Práce je zaměřena na dobu před nástupem Rudolfa II. Zde jsem nastínil stav českého království, postavení nekatolíků v Čechách a boj o Českou konfesi. Abych čtenáře seznámil s tehdejší politickou a náboženskou situací, je také důležité je seznámit s výchovou a vladařskými začátky Rudolfa II. Ve druhé části jsem se snažil popsat průběh zápasu o Majestát a komplikace, které ho doprovázely. Moje práce zahrnula popis náboženské a politické situace v Čechách, od druhé poloviny 16. století, až po Bílou horu. Pro práci jsem použil odbornou literaturu, slovníky a některé vydané historické prameny.

O objetivo do presente trabalho é apresentar a monarcomaquia como um instituto jurídico criado no processo verbal de expulsão dos jesuítas em Portugal e França e diferenciá-la da lesa-majestade. Como metodologia utilizase o casuísmo e a contextualização pela metodologia da história dos conceitos através do método indutivo a partir da análise do processo verbal que ocorreu nestes países pois a monarcomaquia não havia sido utilizada antes como fonte do direito. Como resultado podemos caracteriza-la e diferenciá-la do lesamajestade. Concluímos a presente tese no sentido de que a monarcomaquia é criada como um instituto jurídico do absolutismo francês e do despotismo português por conta dos fatos envolvendo a Companhia de Jesus, no contexto de século XVIII, apresentando como sanção a expulsão e a tomada do patrimônio, diferenciando-se do lesa-majestade. / The objective of the present work is to present monarcomaquia as a legal institute created in the verbal process of expulsion of the Jesuits in Portugal and France and to differentiate it from the lese-majesty. As methodology is used casuism and the contextualization by the methodology of the history of the concepts through the inductive method from the analysis of the verbal process that occurred in these countries because monarcomaquia had not been used as a source of law. As a result, we can characterize it and differentiate it from lese-majesty. We conclude this thesis in the sense that monarcomaquia is created as a legal institute of French absolutism and Portuguese despotism on account of the facts involving the Society of Jesus, in the context of the eighteenth century, presenting as a sanction the expulsion and the taking of the patrimony, differentiating itself from lese-majesty.

O objetivo do presente trabalho é apresentar a monarcomaquia como um instituto jurídico criado no processo verbal de expulsão dos jesuítas em Portugal e França e diferenciá-la da lesa-majestade. Como metodologia utilizase o casuísmo e a contextualização pela metodologia da história dos conceitos através do método indutivo a partir da análise do processo verbal que ocorreu nestes países pois a monarcomaquia não havia sido utilizada antes como fonte do direito. Como resultado podemos caracteriza-la e diferenciá-la do lesamajestade. Concluímos a presente tese no sentido de que a monarcomaquia é criada como um instituto jurídico do absolutismo francês e do despotismo português por conta dos fatos envolvendo a Companhia de Jesus, no contexto de século XVIII, apresentando como sanção a expulsão e a tomada do patrimônio, diferenciando-se do lesa-majestade. / The objective of the present work is to present monarcomaquia as a legal institute created in the verbal process of expulsion of the Jesuits in Portugal and France and to differentiate it from the lese-majesty. As methodology is used casuism and the contextualization by the methodology of the history of the concepts through the inductive method from the analysis of the verbal process that occurred in these countries because monarcomaquia had not been used as a source of law. As a result, we can characterize it and differentiate it from lese-majesty. We conclude this thesis in the sense that monarcomaquia is created as a legal institute of French absolutism and Portuguese despotism on account of the facts involving the Society of Jesus, in the context of the eighteenth century, presenting as a sanction the expulsion and the taking of the patrimony, differentiating itself from lese-majesty.

O objetivo do presente trabalho é apresentar a monarcomaquia como um instituto jurídico criado no processo verbal de expulsão dos jesuítas em Portugal e França e diferenciá-la da lesa-majestade. Como metodologia utilizase o casuísmo e a contextualização pela metodologia da história dos conceitos através do método indutivo a partir da análise do processo verbal que ocorreu nestes países pois a monarcomaquia não havia sido utilizada antes como fonte do direito. Como resultado podemos caracteriza-la e diferenciá-la do lesamajestade. Concluímos a presente tese no sentido de que a monarcomaquia é criada como um instituto jurídico do absolutismo francês e do despotismo português por conta dos fatos envolvendo a Companhia de Jesus, no contexto de século XVIII, apresentando como sanção a expulsão e a tomada do patrimônio, diferenciando-se do lesa-majestade. / The objective of the present work is to present monarcomaquia as a legal institute created in the verbal process of expulsion of the Jesuits in Portugal and France and to differentiate it from the lese-majesty. As methodology is used casuism and the contextualization by the methodology of the history of the concepts through the inductive method from the analysis of the verbal process that occurred in these countries because monarcomaquia had not been used as a source of law. As a result, we can characterize it and differentiate it from lese-majesty. We conclude this thesis in the sense that monarcomaquia is created as a legal institute of French absolutism and Portuguese despotism on account of the facts involving the Society of Jesus, in the context of the eighteenth century, presenting as a sanction the expulsion and the taking of the patrimony, differentiating itself from lese-majesty.

Anne d’Autriche occupe une place importante, longtemps négligée, dans le développement de l’iconographie royale en France au XVIIe siècle. Ecartée du pouvoir sous le règne de son mari Louis XIII, elle est pourtant le sujet de très nombreuses représentations. Sa présence dans le champ des images connaît un net développement lorsqu’elle accède aux responsabilités du gouvernement à la mort du roi, en 1643, en devenant régente au nom de son fils mineur, Louis XIV. Au-delà de sa majorité en 1651, elle conserve un rôle éminent, jusqu’à la mort de Mazarin en 1661. Ces deux décennies sont marquées par une profonde crise politique qui culmine dans l’épisode de la Fronde. Dans ce contexte, l’image d’Anne d’Autriche devient le support d’un discours sur l’autorité monarchique et sur la défense du pouvoir royal. A partir d’un corpus constitué des représentations de la régente, et en les croisant avec des sources textuelles, cette thèse analyse la construction visuelle de ce discours, et ses effets sur l’évolution de l’image de la royauté en France après le règne de Louis XIII. La « majesté », qui constitue dans le corpus des textes, juridiques, politiques et symboliques, la qualité essentielle du souverain et la marque de son identité, doit ainsi être traduite visuellement dans une incarnation féminine, dans un pays où les lois fondamentales, notamment la loi salique, écartent pourtant les femmes du pouvoir. La richesse du corpus rassemblé pour cette thèse, près de cinq cent images, offre une source essentielle pour comprendre de quelle manière la reine a su dépasser cette contrainte et contribuer, en renouvelant ses modèles, à la représentation de l’autorité monarchique. Cette étude permet ainsi de reconsidérer le rapport des femmes au pouvoir. Pour analyser ces différentes questions, la thèse s’organise en quatre parties. La première partie s’attache à comprendre l’image de la reine régnante, en analysant dans un premier chapitre la définition juridique de la reine, pour montrer de quelle manière l’ordre juridique détermine l’ordre symbolique. On peut ainsi expliquer en quoi le mariage de la reine en 1615 et son introduction à la cour constitue une « naissance iconographique ». Le second chapitre explore les différents aspects de ce portrait de la reine en montrant qu’il relève à la fois de caractères propres et de réactions à la situation – politique et civile – de la reine. La deuxième partie soulève la question des moyens mis en œuvre pour opérer la transformation de cette image, qui permet à la reine d’apparaître en régente du royaume. Le troisième chapitre analyse plus particulièrement les étapes chronologiques de cette transformation, tandis que le quatrième chapitre étudie, sur un plan pratique, la « fabrication » de cette image. La troisième partie envisage ensuite le contenu des images, en dressant une analyse en trois temps de son iconographie. Le cinquième chapitre aborde ainsi le corps de la reine comme support des dimensions morales de son portrait. Le sixième chapitre approfondit cette question dans la perspective religieuse, en étudiant de quelle manière la régente parvient à produire l’image d’une reine « très chrétienne ». Le septième chapitre conclut cette analyse iconographique sur la dimension politique de l’image d’Anne d’Autriche. La quatrième et dernière partie est enfin l’occasion d’analyser le « fonctionnement » de ces images. Le huitième chapitre montre combien la situation des représentations de la reine dans les décors est déterminante pour leur interprétation, en envisageant les cas des résidences royales puis des intérieurs privés. Enfin, le neuvième chapitre propose une étude de la performance des images, en étendant l’analyse aux usages publics des représentations de la reine, dans les monuments ou au cours des cérémonies. / Anne of Austria offers an important part, yet neglected, in the the development of royal iconography in seventeenth century France. Devoided from management of power under the reign of her husband Louis XIII, she is however the subject of many representations. The number of her images increases when she accedes to the responsibilities of the government at the death of the king, in 1643, becoming regent in the name of her minor son, Louis XIV. Beyond its majority in 1651, she maintains herself at a prominent place, until the death of Mazarin in 1661. During these two decades, a deep political crisis in France culminates in the so-called Fronde. In this context, the image of Anne of Austria becomes the instrument of a visual narrative on monarchical authority and for the defense of the royal power. Crossing a large corpus of representations of the regent with textual sources, this thesis analyzes the visual construction of this narrative, and its effects on the evolution of the image of power in France after the reign of Louis XIII. In contemporary legal and symbolic literature, "majesty" is presented as he essential quality of the sovereign and the mark of his identity. It must then be visually translated in a female incarnation, despite the fundamental laws, in particular the Salic law, which however exclude women from power. The abundance of the images collected for this thesis, nearly five hundred items, offers an essential source to understand how the queen was able to overcome this constraint and contribute, by renewing its models, to the representation of the monarchical authority. This thesis allows us to reconsider the relationship between women and power. To analyze these different issues, the thesis is organized in four parts. The first part attempts to understand the image of the reigning queen, analyzing in a first chapter the legal definition of the queen, to show how the legal order determines the symbolic one. One can thus understand how the marriage of the queen in 1615 and her arrival at the court can be apprehended as an "iconographic birth". The second chapter explores the different features of this portrait of the queen, showing that it is at the same time a revelation of personal characteristics of the queen and a reaction to the queen's political and civil situation. The second part raises the question of the means implemented to operate the transformation of this image, which allows the queen to appear as regent of the kingdom. The third chapter analyzes in particular the chronological stages of this transformation, while the fourth chapter studies, from a practical point of view, the "fabrication" of this image. The third part then considers the content of the images, drawing up a three-step analysis of its iconography. The fifth chapter addresses the body of the queen as a support for the moral dimensions of her portrait. The sixth chapter deepens this question in the religious perspective, studying how the regent manages to produce the image of a queen "très chrétienne". The seventh chapter concludes this iconographic analysis by studying the political dimension of Anne of Austria's image. The fourth and last part gives finally an analysis of the way these images "operate". The eighth chapter shows how the situation of the queen's representations in decor is decisive for their interpretation, considering the cases of the royal residences and the private interiors. Finally, the ninth chapter proposes a study of the performance of images, extending the analysis to the public uses of representations of the queen, in monuments or during ceremonies.