and fragmentation of care, negatively affecting the quality of the doctor-patient relationship on promoting patient autonomy and the solving of health actions. In contrast, a patient-centered medical practice that enhances understanding of their interpretation of health-disease favors a holistic care and a greater effectiveness of actions. This exploratory research, predominantly qualitative with quantitative component investigates the communicative practices in the doctor-patient relationship in homeopathic consultation, is guided by vitalist paradigm. Looking broadly at the patient and the illness, homeopathic practice provides the means to understand the personal connections between patient and physician to improve the effectiveness of their work. This medical specialty offered since 1988 by SUS, and since 2006, included in PNPIC, requires narrative competence to practice their semiotics. Eight inquiries were first recorded performed in a clinic-school by experienced doctors, transcribed and submitted to content analysis, allowing to analyze how the foundations of homeopathic rationality can contribute to the health care. The results are organized into categories shifts: Topics Control, Health-Disease-Cares Concept, Therapeutic Itineraries, Scientific Ethos and Life Ethos, Empathic Capacity (attitudes of support, legitimacy and politeness) and The Role of the Physician. It is observed that the communication established in this type of health practice advances in the construction of an integral care and can contribute to the better resolution of care in that it minimizes the dichotomy between mental and somatic, individual and social.

Background: Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) is complex and requires active patient engagement in shared decision making to achieve better clinical outcomes, greater medication adherence, and increased treatment satisfaction. Efficacy in patient-physician interactions is a critical component of patient engagement, but factors associated with efficacy in older AF patients have not been well-characterized. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the ongoing Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Elements in Atrial Fibrillation (SAGE-AF) study, a cohort study of older adults (age ≥ 65) with non-valvular AF and CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2. Participants were classified according to their Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) score (lower: 0-44; higher: 45-50). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify sociodemographic, clinical (AF type, AF treatment, medical comorbidities), and geriatric (cognitive impairment, sensory impairment, frailty, independent functioning) factors associated with lower reported efficacy. Results: Participants (n = 1209; 49% female) had a mean age of 75. A majority (66%) reported higher efficacy in their interactions with physicians. Lower efficacy was associated with persistent AF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-2.04) and with symptoms of depression (aOR = 1.67; CI = 1.20-2.33) or anxiety (aOR = 1.40; CI = 1.01-1.94). Decreased odds of lower efficacy were observed in participants with chronic kidney disease (aOR = 0.68; CI = 0.50-0.92) and those classified as pre-frail compared to those classified as not frail (aOR = 0.71; CI = 0.53-0.95). Conclusion: Older patients with persistent AF or symptoms of depression or anxiety have decreased efficacy in patient-physician interactions. These individuals merit greater attention from physicians when engaged in shared decision making.